Two years' performance of an in-house ELISA for diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease: Detection of specific IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6 in human serum

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house ELISA for the diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease (LD) by detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella (L.) pneumophila serogroups (sg) 1, 3 and 6. The evaluation was done throughout a two-year period in a diagnostic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of microbiological methods 2013-08, Vol.94 (2), p.94-97
Hauptverfasser: Elverdal, P.L., Jørgensen, C.S., Krogfelt, K.A., Uldum, S.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 2
container_start_page 94
container_title Journal of microbiological methods
container_volume 94
creator Elverdal, P.L.
Jørgensen, C.S.
Krogfelt, K.A.
Uldum, S.A.
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house ELISA for the diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease (LD) by detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella (L.) pneumophila serogroups (sg) 1, 3 and 6. The evaluation was done throughout a two-year period in a diagnostic routine laboratory. Furthermore, the sensitivity of four different methods, the in-house L. pneumophila antibody test (ELISA), the urinary antigen test (Binax® EIA), an in-house PCR and culture, both alone and in combination was evaluated. From 2008 to 2010, 12,158 serum samples from 10,503 patients were analysed. During the same period, 361 cases of laboratory-confirmed LD cases were recorded in Denmark, but of these only 113 had a serum sample examined. The positive predictive value of the in-house ELISA was calculated to be 12.8 and the negative predictive value was 99.6, using only the confirmed LD cases as true positives. The sensitivity of the in-house ELISA for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in the confirmed LD cases was 61% and 36%, respectively. By combining the two ELISA assays the sensitivity increased to 66%. The sensitivity of the Legionella urinary antigen test (Binax® EIA) was 63%, of the in-house PCR 87% and of culture 69%. When all the different methods were combined, a higher sensitivity was calculated — for in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and Binax® EIA 91%, in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and in-house PCR 93%, in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and culture 93%, Binax® EIA and in-house PCR 79%, Binax® EIA and culture 68% and in-house PCR and culture 94%. This study confirms that the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies by ELISA is an important diagnostic tool, also during the initial phase of the disease. Furthermore, we showed that LD in Denmark with or without serum samples collected exhibits the same age and sex distribution and epidemiology, as in the rest of Europe, i.e., mostly men are infected, infections are mostly community acquired, followed by infection from travelling abroad. Apart from patients with notified LD, the patients investigated by serology were evenly distributed in all age groups; there was only a slightly higher ratio of men tested for “atypical pneumonia” in the serology laboratory. •The sensitivity of the IgM+IgG ELISA’s for confirmed LD cases was 66%.•The sensitivity of the Legionella Binax® EIA was 63%, the PCR 87% and culture 69%.•Combining diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of LD results in a higher sensitivity.•The diagnosis can b
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1627977222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167701213001413</els_id><sourcerecordid>1627977222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-544a3252c7fd9750263b49d1917bcad0943cc5b3b8c9f007bb1c96350e83ae033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhCZDAO1iQ4foncYLEoiqljDSIRdu15Tg3GY8mcbATUJ-PF8PpDCxhdS3d7xwf3UPISwZrBqx4v1_3rsdpzYGJNcg1MHhEVqxUPCtFXj0mq0SpTAHjZ-RZjHsAlgtZPiVnXBS5glyuyK_bn57eownxDR0xtD70ZrBIfUvNQN2Q7fwckV5tNzcXNG1p40w3-Ojigmyxc34YjAuY9I2LaCJ-oJ9wQjulzcLEEa1rnaWb7mvybNK8TnNytW8cRmo644Y4nbzwcDB0HHDu_bhz6R0x-C74eaTsHRUPBkXKRXdzCrps5_45edKaQ8QXp3lO7j5f3V5-ybbfrjeXF9vMSlZMWS6lETznVrVNpXLghahl1bCKqdqaBioprM1rUZe2agFUXTNbFSIHLIVBEOKcvD36jsF_nzFOunfRLokHTFfSrOCqUopz_n9UskRXZckSKo6oDT7GgK0eg-tNuNcM9FK03uuHovVStAapU9FJ9er0wVz32PzV_Gk2Aa-PQGu8Nl1wUd_dJIcCAITkokzExyOB6WY_HAYdrcNUfpPqtJNuvPtnhN_yGsQr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1411629881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two years' performance of an in-house ELISA for diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease: Detection of specific IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6 in human serum</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Elverdal, P.L. ; Jørgensen, C.S. ; Krogfelt, K.A. ; Uldum, S.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elverdal, P.L. ; Jørgensen, C.S. ; Krogfelt, K.A. ; Uldum, S.A.