Comparative evaluation of probiotic and salinomycin effects on performance and coccidiosis control in broiler chickens

The annual financial loss to the poultry industry as a result of coccidiosis has been estimated at about US $3 billion. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of probiotics and salinomycin as feed additives on performance and coccidiosis control in male broilers raised t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2014-12, Vol.93 (12), p.3002-3008
Hauptverfasser: Abdelrahman, Wael, Mohnl, Michaela, Teichmann, Klaus, Doupovec, Barbara, Schatzmayr, Gerd, Lumpkins, Brett, Mathis, Greg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3008
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3002
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 93
creator Abdelrahman, Wael
Mohnl, Michaela
Teichmann, Klaus
Doupovec, Barbara
Schatzmayr, Gerd
Lumpkins, Brett
Mathis, Greg
description The annual financial loss to the poultry industry as a result of coccidiosis has been estimated at about US $3 billion. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of probiotics and salinomycin as feed additives on performance and coccidiosis control in male broilers raised to 42 d of age. The study consisted of 360 Cobb male broiler chickens randomly allocated to 4 groups each with 3 replicates. Group 1: untreated, unchallenged negative control group (NC); group 2: untreated, challenged positive control group (PC); group 3: negative control supplemented with salinomycin 66 mg/kg, challenged group (Sal); and group 4: negative control supplemented with probiotics, challenged (Prob mix). On d 15, all birds (except group 1) were challenged with approximately 75,000, 25,000, and 75,000 of Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria tenella oocytes, respectively, that were mixed into the feed. Feed conversion ratio and mortality were recorded throughout the experiment. On d 21 and 42, intestinal lesions and litter conditions were scored. On d 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42, oocyst counts were determined from 10 freshly collected fecal samples per pen. The results showed that mortality, litter, and lesion scores at d 21 and 42, and oocyst shedding at d 21 did not differ significantly between the Prob mix and the Sal groups. However on d 28, oocyst shedding was significantly lower in the Sal group than in the PC group but insignificantly lower than the Prob mix group. Body weights of the Prob mix group at d 42 were significantly lower than the Sal group; however, the feed conversion ratio values were similar between the 2 groups. The results of this study showed that probiotics supplementation could be considered as a potential strategy to control coccidiosis in broiler chickens.
doi_str_mv 10.3382/ps.2014-04212
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1628882057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1628882057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-57bcc3e088c591e7342d2dfa99ec7ad32d293b31eb7a6d4ebd7009e6270a7f133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhH0A0VI4ckU-cknxI42TI6p4SZW4wNly7LUwJHawk0r997gPOO2s9O1odhC6oWTJec3uh7RkhJYFKRllZ2hOCGfFSjR0hi5T-iKE0aoSF2jGVpwzyqs52q5DP6ioRrcFDFvVTVkGj4PFQwytC6PTWHmDk-qcD_1OO4_BWtBjwpkbINoQe-U1HDAdtHbGheRS1n6MocP5oo3BdRCx_nT6G3y6QudWdQmuT3OBPp4e39cvxebt-XX9sCl0Djjm7K3WHEhd61VDQfCSGWasahrQQhmet4a3nEIrVGVKaI0gpIGKCaKEpZwv0N3RNz_zM0EaZe-Shq5THsKUJK1YXdeMrERGiyOqY0gpgpVDdL2KO0mJ3NcrhyT39cpDvZm_PVlPbQ_mn_7rlv8CKSR6gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1628882057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of probiotic and salinomycin effects on performance and coccidiosis control in broiler chickens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Abdelrahman, Wael ; Mohnl, Michaela ; Teichmann, Klaus ; Doupovec, Barbara ; Schatzmayr, Gerd ; Lumpkins, Brett ; Mathis, Greg</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Wael ; Mohnl, Michaela ; Teichmann, Klaus ; Doupovec, Barbara ; Schatzmayr, Gerd ; Lumpkins, Brett ; Mathis, Greg</creatorcontrib><description>The annual financial loss to the poultry industry as a result of coccidiosis has been estimated at about US $3 billion. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of probiotics and salinomycin as feed additives on performance and coccidiosis control in male broilers raised to 42 d of age. The study consisted of 360 Cobb male broiler chickens randomly allocated to 4 groups each with 3 replicates. Group 1: untreated, unchallenged negative control group (NC); group 2: untreated, challenged positive control group (PC); group 3: negative control supplemented with salinomycin 66 mg/kg, challenged group (Sal); and group 4: negative control supplemented with probiotics, challenged (Prob mix). On d 15, all birds (except group 1) were challenged with approximately 75,000, 25,000, and 75,000 of Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria tenella oocytes, respectively, that were mixed into the feed. Feed conversion ratio and mortality were recorded throughout the experiment. On d 21 and 42, intestinal lesions and litter conditions were scored. On