Variation in general practice prostate‐specific antigen testing and prostate cancer outcomes: An ecological study
Knowledge is sparse about the consequences of variation in prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in general practice. This study investigated associations between PSA testing and prostate cancer‐ related outcomes in Danish general practice, where screening for prostate cancer is not recommen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cancer 2015-01, Vol.136 (2), p.435-442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 442 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 435 |
container_title | International journal of cancer |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Hjertholm, Peter Fenger‐Grøn, Morten Vestergaard, Mogens Christensen, Morten B. Borre, Michael Møller, Henrik Vedsted, Peter |
description | Knowledge is sparse about the consequences of variation in prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in general practice. This study investigated associations between PSA testing and prostate cancer‐ related outcomes in Danish general practice, where screening for prostate cancer is not recommended. National registers were used to divide general practices into four groups based on their adjusted PSA test rate 2004–2009. We analysed associations between PSA test rate and prostate cancer‐related outcomes using Poisson regression adjusted for potential confounders. We included 368 general practices, 303,098 men and 4,199 incident prostate cancers. Men in the highest testing quartile of practices compared to men in the lowest quartile had increased risk of trans‐rectal ultrasound (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.20, 95% CI, 0.95–1.51), biopsy (IRR: 1.76, 95% CI, 1.54–2.02), and getting a prostate cancer diagnosis (IRR: 1.37, 95% CI, 1.23–1.52). More were diagnosed with local stage disease (IRR: 1.61, 95% CI, 1.37–1.89) with no differences regarding regional or distant stage. The IRR for prostatectomy was 2.25 (95% CI, 1.72–2.94) and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.02–1.62) for radiotherapy. No differences in prostate cancer or overall mortality were found between the groups. These results show that the highest PSA testing general practices may not reduce prostate cancer mortality but increase the downstream use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects.
What's new?
The impact of PSA testing on diagnosis and mortality of prostate cancer is not yet clear. In this study, the authors found that patients of general practitioners (GPs) with high rates of PSA testing had a significantly increased incidence of prostate cancer, as well as greater use of diagnostic and surgical procedures. However, the mortality rate due to prostate cancer was similar to patients of GPs with low rates of PSA testing. This indicates that routine PSA testing may increase the use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects, without actually reducing prostate cancer mortality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijc.29008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1627985179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1627985179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-80177a9a909ad6d42c8054c5b0c276ecf2f81b878b28edc61bc6c74f41640353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbtOxDAQRS0EguVR8APIEg1NYOw4sU2HVjyFRINoI2firLzKOkvsCG3HJ_CNfAlmeRRUVDOjObq6M5eQQwanDICfuTmecg2gNsiEgZYZcFZskknaQSZZXu6Q3RDmAIwVILbJDhcaCgF8QsKTGZyJrvfUeTqz3g6mo8vBYHRoU9OHaKJ9f30LS4uudUiNjy6BNNoQnZ-lufnlKBqPdqD9GLFf2HBOLzy12Hf9zGESDnFsVvtkqzVdsAffdY88Xl0-Tm-y-4fr2-nFfYaikCpTwKQ02mjQpikbwVEl01jUgFyWFlveKlYrqWqubIMlq7FEKVrBSgF5ke-Rky_ZZO55TGarhQtou85424-hYiWXWhVM6n-gTOdMqDxP6PEfdN6Pg093fFJJSwrBE3X0TY31wjbVcnALM6yqn8cn4OwLeHGdXf3uGVSfiVYp0WqdaHV7N103-Qc6v5OU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1617937442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in general practice prostate‐specific antigen testing and prostate cancer outcomes: An ecological study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hjertholm, Peter ; Fenger‐Grøn, Morten ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Christensen, Morten B. ; Borre, Michael ; Møller, Henrik ; Vedsted, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Hjertholm, Peter ; Fenger‐Grøn, Morten ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Christensen, Morten B. ; Borre, Michael ; Møller, Henrik ; Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge is sparse about the consequences of variation in prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in general practice. This study investigated associations between PSA testing and prostate cancer‐ related outcomes in Danish general practice, where screening for prostate cancer is not recommended. National registers were used to divide general practices into four groups based on their adjusted PSA test rate 2004–2009. We analysed associations between PSA test rate and prostate cancer‐related outcomes using Poisson regression adjusted for potential confounders. We included 368 general practices, 303,098 men and 4,199 incident prostate cancers. Men in the highest testing quartile of practices compared to men in the lowest quartile had increased risk of trans‐rectal ultrasound (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.20, 95% CI, 0.95–1.51), biopsy (IRR: 1.76, 95% CI, 1.54–2.02), and getting a prostate cancer diagnosis (IRR: 1.37, 95% CI, 1.23–1.52). More were diagnosed with local stage disease (IRR: 1.61, 95% CI, 1.37–1.89) with no differences regarding regional or distant stage. The IRR for prostatectomy was 2.25 (95% CI, 1.72–2.94) and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.02–1.62) for radiotherapy. No differences in prostate cancer or overall mortality were found between the groups. These results show that the highest PSA testing general practices may not reduce prostate cancer mortality but increase the downstream use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects.
