Tibial Rotational Alignment Was Significantly Improved by Use of a CT-Navigated Control Device in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract This study compared the accuracy of three methods to set tibial component rotational alignment: (1) conventional method, the anteroposterior (AP) axis was determined by the surgeon using anatomical landmarks; (2) partial-navigation method, the tibia was prepared according to the AP axis usi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2014-12, Vol.29 (12), p.2352-2356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract This study compared the accuracy of three methods to set tibial component rotational alignment: (1) conventional method, the anteroposterior (AP) axis was determined by the surgeon using anatomical landmarks; (2) partial-navigation method, the tibia was prepared according to the AP axis using a CT-based navigation system and the component was manually positioned; (3) full-navigation method, the tibial component was positioned and fixed with cement under the control of navigation using a newly developed instrument. The conventional method showed considerable deviation (range, − 18.6° to 14.7°), and the partial-navigation method also showed considerable deviation (− 11.3° to 8.1°). In contrast, the full-navigation method significantly improved the accuracy of alignment (− 2.9° to 2.1°). The tibial component can become malaligned during cement fixation, even after proper bone preparation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.016 |