d 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42, oocyst counts were determined from 10 freshly collected fecal samples per pen. The results showed that mortality, litter, and lesion scores at d 21 and 42, and oocyst shedding at d 21 did not differ significantly between the Prob mix and the Sal groups. However on d 28, oocyst shedding was significantly lower in the Sal group than in the PC group but insignificantly lower than the Prob mix group. Body weights of the Prob mix group at d 42 were significantly lower than the Sal group; however, the feed conversion ratio values were similar between the 2 groups. The results of this study showed that probiotics supplementation could be considered as a potential strategy to control coccidiosis in broiler chickens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps.2014-04212</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25332136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animals ; Chickens ; Coccidiosis - prevention &amp; control ; Coccidiosis - veterinary ; Coccidiostats - pharmacology ; Diet - veterinary ; Intestines - parasitology ; Intestines - pathology ; Male ; Poultry Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Probiotics - pharmacology ; Pyrans - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2014-12, Vol.93 (12), p.3002-3008</ispartof><rights>2014 Poultry Science Association Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-57bcc3e088c591e7342d2dfa99ec7ad32d293b31eb7a6d4ebd7009e6270a7f133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-57bcc3e088c591e7342d2dfa99ec7ad32d293b31eb7a6d4ebd7009e6270a7f133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Wael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohnl, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichmann, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doupovec, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzmayr, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumpkins, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathis, Greg</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of probiotic and salinomycin effects on performance and coccidiosis control in broiler chickens</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>The annual financial loss to the poultry industry as a result of coccidiosis has been estimated at about US $3 billion. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of probiotics and salinomycin as feed additives on performance and coccidiosis control in male broilers raised to 42 d of age. The study consisted of 360 Cobb male broiler chickens randomly allocated to 4 groups each with 3 replicates. Group 1: untreated, unchallenged negative control group (NC); group 2: untreated, challenged positive control group (PC); group 3: negative control supplemented with salinomycin 66 mg/kg, challenged group (Sal); and group 4: negative control supplemented with probiotics, challenged (Prob mix). On d 15, all birds (except group 1) were challenged with approximately 75,000, 25,000, and 75,000 of Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria tenella oocytes, respectively, that were mixed into the feed. Feed conversion ratio and mortality were recorded throughout the experiment. On d 21 and 42, intestinal lesions and litter conditions were scored. On d 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42, oocyst counts were determined from 10 freshly collected fecal samples per pen. The results showed that mortality, litter, and lesion scores at d 21 and 42, and oocyst shedding at d 21 did not differ significantly between the Prob mix and the Sal groups. However on d 28, oocyst shedding was significantly lower in the Sal group than in the PC group but insignificantly lower than the Prob mix group. Body weights of the Prob mix group at d 42 were significantly lower than the Sal group; however, the feed conversion ratio values were similar between the 2 groups. The results of this study showed that probiotics supplementation could be considered as a potential strategy to control coccidiosis in broiler chickens.</description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Coccidiosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Coccidiosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Coccidiostats - pharmacology</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Intestines - parasitology</subject><subject>Intestines - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Probiotics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pyrans - pharmacology</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhH0A0VI4ckU-cknxI42TI6p4SZW4wNly7LUwJHawk0r997gPOO2s9O1odhC6oWTJec3uh7RkhJYFKRllZ2hOCGfFSjR0hi5T-iKE0aoSF2jGVpwzyqs52q5DP6ioRrcFDFvVTVkGj4PFQwytC6PTWHmDk-qcD_1OO4_BWtBjwpkbINoQe-U1HDAdtHbGheRS1n6MocP5oo3BdRCx_nT6G3y6QudWdQmuT3OBPp4e39cvxebt-XX9sCl0Djjm7K3WHEhd61VDQfCSGWasahrQQhmet4a3nEIrVGVKaI0gpIGKCaKEpZwv0N3RNz_zM0EaZe-Shq5THsKUJK1YXdeMrERGiyOqY0gpgpVDdL2KO0mJ3NcrhyT39cpDvZm_PVlPbQ_mn_7rlv8CKSR6gg</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Abdelrahman, Wael</creator><creator>Mohnl, Michaela</creator><creator>Teichmann, Klaus</creator><creator>Doupovec, Barbara</creator><creator>Schatzmayr, Gerd</creator><creator>Lumpkins, Brett</creator><creator>Mathis, Greg</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of