Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
Purpose The objective of this study is to compare the ability of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and mental foramen. Methods One hundred twenty-seven preoperative panoramic and CBCT images were evaluated. Two o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Oral and maxillofacial surgery 2014-12, Vol.18 (4), p.419-424 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 424 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 419 |
| container_title | Oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Neves, Frederico Sampaio Nascimento, Monikelly Carmo Chagas Oliveira, Matheus Lima Almeida, Solange Maria Bóscolo, Frab Norberto |
| description | Purpose
The objective of this study is to compare the ability of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and mental foramen.
Methods
One hundred twenty-seven preoperative panoramic and CBCT images were evaluated. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists investigated the presence of bifid mandibular canals and/or additional mental foramina on the right, left, or both sides of the mandible. Intra- and interobserver reliability was determined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. McNemar’s test compared the prevalence of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and CBCT. The significance level was set at 0.05.
Results
Additional mental foramen and bifid mandibular canal were detected in 1.2 and 7.4 % of the panoramic radiographs and 7.4 and 9.8 % of the CBCT images, respectively. The incidence of anatomical variations on the mandibular canal was not significantly different between both imaging modalities (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusions
Although CBCT provides better viewing of anatomical structures, including location, shape, and relationship with the surrounding area, panoramic radiography is a conventional imaging modality that can be used in the study of the bifid mandibular canals. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10006-013-0428-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622594890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3486478771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-bd4f9cae7efc92a6063da3705da2cfe17634c2a642ee18c750026547454880e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1L9DAUhYMofv8ANxJw46aapEk_ljK8foDgRtfhTnqrlbapSavv-Ou944wigpvkcO9zTiCHsSMpzqQQ-XmkU2SJkGkitCqS9w22K4vMJNJk5ea3NmKH7cX4TKySRmyzHZWWuSG9y_7PfDdAgLF5RQ49tIvYRO5r3kFfNfOphbAcj75rHLT8FUJDrO8jn-P4htjzAXofgNY8QNX4xwDD04I8FXe-R8KgI9UN04gVp5w1ccC2amgjHq7vffZw-e9-dp3c3l3dzC5uE6e1GpN5pevSAeZYu1JBJrK0gjQXpgLlapR5lmpHc60QZeFyI4TKjM610UUhUKT77HSVOwT_MmEcbddEh20LPfopWpkpZUpdlEv05Bf67KdAf_JJScordEmUXFEu-BgD1nYITQdhYaWwy1rsqhZLtdhlLfadPMfr5GneYfXt-OqBALUCIq36Rww_nv4z9QMHo5pc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1621880849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Neves, Frederico Sampaio ; Nascimento, Monikelly Carmo Chagas ; Oliveira, Matheus Lima ; Almeida, Solange Maria ; Bóscolo, Frab Norberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Neves, Frederico Sampaio ; Nascimento, Monikelly Carmo Chagas ; Oliveira, Matheus Lima ; Almeida, Solange Maria ; Bóscolo, Frab Norberto</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The objective of this study is to compare the ability of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and mental foramen.
Methods
One hundred twenty-seven preoperative panoramic and CBCT images were evaluated. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists investigated the presence of bifid mandibular canals and/or additional mental foramina on the right, left, or both sides of the mandible. Intra- and interobserver reliability was determined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. McNemar’s test compared the prevalence of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and CBCT. The significance level was set at 0.05.
Results
Additional mental foramen and bifid mandibular canal were detected in 1.2 and 7.4 % of the panoramic radiographs and 7.4 and 9.8 % of the CBCT images, respectively. The incidence of anatomical variations on the mandibular canal was not significantly different between both imaging modalities (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusions
Although CBCT provides better viewing of anatomical structures, including location, shape, and relationship with the surrounding area, panoramic radiography is a conventional imaging modality that can be used in the study of the bifid mandibular canals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1550</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-1569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10006-013-0428-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23975215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anatomic Variation ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Observer Variation ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014-12, Vol.18 (4), p.419-424</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-bd4f9cae7efc92a6063da3705da2cfe17634c2a642ee18c750026547454880e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-bd4f9cae7efc92a6063da3705da2cfe17634c2a642ee18c750026547454880e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10006-013-0428-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10006-013-0428-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23975215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neves, Frederico Sampaio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Monikelly Carmo Chagas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Matheus Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Solange Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bóscolo, Frab Norberto</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography</title><title>Oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose
The objective of this study is to compare the ability of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and mental foramen.
