Computed Tomography Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer-Assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Patients With Advanced Valgus Arthritic Knees
Abstract Arthritic knees with advanced valgus deformity present with soft tissue and osseous anomalies that make total knee arthroplasty (TKA) difficult. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 41 patients (51 knees) to determine whether computer-assisted surgery-TKA (CAS-TKA) is superior to TK...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2014-12, Vol.29 (12), p.2363-2368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2368 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2363 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Huang, Tsan-Wen, MD Kuo, Liang-Tseng, MD Peng, Kuo-Ti, MD, PhD Lee, Mel S., MD, PhD Hsu, Robert Wen-Wei, MD |
description | Abstract Arthritic knees with advanced valgus deformity present with soft tissue and osseous anomalies that make total knee arthroplasty (TKA) difficult. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 41 patients (51 knees) to determine whether computer-assisted surgery-TKA (CAS-TKA) is superior to TKA using conventional guiding systems. A significantly higher rate of lateral retinaculum release as well as outlier of sagittal mechanical axes and position of the femoral component (femoral flexion and femoral rotational angle) was recorded in the conventional TKA group versus the CAS-TKA group. Both groups had significant postoperative improvement in clinical performance, but results did not differ significantly between groups. Despite its radiographic benefit, CAS-TKA showed no significant benefit over TKA in short-term clinical functional outcomes when performed by an experienced surgeon. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629953675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540313009030</els_id><sourcerecordid>1629953675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-7d0720ab287febef1cc183862ab59fb1d3dcbb0787d55f6bdef1723e5916cb543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uktv1DAQjhCILoU_wAHlyCWpH3EeCCGtVgWqVoBEKUfLcZxdL0mcepxI-5_4kUy6Sw8cONljfw_NfBNFrylJKaH5xT5VPuxSRihPKUsJzZ5EKyo4S8qM5E-jFSlLnoiM8LPoBcCeEEqFyJ5HZyzLeFVVxSr6vXH9OAXTxLeud1uvxt0hvpxVN6lg3RDbAT-C6uLrwZh4jX7ejZ2CcHgXn6g-WQNYWDS-qNluj8Q742ECxAyzGZYX1LgaIPipx_pR_BvesIb4pw27eN3MatAodKe6LbIf_Gyw-sEeXkbPWtWBeXU6z6MfHy9vN5-Tm6-frjbrm0RnJQ1J0ZCCEVWzsmhNbVqqNS15mTNVi6qtacMbXdekKItGiDavG4QUjBtR0VzXIuPn0duj7ujd_WQgyN6CNl2nBuMmkDRnVSV4XgiEsiNUewfgTStHb3vlD5ISuaQk93JJSS4pScokpoSkNyf9qe5N80j5GwsC3h8BBrucrfESNI4JJ2O90UE2zv5f_8M_dN3ZwWrV_TIHA3s3eYwD-5CABPl92ZNlTSgnpCKc8D-Oor10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629953675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computed Tomography Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer-Assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Patients With Advanced Valgus Arthritic Knees</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Huang, Tsan-Wen, MD ; Kuo, Liang-Tseng, MD ; Peng, Kuo-Ti, MD, PhD ; Lee, Mel S., MD, PhD ; Hsu, Robert Wen-Wei, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tsan-Wen, MD ; Kuo, Liang-Tseng, MD ; Peng, Kuo-Ti, MD, PhD ; Lee, Mel S., MD, PhD ; Hsu, Robert Wen-Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Arthritic knees with advanced valgus deformity present with soft tissue and osseous anomalies that make total knee arthroplasty (TKA) difficult. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 41 patients (51 knees) to determine whether computer-assisted surgery-TKA (CAS-TKA) is superior to TKA using conventional guiding systems. A significantly higher rate of lateral retinaculum release as well as outlier of sagittal mechanical axes and position of the femoral component (femoral flexion and femoral rotational angle) was recorded in the conventional TKA group versus the CAS-TKA group. Both groups had significant postoperative improvement in clinical performance, but results did not differ significantly between groups. Despite its radiographic benefit, CAS-TKA showed no significant benefit over TKA in short-term clinical functional outcomes when performed by an experienced surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24439997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnostic imaging ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Bone Malalignment - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Malalignment - surgery ; computer-assisted surgery ; Female ; genu valgus deformity ; Humans ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Male ; mechanical axis ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; total knee arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2014-12, Vol.29 (12), p.2363-2368</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-7d0720ab287febef1cc183862ab59fb1d3dcbb0787d55f6bdef1723e5916cb543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-7d0720ab287febef1cc183862ab59fb1d3dcbb0787d55f6bdef1723e5916cb543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540313009030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24439997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tsan-Wen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Liang-Tseng, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Kuo-Ti, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mel S., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Robert Wen-Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Computed Tomography Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer-Assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Patients With Advanced Valgus Arthritic Knees</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Abstract Arthritic knees with advanced valgus deformity present with soft tissue and osseous anomalies that make total knee arthroplasty (TKA) difficult. