Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the effect of morphologic features on distraction forces in fenestrated stent grafts

Objective Secure fixation of endovascular stent grafts is essential for successful endovascular aneurysm repair. Hemodynamic distraction forces are generated by blood pressure and blood flow and act against fixation force to encourage migration that may eventually lead to late stent graft failure. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2014-12, Vol.60 (6), p.1648-1656.e1
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Steven M., MBChB, Poole, Robert J., PhD, How, Thien V., PhD, Williams, Rachel L., PhD, McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR, Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS, Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS, Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1656.e1
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1648
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 60
creator Jones, Steven M., MBChB
Poole, Robert J., PhD
How, Thien V., PhD
Williams, Rachel L., PhD
McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR
Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS
Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS
Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS
description Objective Secure fixation of endovascular stent grafts is essential for successful endovascular aneurysm repair. Hemodynamic distraction forces are generated by blood pressure and blood flow and act against fixation force to encourage migration that may eventually lead to late stent graft failure. The aim of this in silico study was to determine which morphologic features were associated with greater distraction force. Methods Computer models of 54 in situ fenestrated stent grafts were constructed from postoperative computed tomography scans by use of image processing software. Computational fluid dynamic analysis was then performed by use of a commercial finite volume solver with boundary conditions representative of peak systole. Distraction force results were obtained for each component of the stent graft. Distraction force was correlated with lumen cross-sectional area (XSA) at the inlet and outlet of components and was compared between groups of components, depending on the magnitude of four predefined angles within the aortoiliac territory that we describe in detail. Results Median total resultant distraction force (RDF) acting on the fenestrated proximal bodies was 4.8N (1.3-15.7N); bifurcated distal bodies, 5.6N (1.0-8.0N); and limb extensions, 1.7N (0.6-8.4N). Inlet XSA exhibited strong, positive correlation with total RDF in proximal body and distal body components (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ, 0.883 and 0.802, respectively). Outlet XSA exhibited a similarly strong, positive correlation with total RDF in limb extension components (ρ, 0.822). Outlet angulation ≥45 degrees was associated with greater total RDF in the limb extension components only ( P  = .004). Conclusions For a given blood pressure, XSA was the most important morphologic determinant of total RDF. Angulation within the aorta was not large enough to influence this, whereas iliac angulation affecting outlet angulation of limb extension components was associated with significantly greater total RDF.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.077
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629971396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521414016437</els_id><sourcerecordid>1629971396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-cf3dbe193c7455c0f1f9b49ba634f7a51cb0faf3dc2923fb51f60226531f38b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMoznP0B7iRLN30mdskTYsgyEOdgQEX6jqk6c1Mats8k3Tgwfx4U97owoWrJIfvHnLPIeQ1sD0waN6N-_E-7WsGYs_aPVPqCdkB61TVtKx7SnZMCahkDeKCvEhpZAxAtuo5uailkAKY2pGHQ5iPazbZh8VM1E2rH-hwWszsLTVFOiWfaHA03yFF59Dm7TWHeLwLU7gtlEOT14iFWujgU47Gbm7UhWiL6ssNF9z0jANNGZdMb6NxOb0kz5yZEr56PC_Jj8-fvh-uqpuvX64PH28qKyTkyjo-9Agdt0pIaZkD1_Wi603DhVNGgu2ZMwWydVdz10twDavrRnJwvO0bfknenn2PMfxay1f07JPFaTILhjVpaOquU8C7DYUzamNIKaLTx-hnE08amN5C16MuoestdM1aXUIvM28e7dd-xuHvxJ-UC_D-DGBZ8t5j1Ml6XCwOPpZA9RD8f-0__DNtJ794a6afeMI0hjWWnsoWOtWa6W9b61vpIIqf4Ir_BnaUqis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629971396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the effect of morphologic features on distraction forces in fenestrated stent grafts</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jones, Steven M., MBChB ; Poole, Robert J., PhD ; How, Thien V., PhD ; Williams, Rachel L., PhD ; McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR ; Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS ; Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS ; Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Steven M., MBChB ; Poole, Robert J., PhD ; How, Thien V., PhD ; Williams, Rachel L., PhD ; McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR ; Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS ; Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS ; Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Secure fixation of endovascular stent grafts is essential for successful endovascular aneurysm repair. Hemodynamic distraction forces are generated by blood pressure and blood flow and act against fixation force to encourage migration that may eventually lead to late stent graft failure. The aim of this in silico study was to determine which morphologic features were associated with greater distraction force. Methods Computer models of 54 in situ fenestrated stent grafts were constructed from postoperative computed tomography scans by use of image processing software. Computational fluid dynamic analysis was then performed by use of a commercial finite volume solver with boundary conditions representative of peak systole. Distraction