What's new?
The impact of PSA testing on diagnosis and mortality of prostate cancer is not yet clear. In this study, the authors found that patients of general practitioners (GPs) with high rates of PSA testing had a significantly increased incidence of prostate cancer, as well as greater use of diagnostic and surgical procedures. However, the mortality rate due to prostate cancer was similar to patients of GPs with low rates of PSA testing. This indicates that routine PSA testing may increase the use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects, without actually reducing prostate cancer mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24905402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antigens ; Cancer ; Cohort Studies ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Denmark - epidemiology ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data ; Early Detection of Cancer - trends ; Ecology ; Follow-Up Studies ; general practice ; General Practice - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; neoplasm ; Neoplasm Staging ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; primary health care ; Prognosis ; Prostate cancer ; prostate neoplasms ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; prostate‐specific antigen ; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2015-01, Vol.136 (2), p.435-442</ispartof><rights>2014 UICC</rights><rights>2014 UICC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-80177a9a909ad6d42c8054c5b0c276ecf2f81b878b28edc61bc6c74f41640353</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-5726-5371</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.29008$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.29008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24905402$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hjertholm, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenger‐Grøn, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Morten B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borre, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in general practice prostate‐specific antigen testing and prostate cancer outcomes: An ecological study</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Knowledge is sparse about the consequences of variation in prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in general practice. This study investigated associations between PSA testing and prostate cancer‐ related outcomes in Danish general practice, where screening for prostate cancer is not recommended. National registers were used to divide general practices into four groups based on their adjusted PSA test rate 2004–2009. We analysed associations between PSA test rate and prostate cancer‐related outcomes using Poisson regression adjusted for potential confounders. We included 368 general practices, 303,098 men and 4,199 incident prostate cancers. Men in the highest testing quartile of practices compared to men in the lowest quartile had increased risk of trans‐rectal ultrasound (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.20, 95% CI, 0.95–1.51), biopsy (IRR: 1.76, 95% CI, 1.54–2.02), and getting a prostate cancer diagnosis (IRR: 1.37, 95% CI, 1.23–1.52). More were diagnosed with local stage disease (IRR: 1.61, 95% CI, 1.37–1.89) with no differences regarding regional or distant stage. The IRR for prostatectomy was 2.25 (95% CI, 1.72–2.94) and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.02–1.62) for radiotherapy. No differences in prostate cancer or overall mortality were found between the groups. These results show that the highest PSA testing general practices may not reduce prostate cancer mortality but increase the downstream use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects.
What's new?
