Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal in patients with surgically altered anatomy: case series and technical review (with videos)
Recently, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided transhepatic antegrade interventions have been introduced in patients with a surgically altered anatomy. Herein, we focused on and reviewed EUS‐guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal (EUS‐TASR) in patients with a surgically altered anatomy and n...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences 2014-12, Vol.21 (12), p.E86-E93 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | E93 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | E86 |
| container_title | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Itoi, Takao Sofuni, Atsushi Tsuchiya, Takayoshi Ijima, Masashi Iwashita, Takuji |
| description | Recently, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided transhepatic antegrade interventions have been introduced in patients with a surgically altered anatomy. Herein, we focused on and reviewed EUS‐guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal (EUS‐TASR) in patients with a surgically altered anatomy and native papilla. The basic technique of EUS‐TASR involves the following steps: (1) EUS‐guided needle puncture; (2) guidewire placement; (3) tract dilation; (4) balloon sphincteroplasty; (5) stone removal; and (6) stent placement if needed. Based on reports in the literature including our cases, the complete stone extraction rate is 71.4% (10/14) including five of our cases (60% success rate) at one session without serious complications. In conclusion, EUS‐TASR appears to be feasible and useful in selected patients although its application may be limited depending on anatomical factors and current devices used. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jhbp.165 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1627077801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3996463181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4115-d9ce88083a672dfa5b72c56a8140fcb2b97103c4f83cac6574efe558a860b14f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhyMEolWpxBMgS1zKIcV_4tjhBqvSUlWFA6hHy3EmGy9ZO7WTXfI6PCledlkkJHwZa-bzN5Z-WfaS4EuCMX276urhkpT8SXZKZCnzspL06fEuipPsPMYVTocRVjH8PDuhnDJSMX6a_bxyjY_GD9agqR-Djt75ZdBDN-fLyTbQoNR0sYNBj4nRboQ0bgDF0TtAAdZ-o3tkHdoB4MaItnbsUJzC0hrd9zPS_QghibTTo1_P75DRMb2HYCGmZtoApnM7OOk2Frbo4rdik9b7-OZF9qzVfYTzQz3Lvn28-rq4ye8-X39avL_LTUEIz5vKgJRYMl0K2rSa14IaXmpJCtyamtaVIJiZopXMaFNyUUALnEstS1yTomVn2cXeOwT_OEEc1dpGA32vHfgpKlJSgYWQmCT09T_oyk_Bpd8pIgTnpCir6q_QBB9jgFYNwa51mBXBahed2kWXvDyhrw7CqV5DcwT_BJWAfA9sbQ_zf0Xq9ubDl73wwNs4wo8jr8N3VQomuHq4v1a3tFrcLx6oouwXUgq1LA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775514699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal in patients with surgically altered anatomy: case series and technical review (with videos)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Itoi, Takao ; Sofuni, Atsushi ; Tsuchiya, Takayoshi ; Ijima, Masashi ; Iwashita, Takuji</creator><creatorcontrib>Itoi, Takao ; Sofuni, Atsushi ; Tsuchiya, Takayoshi ; Ijima, Masashi ; Iwashita, Takuji</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided transhepatic antegrade interventions have been introduced in patients with a surgically altered anatomy. Herein, we focused on and reviewed EUS‐guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal (EUS‐TASR) in patients with a surgically altered anatomy and native papilla. The basic technique of EUS‐TASR involves the following steps: (1) EUS‐guided needle puncture; (2) guidewire placement; (3) tract dilation; (4) balloon sphincteroplasty; (5) stone removal; and (6) stent placement if needed. Based on reports in the literature including our cases, the complete stone extraction rate is 71.4% (10/14) including five of our cases (60% success rate) at one session without serious complications. In conclusion, EUS‐TASR appears to be feasible and useful in selected patients although its application may be limited depending on anatomical factors and current devices used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-6974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-6982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25231935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bile duct stone ; Cholangiography ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholelithiasis - diagnostic imaging ; Cholelithiasis - surgery ; Drainage - methods ; Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation ; Endoscopic ultrasonography ; Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage ; Endoscopy ; Endosonography ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Needles ; Punctures ; Reoperation ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><ispartof>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2014-12, Vol.21 (12), p.E86-E93</ispartof><rights>2014 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery</rights><rights>2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Royal Pharmaceutical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4115-d9ce88083a672dfa5b72c56a8140fcb2b97103c4f83cac6574efe558a860b14f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4115-d9ce88083a672dfa5b72c56a8140fcb2b97103c4f83cac6574efe558a860b14f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhbp.165$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhbp.165$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25231935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Itoi, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sofuni, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuchiya, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ijima, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwashita, Takuji</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal in patients with surgically altered anatomy: case series and technical review (with videos)</title><title>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</title><addtitle>J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci</addtitle><description>Recently, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided transhepatic antegrade interventions have been introduced in patients with a surgically altered anatomy. Herein, we focused on and reviewed EUS‐guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal (EUS‐TASR) in patients with a surgically altered anatomy and native papilla. The basic technique of EUS‐TASR involves the following steps: (1) EUS‐guided needle puncture; (2) guidewire placement; (3) tract dilation; (4) balloon sphincteroplasty; (5) stone removal; and (6) stent placement if needed. Based on reports in the literature including our cases, the complete stone extraction rate is 71.4% (10/14) including five of our cases (60% success rate) at one session without serious complications. In conclusion, EUS‐TASR appears to be feasible and useful in selected patients although its application may be limited depending on anatomical factors and current devices used.