force results were obtained for each component of the stent graft. Distraction force was correlated with lumen cross-sectional area (XSA) at the inlet and outlet of components and was compared between groups of components, depending on the magnitude of four predefined angles within the aortoiliac territory that we describe in detail. Results Median total resultant distraction force (RDF) acting on the fenestrated proximal bodies was 4.8N (1.3-15.7N); bifurcated distal bodies, 5.6N (1.0-8.0N); and limb extensions, 1.7N (0.6-8.4N). Inlet XSA exhibited strong, positive correlation with total RDF in proximal body and distal body components (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ, 0.883 and 0.802, respectively). Outlet XSA exhibited a similarly strong, positive correlation with total RDF in limb extension components (ρ, 0.822). Outlet angulation ≥45 degrees was associated with greater total RDF in the limb extension components only ( P  = .004). Conclusions For a given blood pressure, XSA was the most important morphologic determinant of total RDF. Angulation within the aorta was not large enough to influence this, whereas iliac angulation affecting outlet angulation of limb extension components was associated with significantly greater total RDF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.077</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25454107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aorta, Abdominal - physiopathology ; Aorta, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - physiopathology ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortography - methods ; Arterial Pressure ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Computer Simulation ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Foreign-Body Migration - etiology ; Foreign-Body Migration - physiopathology ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Stents ; Stress, Mechanical ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2014-12, Vol.60 (6), p.1648-1656.e1</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2014 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-cf3dbe193c7455c0f1f9b49ba634f7a51cb0faf3dc2923fb51f60226531f38b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-cf3dbe193c7455c0f1f9b49ba634f7a51cb0faf3dc2923fb51f60226531f38b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25454107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Steven M., MBChB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poole, Robert J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>How, Thien V., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Rachel L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><title>Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the effect of morphologic features on distraction forces in fenestrated stent grafts</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective Secure fixation of endovascular stent grafts is essential for successful endovascular aneurysm repair. Hemodynamic distraction forces are generated by blood pressure and blood flow and act against fixation force to encourage migration that may eventually lead to late stent graft failure. The aim of this in silico study was to determine which morphologic features were associated with greater distraction force. Methods Computer models of 54 in situ fenestrated stent grafts were constructed from postoperative computed tomography scans by use of image processing software. Computational fluid dynamic analysis was then performed by use of a commercial finite volume solver with boundary conditions representative of peak systole. Distraction force results were obtained for each component of the stent graft. Distraction force was correlated with lumen cross-sectional area (XSA) at the inlet and outlet of components and was compared between groups of components, depending on the magnitude of four predefined angles within the aortoiliac territory that we describe in detail. Results Median total resultant distraction force (RDF) acting on the fenestrated proximal bodies was 4.8N (1.3-15.7N); bifurcated distal bodies, 5.6N (1.0-8.0N); and limb extensions, 1.7N (0.6-8.4N). Inlet XSA exhibited strong, positive correlation with total RDF in proximal body and distal body components (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ, 0.883 and 0.802, respectively). Outlet XSA exhibited a similarly strong, positive correlation with total RDF in limb extension components (ρ, 0.822). Outlet angulation ≥45 degrees was associated with greater total RDF in the limb extension components only ( P  = .004). Conclusions For a given blood pressure, XSA was the most important morphologic determinant of total RDF. Angulation within the aorta was not large enough to influence this, whereas iliac angulation affecting outlet angulation of limb extension components was associated with significantly greater total RDF.</description><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography - methods</subject><subject>Arterial Pressure</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - etiology</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMoznP0B7iRLN30mdskTYsgyEOdgQEX6jqk6c1Mats8k3Tgwfx4U97owoWrJIfvHnLPIeQ1sD0waN6N-_E-7WsGYs_aPVPqCdkB61TVtKx7SnZMCahkDeKCvEhpZAxAtuo5uailkAKY2pGHQ5iPazbZh8VM1E2rH-hwWszsLTVFOiWfaHA03yFF59Dm7TWHeLwLU7gtlEOT14iFWujgU47Gbm7UhWiL6ssNF9z0jANNGZdMb6NxOb0kz5yZEr56PC_Jj8-fvh-uqpuvX64PH28qKyTkyjo-9Agdt0pIaZkD1_Wi603DhVNGgu2ZMwWydVdz10twDavrRnJwvO0bfknenn2PMfxay1f07JPFaTILhjVpaOquU8C7DYUzamNIKaLTx-hnE08amN5C16MuoestdM1aXUIvM28e7dd-xuHvxJ-UC_D-DGBZ8t5j1Ml6XCwOPpZA9RD8f-0__DNtJ794a6afeMI0hjWWnsoWOtWa6W9b61vpIIqf4Ir_BnaUqis</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Jones, Steven M., MBChB</creator><creator>Poole, Robert J., PhD</creator><creator>How, Thien V., PhD</creator><creator>Williams, Rachel