Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback

Background Health care–associated infections are serious complications impacting 2 million patients and accounting for approximately 100,000 deaths per year. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a new hand hygiene monitoring program (HHMP) and measured the sustainability of this e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of infection control 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1074-1078
Hauptverfasser: Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC, Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP, Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC, Burks, Kristi, BSN, Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC, Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA, Thombs, Lori A., PhD, Austin, Cindy, MS, Finley, Phillip J., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1078
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1074
container_title American journal of infection control
container_volume 42
creator Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC
Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP
Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC
Burks, Kristi, BSN
Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC
Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA
Thombs, Lori A., PhD
Austin, Cindy, MS
Finley, Phillip J., PhD
description Background Health care–associated infections are serious complications impacting 2 million patients and accounting for approximately 100,000 deaths per year. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a new hand hygiene monitoring program (HHMP) and measured the sustainability of this effectiveness over a 1-year period. Methods The HHMP consisted of 4 key components: extensive education, conspicuous and visible monitors, immediate feedback concerning compliance to health care workers, and real-time data dissemination to leadership. The HHMP was implemented in 2 hospital care units. Two different, but similar, departments served as controls, and hand hygiene compliance was monitored via the “secret shopper” technique. All 4 departments were followed for 12 months. Results Both experimental departments showed statistically significant increases in hand hygiene compliance. Experimental department 1 increased compliance from 49% to an average of 90%, and experimental department 2 increased compliance from 60% to an average of 96%. Both experimental departments were able to sustain these results for at least 6 months. Compliance rates were significantly higher in the experimental departments compared with the control departments. No significant changes were seen in the control departments. Conclusions These finding suggest that continuous monitoring by salient observers and immediate feedback are critical to the success of hand hygiene programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622064334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0196655314009304</els_id><sourcerecordid>1622064334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-899e0961529c1fae6b58b630098df8cd2b9b62f7f3b52f30da67637d1b1e1d0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIQAQv3VaS7nQCIsiirrDgQb14Cemkeie9_TEmPSvz700zowt70FMuT1XeqqcIec6gZMDkm760fXAlB1aVIEtg6gHZsJo3heBaPiQbYFoWsq7FGXmSUg8AWsj6MTnjGVJCyw35cTmnXVjsQLd28nR7uA44IXXzuBuCnRzSMO7ifIuJ_grLlobJRbQJPR3nKSxzDNM1XSvDOKIPdkHaIfrWupun5FFnh4TPTu85-f7xw7eLy-Lqy6fPF--vClcDXwqlNYKWObd2rLMo21q1UuSsynfKed7qVvKu6URb806At7KRovGsZcg8tOKcvD72zTl_7jEtZgzJ4TDYCed9MkxyDrISovo_WivJoKl0k9GX99B-3scpD5IbMiZrphvIFD9SLs4pRezMLobRxoNhYFZJpjerJLNKMiBNlpSLXpxa79u8tL8lf6xk4NUJsMnZoYtZREh3nFJKKi0y9_bIYV7vbcBoksv6XBYR0S3Gz-HfOd7dK3dDmEL-8QYPmO7mNYkbMF_Xc1qviVXrIUElfgOz38PT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1611651970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC ; Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP ; Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC ; Burks, Kristi, BSN ; Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC ; Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA ; Thombs, Lori A., PhD ; Austin, Cindy, MS ; Finley, Phillip J., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC ; Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP ; Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC ; Burks, Kristi, BSN ; Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC ; Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA ; Thombs, Lori A., PhD ; Austin, Cindy, MS ; Finley, Phillip J., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Health care–associated infections are serious complications impacting 2 million patients and accounting for approximately 100,000 deaths per year. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a new hand hygiene monitoring program (HHMP) and measured the sustainability of this effectiveness over a 1-year period. Methods The HHMP consisted of 4 key components: extensive education, conspicuous and visible monitors, immediate feedback concerning compliance to health care workers, and real-time data dissemination to leadership. The HHMP was implemented in 2 hospital care units. Two different, but similar, departments served as controls, and hand hygiene compliance was monitored via the “secret shopper” technique. All 4 departments were followed for 12 months. Results Both experimental departments showed statistically significant increases in hand hygiene compliance. Experimental department 1 increased compliance from 49% to an average of 90%, and experimental department 2 increased compliance from 60% to an average of 96%. Both experimental departments were able to sustain these results for at least 6 months. Compliance rates were significantly higher in the experimental departments compared with the control departments. No significant changes were seen in the control departments. Conclusions These finding suggest that continuous monitoring by salient observers and immediate feedback are critical to the success of hand hygiene programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25278396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Compliance ; Epidemiological Monitoring ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; Feedback ; General aspects ; Guideline Adherence ; Hand Disinfection - methods ; Hand Hygiene ; Hand hygiene monitoring program ; Hospital-associated infection ; Hospitals ; Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Infection Control ; Infection Control - methods ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Intervention ; Medical sciences ; Monitoring program ; Nosocomial infections ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1074-1078</ispartof><rights>Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Mosby-Year Book, Inc. Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-899e0961529c1fae6b58b630098df8cd2b9b62f7f3b52f30da67637d1b1e1d0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-899e0961529c1fae6b58b630098df8cd2b9b62f7f3b52f30da67637d1b1e1d0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28886893$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278396$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burks, Kristi, BSN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thombs, Lori A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Cindy, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finley, Phillip J., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>Background Health care–associated infections are serious complications impacting 2 million patients and accounting for approximately 100,000 deaths per year. