Traumatic penile injuries: Mechanisms and problems of treatment in a tertiary institution in Nigeria

Penile injuries are uncommon. The more severe injuries are often difficult to manage. We report our experience with penile injuries from different causes and treatment options available. We analyzed retrospectively 23 cases of penile injuries presenting to the Urology Unit of a tertiary hospital in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nigerian journal of clinical practice 2014-11, Vol.17 (6), p.763-766
Hauptverfasser: Oranusi, C K, Nwofor, Ame
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 766
container_issue 6
container_start_page 763
container_title Nigerian journal of clinical practice
container_volume 17
creator Oranusi, C K
Nwofor, Ame
description Penile injuries are uncommon. The more severe injuries are often difficult to manage. We report our experience with penile injuries from different causes and treatment options available. We analyzed retrospectively 23 cases of penile injuries presenting to the Urology Unit of a tertiary hospital in the Southeastern part of Nigeria from January 2007 to December 2012. The management for each patient varied depending on the nature and extent of the injury. The mean age of the patients was 28.9 ± 14.4 years (range 3 weeks to 43 years). The mean duration before presentation was 22.7 ± 17.8 h (range 1-168 h). The causes of penile injuries were categorized as follows: Postcircumcision 3 (13.0%), genital mutilation (self-inflicted injury/attacks by assailants) 6 (26.1%), accident 4 (17.4%), penile fracture 8 (34.8%), and gunshot injury 2 (8.6%). Isolated blunt injuries to the corporal tissues as occurs in penile fractures was managed successfully with early exploration and closure of the tunical tear, while injuries to the penile skin was managed with dressing and secondary closure. Severe penile injuries resulting in partial or total phallic loss presented the most challenge to treatment. Traumatic penile injuries are not common. Severe penile injuries could be challenging because of the nature of the injuries, delayed presentation and unavailability of modern technological tools and experience required for the treatment of such severe injuries. Expertise in the use of flaps for a neophallus are still been developed, and penile prosthetic devices are not readily available in our setting.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/1119-3077.144392
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1624935836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A392270377</galeid><sourcerecordid>A392270377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5d0d4903d106ca2f6128c264c54c3c0808561209b6ace67ca8c690264112683d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkb1PwzAQxT2AaCnsTCgSEmJJsePEidlQxZdUYCmz5TqX1lXiFNsZ-O9xSKmohDxYd_d7lu89hC4InqYE01tCCI8pzvMpSVPKkyM03rdG6NS5DcaM04KcoFGS0SLjhI1RubCya6TXKtqC0TVE2mw6q8HdRa-g1tJo17hImjLa2nZZQyjaKvIWpG_A-IBHMvJgvZb2K1TOa9953Zp-8qZXYLU8Q8eVrB2c7-4J-nh8WMye4_n708vsfh4rynMfZyUuU45pSTBTMqkYSQqVsFRlqaIKF7jIQgvzJZMKWK5koRjHASAkYQUt6QTdDO-Gr3524LxotFNQ19JA2zlBWJJymhWUBfRqQFeyBqFN1XorVY-L-2BekmOa54Ga_kOFU0KjVWugCo4dCq7_CNYga792bf1jiDsE8QAq2zpnoRJbq5tgoSBY9HmKPjzRhyeGPIPkcrddt2yg3At-w6TfXJeaJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1624935836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Traumatic penile injuries: Mechanisms and problems of treatment in a tertiary institution in Nigeria</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><creator>Oranusi, C K ; Nwofor, Ame</creator><creatorcontrib>Oranusi, C K ; Nwofor, Ame</creatorcontrib><description>Penile injuries are uncommon. The more severe injuries are often difficult to manage. We report our experience with penile injuries from different causes and treatment options available. We analyzed retrospectively 23 cases of penile injuries presenting to the Urology Unit of a tertiary hospital in the Southeastern part of Nigeria from January 2007 to December 2012. The management for each patient varied depending on the nature and extent of the injury. The mean age of the patients was 28.9 ± 14.4 years (range 3 weeks to 43 years). The mean duration before presentation was 22.7 ± 17.8 h (range 1-168 h). The causes of penile injuries were categorized as follows: Postcircumcision 3 (13.0%), genital mutilation (self-inflicted injury/attacks by assailants) 6 (26.1%), accident 4 (17.4%), penile fracture 8 (34.8%), and gunshot injury 2 (8.6%). Isolated blunt injuries to the corporal tissues as occurs in penile fractures was managed successfully with early exploration and closure of the tunical tear, while injuries to the penile skin was managed with dressing and secondary closure. Severe penile injuries resulting in partial or total phallic loss presented the most challenge to treatment. Traumatic penile injuries are not common. Severe penile injuries could be challenging because of the nature of the injuries, delayed presentation and unavailability of modern technological tools and experience required for the treatment of such severe injuries. Expertise in the use of flaps for a neophallus are still been developed, and penile prosthetic devices are not readily available in our setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1119-3077</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.144392</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25385916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Wounds and injuries</subject><ispartof>Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 2014-11, Vol.17 (6), p.763-766</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5d0d4903d106ca2f6128c264c54c3c0808561209b6ace67ca8c690264112683d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5d0d4903d106ca2f6128c264c54c3c0808561209b6ace67ca8c690264112683d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27925,27926</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25385916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oranusi, C K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwofor, Ame</creatorcontrib><title>Traumatic penile injuries: Mechanisms and problems of treatment in a tertiary institution in Nigeria</title><title>Nigerian journal of clinical practice</title><addtitle>Niger J Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Penile