Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga
Small-scale distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) was examined, based on catches among 300 pitfall traps, in a coniferous forest in southern Finland. The sample from the whole snow-free season comprised 2405 individuals of twenty-two species. Each of the most numerous species (Ptero...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biogeography 1992-03, Vol.19 (2), p.173-181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 181 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | Journal of biogeography |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Niemela, J Haila, Y Halme, E Pajunen, T Punttila, P |
description | Small-scale distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) was examined, based on catches among 300 pitfall traps, in a coniferous forest in southern Finland. The sample from the whole snow-free season comprised 2405 individuals of twenty-two species. Each of the most numerous species (Pterostichus oblongopunctatus (F.), Calathus micropterus (Dft.), Leistus terminatus (Hellw. in Pz.), Notiophilus biguttatus (F.) and Cychrus caraboides (L.)), was non-randomly distributed and formed aggregations within the site of c. 1.3 ha in area. Although the five species occurred in every microhabitat defined in the plot, four of them (N. biguttatus was an exception) were more abundantly found in certain microhabitat types than in the others. In addition to vegetation around the traps, the numbers of Formica ants in the traps correlated with the numbers of carabids caught, mostly negatively. The considerable variation in catches and species richness among single traps and among blocks of 16 traps tended to even out, when larger subsamples were taken from the total pool (blocks of 48 traps). The distribution patterns observed within the plot were compared to a reference data set from similar habitat in the same region. Species distributions among microhabitats were slightly different in the reference set and the predictive success was relatively poor, probably due to different scales of study in the two data sets. Variation in species distribution in the two spatial scales studied (within a habitat patch and among them) is supposedly due to different factors. Although no direct evidence is available from our study, area, we suggest that active microhabitat selection explains the small-scale distribution within the study plot, whereas dynamics of local populations, influenced by regional-scale differences in habitat composition, are the most likely explanation for the distribution patterns among habitat patches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2845503 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16230550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2845503</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2845503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4dd46ea4e1e02e409fe32c6fbd34ccff2bae5272abf1e8e4fce5a7664caa27b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb1OwzAURi0EEqUgHgEPCKaA4780I0IUkCoxlM7RjXPdukrjYjtD355UrSompm85OsP5CLnN2RMXrHjmE6kUE2dklAutMq7L8pyMmGAqY7xgl-QqxjVjrFRCjoidb6Bts2igRbrChMEvsUOXdtR1NK2Qxi0kBy1tXEzB1X1yvqPeUgMBatfQGjG1GE-474cJHZ26rnNxRRO4JVyTCwttxJvjjsli-vb9-pHNvt4_X19mmZGMp0w2jdQIEnNkHCUrLQputK0bIY2xlteAihccapvjBKU1qKDQWhoAXtRKjMnDwbsN_qfHmKqNiwbbFjr0faxyPTTa5xmTxwNogo8xoK22wW0g7KqcVfuO1bHjQN4flbCvZAN0xsUTLrWUvPyDrWPy4R_b3QGz4CtYhsG0mHOWC5YXaviLi19dt4gZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16230550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Niemela, J ; Haila, Y ; Halme, E ; Pajunen, T ; Punttila, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Niemela, J ; Haila, Y ; Halme, E ; Pajunen, T ; Punttila, P</creatorcontrib><description>Small-scale distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) was examined, based on catches among 300 pitfall traps, in a coniferous forest in southern Finland. The sample from the whole snow-free season comprised 2405 individuals of twenty-two species. Each of the most numerous species (Pterostichus oblongopunctatus (F.), Calathus micropterus (Dft.), Leistus terminatus (Hellw. in Pz.), Notiophilus biguttatus (F.) and Cychrus caraboides (L.)), was non-randomly distributed and formed aggregations within the site of c. 1.3 ha in area. Although the five species occurred in every microhabitat defined in the plot, four of them (N. biguttatus was an exception) were more abundantly found in certain microhabitat types than in the others. In addition to vegetation around the traps, the numbers of Formica ants in the traps correlated with the numbers of carabids caught, mostly negatively. The considerable variation in catches and species richness among single traps and among blocks of 16 traps tended to even out, when larger subsamples were taken from the total pool (blocks of 48 traps). The distribution patterns observed within the plot were compared to a reference data set from similar habitat in the same region. Species distributions among microhabitats were slightly