Uptalk: Towards a quantitative analysis

The use of high-rise terminals, or uptalk, continues to be a point of contention in the study of intonation. Researchers continually produce conflicting descriptions of it in an effort to define it, including conflicting explanations of its connotation or significance in conversation. These difficul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toronto working papers in linguistics 2010-01, Vol.33, p.1-16
Hauptverfasser: Di Gioacchino, Martina, Jessop, Lorena Crook
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Toronto working papers in linguistics
container_volume 33
creator Di Gioacchino, Martina
Jessop, Lorena Crook
description The use of high-rise terminals, or uptalk, continues to be a point of contention in the study of intonation. Researchers continually produce conflicting descriptions of it in an effort to define it, including conflicting explanations of its connotation or significance in conversation. These difficulties suggest that ToBI, the most frequently used system of annotation for intonation, cannot adequately describe the contour. The definitions of uptalk produced using ToBI do not allow it to be distinguished from other contours, namely question intonation. This study tries to define the contour, not by describing it as ToBI does, but by measuring the pitch excursions that speakers produce in these contours in relation to the overall pitch range of the phrase in which it was produced. The results of the study show that the excursions produced in uptalk fall in the mid range of rises, steeper than those of other declarative statements, but not as steep as those produced in question intonation. This provides a potential set of criteria which can be used to precisely distinguish uptalk contours. The ability to identify contours based on the height of the pitch excursion exhibited also points to the possibility of the use of categorical perception of intonation contours by native speakers of English. Adapted from the source document
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629326215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1629326215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16293262153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDcw1bUwM7TkYOAtLs4yAAIzUwMjc0tOBvXQgpLEnGwrhZD88sSilGKFRIXC0sS8ksySxJLMslSFxLzEnMrizGIeBta0xJziVF4ozc2g4eYa4uyhW1CUX1iaWlwSn5tZnJyak5OYl5pfWhxvaGZkaWxkZmRoakyCUgCmuzQM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629326215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uptalk: Towards a quantitative analysis</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Di Gioacchino, Martina ; Jessop, Lorena Crook</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Martina ; Jessop, Lorena Crook</creatorcontrib><description>The use of high-rise terminals, or uptalk, continues to be a point of contention in the study of intonation. Researchers continually produce conflicting descriptions of it in an effort to define it, including conflicting explanations of its connotation or significance in conversation. These difficulties suggest that ToBI, the most frequently used system of annotation for intonation, cannot adequately describe the contour. The definitions of uptalk produced using ToBI do not allow it to be distinguished from other contours, namely question intonation. This study tries to define the contour, not by describing it as ToBI does, but by measuring the pitch excursions that speakers produce in these contours in relation to the overall pitch range of the phrase in which it was produced. The results of the study show that the excursions produced in uptalk fall in the mid range of rises, steeper than those of other declarative statements, but not as steep as those produced in question intonation. This provides a potential set of criteria which can be used to precisely distinguish uptalk contours. The ability to identify contours based on the height of the pitch excursion exhibited also points to the possibility of the use of categorical perception of intonation contours by native speakers of English. Adapted from the source document</description><identifier>ISSN: 1705-8619</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Toronto working papers in linguistics, 2010-01, Vol.33, p.1-16</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessop, Lorena Crook</creatorcontrib><title>Uptalk: Towards a quantitative analysis</title><title>Toronto working papers in linguistics</title><description>The use of high-rise terminals, or uptalk, continues to be a point of contention in the study of intonation. Researchers continually produce conflicting descriptions of it in an effort to define it, including conflicting explanations of its connotation or significance in conversation. These difficulties suggest that ToBI, the most frequently used system of annotation for intonation, cannot adequately describe the contour. The definitions of uptalk produced using ToBI do not allow it to be distinguished from other contours, namely question intonation. This study tries to define the contour, not by describing it as ToBI does, but by measuring the pitch excursions that speakers produce in these contours in relation to the overall pitch range of the phrase in which it was produced. The results of the study show that the excursions produced in uptalk fall in the mid range of rises, steeper than those of other declarative statements, but not as steep as those produced in question intonation. This provides a potential set of criteria which can be used to precisely distinguish uptalk contours. The ability to identify contours based on the height of the pitch excursion exhibited also points to the possibility of the use of categorical perception of intonation contours by native speakers of English. Adapted from the source document</description><issn>1705-8619</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDcw1bUwM7TkYOAtLs4yAAIzUwMjc0tOBvXQgpLEnGwrhZD88sSilGKFRIXC0sS8ksySxJLMslSFxLzEnMrizGIeBta0xJziVF4ozc2g4eYa4uyhW1CUX1iaWlwSn5tZnJyak5OYl5pfWhxvaGZkaWxkZmRoakyCUgCmuzQM</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Di Gioacchino, Martina</creator><creator>Jessop, Lorena Crook</creator><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Uptalk: Towards a quantitative analysis</title><author>Di Gioacchino, Martina ; Jessop, Lorena Crook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16293262153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessop, Lorena Crook</creatorcontrib><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Toronto working papers in linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Gioacchino, Martina</au><au>Jessop, Lorena Crook</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uptalk: Towards a quantitative analysis</atitle><jtitle>Toronto working papers in linguistics</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>33</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><issn>1705-8619</issn><abstract>The use of high-rise terminals, or uptalk, continues to be a point of contention in the study of intonation. Researchers continually produce conflicting descriptions of it in an effort to define it, including conflicting explanations of its connotation or significance in conversation. These difficulties suggest that ToBI, the most frequently used system of annotation for intonation, cannot adequately describe the contour. The definitions of uptalk produced using ToBI do not allow it to be distinguished from other contours, namely question intonation. This study tries to define the contour, not by describing it as ToBI does, but by measuring the pitch excursions that speakers produce in these contours in relation to the overall pitch range of the phrase in which it was produced. The results of the study show that the excursions produced in uptalk fall in the mid range of rises, steeper than those of other declarative statements, but not as steep as those produced in question intonation. This provides a potential set of criteria which can be used to precisely distinguish uptalk contours. The ability to identify contours based on the height of the pitch excursion exhibited also points to the possibility of the use of categorical perception of intonation contours by native speakers of English. Adapted from the source document</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1705-8619
ispartof Toronto working papers in linguistics, 2010-01, Vol.33, p.1-16
issn 1705-8619
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629326215
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Uptalk: Towards a quantitative analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A07%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uptalk:%20Towards%20a%20quantitative%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Toronto%20working%20papers%20in%20linguistics&rft.au=Di%20Gioacchino,%20Martina&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.issn=1705-8619&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1629326215%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629326215&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true