Cyclical Unemployment, Structural Unemployment

Whenever unemployment stays high for an extended period, it is common to see analyses, statements, and rebuttals about the extent to which the high unemployment is structural, not cyclical. This essay views the Beveridge curve pattern of unemployment and vacancy rates and the related matching functi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IMF economic review 2013-08, Vol.61 (3), p.410-455
1. Verfasser: DIAMOND, PETER
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 455
container_issue 3
container_start_page 410
container_title IMF economic review
container_volume 61
creator DIAMOND, PETER
description Whenever unemployment stays high for an extended period, it is common to see analyses, statements, and rebuttals about the extent to which the high unemployment is structural, not cyclical. This essay views the Beveridge curve pattern of unemployment and vacancy rates and the related matching function as proxies for the functioning of the labor market and explores issues in that proxy relationship that complicate such analyses. Also discussed is the concept of mismatch.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/imfer.2013.13
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622291802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A346305775</galeid><jstor_id>43297797</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A346305775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-ce9da3079de27d3a67fad981350e343f232799eb186b4bd9ce5ac73ef300eace3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1LxDAQxYsoKKtHj4LgxcO2Jpm22Rxl8QsEDyp4C2k6rVnadE3aw_73piquSk0gCZnfewzzouiYkoSSjF-YtkKXMEIhobATHTCS0jil_GX3-53T_ejI-xUJC4RYCH4QJcuNboxWzemzxXbddJsWbT8_fezdoPvB_SkcRnuVajwefd2z6Pn66ml5G98_3NwtL-9jnZO0jzWKUgHhokTGS1A5r1QpFhQygpBCxYBxIbCgi7xIi1JozJTmgBUQgkojzKLzT9-1694G9L1sjdfYNMpiN3hJc8aYoAvCAnr2B111g7OhO0lT4BmlLM-2VK0alMZWXe-UHk3lJaQ5hBHykYonqBothkF0FisTvn_xyQQfdomt0ZOC-Q9BMXhj0YfDm_q197UavJ_sR7vOe4eVXDvTKreRlMgxdvkRuxxjlxS2_fjA2TpUtrP4R3DyKVj5vnPf7ikwwbng8A5M27bN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1437511265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cyclical Unemployment, Structural Unemployment</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>DIAMOND, PETER</creator><creatorcontrib>DIAMOND, PETER</creatorcontrib><description>Whenever unemployment stays high for an extended period, it is common to see analyses, statements, and rebuttals about the extent to which the high unemployment is structural, not cyclical. This essay views the Beveridge curve pattern of unemployment and vacancy rates and the related matching function as proxies for the functioning of the labor market and explores issues in that proxy relationship that complicate such analyses. Also discussed is the concept of mismatch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-4161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-417X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/imfer.2013.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business cycles ; Capital Markets ; Demography ; E24 ; E32 ; Economic conditions ; Economic indicators ; Economic models ; Economic Policy ; Economic recessions ; Economic recovery ; Economic statistics ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Employment ; Equality ; Full employment ; Great Recession ; Hiring ; International Economics ; J23 ; Labor ; Labor economics ; Labor market ; Labor markets ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Markets ; Recessions ; Structural unemployment ; Studies ; Trends ; Unemployment ; Unemployment rates ; United States</subject><ispartof>IMF economic review, 2013-08, Vol.61 (3), p.410-455</ispartof><rights>2013 International Monetary Fund</rights><rights>International Monetary Fund 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. (Springer)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-ce9da3079de27d3a67fad981350e343f232799eb186b4bd9ce5ac73ef300eace3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-ce9da3079de27d3a67fad981350e343f232799eb186b4bd9ce5ac73ef300eace3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43297797$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43297797$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27852,27853,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DIAMOND, PETER</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclical Unemployment, Structural Unemployment</title><title>IMF economic review</title><addtitle>IMF Econ Rev</addtitle><description>Whenever unemployment stays high for an extended period, it is common to see analyses, statements, and rebuttals about the extent to which the high unemployment is structural, not cyclical. This essay views the Beveridge curve pattern of unemployment and vacancy rates and the related matching function as proxies for the functioning of the labor market and explores issues in that proxy relationship that complicate such analyses. Also discussed is the concept of mismatch.