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 41 patients (51 knees) to determine whether computer-assisted surgery-TKA (CAS-TKA) is superior to TKA using conventional guiding systems. A significantly higher rate of lateral retinaculum release as well as outlier of sagittal mechanical axes and position of the femoral component (femoral flexion and femoral rotational angle) was recorded in the conventional TKA group versus the CAS-TKA group. Both groups had significant postoperative improvement in clinical performance, but results did not differ significantly between groups. Despite its radiographic benefit, CAS-TKA showed no significant benefit over TKA in short-term clinical functional outcomes when performed by an experienced surgeon.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Bone Malalignment - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Malalignment - surgery</subject><subject>computer-assisted surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>genu valgus deformity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mechanical axis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uktv1DAQjhCILoU_wAHlyCWpH3EeCCGtVgWqVoBEKUfLcZxdL0mcepxI-5_4kUy6Sw8cONljfw_NfBNFrylJKaH5xT5VPuxSRihPKUsJzZ5EKyo4S8qM5E-jFSlLnoiM8LPoBcCeEEqFyJ5HZyzLeFVVxSr6vXH9OAXTxLeud1uvxt0hvpxVN6lg3RDbAT-C6uLrwZh4jX7ejZ2CcHgXn6g-WQNYWDS-qNluj8Q742ECxAyzGZYX1LgaIPipx_pR_BvesIb4pw27eN3MatAodKe6LbIf_Gyw-sEeXkbPWtWBeXU6z6MfHy9vN5-Tm6-frjbrm0RnJQ1J0ZCCEVWzsmhNbVqqNS15mTNVi6qtacMbXdekKItGiDavG4QUjBtR0VzXIuPn0duj7ujd_WQgyN6CNl2nBuMmkDRnVSV4XgiEsiNUewfgTStHb3vlD5ISuaQk93JJSS4pScokpoSkNyf9qe5N80j5GwsC3h8BBrucrfESNI4JJ2O90UE2zv5f_8M_dN3ZwWrV_TIHA3s3eYwD-5CABPl92ZNlTSgnpCKc8D-Oor10</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Huang, Tsan-Wen, MD</creator><creator>Kuo, Liang-Tseng, MD</creator><creator>Peng, Kuo-Ti, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Lee, Mel S., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Hsu, Robert Wen-Wei, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Computed Tomography Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer-Assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Patients With Advanced Valgus Arthritic Knees</title><author>Huang, Tsan-Wen, MD ; Kuo, Liang-Tseng, MD ; Peng, Kuo-Ti, MD, PhD ; Lee, Mel S., MD, PhD ; Hsu, Robert Wen-Wei, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-7d0720ab287febef1cc183862ab59fb1d3dcbb0787d55f6bdef1723e5916cb543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Bone Malalignment - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Malalignment - surgery</topic><topic>computer-assisted surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>genu valgus deformity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mechanical axis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tsan-Wen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Liang-Tseng, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Kuo-Ti, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mel S., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Robert Wen-Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Tsan-Wen, MD</au><au>Kuo, Liang-Tseng, MD</au><au>Peng, Kuo-Ti, MD, PhD</au><au>Lee, Mel S., MD, PhD</au><au>Hsu, Robert Wen-Wei, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computed Tomography Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer-Assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Patients With Advanced Valgus Arthritic Knees</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2363</spage><epage>2368</epage><pages>2363-2368</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Abstract Arthritic knees with advanced valgus deformity present with soft tissue and osseous anomalies that make total knee arthroplasty (TKA) difficult. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 41 patients (51 knees) to determine whether computer-assisted surgery-TKA (CAS-TKA) is superior to TKA using conventional guiding systems. A significantly higher rate of lateral retinaculum release as well as outlier of sagittal mechanical axes and position of the femoral component (femoral flexion and femoral rotational angle) was recorded in the conventional TKA group versus the CAS-TKA group. Both groups had significant postoperative improvement in clinical performance, but results did not differ significantly between groups. Despite its radiographic benefit, CAS-TKA showed no significant benefit over TKA in short-term clinical functional outcomes when performed by an experienced surgeon.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24439997</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.014</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2014-12, Vol.29 (12), p.2363-2368 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629953675 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnostic imaging Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Bone Malalignment - diagnostic imaging Bone Malalignment - surgery computer-assisted surgery Female genu valgus deformity Humans Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging Knee Joint - surgery Male mechanical axis Middle Aged Orthopedics Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery Retrospective Studies Surgery, Computer-Assisted Tomography, X-Ray Computed total knee arthroplasty |
title | Computed Tomography Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer-Assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Patients With Advanced Valgus Arthritic Knees |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T13%3A02%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computed%20Tomography%20Evaluation%20in%20Total%20Knee%20Arthroplasty:%20Computer-Assisted%20Navigation%20Versus%20Conventional%20Instrumentation%20in%20Patients%20With%20Advanced%20Valgus%20Arthritic%20Knees&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Huang,%20Tsan-Wen,%20MD&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2363&rft.epage=2368&rft.pages=2363-2368&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629953675%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629953675&rft_id=info:pmid/24439997&rft_els_id=S0883540313009030&rfr_iscdi=true |