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house ELISA for the diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease (LD) by detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella (L.) pneumophila serogroups (sg) 1, 3 and 6. The evaluation was done throughout a two-year period in a diagnostic routine laboratory. Furthermore, the sensitivity of four different methods, the in-house L. pneumophila antibody test (ELISA), the urinary antigen test (Binax® EIA), an in-house PCR and culture, both alone and in combination was evaluated. From 2008 to 2010, 12,158 serum samples from 10,503 patients were analysed. During the same period, 361 cases of laboratory-confirmed LD cases were recorded in Denmark, but of these only 113 had a serum sample examined. The positive predictive value of the in-house ELISA was calculated to be 12.8 and the negative predictive value was 99.6, using only the confirmed LD cases as true positives. The sensitivity of the in-house ELISA for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in the confirmed LD cases was 61% and 36%, respectively. By combining the two ELISA assays the sensitivity increased to 66%. The sensitivity of the Legionella urinary antigen test (Binax® EIA) was 63%, of the in-house PCR 87% and of culture 69%. When all the different methods were combined, a higher sensitivity was calculated — for in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and Binax® EIA 91%, in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and in-house PCR 93%, in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and culture 93%, Binax® EIA and in-house PCR 79%, Binax® EIA and culture 68% and in-house PCR and culture 94%. This study confirms that the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies by ELISA is an important diagnostic tool, also during the initial phase of the disease. Furthermore, we showed that LD in Denmark with or without serum samples collected exhibits the same age and sex distribution and epidemiology, as in the rest of Europe, i.e., mostly men are infected, infections are mostly community acquired, followed by infection from travelling abroad. Apart from patients with notified LD, the patients investigated by serology were evenly distributed in all age groups; there was only a slightly higher ratio of men tested for “atypical pneumonia” in the serology laboratory. •The sensitivity of the IgM+IgG ELISA’s for confirmed LD cases was 66%.•The sensitivity of the Legionella Binax® EIA was 63%, the PCR 87% and culture 69%.•Combining diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of LD results in a higher sensitivity.•The diagnosis can be improved if different methods used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23657054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; antibodies ; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; Antibodies, Bacterial - immunology ; antigens ; blood serum ; Child ; Culture ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods ; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Immunoglobulin G - immunology ; immunoglobulin M ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Immunoglobulin M - immunology ; In-house ELISA ; Legionella pneumophila ; Legionella pneumophila - classification ; Legionella pneumophila - genetics ; Legionella pneumophila - immunology ; Legionella pneumophila - isolation &amp; purification ; Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6 ; Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis ; Legionnaires' Disease - immunology ; Legionnaires' Disease - microbiology ; Male ; men ; Middle Aged ; patients ; PCR ; pneumonia ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Sensitivity ; serology ; serotypes ; Urinary antigen test ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiological methods, 2013-08, Vol.94 (2), p.94-97</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-544a3252c7fd9750263b49d1917bcad0943cc5b3b8c9f007bb1c96350e83ae033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-544a3252c7fd9750263b49d1917bcad0943cc5b3b8c9f007bb1c96350e83ae033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23657054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elverdal, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogfelt, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uldum, S.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Two years' performance of an in-house ELISA for diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease: Detection of specific IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6 in human serum</title><title>Journal of microbiological methods</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house ELISA for the diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease (LD) by detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella (L.) pneumophila serogroups (sg) 1, 3 and 6. The evaluation was done throughout a two-year period in a diagnostic routine laboratory. Furthermore, the sensitivity of four different methods, the in-house L. pneumophila antibody test (ELISA), the urinary antigen test (Binax® EIA), an in-house PCR and culture, both alone and in combination was evaluated. From 2008 to 2010, 12,158 serum samples from 10,503 patients were analysed. During the same period, 361 cases of laboratory-confirmed LD cases were recorded in Denmark, but of these only 113 had a serum sample examined. The positive predictive value of the in-house ELISA was calculated to be 12.8 and the