different in the reference set and the predictive success was relatively poor, probably due to different scales of study in the two data sets. Variation in species distribution in the two spatial scales studied (within a habitat patch and among them) is supposedly due to different factors. Although no direct evidence is available from our study, area, we suggest that active microhabitat selection explains the small-scale distribution within the study plot, whereas dynamics of local populations, influenced by regional-scale differences in habitat composition, are the most likely explanation for the distribution patterns among habitat patches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2845503</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBIODN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications</publisher><subject>aggregation ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Ants ; Autoecology ; Beetles ; biogeography ; Biological and medical sciences ; Boreal forests ; Carabidae ; Coleoptera ; Environmental conservation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Invertebrates ; Microhabitats ; Mobile Species ; pitfall traps ; Plant litter ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; spatial distribution ; spatial variation ; Species ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biogeography, 1992-03, Vol.19 (2), p.173-181</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1992 Blackwell Scientific Publications</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4dd46ea4e1e02e409fe32c6fbd34ccff2bae5272abf1e8e4fce5a7664caa27b53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2845503$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2845503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4644293$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niemela, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haila, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halme, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pajunen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punttila, P</creatorcontrib><title>Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga</title><title>Journal of biogeography</title><description>Small-scale distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) was examined, based on catches among 300 pitfall traps, in a coniferous forest in southern Finland. The sample from the whole snow-free season comprised 2405 individuals of twenty-two species. Each of the most numerous species (Pterostichus oblongopunctatus (F.), Calathus micropterus (Dft.), Leistus terminatus (Hellw. in Pz.), Notiophilus biguttatus (F.) and Cychrus caraboides (L.)), was non-randomly distributed and formed aggregations within the site of c. 1.3 ha in area. Although the five species occurred in every microhabitat defined in the plot, four of them (N. biguttatus was an exception) were more abundantly found in certain microhabitat types than in the others. In addition to vegetation around the traps, the numbers of Formica ants in the traps correlated with the numbers of carabids caught, mostly negatively. The considerable variation in catches and species richness among single traps and among blocks of 16 traps tended to even out, when larger subsamples were taken from the total pool (blocks of 48 traps). The distribution patterns observed within the plot were compared to a reference data set from similar habitat in the same region. Species distributions among microhabitats were slightly different in the reference set and the predictive success was relatively poor, probably due to different scales of study in the two data sets. Variation in species distribution in the two spatial scales studied (within a habitat patch and among them) is supposedly due to different factors. Although no direct evidence is available from our study, area, we suggest that active microhabitat selection explains the small-scale distribution within the study plot, whereas dynamics of local populations, influenced by regional-scale differences in habitat composition, are the most likely explanation for the distribution patterns among habitat patches.</description><subject>aggregation</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>biogeography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Boreal forests</subject><subject>Carabidae</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Mobile Species</subject><subject>pitfall traps</subject><subject>Plant litter</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>spatial distribution</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0305-0270</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kb1OwzAURi0EEqUgHgEPCKaA4780I0IUkCoxlM7RjXPdukrjYjtD355UrSompm85OsP5CLnN2RMXrHjmE6kUE2dklAutMq7L8pyMmGAqY7xgl-QqxjVjrFRCjoidb6Bts2igRbrChMEvsUOXdtR1NK2Qxi0kBy1tXEzB1X1yvqPeUgMBatfQGjG1GE-474cJHZ26rnNxRRO4JVyTCwttxJvjjsli-vb9-pHNvt4_X19mmZGMp0w2jdQIEnNkHCUrLQputK0bIY2xlteAihccapvjBKU1qKDQWhoAXtRKjMnDwbsN_qfHmKqNiwbbFjr0faxyPTTa5xmTxwNogo8xoK22wW0g7KqcVfuO1bHjQN4flbCvZAN0xsUTLrWUvPyDrWPy4R_b3QGz4CtYhsG0mHOWC5YXaviLi19dt4gZ</recordid><startdate>19920301</startdate><enddate>19920301</enddate><creator>Niemela, J</creator><creator>Haila, Y</creator><creator>Halme, E</creator><creator>Pajunen, T</creator><creator>Punttila, P</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920301</creationdate><title>Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga</title><author>Niemela, J ; Haila, Y ; Halme, E ; Pajunen, T ; Punttila, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4dd46ea4e1e02e409fe32c6fbd34ccff2bae5272abf1e8e4fce5a7664caa27b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>aggregation</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>biogeography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Boreal forests</topic><topic>Carabidae</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Mobile Species</topic><topic>pitfall traps</topic><topic>Plant litter</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>spatial distribution</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niemela, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haila, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halme, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pajunen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punttila, P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niemela, J</au><au>Haila, Y</au><au>Halme, E</au><au>Pajunen, T</au><au>Punttila, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle><date>1992-03-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>173-181</pages><issn>0305-0270</issn><eissn>1365-2699</eissn><coden>JBIODN</coden><abstract>Small-scale distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) was examined, based on catches among 300 pitfall traps, in a coniferous forest in southern Finland. The sample from the whole snow-free season comprised 2405 individuals of twenty-two species. Each of the most numerous species (Pterostichus oblongopunctatus (F.), Calathus micropterus (Dft.), Leistus terminatus (Hellw. in Pz.), Notiophilus biguttatus (F.) and Cychrus caraboides (L.)), was non-randomly distributed and formed aggregations within the site of c. 1.3 ha in area. Although the five species occurred in every microhabitat defined in the plot, four of them (N. biguttatus was an exception) were more abundantly found in certain microhabitat types than in the others. In addition to vegetation around the traps, the numbers of Formica ants in the traps correlated with the numbers of carabids caught, mostly negatively. The considerable variation in catches and species richness among single traps and among blocks of 16 traps tended to even out, when larger subsamples were taken from the total pool (blocks of 48 traps). The distribution patterns observed within the plot were compared to a reference data set from similar habitat in the same region. Species distributions among microhabitats were slightly different in the reference set and the predictive success was relatively poor, probably due to different scales of study in the two data sets. Variation in species distribution in the two spatial scales studied (within a habitat patch and among them) is supposedly due to different factors. Although no direct evidence is available from our study, area, we suggest that active microhabitat selection explains the small-scale distribution within the study plot, whereas dynamics of local populations, influenced by regional-scale differences in habitat composition, are the most likely explanation for the distribution patterns among habitat patches.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publications</pub><doi>10.2307/2845503</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-0270 |
ispartof | Journal of biogeography, 1992-03, Vol.19 (2), p.173-181 |
issn | 0305-0270 1365-2699 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16230550 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | aggregation Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Ants Autoecology Beetles biogeography Biological and medical sciences Boreal forests Carabidae Coleoptera Environmental conservation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitat conservation Habitats Invertebrates Microhabitats Mobile Species pitfall traps Plant litter Protozoa. Invertebrata spatial distribution spatial variation Species Synecology |
title | Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A13%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small-scale%20heterogeneity%20in%20the%20spatial%20distribution%20of%20carabid%20beetles%20in%20the%20southern%20Finnish%20taiga&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biogeography&rft.au=Niemela,%20J&rft.date=1992-03-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=173-181&rft.issn=0305-0270&rft.eissn=1365-2699&rft.coden=JBIODN&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2845503&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2845503%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16230550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2845503&rfr_iscdi=true |