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Capital Markets</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>E24</subject><subject>E32</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economic recessions</subject><subject>Economic recovery</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Full employment</subject><subject>Great Recession</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>International Economics</subject><subject>J23</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labor markets</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Structural unemployment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Unemployment rates</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2041-4161</issn><issn>2041-417X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1LxDAQxYsoKKtHj4LgxcO2Jpm22Rxl8QsEDyp4C2k6rVnadE3aw_73piquSk0gCZnfewzzouiYkoSSjF-YtkKXMEIhobATHTCS0jil_GX3-53T_ejI-xUJC4RYCH4QJcuNboxWzemzxXbddJsWbT8_fezdoPvB_SkcRnuVajwefd2z6Pn66ml5G98_3NwtL-9jnZO0jzWKUgHhokTGS1A5r1QpFhQygpBCxYBxIbCgi7xIi1JozJTmgBUQgkojzKLzT9-1694G9L1sjdfYNMpiN3hJc8aYoAvCAnr2B111g7OhO0lT4BmlLM-2VK0alMZWXe-UHk3lJaQ5hBHykYonqBothkF0FisTvn_xyQQfdomt0ZOC-Q9BMXhj0YfDm_q197UavJ_sR7vOe4eVXDvTKreRlMgxdvkRuxxjlxS2_fjA2TpUtrP4R3DyKVj5vnPf7ikwwbng8A5M27bN</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>DIAMOND, PETER</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. (Springer)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Cyclical Unemployment, Structural Unemployment</title><author>DIAMOND, PETER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-ce9da3079de27d3a67fad981350e343f232799eb186b4bd9ce5ac73ef300eace3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Capital Markets</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>E24</topic><topic>E32</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economic recessions</topic><topic>Economic recovery</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Full employment</topic><topic>Great Recession</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>International Economics</topic><topic>J23</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labor markets</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Structural unemployment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Unemployment rates</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DIAMOND, PETER</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>IMF economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DIAMOND, PETER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cyclical Unemployment, Structural Unemployment</atitle><jtitle>IMF economic review</jtitle><stitle>IMF Econ Rev</stitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>410</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>410-455</pages><issn>2041-4161</issn><eissn>2041-417X</eissn><abstract>Whenever unemployment stays high for an extended period, it is common to see analyses, statements, and rebuttals about the extent to which the high unemployment is structural, not cyclical. This essay views the Beveridge curve pattern of unemployment and vacancy rates and the related matching function as proxies for the functioning of the labor market and explores issues in that proxy relationship that complicate such analyses. Also discussed is the concept of mismatch.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan</pub><doi>10.1057/imfer.2013.13</doi><tpages>46</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-4161
ispartof IMF economic review, 2013-08, Vol.61 (3), p.410-455
issn 2041-4161
2041-417X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622291802
source PAIS Index; Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis
Business cycles
Capital Markets
Demography
E24
E32
Economic conditions
Economic indicators
Economic models
Economic Policy
Economic recessions
Economic recovery
Economic statistics
Economic theory
Economics
Economics and Finance
Employment
Equality
Full employment
Great Recession
Hiring
International Economics
J23
Labor
Labor economics
Labor market
Labor markets
Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics
Markets
Recessions
Structural unemployment
Studies
Trends
Unemployment
Unemployment rates
United States
title Cyclical Unemployment, Structural Unemployment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cyclical%20Unemployment,%20Structural%20Unemployment&rft.jtitle=IMF%20economic%20review&rft.au=DIAMOND,%20PETER&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=410-455&rft.issn=2041-4161&rft.eissn=2041-417X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/imfer.2013.13&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA346305775%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1437511265&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A346305775&rft_jstor_id=43297797&rfr_iscdi=true