negative predictive value was 99.6, using only the confirmed LD cases as true positives. The sensitivity of the in-house ELISA for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in the confirmed LD cases was 61% and 36%, respectively. By combining the two ELISA assays the sensitivity increased to 66%. The sensitivity of the Legionella urinary antigen test (Binax® EIA) was 63%, of the in-house PCR 87% and of culture 69%. When all the different methods were combined, a higher sensitivity was calculated — for in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and Binax® EIA 91%, in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and in-house PCR 93%, in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and culture 93%, Binax® EIA and in-house PCR 79%, Binax® EIA and culture 68% and in-house PCR and culture 94%. This study confirms that the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies by ELISA is an important diagnostic tool, also during the initial phase of the disease. Furthermore, we showed that LD in Denmark with or without serum samples collected exhibits the same age and sex distribution and epidemiology, as in the rest of Europe, i.e., mostly men are infected, infections are mostly community acquired, followed by infection from travelling abroad. Apart from patients with notified LD, the patients investigated by serology were evenly distributed in all age groups; there was only a slightly higher ratio of men tested for “atypical pneumonia” in the serology laboratory. •The sensitivity of the IgM+IgG ELISA’s for confirmed LD cases was 66%.•The sensitivity of the Legionella Binax® EIA was 63%, the PCR 87% and culture 69%.•Combining diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of LD results in a higher sensitivity.•The diagnosis can be improved if different methods used.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - immunology</subject><subject>antigens</subject><subject>blood serum</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</subject><subject>enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</subject><subject>immunoglobulin M</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - immunology</subject><subject>In-house ELISA</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - classification</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - genetics</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - immunology</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - immunology</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - microbiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>pneumonia</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>serology</subject><subject>serotypes</subject><subject>Urinary antigen test</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-7012</issn><issn>1872-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhCZDAO1iQ4foncYLEoiqljDSIRdu15Tg3GY8mcbATUJ-PF8PpDCxhdS3d7xwf3UPISwZrBqx4v1_3rsdpzYGJNcg1MHhEVqxUPCtFXj0mq0SpTAHjZ-RZjHsAlgtZPiVnXBS5glyuyK_bn57eownxDR0xtD70ZrBIfUvNQN2Q7fwckV5tNzcXNG1p40w3-Ojigmyxc34YjAuY9I2LaCJ-oJ9wQjulzcLEEa1rnaWb7mvybNK8TnNytW8cRmo644Y4nbzwcDB0HHDu_bhz6R0x-C74eaTsHRUPBkXKRXdzCrps5_45edKaQ8QXp3lO7j5f3V5-ybbfrjeXF9vMSlZMWS6lETznVrVNpXLghahl1bCKqdqaBioprM1rUZe2agFUXTNbFSIHLIVBEOKcvD36jsF_nzFOunfRLokHTFfSrOCqUopz_n9UskRXZckSKo6oDT7GgK0eg-tNuNcM9FK03uuHovVStAapU9FJ9er0wVz32PzV_Gk2Aa-PQGu8Nl1wUd_dJIcCAITkokzExyOB6WY_HAYdrcNUfpPqtJNuvPtnhN_yGsQr</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Elverdal, P.L.</creator><creator>Jørgensen, C.S.</creator><creator>Krogfelt, K.A.</creator><creator>Uldum, S.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Two years' performance of an in-house ELISA for diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease: Detection of specific IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6 in human serum</title><author>Elverdal, P.L. ; Jørgensen, C.S. ; Krogfelt, K.A. ; Uldum, S.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-544a3252c7fd9750263b49d1917bcad0943cc5b3b8c9f007bb1c96350e83ae033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - immunology</topic><topic>antigens</topic><topic>blood serum</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</topic><topic>enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</topic><topic>immunoglobulin M</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - immunology</topic><topic>In-house ELISA</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - classification</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - genetics</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - immunology</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - immunology</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - microbiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>pneumonia</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>serology</topic><topic>serotypes</topic><topic>Urinary antigen test</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elverdal, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogfelt, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uldum, S.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elverdal, P.L.</au><au>Jørgensen, C.S.</au><au>Krogfelt, K.A.</au><au>Uldum, S.