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a new hand hygiene monitoring program (HHMP) and measured the sustainability of this effectiveness over a 1-year period. Methods The HHMP consisted of 4 key components: extensive education, conspicuous and visible monitors, immediate feedback concerning compliance to health care workers, and real-time data dissemination to leadership. The HHMP was implemented in 2 hospital care units. Two different, but similar, departments served as controls, and hand hygiene compliance was monitored via the “secret shopper” technique. All 4 departments were followed for 12 months. Results Both experimental departments showed statistically significant increases in hand hygiene compliance. Experimental department 1 increased compliance from 49% to an average of 90%, and experimental department 2 increased compliance from 60% to an average of 96%. Both experimental departments were able to sustain these results for at least 6 months. Compliance rates were significantly higher in the experimental departments compared with the control departments. No significant changes were seen in the control departments. Conclusions These finding suggest that continuous monitoring by salient observers and immediate feedback are critical to the success of hand hygiene programs.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Epidemiological Monitoring</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Hand Hygiene</subject><subject>Hand hygiene monitoring program</subject><subject>Hospital-associated infection</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Monitoring program</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIQAQv3VaS7nQCIsiirrDgQb14Cemkeie9_TEmPSvz700zowt70FMuT1XeqqcIec6gZMDkm760fXAlB1aVIEtg6gHZsJo3heBaPiQbYFoWsq7FGXmSUg8AWsj6MTnjGVJCyw35cTmnXVjsQLd28nR7uA44IXXzuBuCnRzSMO7ifIuJ_grLlobJRbQJPR3nKSxzDNM1XSvDOKIPdkHaIfrWupun5FFnh4TPTu85-f7xw7eLy-Lqy6fPF--vClcDXwqlNYKWObd2rLMo21q1UuSsynfKed7qVvKu6URb806At7KRovGsZcg8tOKcvD72zTl_7jEtZgzJ4TDYCed9MkxyDrISovo_WivJoKl0k9GX99B-3scpD5IbMiZrphvIFD9SLs4pRezMLobRxoNhYFZJpjerJLNKMiBNlpSLXpxa79u8tL8lf6xk4NUJsMnZoYtZREh3nFJKKi0y9_bIYV7vbcBoksv6XBYR0S3Gz-HfOd7dK3dDmEL-8QYPmO7mNYkbMF_Xc1qviVXrIUElfgOz38PT</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC</creator><creator>Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP</creator><creator>Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC</creator><creator>Burks, Kristi, BSN</creator><creator>Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC</creator><creator>Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA</creator><creator>Thombs, Lori A., PhD</creator><creator>Austin, Cindy, MS</creator><creator>Finley, Phillip J., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Mosby-Year Book, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback</title><author>Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC ; Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP ; Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC ; Burks, Kristi, BSN ; Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC ; Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA ; Thombs, Lori A., PhD ; Austin, Cindy, MS ; Finley, Phillip J., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-899e0961529c1fae6b58b630098df8cd2b9b62f7f3b52f30da67637d1b1e1d0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Epidemiological Monitoring</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Hand Hygiene</topic><topic>Hand hygiene monitoring program</topic><topic>Hospital-associated infection</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Monitoring program</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burks, Kristi, BSN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thombs, Lori A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Cindy, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finley, Phillip J., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, Judy L., BSN, MHSA, CIC</au><au>Sistrunk, William W., MD, FACP</au><au>Higginbotham, Mary Ann, BSN, CIC</au><au>Burks, Kristi, BSN</au><au>Halford, Linda, BSN, CIC</au><au>Goddard, Linda, BS, MHA</au><au>Thombs, Lori A., PhD</au><au>Austin, Cindy, MS</au><au>Finley, Phillip J., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1074</spage><epage>1078</epage><pages>1074-1078</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>Background Health care–associated infections are serious complications impacting 2 million patients and accounting for approximately 100,000 deaths per year. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a new hand hygiene monitoring program (HHMP) and measured the sustainability of this effectiveness over a 1-year period. Methods The HHMP consisted of 4 key components: extensive education, conspicuous and visible monitors, immediate feedback concerning compliance to health care workers, and real-time data dissemination to leadership. The HHMP was implemented in 2 hospital care units. Two different, but similar, departments served as controls, and hand hygiene compliance was monitored via the “secret shopper” technique. All 4 departments were followed for 12 months. Results Both experimental departments showed statistically significant increases in hand hygiene compliance. Experimental department 1 increased compliance from 49% to an average of 90%, and experimental department 2 increased compliance from 60% to an average of 96%. Both experimental departments were able to sustain these results for at least 6 months. Compliance rates were significantly higher in the experimental departments compared with the control departments. No significant changes were seen in the control departments. Conclusions These finding suggest that continuous monitoring by salient observers and immediate feedback are critical to the success of hand hygiene programs.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25278396</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.018</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-6553
ispartof American journal of infection control, 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1074-1078
issn 0196-6553
1527-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622064334
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Compliance
Epidemiological Monitoring
Epidemiology. Vaccinations
Feedback
General aspects
Guideline Adherence
Hand Disinfection - methods
Hand Hygiene
Hand hygiene monitoring program
Hospital-associated infection
Hospitals
Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models
Humans
Hygiene
Infection Control
Infection Control - methods
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
Intervention
Medical sciences
Monitoring program
Nosocomial infections
Sustainability
title Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T18%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hospital%20hand%20hygiene%20compliance%20improves%20with%20increased%20monitoring%20and%20immediate%20feedback&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Walker,%20Judy%20L.,%20BSN,%20MHSA,%20CIC&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1074&rft.epage=1078&rft.pages=1074-1078&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1622064334%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1611651970&rft_id=info:pmid/25278396&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0196655314009304&rfr_iscdi=true