Validity of Prepregnancy Weight Status Estimated from Self-reported Height and Weight
The Institute of Medicine’s gestational weight gain guidelines are intended to reduce pregnancy complications, poor birth outcomes and excessive postpartum weight retention. The specific weight gain guidelines vary by prepregnancy weight status. We evaluated the validity of prepregnancy weight statu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Maternal and child health journal 2014-09, Vol.18 (7), p.1667-1674 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1674 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1667 |
container_title | Maternal and child health journal |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Shin, Dayeon Chung, Hwan Weatherspoon, Lorraine Song, Won O. |
description | The Institute of Medicine’s gestational weight gain guidelines are intended to reduce pregnancy complications, poor birth outcomes and excessive postpartum weight retention. The specific weight gain guidelines vary by prepregnancy weight status. We evaluated the validity of prepregnancy weight status (underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity) classified from self-reported prepregnancy height and weight in reference to those from measured data during the first trimester of pregnancy and imputed data for both pregnant and age-matched non-pregnant women included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006. Self-reported prepregnancy weight status was validated by two ideal references: imputed data with the number of imputations as 10 (n = 5,040) using the data of age-matched non-pregnant women who had both self-reported and measured data, and weight status based on height and weight measured during the first trimester (n = 95). Mean differences, Pearson’s correlations (r), and Kappa statistics (κ) were used to examine the strength of agreement between self-reported data and the two reference measures. Mean (standard error of the mean) differences between self-reported versus imputed prepregnancy weight was −1.7 (0.1) kg with an r = 0.98 (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10995-013-1407-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622064646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A383854534</galeid><sourcerecordid>A383854534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-13f01f9be20f2bc11eb90586e6c955ccb724d343257eea1cc5bdb4273fbb10193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl-L1DAUxYso7jr6AXyRgiC-dM3_tI_LsrrCgsK6-hjS9KbTpU3GJH2Yb29KR5mVEbkPCTe_c0huTlG8xugCIyQ_RIyahlcI0wozJCvxpDjHXNJKCFI_zXvUkErWkp8VL2J8QCirEHtenBFGqawxOy_uv-tx6Ia0L70tvwbYBeiddmZf_oCh36byLuk0x_I6pmHSCbrSBj-VdzDaKtM-LK2bFdWuO6heFs-sHiO8Oqyb4v7j9berm-r2y6fPV5e3lRFSpgpTi7BtWiDIktZgDG2DeC1AmIZzY1pJWEcZJVwCaGwMb7uWEUlt22KEG7op3q--u-B_zhCTmoZoYBy1Az9HhQUhSLBc_0e5QKjhQpKMvv0LffBzcPkhmeJ1IxDjR1SvR1CDsz4FbRZTdUlrWnPG89U3RXWC6sFB0KN3YIfcfsRfnOBzdTAN5qTg3ZFgC3pM2-jHOQ3exccgXkETfIwBrNqF_KVhrzBSS5zUGieV46SWOKllaG8Ok5jbCbo_it_5yQBZgZiPXA_haFT_dP0FkwfQ4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1558960452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of Prepregnancy Weight Status Estimated from Self-reported Height and Weight</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Shin, Dayeon ; Chung, Hwan ; Weatherspoon, Lorraine ; Song, Won O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shin, Dayeon ; Chung, Hwan ; Weatherspoon, Lorraine ; Song, Won O.</creatorcontrib><description>The Institute of Medicine’s gestational weight gain guidelines are intended to reduce pregnancy complications, poor birth outcomes and excessive postpartum weight retention. The specific weight gain guidelines vary by prepregnancy weight status. We evaluated the validity of prepregnancy weight status (underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity) classified from self-reported prepregnancy height and weight in reference to those from measured data during the first trimester of pregnancy and imputed data for both pregnant and age-matched non-pregnant women included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006. Self-reported prepregnancy weight status was validated by two ideal references: imputed data with the number of imputations as 10 (n = 5,040) using the data of age-matched non-pregnant women who had both self-reported and measured data, and weight status based on height and weight measured during the first trimester (n = 95). Mean differences, Pearson’s correlations (r), and Kappa statistics (κ) were used to examine the strength of agreement between self-reported data and the two reference measures. Mean (standard error of the mean) differences between self-reported versus imputed prepregnancy weight was −1.7 (0.1) kg with an r = 0.98 (
p
< 0.001), and κ = 0.78 which indicate substantial agreement for the 504 pregnant women. Mean (SEM) differences between self-reported prepregnancy weight versus measured weight in the first trimester was −2.3 (0.7) kg with r = 0.98 (
p
< 0.001), and κ = 0.76, which also showed substantial agreements in 95 pregnant women. Prepregnancy weight status classified based on self-reported prepregnancy height and weight was valid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-013-1407-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24337814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Body Height ; Body mass index ; Body Weight ; Care and treatment ; Childrens health ; Female ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Interviews ; Maternal and Child Health ; Measurement ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Surveys ; Obesity ; Pediatrics ; Population ; Population Economics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Public Health ; Reproductive health ; Risk Assessment ; Self Report ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sociology ; Validity ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2014-09, Vol.18 (7), p.1667-1674</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-13f01f9be20f2bc11eb90586e6c955ccb724d343257eea1cc5bdb4273fbb10193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-13f01f9be20f2bc11eb90586e6c955ccb724d343257eea1cc5bdb4273fbb10193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-013-1407-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-013-1407-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24337814$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shin, Dayeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weatherspoon, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Won O.