Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals
Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1062-1070 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1070 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1062 |
container_title | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Byrne, Miriam Chan, Jeffrey C.Y O'Broin, Eoin |
description | Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR. Results Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained ‘uncertain’ and 6% felt ‘different but not improved.’ Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between ‘good’ to ‘fair’ (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as ‘unchanged’, while 3% reported a ‘worsened’ appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Conclusions Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629965952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S101051821400033X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1629965952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c5d1cf06172392ddde421e3384ee025f23134f62c1d33eebd7d871b242ba67083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEUbERxP_QPeJAcvcyYl3T3dIsIsqyrsKCggreQSV6ctOnOmJcemd_gnzbtrB48eHqPUFWhql5VPQG-Bg7t82E9mJHWgkO95rDmEu5V59BtulUN0N8vOwe-aqATZ9UF0cA5b3nXP6zORN100MrmvPr5AZPBffZxIqYny0hnT06b5YVFxzRS3mH2hsU5mzgiczGE-MNPXxmhiZPV6chMQJdZ2vkp7oOmfHzBrg86zPq3zPbI9mXDKRM7YKKZ2A51yDu2T9EhUQHpQI-qB64MfHw3L6vPb64_Xb1d3b6_eXf1-nZl6g7yyjQWjOMtbITshbUWawEoZVcjctE4IUHWrhUGrJSIW7ux3Qa2ohZb3W54Jy-rZyfd8vv3ufhToyeDIegJ40wKWtH3bdM3okDFCWpSJEro1D75sThWwNVSghrUUoJaSlAcVCmhkJ7e6c_bEe1fyp_UC-DlCYDF5cFjUmRKOgatT2iystH_X__VP3QT_OSNDt_wiDTEOS1xKlAkFFcflzNYrgDqcgFSfpG_ABn1sTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629965952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Byrne, Miriam ; Chan, Jeffrey C.Y ; O'Broin, Eoin</creator><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Miriam ; Chan, Jeffrey C.Y ; O'Broin, Eoin</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR. Results Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained ‘uncertain’ and 6% felt ‘different but not improved.’ Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between ‘good’ to ‘fair’ (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as ‘unchanged’, while 3% reported a ‘worsened’ appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Conclusions Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24581635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aesthetic ; Age Factors ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Health ; Cleft Lip - surgery ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Cleft-lip nasal deformity ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dentistry ; Esthetics ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nasal Cartilages - surgery ; Nose - anatomy & histology ; Nose - physiology ; Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery ; Osteotomy - methods ; Patient Satisfaction ; Perception ; Respiration ; Rhinoplasty ; Rhinoplasty - methods ; Rhinoplasty - psychology ; Satisfaction ; Sex Factors ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1062-1070</ispartof><rights>European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c5d1cf06172392ddde421e3384ee025f23134f62c1d33eebd7d871b242ba67083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c5d1cf06172392ddde421e3384ee025f23134f62c1d33eebd7d871b242ba67083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24581635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jeffrey C.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Broin, Eoin</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR. Results Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained ‘uncertain’ and 6% felt ‘different but not improved.’ Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between ‘good’ to ‘fair’ (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as ‘unchanged’, while 3% reported a ‘worsened’ appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Conclusions Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aesthetic</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - surgery</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Cleft-lip nasal deformity</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nasal Cartilages - surgery</subject><subject>Nose - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Nose - physiology</subject><subject>Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - psychology</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEUbERxP_QPeJAcvcyYl3T3dIsIsqyrsKCggreQSV6ctOnOmJcemd_gnzbtrB48eHqPUFWhql5VPQG-Bg7t82E9mJHWgkO95rDmEu5V59BtulUN0N8vOwe-aqATZ9UF0cA5b3nXP6zORN100MrmvPr5AZPBffZxIqYny0hnT06b5YVFxzRS3mH2hsU5mzgiczGE-MNPXxmhiZPV6chMQJdZ2vkp7oOmfHzBrg86zPq3zPbI9mXDKRM7YKKZ2A51yDu2T9EhUQHpQI-qB64MfHw3L6vPb64_Xb1d3b6_eXf1-nZl6g7yyjQWjOMtbITshbUWawEoZVcjctE4IUHWrhUGrJSIW7ux3Qa2ohZb3W54Jy-rZyfd8vv3ufhToyeDIegJ40wKWtH3bdM3okDFCWpSJEro1D75sThWwNVSghrUUoJaSlAcVCmhkJ7e6c_bEe1fyp_UC-DlCYDF5cFjUmRKOgatT2iystH_X__VP3QT_OSNDt_wiDTEOS1xKlAkFFcflzNYrgDqcgFSfpG_ABn1sTE</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Byrne, Miriam</creator><creator>Chan, Jeffrey C.Y</creator><creator>O'Broin, Eoin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals</title><author>Byrne, Miriam ; Chan, Jeffrey C.Y ; O'Broin, Eoin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c5d1cf06172392ddde421e3384ee025f23134f62c1d33eebd7d871b242ba67083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aesthetic</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - surgery</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Cleft-lip nasal deformity</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nasal Cartilages - surgery</topic><topic>Nose - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Nose - physiology</topic><topic>Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - psychology</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jeffrey C.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Broin, Eoin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Byrne, Miriam</au><au>Chan, Jeffrey C.Y</au><au>O'Broin, Eoin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1062</spage><epage>1070</epage><pages>1062-1070</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty. Design A cross-sectional survey. Participants 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR. Results Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained ‘uncertain’ and 6% felt ‘different but not improved.’ Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between ‘good’ to ‘fair’ (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as ‘unchanged’, while 3% reported a ‘worsened’ appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Conclusions Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24581635</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-5182 |
ispartof | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1062-1070 |
issn | 1010-5182 1878-4119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629965952 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aesthetic Age Factors Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude to Health Cleft Lip - surgery Cleft Palate - surgery Cleft-lip nasal deformity Cohort Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Dentistry Esthetics Female Humans Male Middle Aged Nasal Cartilages - surgery Nose - anatomy & histology Nose - physiology Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery Osteotomy - methods Patient Satisfaction Perception Respiration Rhinoplasty Rhinoplasty - methods Rhinoplasty - psychology Satisfaction Sex Factors Surgery Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: Evaluation by patients versus health professionals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T06%3A15%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20and%20satisfaction%20of%20aesthetic%20outcome%20following%20secondary%20cleft%20rhinoplasty:%20Evaluation%20by%20patients%20versus%20health%20professionals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Byrne,%20Miriam&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1062&rft.epage=1070&rft.pages=1062-1070&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629965952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629965952&rft_id=info:pmid/24581635&rft_els_id=S101051821400033X&rfr_iscdi=true |