Effect of feed grade L-methionine on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with conventional DL-methionine

Two experiments were conducted to test if supplementation of LMET has beneficial effects on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with DL-Met. In Exp. 1, 168 pigs in 56 pens were randomly allotted to 7 dietary treatments for 20 d, including a basal diet (BD; 55% of the NRC requi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2014-12, Vol.92 (12), p.5530-5539
Hauptverfasser: Shen, Y B, Weaver, A C, Kim, S W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5539
container_issue 12
container_start_page 5530
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 92
creator Shen, Y B
Weaver, A C
Kim, S W
description Two experiments were conducted to test if supplementation of LMET has beneficial effects on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with DL-Met. In Exp. 1, 168 pigs in 56 pens were randomly allotted to 7 dietary treatments for 20 d, including a basal diet (BD; 55% of the NRC requirement for Met), the BD+0.048% L-Met or DL-Met (70% of the NRC requirement), the BD+0.096% L-Met or DL-Met (85% of the NRC requirement), and the BD+0.144% L-Met or DL-Met (100% of the NRC requirement). Body weight and feed disappearance were recorded every 5 d for computation of growth performance. In Exp. 2, 20 individually housed nursery pigs were randomly allotted to 2 dietary treatments for 20 d: DML (0.16% Met from the BD+0.145% supplemental DL-Met) or LMET (0.16% Met from the BD+0.145% supplemental L-Met). Both diets had Met meeting 95% of the NRC requirement. Duodenum samples from all pigs were collected at the end of the trial to evaluate morphology and redox status. In Exp. 1, during the entire 20 d, pigs fed diets supplemented with L-Met tended to have greater (P=0.087) ADG and reduced (P
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas.2014-7830
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1627072801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1627072801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-9fe725cd4d7d6c9027d05c61ce474f3375c74554895a6265e732766f5f726e8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLxDAQgIMouj6OXiXgxUs177RH8Q0LXvRcYjpxu7RJTVoXT_51s74QTwMzHx8DH0KHlJwyyfTZ0qRTRqgodMnJBppRyWTBqeKbaEYIo0VZUraDdlNaEkKZrOQ22mFSUEGJnKH3K-fAjjg47AAa_BxNA3he9DAu2uBbDzj4vA2rcYEHiC7E3ngL2PgMTyNegOnyqfXYTzFBfMND-5ywDf1gYhau2ny1wb-CH7PQdPjyr30fbTnTJTj4nnvo8frq4eK2mN_f3F2czwvLKzoWlQPNpG1EoxtlK8J0Q6RV1ILQwnGupdVCSlFW0iimJGjOtFJOOs0UlMD30MmXd4jhZYI01n2bLHSd8RCmVFPFNNGsJDSjx__QZZhi_vyTqgQrK04yVXxRNoaUIrh6iG1v4ltNSb0uU-cy9bpMvS6T-aNv6_TUQ_NL_6TgH_a9iWc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629428930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of feed grade L-methionine on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with conventional DL-methionine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Shen, Y B ; Weaver, A C ; Kim, S W</creator><creatorcontrib>Shen, Y B ; Weaver, A C ; Kim, S W</creatorcontrib><description>Two experiments were conducted to test if supplementation of LMET has beneficial effects on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with DL-Met. In Exp. 1, 168 pigs in 56 pens were randomly allotted to 7 dietary treatments for 20 d, including a basal diet (BD; 55% of the NRC requirement for Met), the BD+0.048% L-Met or DL-Met (70% of the NRC requirement), the BD+0.096% L-Met or DL-Met (85% of the NRC requirement), and the BD+0.144% L-Met or DL-Met (100% of the NRC requirement). Body weight and feed disappearance were recorded every 5 d for computation of growth performance. In Exp. 2, 20 individually housed nursery pigs were randomly allotted to 2 dietary treatments for 20 d: DML (0.16% Met from the BD+0.145% supplemental DL-Met) or LMET (0.16% Met from the BD+0.145% supplemental L-Met). Both diets had Met meeting 95% of the NRC requirement. Duodenum samples from all pigs were collected at the end of the trial to evaluate morphology and redox status. In Exp. 1, during the entire 20 d, pigs fed diets supplemented with L-Met tended to have greater (P=0.087) ADG and reduced (P&lt;0.01) plasma urea nitrogen (PUN) than pigs fed diets supplemented with DL-Met. The relative bioavailability (RBA) of L-Met to DL-Met for ADG and G:F was 143.8 and 122.7%, respectively. In Exp. 2, pigs fed a diet supplemented with L-Met had duodenum tissue with greater (P&lt;0.05) concentrations of glutathione (GSH) and greater villus height and width as well as lower (P&lt;0.05) concentrations of protein carbonyl compared with pigs fed DL-Met. Overall, compared with DL-Met, the use of L-Met as a source of supplemental Met in nursery pig diets enhanced duodenum villus development in association with reduced oxidative stress and improved GSH. The beneficial effects of supplementing L-Met compared to DL-Met in gut of nursery pigs resulted in a potential enhancement of ADG and reduction of PUN.