The Australian experience with the Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies

Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the initial investigation of choice for thyroid nodules. The Bethesda system, which classifies thyroid FNABs into different categories each linked to a risk of malignancy has been widely adopted. However, the risk of malignancy implied by each Bethesda categor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pathology 2014-12, Vol.46 (7), p.592-595
Hauptverfasser: Sarkis, L.M., Norlen, O., Aniss, A., Watson, N., Delbridge, L.W., Sidhu, S.B., Sywak, M.S., Gill, A.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 595
container_issue 7
container_start_page 592
container_title Pathology
container_volume 46
creator Sarkis, L.M.
Norlen, O.
Aniss, A.
Watson, N.
Delbridge, L.W.
Sidhu, S.B.
Sywak, M.S.
Gill, A.J.
description Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the initial investigation of choice for thyroid nodules. The Bethesda system, which classifies thyroid FNABs into different categories each linked to a risk of malignancy has been widely adopted. However, the risk of malignancy implied by each Bethesda category is likely to vary due to population characteristics and inconsistency in the application of diagnostic criteria. We present our experience of the Bethesda system in 2076 thyroid nodules from 1410 patients. Categories were as follows: 266 (12.8%) were category 1 (B1) non-diagnostic, 1551 (74.7%) category 2 (B2) benign, 97 (4.7%) category 3 (B3) atypia of uncertain significance, 98 (4.7%) category 4 (B4) suspicious for follicular neoplasm, 16 (0.8%) category 5 (B5) suspicious for malignancy and 48 (2.3%) category 6 (B6) malignant. Surgery was performed on 425 nodules from 315 patients. Malignancy rates in the target nodules were B1 4.2%, B2 0.26%, B3 9.3%, B4 15.3%, B5 79% and B6 100%. Twelve patients with B3 nodules underwent repeat FNAB, with eight reclassified as B2, one as B3, one as B1 and two as B4. An incidental microcarcinoma separate to the target nodule was identified in 11.1%. As applied in our institution, and despite very sparing use of B3 and B5 categories, our audit has demonstrated risks of malignancy broadly in keeping with that predicted. Of note, the risk of malignancy in the clinically indeterminate categories of B1, B3 and B4 were all at the lower ranges of those predicted in the Bethesda atlas and mostly lower than those reported by other studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000168
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1625342139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0031302516305098</els_id><sourcerecordid>1625342139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5bada9bfb145850790262990cff36920e17c39ee0c69a16bb760ab6841a374023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAMgCMEYmPwDxDKkUshjzZtLkgD8ZKQ4DDOUZq6WlBfxB2wf09ggBAHfLAP_mzLHyGHnJ1wpvPTh_nihP0OrootMuWpyhKpJd8mU8YkTyQT2YTsIT5FJi2KYpdMRBYJkRZT0i6WQOcrHINtvO0ovA0QPHQO6Ksfl3SM7XOIGStLXWMRfe2dHX3fUVzjCC2t-xCxdeh9RWvfAe0AqgaoxcGHDVn6fkAPuE92atsgHHzVGXm8ulxc3CR399e3F_O7xEklxiQrbWV1WZc8zYqM5ZoJJbRmrq6l0oIBz53UAMwpbbkqy1wxW6oi5VbmKRNyRo43e4fQP68AR9N6dNA0toN-hYaraCAVPFqYkXSDutAjBqjNEHxrw9pwZj5Emyja_BUdx46-LqzKFqqfoW-zETjbABD_fPEQDLpPr5UP4EZT9f7_C-8N841d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1625342139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Australian experience with the Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sarkis, L.M. ; Norlen, O. ; Aniss, A. ; Watson, N. ; Delbridge, L.W. ; Sidhu, S.B. ; Sywak, M.S. ; Gill, A.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarkis, L.M. ; Norlen, O. ; Aniss, A. ; Watson, N. ; Delbridge, L.W. ; Sidhu, S.B. ; Sywak, M.S. ; Gill, A.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the initial investigation of choice for thyroid nodules. The Bethesda system, which classifies thyroid FNABs into different categories each linked to a risk of malignancy has been widely adopted. However, the risk of malignancy implied by each Bethesda category is likely to vary due to population characteristics and inconsistency in the application of diagnostic criteria. We present our experience of the Bethesda system in 2076 thyroid nodules from 1410 patients. Categories were as follows: 266 (12.8%) were category 1 (B1) non-diagnostic, 1551 (74.7%) category 2 (B2) benign, 97 (4.7%) category 3 (B3) atypia of uncertain significance, 98 (4.7%) category 4 (B4) suspicious for follicular neoplasm, 16 (0.8%) category 5 (B5) suspicious for malignancy and 48 (2.3%) category 6 (B6) malignant. Surgery was performed on 425 nodules from 315 patients. Malignancy rates in the target nodules were B1 4.2%, B2 