Evolution of tuff ring-dome complex: the case study of Cerro Pinto, eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt

Cerro Pinto is a Pleistocene rhyolite tuff ring-dome complex located in the eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The complex is composed of four tuff rings and four domes that were emplaced in three eruptive stages marked by changes in vent location and eruptive character. During Stage I, vent clear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of volcanology 2010-12, Vol.72 (10), p.1223-1240
Hauptverfasser: Zimmer, Brian W., Riggs, Nancy R., Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1240
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1223
container_title Bulletin of volcanology
container_volume 72
creator Zimmer, Brian W.
Riggs, Nancy R.
Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo
description Cerro Pinto is a Pleistocene rhyolite tuff ring-dome complex located in the eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The complex is composed of four tuff rings and four domes that were emplaced in three eruptive stages marked by changes in vent location and eruptive character. During Stage I, vent clearing produced a 1.5-km-diameter tuff ring that was then followed by emplacement of two domes of approximately 0.2 km 3 each. With no apparent hiatus in activity, Stage II began with the explosive formation of a tuff ring ~2 km in diameter adjacent to and north of the earlier ring. Subsequent Stage II eruptions produced two smaller tuff rings within the northern tuff ring as well as a small dome that was mostly destroyed by explosions during its growth. Stage III involved the emplacement of a 0.04 km 3 dome within the southern tuff ring. Cerro Pinto’s eruptive history includes sequences that follow simple rhyolite-dome models, in which a pyroclastic phase is followed immediately by effusive dome emplacement. Some aspects of the eruption, however, such as the explosive reactivation of the system and explosive dome destruction, are more complex. These events are commonly associated with polygenetic structures, such as stratovolcanoes or calderas, in which multiple pulses of magma initiate reactivation. A comparison of major and trace element geochemistry with nearby Pleistocene silicic centers does not show indication of any co-genetic relationship, suggesting that Cerro Pinto was produced by a small, isolated magma chamber. The compositional variation of the erupted material at Cerro Pinto is minimal, suggesting that there were not multiple pulses of magma responsible for the complex behavior of the volcano and that the volcanic system was formed in a short time period. The variety of eruptive style observed at Cerro Pinto reflects the influence of quickly exhaustible water sources on a short-lived eruption. The rising magma encountered small amounts of groundwater that initiated eruption phases. Once a critical magma:water ratio was exceeded, the eruptions became dry and sub-plinian to plinian. The primary characteristic of Cerro Pinto is the predominance of fall deposits, suggesting that the level at which rising magma encountered water was deep enough to allow substantial fragmentation after the water source was exhausted. Isolated rhyolite domes are rare and are not currently viewed as prominent volcanic hazards, but the evolution of Cerro Pinto demonstrates th
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00445-010-0391-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622613611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1622613611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-b6eeeb82586c5018f80e662772bde673420b560e2618b64ed162924e006598a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOD5-gLsgCC6M3qRNmrrTYXyAoovRbUg7t1rpNGOSivPvzTCiILi6hHzncPgIOeBwygGKswCQ55IBBwZZyZnaICOeZ4KB5uUmGYGQmukSYJvshPAGkD5VMSIvkw_XDbF1PXUNjUPTUN_2L2zm5khrN190-HlO42t62IA0xGG2XJFj9N7Rx7aP7oSiDRF9T6fe9oHd42db254-uy6dtqaX2MU9stXYLuD-990lT1eT6fiG3T1c344v7pjNgUdWKUSsdBqraglcNxpQKVEUopqhKrJcQCUVoFBcVyrHGVeiFDkCKFlqm2W75Hjdu_DufcAQzbwNNXad7dENwSQ-ZTPFeUIP_6BvbvB9Wmc0FLKQpRQJ4muo9i4Ej41Z-HZu_dJwMCvzZm3eJPNmZd6olDn6Lrahtl2TrNRt-AmKTKZcAYkTay4sVs7R_w74v_wLgIiQ4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807575952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of tuff ring-dome complex: the case study of Cerro Pinto, eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Zimmer, Brian W. ; Riggs, Nancy R. ; Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Brian W. ; Riggs, Nancy R. ; Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><description>Cerro Pinto is a Pleistocene rhyolite tuff ring-dome complex located in the eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The complex is composed of four tuff rings and four domes that were emplaced in three eruptive stages marked by changes in vent location and eruptive character. During Stage I, vent clearing produced a 1.5-km-diameter tuff ring that was then followed by emplacement of two domes of approximately 0.2 km 3 each. With no apparent hiatus in activity, Stage II began with the explosive formation of a tuff ring ~2 km in diameter adjacent to and north of the earlier ring. Subsequent Stage II eruptions produced two smaller tuff rings within the northern tuff ring as well as a small dome that was mostly destroyed by explosions during its growth. Stage III involved the emplacement of a 0.04 km 3 dome within the southern tuff ring. Cerro Pinto’s eruptive history includes sequences that follow simple rhyolite-dome models, in which a pyroclastic phase is followed immediately by effusive dome emplacement. Some aspects of the eruption, however, such as the explosive reactivation of the system and explosive dome destruction, are more complex. These events are commonly associated with polygenetic structures, such as stratovolcanoes or calderas, in which multiple pulses of magma initiate reactivation. A comparison of major and trace element geochemistry with nearby Pleistocene silicic centers does not show indication of any co-genetic relationship, suggesting that Cerro Pinto was produced by a small, isolated magma chamber. The