Methods
One hundred twenty-seven preoperative panoramic and CBCT images were evaluated. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists investigated the presence of bifid mandibular canals and/or additional mental foramina on the right, left, or both sides of the mandible. Intra- and interobserver reliability was determined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. McNemar’s test compared the prevalence of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and CBCT. The significance level was set at 0.05.
Results
Additional mental foramen and bifid mandibular canal were detected in 1.2 and 7.4 % of the panoramic radiographs and 7.4 and 9.8 % of the CBCT images, respectively. The incidence of anatomical variations on the mandibular canal was not significantly different between both imaging modalities (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusions
Although CBCT provides better viewing of anatomical structures, including location, shape, and relationship with the surrounding area, panoramic radiography is a conventional imaging modality that can be used in the study of the bifid mandibular canals.</description><subject>Anatomic Variation</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1865-1550</issn><issn>1865-1569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1L9DAUhYMofv8ANxJw46aapEk_ljK8foDgRtfhTnqrlbapSavv-Ou944wigpvkcO9zTiCHsSMpzqQQ-XmkU2SJkGkitCqS9w22K4vMJNJk5ea3NmKH7cX4TKySRmyzHZWWuSG9y_7PfDdAgLF5RQ49tIvYRO5r3kFfNfOphbAcj75rHLT8FUJDrO8jn-P4htjzAXofgNY8QNX4xwDD04I8FXe-R8KgI9UN04gVp5w1ccC2amgjHq7vffZw-e9-dp3c3l3dzC5uE6e1GpN5pevSAeZYu1JBJrK0gjQXpgLlapR5lmpHc60QZeFyI4TKjM610UUhUKT77HSVOwT_MmEcbddEh20LPfopWpkpZUpdlEv05Bf67KdAf_JJScordEmUXFEu-BgD1nYITQdhYaWwy1rsqhZLtdhlLfadPMfr5GneYfXt-OqBALUCIq36Rww_nv4z9QMHo5pc</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Neves, Frederico Sampaio</creator><creator>Nascimento, Monikelly Carmo Chagas</creator><creator>Oliveira, Matheus Lima</creator><creator>Almeida, Solange Maria</creator><creator>Bóscolo, Frab Norberto</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography</title><author>Neves, Frederico Sampaio ; Nascimento, Monikelly Carmo Chagas ; Oliveira, Matheus Lima ; Almeida, Solange Maria ; Bóscolo, Frab Norberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-bd4f9cae7efc92a6063da3705da2cfe17634c2a642ee18c750026547454880e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anatomic Variation</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neves, Frederico Sampaio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Monikelly Carmo Chagas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Matheus Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Solange Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bóscolo, Frab Norberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neves, Frederico Sampaio</au><au>Nascimento, Monikelly Carmo Chagas</au><au>Oliveira, Matheus Lima</au><au>Almeida, Solange Maria</au><au>Bóscolo, Frab Norberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>Oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><stitle>Oral Maxillofac Surg</stitle><addtitle>Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>424</epage><pages>419-424</pages><issn>1865-1550</issn><eissn>1865-1569</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The objective of this study is to compare the ability of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and mental foramen.
Methods
One hundred twenty-seven preoperative panoramic and CBCT images were evaluated. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists investigated the presence of bifid mandibular canals and/or additional mental foramina on the right, left, or both sides of the mandible. Intra- and interobserver reliability was determined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. McNemar’s test compared the prevalence of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and CBCT. The significance level was set at 0.05.
Results
Additional mental foramen and bifid mandibular canal were detected in 1.2 and 7.4 % of the panoramic radiographs and 7.4 and 9.8 % of the CBCT images, respectively. The incidence of anatomical variations on the mandibular canal was not significantly different between both imaging modalities (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusions
Although CBCT provides better viewing of anatomical structures, including location, shape, and relationship with the surrounding area, panoramic radiography is a conventional imaging modality that can be used in the study of the bifid mandibular canals.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>23975215</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10006-013-0428-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1865-1550 |
| ispartof | Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014-12, Vol.18 (4), p.419-424 |
| issn | 1865-1550 1865-1569 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622594890 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Anatomic Variation Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data Dentistry Humans Mandible - diagnostic imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Observer Variation Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Original Article Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data Reproducibility of Results |
| title | Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T23%3A49%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20mandibular%20anatomical%20variations%20between%20panoramic%20radiography%20and%20cone%20beam%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Neves,%20Frederico%20Sampaio&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=424&rft.pages=419-424&rft.issn=1865-1550&rft.eissn=1865-1569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10006-013-0428-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3486478771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1621880849&rft_id=info:pmid/23975215&rfr_iscdi=true |