0.26%, B3 9.3%, B4 15.3%, B5 79% and B6 100%. Twelve patients with B3 nodules underwent repeat FNAB, with eight reclassified as B2, one as B3, one as B1 and two as B4. An incidental microcarcinoma separate to the target nodule was identified in 11.1%. As applied in our institution, and despite very sparing use of B3 and B5 categories, our audit has demonstrated risks of malignancy broadly in keeping with that predicted. Of note, the risk of malignancy in the clinically indeterminate categories of B1, B3 and B4 were all at the lower ranges of those predicted in the Bethesda atlas and mostly lower than those reported by other studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-3025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3931</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000168</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25393248</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Australia ; Bethesda ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; fine needle aspiration biopsy ; FNAB ; Humans ; Male ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk ; thyroid ; Thyroid Neoplasms - classification ; Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Pathology, 2014-12, Vol.46 (7), p.592-595</ispartof><rights>2014 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5bada9bfb145850790262990cff36920e17c39ee0c69a16bb760ab6841a374023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5bada9bfb145850790262990cff36920e17c39ee0c69a16bb760ab6841a374023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarkis, L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norlen, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aniss, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delbridge, L.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, S.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sywak, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, A.J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Australian experience with the Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies</title><title>Pathology</title><addtitle>Pathology</addtitle><description>Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the initial investigation of choice for thyroid nodules. The Bethesda system, which classifies thyroid FNABs into different categories each linked to a risk of malignancy has been widely adopted. However, the risk of malignancy implied by each Bethesda category is likely to vary due to population characteristics and inconsistency in the application of diagnostic criteria. We present our experience of the Bethesda system in 2076 thyroid nodules from 1410 patients. Categories were as follows: 266 (12.8%) were category 1 (B1) non-diagnostic, 1551 (74.7%) category 2 (B2) benign, 97 (4.7%) category 3 (B3) atypia of uncertain significance, 98 (4.7%) category 4 (B4) suspicious for follicular neoplasm, 16 (0.8%) category 5 (B5) suspicious for malignancy and 48 (2.3%) category 6 (B6) malignant. Surgery was performed on 425 nodules from 315 patients. Malignancy rates in the target nodules were B1 4.2%, B2 0.26%, B3 9.3%, B4 15.3%, B5 79% and B6 100%. Twelve patients with B3 nodules underwent repeat FNAB, with eight reclassified as B2, one as B3, one as B1 and two as B4. An incidental microcarcinoma separate to the target nodule was identified in 11.1%. As applied in our institution, and despite very sparing use of B3 and B5 categories, our audit has demonstrated risks of malignancy broadly in keeping with that predicted. Of note, the risk of malignancy in the clinically indeterminate categories of B1, B3 and B4 were all at the lower ranges of those predicted in the Bethesda atlas and mostly lower than those reported by other studies.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Bethesda</subject><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle</subject><subject>fine needle aspiration biopsy</subject><subject>FNAB</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>thyroid</subject><subject>Thyroid Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>0031-3025</issn><issn>1465-3931</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAMgCMEYmPwDxDKkUshjzZtLkgD8ZKQ4DDOUZq6WlBfxB2wf09ggBAHfLAP_mzLHyGHnJ1wpvPTh_nihP0OrootMuWpyhKpJd8mU8YkTyQT2YTsIT5FJi2KYpdMRBYJkRZT0i6WQOcrHINtvO0ovA0QPHQO6Ksfl3SM7XOIGStLXWMRfe2dHX3fUVzjCC2t-xCxdeh9RWvfAe0AqgaoxcGHDVn6fkAPuE92atsgHHzVGXm8ulxc3CR399e3F_O7xEklxiQrbWV1WZc8zYqM5ZoJJbRmrq6l0oIBz53UAMwpbbkqy1wxW6oi5VbmKRNyRo43e4fQP68AR9N6dNA0toN-hYaraCAVPFqYkXSDutAjBqjNEHxrw9pwZj5Emyja_BUdx46-LqzKFqqfoW-zETjbABD_fPEQDLpPr5UP4EZT9f7_C-8N841d</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Sarkis, L.M.</creator><creator>Norlen, O.</creator><creator>Aniss, A.