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two years' performance of an in-house ELISA for diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease: Detection of specific IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6 in human serum</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>94-97</pages><issn>0167-7012</issn><eissn>1872-8359</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house ELISA for the diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease (LD) by detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella (L.) pneumophila serogroups (sg) 1, 3 and 6. The evaluation was done throughout a two-year period in a diagnostic routine laboratory. Furthermore, the sensitivity of four different methods, the in-house L. pneumophila antibody test (ELISA), the urinary antigen test (Binax® EIA), an in-house PCR and culture, both alone and in combination was evaluated. From 2008 to 2010, 12,158 serum samples from 10,503 patients were analysed. During the same period, 361 cases of laboratory-confirmed LD cases were recorded in Denmark, but of these only 113 had a serum sample examined. The positive predictive value of the in-house ELISA was calculated to be 12.8 and the negative predictive value was 99.6, using only the confirmed LD cases as true positives. The sensitivity of the in-house ELISA for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in the confirmed LD cases was 61% and 36%, respectively. By combining the two ELISA assays the sensitivity increased to 66%. The sensitivity of the Legionella urinary antigen test (Binax® EIA) was 63%, of the in-house PCR 87% and of culture 69%. When all the different methods were combined, a higher sensitivity was calculated — for in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and Binax® EIA 91%, in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and in-house PCR 93%, in-house ELISA (IgM+IgG) and culture 93%, Binax® EIA and in-house PCR 79%, Binax® EIA and culture 68% and in-house PCR and culture 94%. This study confirms that the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies by ELISA is an important diagnostic tool, also during the initial phase of the disease. Furthermore, we showed that LD in Denmark with or without serum samples collected exhibits the same age and sex distribution and epidemiology, as in the rest of Europe, i.e., mostly men are infected, infections are mostly community acquired, followed by infection from travelling abroad. Apart from patients with notified LD, the patients investigated by serology were evenly distributed in all age groups; there was only a slightly higher ratio of men tested for “atypical pneumonia” in the serology laboratory. •The sensitivity of the IgM+IgG ELISA’s for confirmed LD cases was 66%.•The sensitivity of the Legionella Binax® EIA was 63%, the PCR 87% and culture 69%.•Combining diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of LD results in a higher sensitivity.•The diagnosis can be improved if different methods used.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>23657054</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.010</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-7012
ispartof Journal of microbiological methods, 2013-08, Vol.94 (2), p.94-97
issn 0167-7012
1872-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1627977222
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
antibodies
Antibodies, Bacterial - blood
Antibodies, Bacterial - immunology
antigens
blood serum
Child
Culture
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods
epidemiology
Female
Humans
immunoglobulin G
Immunoglobulin G - blood
Immunoglobulin G - immunology
immunoglobulin M
Immunoglobulin M - blood
Immunoglobulin M - immunology
In-house ELISA
Legionella pneumophila
Legionella pneumophila - classification
Legionella pneumophila - genetics
Legionella pneumophila - immunology
Legionella pneumophila - isolation & purification
Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6
Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis
Legionnaires' Disease - immunology
Legionnaires' Disease - microbiology
Male
men
Middle Aged
patients
PCR
pneumonia
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sensitivity
serology
serotypes
Urinary antigen test
Young Adult
title Two years' performance of an in-house ELISA for diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease: Detection of specific IgM and IgG antibodies against Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, 3 and 6 in human serum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A44%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20years'%20performance%20of%20an%20in-house%20ELISA%20for%20diagnosis%20of%20Legionnaires'%20disease:%20Detection%20of%20specific%20IgM%20and%20IgG%20antibodies%20against%20Legionella%20pneumophila%20serogroup%201,%203%20and%206%20in%20human%20serum&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiological%20methods&rft.au=Elverdal,%20P.L.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=94-97&rft.issn=0167-7012&rft.eissn=1872-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1627977222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1411629881&rft_id=info:pmid/23657054&rft_els_id=S0167701213001413&rfr_iscdi=true