Tibial Rotational Alignment Was Significantly Improved by Use of a CT-Navigated Control Device in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract This study compared the accuracy of three methods to set tibial component rotational alignment: (1) conventional method, the anteroposterior (AP) axis was determined by the surgeon using anatomical landmarks; (2) partial-navigation method, the tibia was prepared according to the AP axis usi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2014-12, Vol.29 (12), p.2352-2356
Hauptverfasser: Kuriyama, Shinichi, MD, Hyakuna, Katsufumi, MD, PhD, Inoue, Satoshi, MD, Tamaki, Yasuyuki, MD, Ito, Hiromu, MD, PhD, Matsuda, Shuichi, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract This study compared the accuracy of three methods to set tibial component rotational alignment: (1) conventional method, the anteroposterior (AP) axis was determined by the surgeon using anatomical landmarks; (2) partial-navigation method, the tibia was prepared according to the AP axis using a CT-based navigation system and the component was manually positioned; (3) full-navigation method, the tibial component was positioned and fixed with cement under the control of navigation using a newly developed instrument. The conventional method showed considerable deviation (range, − 18.6° to 14.7°), and the partial-navigation method also showed considerable deviation (− 11.3° to 8.1°). In contrast, the full-navigation method significantly improved the accuracy of alignment (− 2.9° to 2.1°). The tibial component can become malaligned during cement fixation, even after proper bone preparation.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.016