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-7830</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25414105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal sciences ; Animals ; Biological Availability ; Blood Urea Nitrogen ; Body Weight - drug effects ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Supplements ; Duodenum - anatomy &amp; histology ; Duodenum - drug effects ; Glutathione - metabolism ; Hogs ; Methionine - administration &amp; dosage ; Methionine - pharmacokinetics ; Methionine - pharmacology ; Physical growth ; Regression Analysis ; Sus scrofa - growth &amp; development ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2014-12, Vol.92 (12), p.5530-5539</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Dec 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-9fe725cd4d7d6c9027d05c61ce474f3375c74554895a6265e732766f5f726e8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-9fe725cd4d7d6c9027d05c61ce474f3375c74554895a6265e732766f5f726e8e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414105$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shen, Y B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, A C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S W</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of feed grade L-methionine on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with conventional DL-methionine</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Two experiments were conducted to test if supplementation of LMET has beneficial effects on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with DL-Met. In Exp. 1, 168 pigs in 56 pens were randomly allotted to 7 dietary treatments for 20 d, including a basal diet (BD; 55% of the NRC requirement for Met), the BD+0.048% L-Met or DL-Met (70% of the NRC requirement), the BD+0.096% L-Met or DL-Met (85% of the NRC requirement), and the BD+0.144% L-Met or DL-Met (100% of the NRC requirement). Body weight and feed disappearance were recorded every 5 d for computation of growth performance. In Exp. 2, 20 individually housed nursery pigs were randomly allotted to 2 dietary treatments for 20 d: DML (0.16% Met from the BD+0.145% supplemental DL-Met) or LMET (0.16% Met from the BD+0.145% supplemental L-Met). Both diets had Met meeting 95% of the NRC requirement. Duodenum samples from all pigs were collected at the end of the trial to evaluate morphology and redox status. In Exp. 1, during the entire 20 d, pigs fed diets supplemented with L-Met tended to have greater (P=0.087) ADG and reduced (P&lt;0.01) plasma urea nitrogen (PUN) than pigs fed diets supplemented with DL-Met. The relative bioavailability (RBA) of L-Met to DL-Met for ADG and G:F was 143.8 and 122.7%, respectively. In Exp. 2, pigs fed a diet supplemented with L-Met had duodenum tissue with greater (P&lt;0.05) concentrations of glutathione (GSH) and greater villus height and width as well as lower (P&lt;0.05) concentrations of protein carbonyl compared with pigs fed DL-Met. Overall, compared with DL-Met, the use of L-Met as a source of supplemental Met in nursery pig diets enhanced duodenum villus development in association with reduced oxidative stress and improved GSH. The beneficial effects of supplementing L-Met compared to DL-Met in gut of nursery pigs resulted in a potential enhancement of ADG and reduction of PUN.</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Blood Urea Nitrogen</subject><subject>Body Weight - drug effects</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Duodenum - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Duodenum - drug effects</subject><subject>Glutathione - metabolism</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Methionine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Methionine - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Methionine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Sus scrofa - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLxDAQgIMouj6OXiXgxUs177RH8Q0LXvRcYjpxu7RJTVoXT_51s74QTwMzHx8DH0KHlJwyyfTZ0qRTRqgodMnJBppRyWTBqeKbaEYIo0VZUraDdlNaEkKZrOQ22mFSUEGJnKH3K-fAjjg47AAa_BxNA3he9DAu2uBbDzj4vA2rcYEHiC7E3ngL2PgMTyNegOnyqfXYTzFBfMND-5ywDf1gYhau2ny1wb-CH7PQdPjyr30fbTnTJTj4nnvo8frq4eK2mN_f3F2czwvLKzoWlQPNpG1EoxtlK8J0Q6RV1ILQwnGupdVCSlFW0iimJGjOtFJOOs0UlMD30MmXd4jhZYI01n2bLHSd8RCmVFPFNNGsJDSjx__QZZhi_vyTqgQrK04yVXxRNoaUIrh6iG1v4ltNSb0uU-cy9bpMvS6T-aNv6_TUQ_NL_6TgH_a9iWc</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Shen, Y B</creator><creator>Weaver, A C</creator><creator>Kim, S W</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Effect of feed