L., PhD</creator><creator>McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR</creator><creator>Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS</creator><creator>Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS</creator><creator>Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the effect of morphologic features on distraction forces in fenestrated stent grafts</title><author>Jones, Steven M., MBChB ; Poole, Robert J., PhD ; How, Thien V., PhD ; Williams, Rachel L., PhD ; McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR ; Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS ; Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS ; Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-cf3dbe193c7455c0f1f9b49ba634f7a51cb0faf3dc2923fb51f60226531f38b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aorta, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aorta, Abdominal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aorta, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography - methods</topic><topic>Arterial Pressure</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - etiology</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Steven M., MBChB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poole, Robert J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>How, Thien V., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Rachel L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Steven M., MBChB</au><au>Poole, Robert J., PhD</au><au>How, Thien V., PhD</au><au>Williams, Rachel L., PhD</au><au>McWilliams, Richard G., FRCR</au><au>Brennan, John A., MD, FRCS</au><au>Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa R., MD, FRCS</au><au>Fisher, Robert K., MD, FRCS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the effect of morphologic features on distraction forces in fenestrated stent grafts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1648</spage><epage>1656.e1</epage><pages>1648-1656.e1</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Objective Secure fixation of endovascular stent grafts is essential for successful endovascular aneurysm repair. Hemodynamic distraction forces are generated by blood pressure and blood flow and act against fixation force to encourage migration that may eventually lead to late stent graft failure. The aim of this in silico study was to determine which morphologic features were associated with greater distraction force. Methods Computer models of 54 in situ fenestrated stent grafts were constructed from postoperative computed tomography scans by use of image processing software. Computational fluid dynamic analysis was then performed by use of a commercial finite volume solver with boundary conditions representative of peak systole. Distraction force results were obtained for each component of the stent graft. Distraction force was correlated with lumen cross-sectional area (XSA) at the inlet and outlet of components and was compared between groups of components, depending on the magnitude of four predefined angles within the aortoiliac territory that we describe in detail. Results Median total resultant distraction force (RDF) acting on the fenestrated proximal bodies was 4.8N (1.3-15.7N); bifurcated distal bodies, 5.6N (1.0-8.0N); and limb extensions, 1.7N (0.6-8.4N). Inlet XSA exhibited strong, positive correlation with total RDF in proximal body and distal body components (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ, 0.883 and 0.802, respectively). Outlet XSA exhibited a similarly strong, positive correlation with total RDF in limb extension components (ρ, 0.822). Outlet angulation ≥45 degrees was associated with greater total RDF in the limb extension components only ( P  = .004). Conclusions For a given blood pressure, XSA was the most important morphologic determinant of total RDF. Angulation within the aorta was not large enough to influence this, whereas iliac angulation affecting outlet angulation of limb extension components was associated with significantly greater total RDF.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25454107</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.077</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2014-12, Vol.60 (6), p.1648-1656.e1
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629971396
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aorta, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging
Aorta, Abdominal - physiopathology
Aorta, Abdominal - surgery
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - physiopathology
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Aortography - methods
Arterial Pressure
Blood Flow Velocity
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation
Computer Simulation
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation
Foreign-Body Migration - etiology
Foreign-Body Migration - physiopathology
Hemodynamics
Humans
Models, Cardiovascular
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Stents
Stress, Mechanical
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
title Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the effect of morphologic features on distraction forces in fenestrated stent grafts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T16%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20fluid%20dynamic%20analysis%20of%20the%20effect%20of%20morphologic%20features%20on%20distraction%20forces%20in%20fenestrated%20stent%20grafts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Jones,%20Steven%20M.,%20MBChB&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1648&rft.epage=1656.e1&rft.pages=1648-1656.e1&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.077&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629971396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629971396&rft_id=info:pmid/25454107&rft_els_id=S0741521414016437&rfr_iscdi=true