The impact of PSA testing on diagnosis and mortality of prostate cancer is not yet clear. In this study, the authors found that patients of general practitioners (GPs) with high rates of PSA testing had a significantly increased incidence of prostate cancer, as well as greater use of diagnostic and surgical procedures. However, the mortality rate due to prostate cancer was similar to patients of GPs with low rates of PSA testing. This indicates that routine PSA testing may increase the use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects, without actually reducing prostate cancer mortality.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - trends</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>general practice</subject><subject>General Practice - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>neoplasm</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>primary health care</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate neoplasms</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>prostate‐specific antigen</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkbtOxDAQRS0EguVR8APIEg1NYOw4sU2HVjyFRINoI2firLzKOkvsCG3HJ_CNfAlmeRRUVDOjObq6M5eQQwanDICfuTmecg2gNsiEgZYZcFZskknaQSZZXu6Q3RDmAIwVILbJDhcaCgF8QsKTGZyJrvfUeTqz3g6mo8vBYHRoU9OHaKJ9f30LS4uudUiNjy6BNNoQnZ-lufnlKBqPdqD9GLFf2HBOLzy12Hf9zGESDnFsVvtkqzVdsAffdY88Xl0-Tm-y-4fr2-nFfYaikCpTwKQ02mjQpikbwVEl01jUgFyWFlveKlYrqWqubIMlq7FEKVrBSgF5ke-Rky_ZZO55TGarhQtou85424-hYiWXWhVM6n-gTOdMqDxP6PEfdN6Pg093fFJJSwrBE3X0TY31wjbVcnALM6yqn8cn4OwLeHGdXf3uGVSfiVYp0WqdaHV7N103-Qc6v5OU</recordid><startdate>20150115</startdate><enddate>20150115</enddate><creator>Hjertholm, Peter</creator><creator>Fenger‐Grøn, Morten</creator><creator>Vestergaard, Mogens</creator><creator>Christensen, Morten B.</creator><creator>Borre, Michael</creator><creator>Møller, Henrik</creator><creator>Vedsted, Peter</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-5371</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150115</creationdate><title>Variation in general practice prostate‐specific antigen testing and prostate cancer outcomes: An ecological study</title><author>Hjertholm, Peter ; Fenger‐Grøn, Morten ; Vestergaard, Mogens ; Christensen, Morten B. ; Borre, Michael ; Møller, Henrik ; Vedsted, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-80177a9a909ad6d42c8054c5b0c276ecf2f81b878b28edc61bc6c74f41640353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - trends</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>general practice</topic><topic>General Practice - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>neoplasm</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>primary health care</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate neoplasms</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>prostate‐specific antigen</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hjertholm, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenger‐Grøn, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Morten B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borre, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hjertholm, Peter</au><au>Fenger‐Grøn, Morten</au><au>Vestergaard, Mogens</au><au>Christensen, Morten B.</au><au>Borre, Michael</au><au>Møller, Henrik</au><au>Vedsted, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in general practice prostate‐specific antigen testing and prostate cancer outcomes: An ecological study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2015-01-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>435-442</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>Knowledge is sparse about the consequences of variation in prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in general practice. This study investigated associations between PSA testing and prostate cancer‐ related outcomes in Danish general practice, where screening for prostate cancer is not recommended. National registers were used to divide general practices into four groups based on their adjusted PSA test rate 2004–2009. We analysed associations between PSA test rate and prostate cancer‐related outcomes using Poisson regression adjusted for potential confounders. We included 368 general practices, 303,098 men and 4,199 incident prostate cancers. Men in the highest testing quartile of practices compared to men in the lowest quartile had increased risk of trans‐rectal ultrasound (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.20, 95% CI, 0.95–1.51), biopsy (IRR: 1.76, 95% CI, 1.54–2.02), and getting a prostate cancer diagnosis (IRR: 1.37, 95% CI, 1.23–1.52). More were diagnosed with local stage disease (IRR: 1.61, 95% CI, 1.37–1.89) with no differences regarding regional or distant stage. The IRR for prostatectomy was 2.25 (95% CI, 1.72–2.94) and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.02–1.62) for radiotherapy. No differences in prostate cancer or overall mortality were found between the groups. These results show that the highest PSA testing general practices may not reduce prostate cancer mortality but increase the downstream use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects.
What's new?
The impact of PSA testing on diagnosis and mortality of prostate cancer is not yet clear. In this study, the authors found that patients of general practitioners (GPs) with high rates of PSA testing had a significantly increased incidence of prostate cancer, as well as greater use of diagnostic and surgical procedures. However, the mortality rate due to prostate cancer was similar to patients of GPs with low rates of PSA testing. This indicates that routine PSA testing may increase the use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects, without actually reducing prostate cancer mortality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>24905402</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.29008</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-5371</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7136 |
ispartof | International journal of cancer, 2015-01, Vol.136 (2), p.435-442 |
issn | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1627985179 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Antigens Cancer Cohort Studies Combined Modality Therapy Denmark - epidemiology Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data Early Detection of Cancer - trends Ecology Follow-Up Studies general practice General Practice - statistics & numerical data Humans Male Medical research Middle Aged Mortality neoplasm Neoplasm Staging Practice Patterns, Physicians primary health care Prognosis Prostate cancer prostate neoplasms Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood prostate‐specific antigen Prostatic Neoplasms - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality Survival Rate |
title | Variation in general practice prostate‐specific antigen testing and prostate cancer outcomes: An ecological study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A54%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20general%20practice%20prostate%E2%80%90specific%20antigen%20testing%20and%20prostate%20cancer%20outcomes:%20An%20ecological%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Hjertholm,%20Peter&rft.date=2015-01-15&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=435-442&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.29008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1627985179%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1617937442&rft_id=info:pmid/24905402&rfr_iscdi=true |