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bile duct stone</subject><subject>Cholangiography</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subject><subject>Cholelithiasis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cholelithiasis - surgery</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation</subject><subject>Endoscopic ultrasonography</subject><subject>Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endosonography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Punctures</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><issn>1868-6974</issn><issn>1868-6982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhyMEolWpxBMgS1zKIcV_4tjhBqvSUlWFA6hHy3EmGy9ZO7WTXfI6PCledlkkJHwZa-bzN5Z-WfaS4EuCMX276urhkpT8SXZKZCnzspL06fEuipPsPMYVTocRVjH8PDuhnDJSMX6a_bxyjY_GD9agqR-Djt75ZdBDN-fLyTbQoNR0sYNBj4nRboQ0bgDF0TtAAdZ-o3tkHdoB4MaItnbsUJzC0hrd9zPS_QghibTTo1_P75DRMb2HYCGmZtoApnM7OOk2Frbo4rdik9b7-OZF9qzVfYTzQz3Lvn28-rq4ye8-X39avL_LTUEIz5vKgJRYMl0K2rSa14IaXmpJCtyamtaVIJiZopXMaFNyUUALnEstS1yTomVn2cXeOwT_OEEc1dpGA32vHfgpKlJSgYWQmCT09T_oyk_Bpd8pIgTnpCir6q_QBB9jgFYNwa51mBXBahed2kWXvDyhrw7CqV5DcwT_BJWAfA9sbQ_zf0Xq9ubDl73wwNs4wo8jr8N3VQomuHq4v1a3tFrcLx6oouwXUgq1LA</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Itoi, Takao</creator><creator>Sofuni, Atsushi</creator><creator>Tsuchiya, Takayoshi</creator><creator>Ijima, Masashi</creator><creator>Iwashita, Takuji</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal in patients with surgically altered anatomy: case series and technical review (with videos)</title><author>Itoi, Takao ; Sofuni, Atsushi ; Tsuchiya, Takayoshi ; Ijima, Masashi ; Iwashita, Takuji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4115-d9ce88083a672dfa5b72c56a8140fcb2b97103c4f83cac6574efe558a860b14f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bile duct stone</topic><topic>Cholangiography</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</topic><topic>Cholelithiasis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cholelithiasis - surgery</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation</topic><topic>Endoscopic ultrasonography</topic><topic>Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endosonography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Punctures</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Itoi, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sofuni, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuchiya, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ijima, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwashita, Takuji</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Itoi, Takao</au><au>Sofuni, Atsushi</au><au>Tsuchiya, Takayoshi</au><au>Ijima, Masashi</au><au>Iwashita, Takuji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal in patients with surgically altered anatomy: case series and technical review (with videos)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>E86</spage><epage>E93</epage><pages>E86-E93</pages><issn>1868-6974</issn><eissn>1868-6982</eissn><abstract>Recently, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided transhepatic antegrade interventions have been introduced in patients with a surgically altered anatomy. Herein, we focused on and reviewed EUS‐guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal (EUS‐TASR) in patients with a surgically altered anatomy and native papilla. The basic technique of EUS‐TASR involves the following steps: (1) EUS‐guided needle puncture; (2) guidewire placement; (3) tract dilation; (4) balloon sphincteroplasty; (5) stone removal; and (6) stent placement if needed. Based on reports in the literature including our cases, the complete stone extraction rate is 71.4% (10/14) including five of our cases (60% success rate) at one session without serious complications. In conclusion, EUS‐TASR appears to be feasible and useful in selected patients although its application may be limited depending on anatomical factors and current devices used.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25231935</pmid><doi>10.1002/jhbp.165</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1868-6974 |
| ispartof | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2014-12, Vol.21 (12), p.E86-E93 |
| issn | 1868-6974 1868-6982 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1627077801 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Bile duct stone Cholangiography Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholelithiasis - diagnostic imaging Cholelithiasis - surgery Drainage - methods Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation Endoscopic ultrasonography Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage Endoscopy Endosonography Female Humans Male Needles Punctures Reoperation Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic Stents Treatment Outcome Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography, Interventional |
| title | Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal in patients with surgically altered anatomy: case series and technical review (with videos) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A46%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopic%20ultrasonography-guided%20transhepatic%20antegrade%20stone%20removal%20in%20patients%20with%20surgically%20altered%20anatomy:%20case%20series%20and%20technical%20review%20(with%20videos)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hepato-biliary-pancreatic%20sciences&rft.au=Itoi,%20Takao&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=E86&rft.epage=E93&rft.pages=E86-E93&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhbp.165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3996463181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775514699&rft_id=info:pmid/25231935&rfr_iscdi=true |