Contrast and reinforcement in consumption

In three experiments negative contrast in consummatory responding was measured, as well as the preference for the flavor associated with the lesser reinforcer. In all experiments one flavor of saccharin was given on days that chocolate milk occurred and another flavor was given on days with no choco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Learning and motivation 1992-02, Vol.23 (1), p.63-79
Hauptverfasser: Capaldi, Elizabeth D., Sheffer, Joan D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 79
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Learning and motivation
container_volume 23
creator Capaldi, Elizabeth D.
Sheffer, Joan D.
description In three experiments negative contrast in consummatory responding was measured, as well as the preference for the flavor associated with the lesser reinforcer. In all experiments one flavor of saccharin was given on days that chocolate milk occurred and another flavor was given on days with no chocolate milk. For some groups the saccharin preceded chocolate milk, for others the order of chocolate milk and saccharin was random, and for others the saccharin followed the chocolate milk. In all experiments rats suppressed consumption of the lesser reinforcer during training (negative contrast) but preferred the flavor of saccharin that had accompanied chocolate milk to the flavor of saccharin that occurred alone. This suggests that contrast is not a reflection of reduced reward value of the lesser reinforcer. Instead some negative reaction to receiving the lesser reinforcer during training must suppress consumption.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0023-9690(92)90023-F
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16269147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>002396909290023F</els_id><sourcerecordid>3107878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-cef6cbc797436298efa9e369450c95f0ed18de9fd44a1c27f86857638fe520313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKtv4GEREXtYzSSb7OYiSLEqFLzoOcTsBFLapCZbwbd3ty09ePA0DHz_P8NHyCXQO6Ag7yllvFRS0VvFJmq7zY7ICKgSpQLGjsnogJySs5wXlAKIRo3IZBpDl0zuChPaIqEPLiaLKwxd4UNhY8ib1brzMZyTE2eWGS_2c0w-Zk_v05dy_vb8On2cl5Yr3pUWnbSftlZ1xSVTDTqjkEtVCWqVcBRbaFpUrq0qA5bVrpGNqCVvHApGOfAxudn1rlP82mDu9Mpni8ulCRg3WYNkUkFV9-DVH3ARNyn0v2kGogJeswGqdpBNMeeETq-TX5n0o4HqQZ4ezOjBjFZMb-XpWR-73nebbM3SJROsz4es6O8LGNofdhj2Qr49Jp2tx2Cx9Qltp9vo_7_zC0_UgPc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215413727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrast and reinforcement in consumption</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Capaldi, Elizabeth D. ; Sheffer, Joan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Capaldi, Elizabeth D. ; Sheffer, Joan D.</creatorcontrib><description>In three experiments negative contrast in consummatory responding was measured, as well as the preference for the flavor associated with the lesser reinforcer. In all experiments one flavor of saccharin was given on days that chocolate milk occurred and another flavor was given on days with no chocolate milk. For some groups the saccharin preceded chocolate milk, for others the order of chocolate milk and saccharin was random, and for others the saccharin followed the chocolate milk. In all experiments rats suppressed consumption of the lesser reinforcer during training (negative contrast) but preferred the flavor of saccharin that had accompanied chocolate milk to the flavor of saccharin that occurred alone. This suggests that contrast is not a reflection of reduced reward value of the lesser reinforcer. Instead some negative reaction to receiving the lesser reinforcer during training must suppress consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9122</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(92)90023-F</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LNMVAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>Learning and motivation, 1992-02, Vol.23 (1), p.63-79</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Feb 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-cef6cbc797436298efa9e369450c95f0ed18de9fd44a1c27f86857638fe520313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-cef6cbc797436298efa9e369450c95f0ed18de9fd44a1c27f86857638fe520313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(92)90023-F$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5147517$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Capaldi, Elizabeth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheffer, Joan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Contrast