probiotic and salinomycin effects on performance and coccidiosis control in broiler chickens</title><author>Abdelrahman, Wael ; Mohnl, Michaela ; Teichmann, Klaus ; Doupovec, Barbara ; Schatzmayr, Gerd ; Lumpkins, Brett ; Mathis, Greg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-57bcc3e088c591e7342d2dfa99ec7ad32d293b31eb7a6d4ebd7009e6270a7f133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Coccidiosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Coccidiosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Coccidiostats - pharmacology</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Intestines - parasitology</topic><topic>Intestines - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Probiotics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pyrans - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Wael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohnl, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichmann, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doupovec, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzmayr, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumpkins, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathis, Greg</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdelrahman, Wael</au><au>Mohnl, Michaela</au><au>Teichmann, Klaus</au><au>Doupovec, Barbara</au><au>Schatzmayr, Gerd</au><au>Lumpkins, Brett</au><au>Mathis, Greg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of probiotic and salinomycin effects on performance and coccidiosis control in broiler chickens</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3002</spage><epage>3008</epage><pages>3002-3008</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><abstract>The annual financial loss to the poultry industry as a result of coccidiosis has been estimated at about US $3 billion. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of probiotics and salinomycin as feed additives on performance and coccidiosis control in male broilers raised to 42 d of age. The study consisted of 360 Cobb male broiler chickens randomly allocated to 4 groups each with 3 replicates. Group 1: untreated, unchallenged negative control group (NC); group 2: untreated, challenged positive control group (PC); group 3: negative control supplemented with salinomycin 66 mg/kg, challenged group (Sal); and group 4: negative control supplemented with probiotics, challenged (Prob mix). On d 15, all birds (except group 1) were challenged with approximately 75,000, 25,000, and 75,000 of Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria tenella oocytes, respectively, that were mixed into the feed. Feed conversion ratio and mortality were recorded throughout the experiment. On d 21 and 42, intestinal lesions and litter conditions were scored. On d 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42, oocyst counts were determined from 10 freshly collected fecal samples per pen. The results showed that mortality, litter, and lesion scores at d 21 and 42, and oocyst shedding at d 21 did not differ significantly between the Prob mix and the Sal groups. However on d 28, oocyst shedding was significantly lower in the Sal group than in the PC group but insignificantly lower than the Prob mix group. Body weights of the Prob mix group at d 42 were significantly lower than the Sal group; however, the feed conversion ratio values were similar between the 2 groups. The results of this study showed that probiotics supplementation could be considered as a potential strategy to control coccidiosis in broiler chickens.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>25332136</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps.2014-04212</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2014-12, Vol.93 (12), p.3002-3008
issn 0032-5791
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1628882057
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animal Feed - analysis
Animals
Chickens
Coccidiosis - prevention & control
Coccidiosis - veterinary
Coccidiostats - pharmacology
Diet - veterinary
Intestines - parasitology
Intestines - pathology
Male
Poultry Diseases - prevention & control
Probiotics - pharmacology
Pyrans - pharmacology
title Comparative evaluation of probiotic and salinomycin effects on performance and coccidiosis control in broiler chickens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A13%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20probiotic%20and%20salinomycin%20effects%20on%20performance%20and%20coccidiosis%20control%20in%20broiler%20chickens&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Abdelrahman,%20Wael&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3002&rft.epage=3008&rft.pages=3002-3008&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps.2014-04212&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1628882057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1628882057&rft_id=info:pmid/25332136&rfr_iscdi=true