Seed weight variability of antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata: Rosaceae)
Reproductive output in plants can be affected by a number of factors that can have lasting fitness consequences. Factors influencing seed weight in herbaceous plants have been thoroughly explored, but are relatively unknown in woody plants. This study provides data on variation in seed weight from o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American midland naturalist 1997-10, Vol.138 (2), p.306-321 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 321 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 306 |
container_title | The American midland naturalist |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Krannitz, P.G. (Environment Canada, Delta, BC.) |
description | Reproductive output in plants can be affected by a number of factors that can have lasting fitness consequences. Factors influencing seed weight in herbaceous plants have been thoroughly explored, but are relatively unknown in woody plants. This study provides data on variation in seed weight from over 240 antelope bitterbrush plants from 10 sites in the dry interior of British Columbia, Canada. I determined the relationship between seed weight and shrub and site characteristics. Seed weight varied over 9-fold, from 5 to 46 mg, and was skewed in favour of smaller seeds. Most of the variation in seed weight was attributable to variation within individual shrubs (63.2%) whereas different shrubs accounted for 29.1%. Different shrubs produced seeds of different mean weight as did different sites but no measured site or shrub characteristics were related to these seed weight differences. Average seed weight per shrub was not associated with shrub size or percent dieback. Average seed weight per site was not associated with browse intensity, density of knapweed or cheatgrass, shrub density, percent cover of bare soil, or cation exchange capacity of the soil. Seed weights of some antelope bitterbrush plants varied more than others; coefficient of variation ranged from 9 to 39%. Seed weight variability was positively correlated with the number of twigs browsed during the winter previous to seed production. Antelope bitterbrush is known to overcompensate twig production in response to browsing, and to forfeit the production of flowers in favour of twigs. I discuss how this might result in the development of more varied seed weights. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2426824 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16305702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A20391884</galeid><jstor_id>2426824</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A20391884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-1edda13804412c255f4d9f69d5febf478d5c73a8f2d041ed896a7c007ecf3bfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V9r1EAQAPAgFjxb8RMIQcRWMLr_kuz6VoraQlHp2edlspnN7ZHLnrsbbb-9K-lLpZRhGGb4MQxMUbyk5APjpP3IBGskE0-KFVVcVoJx-bRYEUJ4lZM-K57HuM2tEkqsim9rxL78g27YpPI3BAedG126Lb0tYUo4-j2WnUsJQxfmuClPfswhbhyUKbgepwQJPpVXPoJBwHdHxYGFMeKLu3pYXH_5_PPsvLr8_vXi7PSyMkKQVFHse6BcEiEoM6yureiVbVRfW-ysaGVfm5aDtKwnImOpGmgNIS0ayzuL_LB4u-zdB_9rxpj0zkWD4wgT-jlq2nBSt4Rl-Po_uPVzmPJtmnGhaipEk9H7BQ0wonaT9SmAGXDCAKOf0Lo8PmWEKyqlyLx6gOfocefMQ_7kns8k4U0aYI5RX6yv7tHjhZrgYwxo9T64HYRbTYn-9159994s3yxyG5MPj7BXC7PgNQzBRX29pkq1pG4a0vC_K4KpKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234951446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seed weight variability of antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata: Rosaceae)</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Krannitz, P.G. (Environment Canada, Delta, BC.)</creator><creatorcontrib>Krannitz, P.G. (Environment Canada, Delta, BC.)</creatorcontrib><description>Reproductive output in plants can be affected by a number of factors that can have lasting fitness consequences. Factors influencing seed weight in herbaceous plants have been thoroughly explored, but are relatively unknown in woody plants. This study provides data on variation in seed weight from over 240 antelope bitterbrush plants from 10 sites in the dry interior of British Columbia, Canada. I determined the relationship between seed weight and shrub and site characteristics. Seed weight varied over 9-fold, from 5 to 46 mg, and was skewed in favour of smaller seeds. Most of the variation in seed weight was attributable to variation within individual shrubs (63.2%) whereas different shrubs accounted for 29.1%. Different shrubs produced seeds of different mean weight as did different sites but no measured site or shrub characteristics were related to these seed weight differences. Average seed weight per shrub was not associated with shrub size or percent dieback. Average seed weight per site was not associated with browse intensity, density of knapweed or cheatgrass, shrub density, percent cover of bare soil, or cation exchange capacity of the soil. Seed weights of some antelope bitterbrush plants varied more than others; coefficient of variation ranged from 9 to 39%. Seed weight variability was positively correlated with the number of twigs browsed during the winter previous to seed production. Antelope bitterbrush is known to overcompensate twig production in response to browsing, and to forfeit the production of flowers in favour of twigs. I discuss how this might result in the development of more varied seed weights.