and reinforcement in consumption</title><title>Learning and motivation</title><description>In three experiments negative contrast in consummatory responding was measured, as well as the preference for the flavor associated with the lesser reinforcer. In all experiments one flavor of saccharin was given on days that chocolate milk occurred and another flavor was given on days with no chocolate milk. For some groups the saccharin preceded chocolate milk, for others the order of chocolate milk and saccharin was random, and for others the saccharin followed the chocolate milk. In all experiments rats suppressed consumption of the lesser reinforcer during training (negative contrast) but preferred the flavor of saccharin that had accompanied chocolate milk to the flavor of saccharin that occurred alone. This suggests that contrast is not a reflection of reduced reward value of the lesser reinforcer. Instead some negative reaction to receiving the lesser reinforcer during training must suppress consumption.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>0023-9690</issn><issn>1095-9122</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKtv4GEREXtYzSSb7OYiSLEqFLzoOcTsBFLapCZbwbd3ty09ePA0DHz_P8NHyCXQO6Ag7yllvFRS0VvFJmq7zY7ICKgSpQLGjsnogJySs5wXlAKIRo3IZBpDl0zuChPaIqEPLiaLKwxd4UNhY8ib1brzMZyTE2eWGS_2c0w-Zk_v05dy_vb8On2cl5Yr3pUWnbSftlZ1xSVTDTqjkEtVCWqVcBRbaFpUrq0qA5bVrpGNqCVvHApGOfAxudn1rlP82mDu9Mpni8ulCRg3WYNkUkFV9-DVH3ARNyn0v2kGogJeswGqdpBNMeeETq-TX5n0o4HqQZ4ezOjBjFZMb-XpWR-73nebbM3SJROsz4es6O8LGNofdhj2Qr49Jp2tx2Cx9Qltp9vo_7_zC0_UgPc</recordid><startdate>19920201</startdate><enddate>19920201</enddate><creator>Capaldi, Elizabeth D.</creator><creator>Sheffer, Joan D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920201</creationdate><title>Contrast and reinforcement in consumption</title><author>Capaldi, Elizabeth D. ; Sheffer, Joan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-cef6cbc797436298efa9e369450c95f0ed18de9fd44a1c27f86857638fe520313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Capaldi, Elizabeth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheffer, Joan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Learning and motivation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Capaldi, Elizabeth D.</au><au>Sheffer, Joan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrast and reinforcement in consumption</atitle><jtitle>Learning and motivation</jtitle><date>1992-02-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>63-79</pages><issn>0023-9690</issn><eissn>1095-9122</eissn><coden>LNMVAV</coden><abstract>In three experiments negative contrast in consummatory responding was measured, as well as the preference for the flavor associated with the lesser reinforcer. In all experiments one flavor of saccharin was given on days that chocolate milk occurred and another flavor was given on days with no chocolate milk. For some groups the saccharin preceded chocolate milk, for others the order of chocolate milk and saccharin was random, and for others the saccharin followed the chocolate milk. In all experiments rats suppressed consumption of the lesser reinforcer during training (negative contrast) but preferred the flavor of saccharin that had accompanied chocolate milk to the flavor of saccharin that occurred alone. This suggests that contrast is not a reflection of reduced reward value of the lesser reinforcer. Instead some negative reaction to receiving the lesser reinforcer during training must suppress consumption.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0023-9690(92)90023-F</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-9690
ispartof Learning and motivation, 1992-02, Vol.23 (1), p.63-79
issn 0023-9690
1095-9122
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16269147
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
title Contrast and reinforcement in consumption
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A40%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrast%20and%20reinforcement%20in%20consumption&rft.jtitle=Learning%20and%20motivation&rft.au=Capaldi,%20Elizabeth%20D.&rft.date=1992-02-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=63-79&rft.issn=0023-9690&rft.eissn=1095-9122&rft.coden=LNMVAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0023-9690(92)90023-F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3107878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215413727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=002396909290023F&rfr_iscdi=true