grade L-methionine on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with conventional DL-methionine</title><author>Shen, Y B ; Weaver, A C ; Kim, S W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-9fe725cd4d7d6c9027d05c61ce474f3375c74554895a6265e732766f5f726e8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Blood Urea Nitrogen</topic><topic>Body Weight - drug effects</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Duodenum - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Duodenum - drug effects</topic><topic>Glutathione - metabolism</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Methionine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Methionine - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Methionine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Sus scrofa - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shen, Y B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, A C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shen, Y B</au><au>Weaver, A C</au><au>Kim, S W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of feed grade L-methionine on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with conventional DL-methionine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5530</spage><epage>5539</epage><pages>5530-5539</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Two experiments were conducted to test if supplementation of LMET has beneficial effects on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with DL-Met. In Exp. 1, 168 pigs in 56 pens were randomly allotted to 7 dietary treatments for 20 d, including a basal diet (BD; 55% of the NRC requirement for Met), the BD+0.048% L-Met or DL-Met (70% of the NRC requirement), the BD+0.096% L-Met or DL-Met (85% of the NRC requirement), and the BD+0.144% L-Met or DL-Met (100% of the NRC requirement). Body weight and feed disappearance were recorded every 5 d for computation of growth performance. In Exp. 2, 20 individually housed nursery pigs were randomly allotted to 2 dietary treatments for 20 d: DML (0.16% Met from the BD+0.145% supplemental DL-Met) or LMET (0.16% Met from the BD+0.145% supplemental L-Met). Both diets had Met meeting 95% of the NRC requirement. Duodenum samples from all pigs were collected at the end of the trial to evaluate morphology and redox status. In Exp. 1, during the entire 20 d, pigs fed diets supplemented with L-Met tended to have greater (P=0.087) ADG and reduced (P&lt;0.01) plasma urea nitrogen (PUN) than pigs fed diets supplemented with DL-Met. The relative bioavailability (RBA) of L-Met to DL-Met for ADG and G:F was 143.8 and 122.7%, respectively. In Exp. 2, pigs fed a diet supplemented with L-Met had duodenum tissue with greater (P&lt;0.05) concentrations of glutathione (GSH) and greater villus height and width as well as lower (P&lt;0.05) concentrations of protein carbonyl compared with pigs fed DL-Met. Overall, compared with DL-Met, the use of L-Met as a source of supplemental Met in nursery pig diets enhanced duodenum villus development in association with reduced oxidative stress and improved GSH. The beneficial effects of supplementing L-Met compared to DL-Met in gut of nursery pigs resulted in a potential enhancement of ADG and reduction of PUN.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>25414105</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2014-7830</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2014-12, Vol.92 (12), p.5530-5539
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1627072801
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Amino acids
Animal Feed - analysis
Animal sciences
Animals
Biological Availability
Blood Urea Nitrogen
Body Weight - drug effects
Diet - veterinary
Dietary Supplements
Duodenum - anatomy & histology
Duodenum - drug effects
Glutathione - metabolism
Hogs
Methionine - administration & dosage
Methionine - pharmacokinetics
Methionine - pharmacology
Physical growth
Regression Analysis
Sus scrofa - growth & development
Swine
title Effect of feed grade L-methionine on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with conventional DL-methionine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T00%3A30%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20feed%20grade%20L-methionine%20on%20growth%20performance%20and%20gut%20health%20in%20nursery%20pigs%20compared%20with%20conventional%20DL-methionine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Shen,%20Y%20B&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5530&rft.epage=5539&rft.pages=5530-5539&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2014-7830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1627072801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629428930&rft_id=info:pmid/25414105&rfr_iscdi=true