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2426824</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNAAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame</publisher><subject>Antelopes ; Botany ; BRITISH COLUMBIA ; Browsing ; Cation exchange capacity ; COLOMBIE BRITANNIQUE ; COLUMBIA BRITANICA ; Correlation coefficients ; ECOLOGIA ; ECOLOGIE ; ECOLOGY ; Environment ; Flowers & plants ; HABITAT ; HABITATS ; Nitrogen ; PESO DE LAS SEMILLAS ; Plants ; POIDS DES SEMENCES ; PURSHIA TRIDENTATA ; Seed size ; SEED WEIGHT ; Seeds ; Shrubs ; VARIATION ; WASHINGTON ; Weight</subject><ispartof>The American midland naturalist, 1997-10, Vol.138 (2), p.306-321</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 American Midland Naturalist</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1997 University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright American Midland Naturalist Oct 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-1edda13804412c255f4d9f69d5febf478d5c73a8f2d041ed896a7c007ecf3bfe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2426824$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2426824$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krannitz, P.G. (Environment Canada, Delta, BC.)</creatorcontrib><title>Seed weight variability of antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata: Rosaceae)</title><title>The American midland naturalist</title><description>Reproductive output in plants can be affected by a number of factors that can have lasting fitness consequences. Factors influencing seed weight in herbaceous plants have been thoroughly explored, but are relatively unknown in woody plants. This study provides data on variation in seed weight from over 240 antelope bitterbrush plants from 10 sites in the dry interior of British Columbia, Canada. I determined the relationship between seed weight and shrub and site characteristics. Seed weight varied over 9-fold, from 5 to 46 mg, and was skewed in favour of smaller seeds. Most of the variation in seed weight was attributable to variation within individual shrubs (63.2%) whereas different shrubs accounted for 29.1%. Different shrubs produced seeds of different mean weight as did different sites but no measured site or shrub characteristics were related to these seed weight differences. Average seed weight per shrub was not associated with shrub size or percent dieback. Average seed weight per site was not associated with browse intensity, density of knapweed or cheatgrass, shrub density, percent cover of bare soil, or cation exchange capacity of the soil. Seed weights of some antelope bitterbrush plants varied more than others; coefficient of variation ranged from 9 to 39%. Seed weight variability was positively correlated with the number of twigs browsed during the winter previous to seed production. Antelope bitterbrush is known to overcompensate twig production in response to browsing, and to forfeit the production of flowers in favour of twigs. I discuss how this might result in the development of more varied seed weights.</description><subject>Antelopes</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>BRITISH COLUMBIA</subject><subject>Browsing</subject><subject>Cation exchange capacity</subject><subject>COLOMBIE BRITANNIQUE</subject><subject>COLUMBIA BRITANICA</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>ECOLOGIA</subject><subject>ECOLOGIE</subject><subject>ECOLOGY</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>HABITAT</subject><subject>HABITATS</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>PESO DE LAS SEMILLAS</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>POIDS DES SEMENCES</subject><subject>PURSHIA TRIDENTATA</subject><subject>Seed size</subject><subject>SEED WEIGHT</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>VARIATION</subject><subject>WASHINGTON</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0003-0031</issn><issn>1938-4238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90V9r1EAQAPAgFjxb8RMIQcRWMLr_kuz6VoraQlHp2edlspnN7ZHLnrsbbb-9K-lLpZRhGGb4MQxMUbyk5APjpP3IBGskE0-KFVVcVoJx-bRYEUJ4lZM-K57HuM2tEkqsim9rxL78g27YpPI3BAedG126Lb0tYUo4-j2WnUsJQxfmuClPfswhbhyUKbgepwQJPpVXPoJBwHdHxYGFMeKLu3pYXH_5_PPsvLr8_vXi7PSyMkKQVFHse6BcEiEoM6yureiVbVRfW-ysaGVfm5aDtKwnImOpGmgNIS0ayzuL_LB4u-zdB_9rxpj0zkWD4wgT-jlq2nBSt4Rl-Po_uPVzmPJtmnGhaipEk9H7BQ0wonaT9SmAGXDCAKOf0Lo8PmWEKyqlyLx6gOfocefMQ_7kns8k4U0aYI5RX6yv7tHjhZrgYwxo9T64HYRbTYn-9159994s3yxyG5MPj7BXC7PgNQzBRX29pkq1pG4a0vC_K4KpKA</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Krannitz, P.G. (Environment Canada, Delta, BC.)