Use of Road Verges by Butterfly and Burnet Populations, and the Effect of Roads on Adult Dispersal and Mortality

1. Transects made beside 12 main roads in Dorset and Hampshire (UK) showed that verges and central reservations supported a wide variety of butterflies and burnets (Zygaenidae). One site had 23 species of butterfly (=40% of British species), while the average was nine (16%) species per 100-m transec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 1992-01, Vol.29 (2), p.316-329
Hauptverfasser: Munguira, M. L., Thomas, J. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 329
container_issue 2
container_start_page 316
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 29
creator Munguira, M. L.
Thomas, J. A.
description 1. Transects made beside 12 main roads in Dorset and Hampshire (UK) showed that verges and central reservations supported a wide variety of butterflies and burnets (Zygaenidae). One site had 23 species of butterfly (=40% of British species), while the average was nine (16%) species per 100-m transect. Most were common species, but some rarities were present. 2. Mark-recapture estimates of adult densities on verges were up to 2774 adults ha-1for Maniola jurtina. Populations of Melanargia galathea, Pieris rapae and Polyommatus icarus were large or medium-sized for these species. 3. Variation in the number of species, density and diversity of butterflies and burnets depended on the range of breeding habitats on verges. The density of adults and number of species were correlated with verge width, while diversity was correlated with the abundance of nectar. The amount of traffic had no apparent effect on populations on verges. 4. Road verges could be substantially improved for butterflies and burnets by reducing the depth of top soil and amount of fertilizer applied, by planting with native seed mixes and shrubs, by creating an irregular topography and surrounding them with hedges, and by making verges and central reservations as wide as possible. 5. Wide busy roads were no barrier to the movements of species living in open populations, but slightly impeded those with closed populations. Mark-recapture showed that 10-30% of adults of three species with closed populations crossed the road. Roads cannot be considered as a barrier to gene flow in any species in this study. 6. Vehicles killed 0.6-1.9% of adults of species from closed populations, and about 7% of those from open populations. These mortalities were insignificant compared to those caused by natural factors.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2404501
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16267026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2404501</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2404501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-4a7a975626289f9d3d53cf61632e2ca85297092043c74144c06726ca2a7d3cd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUgOEgCo4XfIWAohuruTVpljpeQVFE3ZaYJtohNjUnXczbW3VUEFyFEz5-koPQFiUHjBN1yAQRJaFLaEK5LAsmpVhGE0IYLSpN6CpaA5gRQnTJ-QT1D-Bw9PgumgY_uvTsAD_N8fGQs0s-zLHpmnFKncv4NvZDMLmNHex_3ucXh0-9dzZ_JwDHDh81Q8j4pIXeJTDhk17HlE1o83wDrXgTwG0uznX0cHZ6P70orm7OL6dHV4XlguRCGGW0KiWTrNJeN7wpufWSSs4cs6YqmVZEMyK4VYIKYYlUTFrDjGq4bTRfR7tf3T7Ft8FBrl9bsC4E07k4QE3HtCJMjnD7D5zF8b_j22rKKZUlU1qMau9L2RQBkvN1n9pXk-Y1JfXH3uvF3ke5s-gZsCb4ZDrbwg8vha4qKn_ZDHJM_9beAejBies</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311652794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Road Verges by Butterfly and Burnet Populations, and the Effect of Roads on Adult Dispersal and Mortality</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Munguira, M. L. ; Thomas, J. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Munguira, M. L. ; Thomas, J. A.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Transects made beside 12 main roads in Dorset and Hampshire (UK) showed that verges and central reservations supported a wide variety of butterflies and burnets (Zygaenidae). One site had 23 species of butterfly (=40% of British species), while the average was nine (16%) species per 100-m transect. Most were common species, but some rarities were present. 2. Mark-recapture estimates of adult densities on verges were up to 2774 adults ha-1for Maniola jurtina. Populations of Melanargia galathea, Pieris rapae and Polyommatus icarus were large or medium-sized for these species. 3. Variation in the number of species, density and diversity of butterflies and burnets depended on the range of breeding habitats on verges. The density of adults and number of species were correlated with verge width, while diversity was correlated with the abundance of nectar. The amount of traffic had no apparent effect on populations on verges. 4. Road verges could be substantially improved for butterflies and burnets by reducing the depth of top soil and amount of fertilizer applied, by planting with native seed mixes and shrubs, by creating an irregular topography and surrounding them with hedges, and by making verges and central reservations as wide as possible. 5. Wide busy roads were no barrier to the movements of species living in open populations, but slightly impeded those with closed populations. Mark-recapture showed that 10-30% of adults of three species with closed populations crossed the road. Roads cannot be considered as a barrier to gene flow in any species in this study. 6. Vehicles killed 0.6-1.9% of adults of species from closed populations, and about 7% of those from open populations. These mortalities were insignificant compared to those caused by natural factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2404501</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Science Publications</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding sites ; Butterflies ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat conservation ; Heathlands ; Insect ecology ; Invertebrates ; Larvae ; Lepidoptera ; Rhopalocera ; Roads ; Roadside ; Species diversity ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Zygaenidae</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 1992-01, Vol.29 (2), p.316-329</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1992 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-4a7a975626289f9d3d53cf61632e2ca85297092043c74144c06726ca2a7d3cd93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2404501$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2404501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5498816$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munguira, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Road Verges by Butterfly and Burnet Populations, and the Effect of Roads on Adult Dispersal and Mortality</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Transects made beside 12 main roads in Dorset and Hampshire (UK) showed that verges and central reservations supported a wide variety of butterflies and burnets (Zygaenidae). One site had 23 species of butterfly (=40% of British species), while the average was nine (16%) species per 100-m transect. Most were common species, but some rarities were present. 