</creator><creator>Watson, N.</creator><creator>Delbridge, L.W.</creator><creator>Sidhu, S.B.</creator><creator>Sywak, M.S.</creator><creator>Gill, A.J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>The Australian experience with the Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies</title><author>Sarkis, L.M. ; Norlen, O. ; Aniss, A. ; Watson, N. ; Delbridge, L.W. ; Sidhu, S.B. ; Sywak, M.S. ; Gill, A.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5bada9bfb145850790262990cff36920e17c39ee0c69a16bb760ab6841a374023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Bethesda</topic><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle</topic><topic>fine needle aspiration biopsy</topic><topic>FNAB</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>thyroid</topic><topic>Thyroid Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarkis, L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norlen, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aniss, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delbridge, L.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, S.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sywak, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, A.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarkis, L.M.</au><au>Norlen, O.</au><au>Aniss, A.</au><au>Watson, N.</au><au>Delbridge, L.W.</au><au>Sidhu, S.B.</au><au>Sywak, M.S.</au><au>Gill, A.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Australian experience with the Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies</atitle><jtitle>Pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Pathology</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>595</epage><pages>592-595</pages><issn>0031-3025</issn><eissn>1465-3931</eissn><abstract>Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the initial investigation of choice for thyroid nodules. The Bethesda system, which classifies thyroid FNABs into different categories each linked to a risk of malignancy has been widely adopted. However, the risk of malignancy implied by each Bethesda category is likely to vary due to population characteristics and inconsistency in the application of diagnostic criteria. We present our experience of the Bethesda system in 2076 thyroid nodules from 1410 patients. Categories were as follows: 266 (12.8%) were category 1 (B1) non-diagnostic, 1551 (74.7%) category 2 (B2) benign, 97 (4.7%) category 3 (B3) atypia of uncertain significance, 98 (4.7%) category 4 (B4) suspicious for follicular neoplasm, 16 (0.8%) category 5 (B5) suspicious for malignancy and 48 (2.3%) category 6 (B6) malignant. Surgery was performed on 425 nodules from 315 patients. Malignancy rates in the target nodules were B1 4.2%, B2 0.26%, B3 9.3%, B4 15.3%, B5 79% and B6 100%. Twelve patients with B3 nodules underwent repeat FNAB, with eight reclassified as B2, one as B3, one as B1 and two as B4. An incidental microcarcinoma separate to the target nodule was identified in 11.1%. As applied in our institution, and despite very sparing use of B3 and B5 categories, our audit has demonstrated risks of malignancy broadly in keeping with that predicted. Of note, the risk of malignancy in the clinically indeterminate categories of B1, B3 and B4 were all at the lower ranges of those predicted in the Bethesda atlas and mostly lower than those reported by other studies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25393248</pmid><doi>10.1097/PAT.0000000000000168</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-3025
ispartof Pathology, 2014-12, Vol.46 (7), p.592-595
issn 0031-3025
1465-3931
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1625342139
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Aged
Australia
Bethesda
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
fine needle aspiration biopsy
FNAB
Humans
Male
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk
thyroid
Thyroid Neoplasms - classification
Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology
title The Australian experience with the Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T20%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Australian%20experience%20with%20the%20Bethesda%20classification%20system%20for%20thyroid%20fine%20needle%20aspiration%20biopsies&rft.jtitle=Pathology&rft.au=Sarkis,%20L.M.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=595&rft.pages=592-595&rft.issn=0031-3025&rft.eissn=1465-3931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PAT.0000000000000168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1625342139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1625342139&rft_id=info:pmid/25393248&rft_els_id=S0031302516305098&rfr_iscdi=true