injuries are uncommon. The more severe injuries are often difficult to manage. We report our experience with penile injuries from different causes and treatment options available. We analyzed retrospectively 23 cases of penile injuries presenting to the Urology Unit of a tertiary hospital in the Southeastern part of Nigeria from January 2007 to December 2012. The management for each patient varied depending on the nature and extent of the injury. The mean age of the patients was 28.9 ± 14.4 years (range 3 weeks to 43 years). The mean duration before presentation was 22.7 ± 17.8 h (range 1-168 h). The causes of penile injuries were categorized as follows: Postcircumcision 3 (13.0%), genital mutilation (self-inflicted injury/attacks by assailants) 6 (26.1%), accident 4 (17.4%), penile fracture 8 (34.8%), and gunshot injury 2 (8.6%). Isolated blunt injuries to the corporal tissues as occurs in penile fractures was managed successfully with early exploration and closure of the tunical tear, while injuries to the penile skin was managed with dressing and secondary closure. Severe penile injuries resulting in partial or total phallic loss presented the most challenge to treatment. Traumatic penile injuries are not common. Severe penile injuries could be challenging because of the nature of the injuries, delayed presentation and unavailability of modern technological tools and experience required for the treatment of such severe injuries. Expertise in the use of flaps for a neophallus are still been developed, and penile prosthetic devices are not readily available in our setting.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Wounds and injuries</subject><issn>1119-3077</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkb1PwzAQxT2AaCnsTCgSEmJJsePEidlQxZdUYCmz5TqX1lXiFNsZ-O9xSKmohDxYd_d7lu89hC4InqYE01tCCI8pzvMpSVPKkyM03rdG6NS5DcaM04KcoFGS0SLjhI1RubCya6TXKtqC0TVE2mw6q8HdRa-g1tJo17hImjLa2nZZQyjaKvIWpG_A-IBHMvJgvZb2K1TOa9953Zp-8qZXYLU8Q8eVrB2c7-4J-nh8WMye4_n708vsfh4rynMfZyUuU45pSTBTMqkYSQqVsFRlqaIKF7jIQgvzJZMKWK5koRjHASAkYQUt6QTdDO-Gr3524LxotFNQ19JA2zlBWJJymhWUBfRqQFeyBqFN1XorVY-L-2BekmOa54Ga_kOFU0KjVWugCo4dCq7_CNYga792bf1jiDsE8QAq2zpnoRJbq5tgoSBY9HmKPjzRhyeGPIPkcrddt2yg3At-w6TfXJeaJA</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Oranusi, C K</creator><creator>Nwofor, Ame</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Traumatic penile injuries: Mechanisms and problems of treatment in a tertiary institution in Nigeria</title><author>Oranusi, C K ; Nwofor, Ame</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5d0d4903d106ca2f6128c264c54c3c0808561209b6ace67ca8c690264112683d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Wounds and injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oranusi, C K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwofor, Ame</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nigerian journal of clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oranusi, C K</au><au>Nwofor, Ame</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Traumatic penile injuries: Mechanisms and problems of treatment in a tertiary institution in Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>Nigerian journal of clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Niger J Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>763</spage><epage>766</epage><pages>763-766</pages><issn>1119-3077</issn><abstract>Penile injuries are uncommon. The more severe injuries are often difficult to manage. We report our experience with penile injuries from different causes and treatment options available. We analyzed retrospectively 23 cases of penile injuries presenting to the Urology Unit of a tertiary hospital in the Southeastern part of Nigeria from January 2007 to December 2012. The management for each patient varied depending on the nature and extent of the injury. The mean age of the patients was 28.9 ± 14.4 years (range 3 weeks to 43 years). The mean duration before presentation was 22.7 ± 17.8 h (range 1-168 h). The causes of penile injuries were categorized as follows: Postcircumcision 3 (13.0%), genital mutilation (self-inflicted injury/attacks by assailants) 6 (26.1%), accident 4 (17.4%), penile fracture 8 (34.8%), and gunshot injury 2 (8.6%). Isolated blunt injuries to the corporal tissues as occurs in penile fractures was managed successfully with early exploration and closure of the tunical tear, while injuries to the penile skin was managed with dressing and secondary closure. Severe penile injuries resulting in partial or total phallic loss presented the most challenge to treatment. Traumatic penile injuries are not common. Severe penile injuries could be challenging because of the nature of the injuries, delayed presentation and unavailability of modern technological tools and experience required for the treatment of such severe injuries. Expertise in the use of flaps for a neophallus are still been developed, and penile prosthetic devices are not readily available in our setting.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>25385916</pmid><doi>10.4103/1119-3077.144392</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1119-3077
ispartof Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 2014-11, Vol.17 (6), p.763-766
issn 1119-3077
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1624935836
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; African Journals Online (Open Access)
subjects Care and treatment
Wounds and injuries
title Traumatic penile injuries: Mechanisms and problems of treatment in a tertiary institution in Nigeria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T13%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Traumatic%20penile%20injuries:%20Mechanisms%20and%20problems%20of%20treatment%20in%20a%20tertiary%20institution%20in%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Nigerian%20journal%20of%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Oranusi,%20C%20K&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=763&rft.epage=766&rft.pages=763-766&rft.issn=1119-3077&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/1119-3077.144392&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA392270377%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1624935836&rft_id=info:pmid/25385916&rft_galeid=A392270377&rfr_iscdi=true