</creator><general>University of Notre Dame</general><general>University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences</general><general>American Midland Naturalist</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Seed weight variability of antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata: Rosaceae)</title><author>Krannitz, P.G. (Environment Canada, Delta, BC.)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-1edda13804412c255f4d9f69d5febf478d5c73a8f2d041ed896a7c007ecf3bfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Antelopes</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>BRITISH COLUMBIA</topic><topic>Browsing</topic><topic>Cation exchange capacity</topic><topic>COLOMBIE BRITANNIQUE</topic><topic>COLUMBIA BRITANICA</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>ECOLOGIA</topic><topic>ECOLOGIE</topic><topic>ECOLOGY</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>HABITAT</topic><topic>HABITATS</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>PESO DE LAS SEMILLAS</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>POIDS DES SEMENCES</topic><topic>PURSHIA TRIDENTATA</topic><topic>Seed size</topic><topic>SEED WEIGHT</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>VARIATION</topic><topic>WASHINGTON</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krannitz, P.G. (Environment Canada, Delta, BC.)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krannitz, P.G. (Environment Canada, Delta, BC.)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seed weight variability of antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata: Rosaceae)</atitle><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>306-321</pages><issn>0003-0031</issn><eissn>1938-4238</eissn><coden>AMNAAF</coden><abstract>Reproductive output in plants can be affected by a number of factors that can have lasting fitness consequences. Factors influencing seed weight in herbaceous plants have been thoroughly explored, but are relatively unknown in woody plants. This study provides data on variation in seed weight from over 240 antelope bitterbrush plants from 10 sites in the dry interior of British Columbia, Canada. I determined the relationship between seed weight and shrub and site characteristics. Seed weight varied over 9-fold, from 5 to 46 mg, and was skewed in favour of smaller seeds. Most of the variation in seed weight was attributable to variation within individual shrubs (63.2%) whereas different shrubs accounted for 29.1%. Different shrubs produced seeds of different mean weight as did different sites but no measured site or shrub characteristics were related to these seed weight differences. Average seed weight per shrub was not associated with shrub size or percent dieback. Average seed weight per site was not associated with browse intensity, density of knapweed or cheatgrass, shrub density, percent cover of bare soil, or cation exchange capacity of the soil. Seed weights of some antelope bitterbrush plants varied more than others; coefficient of variation ranged from 9 to 39%. Seed weight variability was positively correlated with the number of twigs browsed during the winter previous to seed production. Antelope bitterbrush is known to overcompensate twig production in response to browsing, and to forfeit the production of flowers in favour of twigs. I discuss how this might result in the development of more varied seed weights.</abstract><cop>Notre Dame</cop><pub>University of Notre Dame</pub><doi>10.2307/2426824</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0031 |
ispartof | The American midland naturalist, 1997-10, Vol.138 (2), p.306-321 |
issn | 0003-0031 1938-4238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16305702 |
source | JSTOR |
subjects | Antelopes Botany BRITISH COLUMBIA Browsing Cation exchange capacity COLOMBIE BRITANNIQUE COLUMBIA BRITANICA Correlation coefficients ECOLOGIA ECOLOGIE ECOLOGY Environment Flowers & plants HABITAT HABITATS Nitrogen PESO DE LAS SEMILLAS Plants POIDS DES SEMENCES PURSHIA TRIDENTATA Seed size SEED WEIGHT Seeds Shrubs VARIATION WASHINGTON Weight |
title | Seed weight variability of antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata: Rosaceae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T15%3A07%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seed%20weight%20variability%20of%20antelope%20bitterbrush%20(Purshia%20tridentata:%20Rosaceae)&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20midland%20naturalist&rft.au=Krannitz,%20P.G.%20(Environment%20Canada,%20Delta,%20BC.)&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=306-321&rft.issn=0003-0031&rft.eissn=1938-4238&rft.coden=AMNAAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2426824&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA20391884%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234951446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A20391884&rft_jstor_id=2426824&rfr_iscdi=true |