compositional variation of the erupted material at Cerro Pinto is minimal, suggesting that there were not multiple pulses of magma responsible for the complex behavior of the volcano and that the volcanic system was formed in a short time period. The variety of eruptive style observed at Cerro Pinto reflects the influence of quickly exhaustible water sources on a short-lived eruption. The rising magma encountered small amounts of groundwater that initiated eruption phases. Once a critical magma:water ratio was exceeded, the eruptions became dry and sub-plinian to plinian. The primary characteristic of Cerro Pinto is the predominance of fall deposits, suggesting that the level at which rising magma encountered water was deep enough to allow substantial fragmentation after the water source was exhausted. Isolated rhyolite domes are rare and are not currently viewed as prominent volcanic hazards, but the evolution of Cerro Pinto demonstrates that individual domes may have complex cycles, and such complexity must be taken into account when making hazard risk assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-8900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0819</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00445-010-0391-6</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUVOEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Calderas ; Crystalline rocks ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Explosions ; Geochemistry ; Geological hazards ; Geology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Igneous and metamorphic rocks petrology, volcanic processes, magmas ; Igneous rocks ; Magma ; Mineralogy ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Petrology ; Pleistocene ; Research Article ; Risk assessment ; Sedimentology ; Trace elements ; Volcanic belts ; Volcanic eruptions ; Volcanoes ; Volcanology</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of volcanology, 2010-12, Vol.72 (10), p.1223-1240</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-b6eeeb82586c5018f80e662772bde673420b560e2618b64ed162924e006598a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-b6eeeb82586c5018f80e662772bde673420b560e2618b64ed162924e006598a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00445-010-0391-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00445-010-0391-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23500770$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggs, Nancy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of tuff ring-dome complex: the case study of Cerro Pinto, eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt</title><title>Bulletin of volcanology</title><addtitle>Bull Volcanol</addtitle><description>Cerro Pinto is a Pleistocene rhyolite tuff ring-dome complex located in the eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The complex is composed of four tuff rings and four domes that were emplaced in three eruptive stages marked by changes in vent location and eruptive character. During Stage I, vent clearing produced a 1.5-km-diameter tuff ring that was then followed by emplacement of two domes of approximately 0.2 km 3 each. With no apparent hiatus in activity, Stage II began with the explosive formation of a tuff ring ~2 km in diameter adjacent to and north of the earlier ring. Subsequent Stage II eruptions produced two smaller tuff rings within the northern tuff ring as well as a small dome that was mostly destroyed by explosions during its growth. Stage III involved the emplacement of a 0.04 km 3 dome within the southern tuff ring. Cerro Pinto’s eruptive history includes sequences that follow simple rhyolite-dome models, in which a pyroclastic phase is followed immediately by effusive dome emplacement. Some aspects of the eruption, however, such as the explosive reactivation of the system and explosive dome destruction, are more complex. These events are commonly associated with polygenetic structures, such as stratovolcanoes or calderas, in which multiple pulses of magma initiate reactivation. A comparison of major and trace element geochemistry with nearby Pleistocene silicic centers does not show indication of any co-genetic relationship, suggesting that Cerro Pinto was produced by a small, isolated magma chamber. The compositional variation of the erupted material at Cerro Pinto is minimal, suggesting that there were not multiple pulses of magma responsible for the complex behavior of the volcano and that the volcanic system was formed in a short time period. The variety of eruptive style observed at Cerro Pinto reflects the influence of quickly exhaustible water sources on a short-lived eruption. The rising magma encountered small amounts of groundwater that initiated eruption phases. Once a critical magma:water ratio was exceeded, the eruptions became dry and sub-plinian to plinian. The primary characteristic of Cerro Pinto is the predominance of fall deposits, suggesting that the level at which rising magma encountered water was deep enough to allow substantial fragmentation after the water source was exhausted. Isolated rhyolite domes are rare and are not currently viewed as prominent volcanic hazards, but the evolution of Cerro Pinto demonstrates that individual domes may have complex cycles, and such complexity must be taken into account when making hazard risk assessments.</description><subject>Calderas</subject><subject>Crystalline rocks</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Igneous and metamorphic rocks petrology, volcanic processes, magmas</subject><subject>Igneous rocks</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Petrology</subject><subject>Pleistocene</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Sedimentology</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Volcanic belts</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><subject>Volcanology</subject><issn>0258-8900</issn><issn>1432-0819</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOD5-gLsgCC6M3qRNmrrTYXyAoovRbUg7t1rpNGOSivPvzTCiILi6hHzncPgIOeBwygGKswCQ55IBBwZZyZnaICOeZ4KB5uUmGYGQmukSYJvshPAGkD5VMSIvkw_XDbF1PXUNjUPTUN_2L2zm5khrN190-HlO42t62IA0xGG2XJFj9N7Rx7aP7oSiDRF9T6fe9oHd42db254-uy6dtqaX2MU9stXYLuD-990lT1eT6fiG3T1c344v7pjNgUdWKUSsdBqraglcNxpQKVEUopqhKrJcQCUVoFBcVyrHGVeiFDkCKFlqm2W75Hjdu_DufcAQzbwNNXad7dENwSQ-ZTPFeUIP_6BvbvB9Wmc0FLKQpRQJ4muo9i4Ej41Z-HZu_dJwMCvzZm3eJPNmZd6olDn6Lrahtl2TrNRt-AmKTKZcAYkTay4sVs7R_w74v_wLgIiQ4A</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Zimmer, Brian W.