2. Mark-recapture estimates of adult densities on verges were up to 2774 adults ha-1for Maniola jurtina. Populations of Melanargia galathea, Pieris rapae and Polyommatus icarus were large or medium-sized for these species. 3. Variation in the number of species, density and diversity of butterflies and burnets depended on the range of breeding habitats on verges. The density of adults and number of species were correlated with verge width, while diversity was correlated with the abundance of nectar. The amount of traffic had no apparent effect on populations on verges. 4. Road verges could be substantially improved for butterflies and burnets by reducing the depth of top soil and amount of fertilizer applied, by planting with native seed mixes and shrubs, by creating an irregular topography and surrounding them with hedges, and by making verges and central reservations as wide as possible. 5. Wide busy roads were no barrier to the movements of species living in open populations, but slightly impeded those with closed populations. Mark-recapture showed that 10-30% of adults of three species with closed populations crossed the road. Roads cannot be considered as a barrier to gene flow in any species in this study. 6. Vehicles killed 0.6-1.9% of adults of species from closed populations, and about 7% of those from open populations. These mortalities were insignificant compared to those caused by natural factors.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Heathlands</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Rhopalocera</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Roadside</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Zygaenidae</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUgOEgCo4XfIWAohuruTVpljpeQVFE3ZaYJtohNjUnXczbW3VUEFyFEz5-koPQFiUHjBN1yAQRJaFLaEK5LAsmpVhGE0IYLSpN6CpaA5gRQnTJ-QT1D-Bw9PgumgY_uvTsAD_N8fGQs0s-zLHpmnFKncv4NvZDMLmNHex_3ucXh0-9dzZ_JwDHDh81Q8j4pIXeJTDhk17HlE1o83wDrXgTwG0uznX0cHZ6P70orm7OL6dHV4XlguRCGGW0KiWTrNJeN7wpufWSSs4cs6YqmVZEMyK4VYIKYYlUTFrDjGq4bTRfR7tf3T7Ft8FBrl9bsC4E07k4QE3HtCJMjnD7D5zF8b_j22rKKZUlU1qMau9L2RQBkvN1n9pXk-Y1JfXH3uvF3ke5s-gZsCb4ZDrbwg8vha4qKn_ZDHJM_9beAejBies</recordid><startdate>19920101</startdate><enddate>19920101</enddate><creator>Munguira, M. L.</creator><creator>Thomas, J. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Publications</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920101</creationdate><title>Use of Road Verges by Butterfly and Burnet Populations, and the Effect of Roads on Adult Dispersal and Mortality</title><author>Munguira, M. L. ; Thomas, J. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-4a7a975626289f9d3d53cf61632e2ca85297092043c74144c06726ca2a7d3cd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Heathlands</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Rhopalocera</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Roadside</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Zygaenidae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munguira, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munguira, M. L.</au><au>Thomas, J. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Road Verges by Butterfly and Burnet Populations, and the Effect of Roads on Adult Dispersal and Mortality</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>1992-01-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>316-329</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Transects made beside 12 main roads in Dorset and Hampshire (UK) showed that verges and central reservations supported a wide variety of butterflies and burnets (Zygaenidae). One site had 23 species of butterfly (=40% of British species), while the average was nine (16%) species per 100-m transect. Most were common species, but some rarities were present. 2. Mark-recapture estimates of adult densities on verges were up to 2774 adults ha-1for Maniola jurtina. Populations of Melanargia galathea, Pieris rapae and Polyommatus icarus were large or medium-sized for these species. 3. Variation in the number of species, density and diversity of butterflies and burnets depended on the range of breeding habitats on verges. The density of adults and number of species were correlated with verge width, while diversity was correlated with the abundance of nectar. The amount of traffic had no apparent effect on populations on verges. 4. Road verges could be substantially improved for butterflies and burnets by reducing the depth of top soil and amount of fertilizer applied, by planting with native seed mixes and shrubs, by creating an irregular topography and surrounding them with hedges, and by making verges and central reservations as wide as possible. 5. Wide busy roads were no barrier to the movements of species living in open populations, but slightly impeded those with closed populations. Mark-recapture showed that 10-30% of adults of three species with closed populations crossed the road. Roads cannot be considered as a barrier to gene flow in any species in this study. 6. Vehicles killed 0.6-1.9% of adults of species from closed populations, and about 7% of those from open populations. These mortalities were insignificant compared to those caused by natural factors.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Publications</pub><doi>10.2307/2404501</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 1992-01, Vol.29 (2), p.316-329
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16267026
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Breeding sites
Butterflies
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat conservation
Heathlands
Insect ecology
Invertebrates
Larvae
Lepidoptera
Rhopalocera
Roads
Roadside
Species diversity
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Zygaenidae
title Use of Road Verges by Butterfly and Burnet Populations, and the Effect of Roads on Adult Dispersal and Mortality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A18%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Road%20Verges%20by%20Butterfly%20and%20Burnet%20Populations,%20and%20the%20Effect%20of%20Roads%20on%20Adult%20Dispersal%20and%20Mortality&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Munguira,%20M.%20L.&rft.date=1992-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=316-329&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2404501&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2404501%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311652794&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2404501&rfr_iscdi=true