Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals

Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1062-1070
Hauptverfasser: Byrne, Miriam, Chan, Jeffrey C.Y, O'Broin, Eoin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1070
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1062
container_title Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery
container_volume 42
creator Byrne, Miriam
Chan, Jeffrey C.Y
O'Broin, Eoin
description Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR. Results Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained ‘uncertain’ and 6% felt ‘different but not improved.’ Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between ‘good’ to ‘fair’ (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as ‘unchanged’, while 3% reported a ‘worsened’ appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Conclusions Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629965952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S101051821400033X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1629965952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c5d1cf06172392ddde421e3384ee025f23134f62c1d33eebd7d871b242ba67083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEUbERxP_QPeJAcvcyYl3T3dIsIsqyrsKCggreQSV6ctOnOmJcemd_gnzbtrB48eHqPUFWhql5VPQG-Bg7t82E9mJHWgkO95rDmEu5V59BtulUN0N8vOwe-aqATZ9UF0cA5b3nXP6zORN100MrmvPr5AZPBffZxIqYny0hnT06b5YVFxzRS3mH2hsU5mzgiczGE-MNPXxmhiZPV6chMQJdZ2vkp7oOmfHzBrg86zPq3zPbI9mXDKRM7YKKZ2A51yDu2T9EhUQHpQI-qB64MfHw3L6vPb64_Xb1d3b6_eXf1-nZl6g7yyjQWjOMtbITshbUWawEoZVcjctE4IUHWrhUGrJSIW7ux3Qa2ohZb3W54Jy-rZyfd8vv3ufhToyeDIegJ40wKWtH3bdM3okDFCWpSJEro1D75sThWwNVSghrUUoJaSlAcVCmhkJ7e6c_bEe1fyp_UC-DlCYDF5cFjUmRKOgatT2iystH_X__VP3QT_OSNDt_wiDTEOS1xKlAkFFcflzNYrgDqcgFSfpG_ABn1sTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629965952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Byrne, Miriam ; Chan, Jeffrey C.Y ; O'Broin, Eoin</creator><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Miriam ; Chan, Jeffrey C.Y ; O'Broin, Eoin</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR. Results Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained ‘uncertain’ and 6% felt ‘different but not improved.’ Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between ‘good’ to ‘fair’ (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as ‘unchanged’, while 3% reported a ‘worsened’ appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Conclusions Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24581635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aesthetic ; Age Factors ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Health ; Cleft Lip - surgery ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Cleft-lip nasal deformity ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dentistry ; Esthetics ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nasal Cartilages - surgery ; Nose - anatomy &amp; histology ; Nose - physiology ; Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery ; Osteotomy - methods ; Patient Satisfaction ; Perception ; Respiration ; Rhinoplasty ; Rhinoplasty - methods ; Rhinoplasty - psychology ; Satisfaction ; Sex Factors ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1062-1070</ispartof><rights>European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c5d1cf06172392ddde421e3384ee025f23134f62c1d33eebd7d871b242ba67083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c5d1cf06172392ddde421e3384ee025f23134f62c1d33eebd7d871b242ba67083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24581635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jeffrey C.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Broin, Eoin</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR. Results Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained ‘uncertain’ and 6% felt ‘different but not improved.’ Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between ‘good’ to ‘fair’ (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as ‘unchanged’, while 3% reported a ‘worsened’ appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Conclusions Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aesthetic</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - surgery</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Cleft-lip nasal deformity</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nasal Cartilages - surgery</subject><subject>Nose - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Nose - physiology</subject><subject>Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - psychology</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEUbERxP_QPeJAcvcyYl3T3dIsIsqyrsKCggreQSV6ctOnOmJcemd_gnzbtrB48eHqPUFWhql5VPQG-Bg7t82E9mJHWgkO95rDmEu5V59BtulUN0N8vOwe-aqATZ9UF0cA5b3nXP6zORN100MrmvPr5AZPBffZxIqYny0hnT06b5YVFxzRS3mH2hsU5mzgiczGE-MNPXxmhiZPV6chMQJdZ2vkp7oOmfHzBrg86zPq3zPbI9mXDKRM7YKKZ2A51yDu2T9EhUQHpQI-qB64MfHw3L6vPb64_Xb1d3b6_eXf1-nZl6g7yyjQWjOMtbITshbUWawEoZVcjctE4IUHWrhUGrJSIW7ux3Qa2ohZb3W54Jy-rZyfd8vv3ufhToyeDIegJ40wKWtH3bdM3okDFCWpSJEro1D75sThWwNVSghrUUoJaSlAcVCmhkJ7e6c_bEe1fyp_UC-DlCYDF5cFjUmRKOgatT2iystH_X__VP3QT_OSNDt_wiDTEOS1xKlAkFFcflzNYrgDqcgFSfpG_ABn1sTE</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Byrne, Miriam</creator><creator>Chan, Jeffrey C.Y</creator><creator>O'Broin, Eoin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals</title><author>Byrne, Miriam ; Chan, Jeffrey C.Y ; O'Broin, Eoin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c5d1cf06172392ddde421e3384ee025f23134f62c1d33eebd7d871b242ba67083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aesthetic</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - surgery</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Cleft-lip nasal deformity</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nasal Cartilages - surgery</topic><topic>Nose - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Nose - physiology</topic><topic>Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - psychology</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jeffrey C.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Broin, Eoin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Byrne, Miriam</au><au>Chan, Jeffrey C.Y</au><au>O'Broin, Eoin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1062</spage><epage>1070</epage><pages>1062-1070</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR. Results Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained ‘uncertain’ and 6% felt ‘different but not improved.’ Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between ‘good’ to ‘fair’ (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as ‘unchanged’, while 3% reported a ‘worsened’ appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Conclusions Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24581635</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-5182
ispartof Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1062-1070
issn 1010-5182
1878-4119
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629965952
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aesthetic
Age Factors
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitude to Health
Cleft Lip - surgery
Cleft Palate - surgery
Cleft-lip nasal deformity
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dentistry
Esthetics
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nasal Cartilages - surgery
Nose - anatomy & histology
Nose - physiology
Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery
Osteotomy - methods
Patient Satisfaction
Perception
Respiration
Rhinoplasty
Rhinoplasty - methods
Rhinoplasty - psychology
Satisfaction
Sex Factors
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T06%3A15%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20and%20satisfaction%20of%20aesthetic%20outcome%20following%20secondary%20cleft%20rhinoplasty:%20Evaluation%20by%20patients%20versus%20health%20professionals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Byrne,%20Miriam&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1062&rft.epage=1070&rft.pages=1062-1070&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629965952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629965952&rft_id=info:pmid/24581635&rft_els_id=S101051821400033X&rfr_iscdi=true