</creator><creator>Riggs, Nancy R.</creator><creator>Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Evolution of tuff ring-dome complex: the case study of Cerro Pinto, eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt</title><author>Zimmer, Brian W. ; Riggs, Nancy R. ; Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-b6eeeb82586c5018f80e662772bde673420b560e2618b64ed162924e006598a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Calderas</topic><topic>Crystalline rocks</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Igneous and metamorphic rocks petrology, volcanic processes, magmas</topic><topic>Igneous rocks</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Petrology</topic><topic>Pleistocene</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Sedimentology</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Volcanic belts</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><topic>Volcanology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggs, Nancy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of volcanology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmer, Brian W.</au><au>Riggs, Nancy R.</au><au>Carrasco-Núñez, Gerardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of tuff ring-dome complex: the case study of Cerro Pinto, eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of volcanology</jtitle><stitle>Bull Volcanol</stitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1223</spage><epage>1240</epage><pages>1223-1240</pages><issn>0258-8900</issn><eissn>1432-0819</eissn><coden>BUVOEW</coden><abstract>Cerro Pinto is a Pleistocene rhyolite tuff ring-dome complex located in the eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The complex is composed of four tuff rings and four domes that were emplaced in three eruptive stages marked by changes in vent location and eruptive character. During Stage I, vent clearing produced a 1.5-km-diameter tuff ring that was then followed by emplacement of two domes of approximately 0.2 km 3 each. With no apparent hiatus in activity, Stage II began with the explosive formation of a tuff ring ~2 km in diameter adjacent to and north of the earlier ring. Subsequent Stage II eruptions produced two smaller tuff rings within the northern tuff ring as well as a small dome that was mostly destroyed by explosions during its growth. Stage III involved the emplacement of a 0.04 km 3 dome within the southern tuff ring. Cerro Pinto’s eruptive history includes sequences that follow simple rhyolite-dome models, in which a pyroclastic phase is followed immediately by effusive dome emplacement. Some aspects of the eruption, however, such as the explosive reactivation of the system and explosive dome destruction, are more complex. These events are commonly associated with polygenetic structures, such as stratovolcanoes or calderas, in which multiple pulses of magma initiate reactivation. A comparison of major and trace element geochemistry with nearby Pleistocene silicic centers does not show indication of any co-genetic relationship, suggesting that Cerro Pinto was produced by a small, isolated magma chamber. The compositional variation of the erupted material at Cerro Pinto is minimal, suggesting that there were not multiple pulses of magma responsible for the complex behavior of the volcano and that the volcanic system was formed in a short time period. The variety of eruptive style observed at Cerro Pinto reflects the influence of quickly exhaustible water sources on a short-lived eruption. The rising magma encountered small amounts of groundwater that initiated eruption phases. Once a critical magma:water ratio was exceeded, the eruptions became dry and sub-plinian to plinian. The primary characteristic of Cerro Pinto is the predominance of fall deposits, suggesting that the level at which rising magma encountered water was deep enough to allow substantial fragmentation after the water source was exhausted. Isolated rhyolite domes are rare and are not currently viewed as prominent volcanic hazards, but the evolution of Cerro Pinto demonstrates that individual domes may have complex cycles, and such complexity must be taken into account when making hazard risk assessments.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00445-010-0391-6</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0258-8900
ispartof Bulletin of volcanology, 2010-12, Vol.72 (10), p.1223-1240
issn 0258-8900
1432-0819
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622613611
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Calderas
Crystalline rocks
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Exact sciences and technology
Explosions
Geochemistry
Geological hazards
Geology
Geophysics/Geodesy
Igneous and metamorphic rocks petrology, volcanic processes, magmas
Igneous rocks
Magma
Mineralogy
Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc
Petrology
Pleistocene
Research Article
Risk assessment
Sedimentology
Trace elements
Volcanic belts
Volcanic eruptions
Volcanoes
Volcanology
title Evolution of tuff ring-dome complex: the case study of Cerro Pinto, eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A19%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20tuff%20ring-dome%20complex:%20the%20case%20study%20of%20Cerro%20Pinto,%20eastern%20Trans-Mexican%20Volcanic%20Belt&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20volcanology&rft.au=Zimmer,%20Brian%20W.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1223&rft.epage=1240&rft.pages=1223-1240&rft.issn=0258-8900&rft.eissn=1432-0819&rft.coden=BUVOEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00445-010-0391-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1622613611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807575952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true