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of Prepregnancy Weight Status Estimated from Self-reported Height and Weight</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>The Institute of Medicine’s gestational weight gain guidelines are intended to reduce pregnancy complications, poor birth outcomes and excessive postpartum weight retention. The specific weight gain guidelines vary by prepregnancy weight status. We evaluated the validity of prepregnancy weight status (underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity) classified from self-reported prepregnancy height and weight in reference to those from measured data during the first trimester of pregnancy and imputed data for both pregnant and age-matched non-pregnant women included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006. Self-reported prepregnancy weight status was validated by two ideal references: imputed data with the number of imputations as 10 (n = 5,040) using the data of age-matched non-pregnant women who had both self-reported and measured data, and weight status based on height and weight measured during the first trimester (n = 95). Mean differences, Pearson’s correlations (r), and Kappa statistics (κ) were used to examine the strength of agreement between self-reported data and the two reference measures. Mean (standard error of the mean) differences between self-reported versus imputed prepregnancy weight was −1.7 (0.1) kg with an r = 0.98 (
p
< 0.001), and κ = 0.78 which indicate substantial agreement for the 504 pregnant women. Mean (SEM) differences between self-reported prepregnancy weight versus measured weight in the first trimester was −2.3 (0.7) kg with r = 0.98 (
p
< 0.001), and κ = 0.76, which also showed substantial agreements in 95 pregnant women. Prepregnancy weight status classified based on self-reported prepregnancy height and weight was valid.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Surveys</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl-L1DAUxYso7jr6AXyRgiC-dM3_tI_LsrrCgsK6-hjS9KbTpU3GJH2Yb29KR5mVEbkPCTe_c0huTlG8xugCIyQ_RIyahlcI0wozJCvxpDjHXNJKCFI_zXvUkErWkp8VL2J8QCirEHtenBFGqawxOy_uv-tx6Ia0L70tvwbYBeiddmZf_oCh36byLuk0x_I6pmHSCbrSBj-VdzDaKtM-LK2bFdWuO6heFs-sHiO8Oqyb4v7j9berm-r2y6fPV5e3lRFSpgpTi7BtWiDIktZgDG2DeC1AmIZzY1pJWEcZJVwCaGwMb7uWEUlt22KEG7op3q--u-B_zhCTmoZoYBy1Az9HhQUhSLBc_0e5QKjhQpKMvv0LffBzcPkhmeJ1IxDjR1SvR1CDsz4FbRZTdUlrWnPG89U3RXWC6sFB0KN3YIfcfsRfnOBzdTAN5qTg3ZFgC3pM2-jHOQ3exccgXkETfIwBrNqF_KVhrzBSS5zUGieV46SWOKllaG8Ok5jbCbo_it_5yQBZgZiPXA_haFT_dP0FkwfQ4Q</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Shin, Dayeon</creator><creator>Chung, Hwan</creator><creator>Weatherspoon, Lorraine</creator><creator>Song, Won O.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Validity of Prepregnancy Weight Status Estimated from Self-reported Height and Weight</title><author>Shin, Dayeon ; Chung, Hwan ; Weatherspoon, Lorraine ; Song, Won O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-13f01f9be20f2bc11eb90586e6c955ccb724d343257eea1cc5bdb4273fbb10193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Surveys</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shin, Dayeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weatherspoon, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Won O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shin, Dayeon</au><au>Chung, Hwan</au><au>Weatherspoon, Lorraine</au><au>Song, Won O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of Prepregnancy Weight Status Estimated from Self-reported Height and Weight</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1667</spage><epage>1674</epage><pages>1667-1674</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>The Institute of Medicine’s gestational weight gain guidelines are intended to reduce pregnancy complications, poor birth outcomes and excessive postpartum weight retention. The specific weight gain guidelines vary by prepregnancy weight status. We evaluated the validity of prepregnancy weight status (underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity) classified from self-reported prepregnancy height and weight in reference to those from measured data during the first trimester of pregnancy and imputed data for both pregnant and age-matched non-pregnant women included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006. Self-reported prepregnancy weight status was validated by two ideal references: imputed data with the number of imputations as 10 (n = 5,040) using the data of age-matched non-pregnant women who had both self-reported and measured data, and weight status based on height and weight measured during the first trimester (n = 95). Mean differences, Pearson’s correlations (r), and Kappa statistics (κ) were used to examine the strength of agreement between self-reported data and the two reference measures. Mean (standard error of the mean) differences between self-reported versus imputed prepregnancy weight was −1.7 (0.1) kg with an r = 0.98 (
p
< 0.001), and κ = 0.78 which indicate substantial agreement for the 504 pregnant women. Mean (SEM) differences between self-reported prepregnancy weight versus measured weight in the first trimester was −2.3 (0.7) kg with r = 0.98 (
p
< 0.001), and κ = 0.76, which also showed substantial agreements in 95 pregnant women. Prepregnancy weight status classified based on self-reported prepregnancy height and weight was valid.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24337814</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-013-1407-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-7875 |
ispartof | Maternal and child health journal, 2014-09, Vol.18 (7), p.1667-1674 |
issn | 1092-7875 1573-6628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622064646 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Body Height Body mass index Body Weight Care and treatment Childrens health Female Gynecology Humans Interviews Maternal and Child Health Measurement Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nutrition Nutrition Surveys Obesity Pediatrics Population Population Economics Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control Pregnancy Trimester, First Public Health Reproductive health Risk Assessment Self Report Sensitivity and Specificity Sociology Validity Womens health Young Adult |
title | Validity of Prepregnancy Weight Status Estimated from Self-reported Height and Weight |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A30%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20Prepregnancy%20Weight%20Status%20Estimated%20from%20Self-reported%20Height%20and%20Weight&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Shin,%20Dayeon&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1667&rft.epage=1674&rft.pages=1667-1674&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-013-1407-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA383854534%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1558960452&rft_id=info:pmid/24337814&rft_galeid=A383854534&rfr_iscdi=true |