Origins of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to 60 Hz magnetic fields: A provocation study

With increasing electrical device usage, social concerns about the possible effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic fields on human health have increased. The number of people with self‐attributed electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) who complain of various subjective symptoms such as headache and insomn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioelectromagnetics 2012-05, Vol.33 (4), p.326-333
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Deok Won, Choi, Jae Lim, Nam, Ki Chang, Yang, Dong In, Kwon, Min Kyung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 333
container_issue 4
container_start_page 326
container_title Bioelectromagnetics
container_volume 33
creator Kim, Deok Won
Choi, Jae Lim
Nam, Ki Chang
Yang, Dong In
Kwon, Min Kyung
description With increasing electrical device usage, social concerns about the possible effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic fields on human health have increased. The number of people with self‐attributed electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) who complain of various subjective symptoms such as headache and insomnia has also increased. However, it is unclear whether EHS results from physiological or other origins. In this double‐blinded study, we simultaneously investigated physiological changes (heart rate, respiration rate, and heart rate variability), subjective symptoms, and perception of the magnetic field to assess origins of the subjective symptoms. Two volunteer groups of 15 self‐reported EHS and 16 non‐EHS individuals were tested with exposure to sham and real (60 Hz, 12.5 µT) magnetic fields for 30 min. Magnetic field exposure did not have any effects on physiological parameters or eight subjective symptoms in either group. There was also no evidence that the EHS group perceived the magnetic field better than the non‐EHS group. In conclusion, the subjective symptoms did not result from the 60 Hz, 12.5 µT magnetic field exposures but from other non‐physiological factors. Bioelectromagnetics 33:326–333, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bem.20711
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1620024589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1620024589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-86e3df574e1c99bb4c7df2f2c946a7349ad5e34cc1a777b82ac59a51c4cdac5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMsyBDEUQFOKYjwWfkBlyaJHkn6kY2cUhvKo8iiKRSqdvk3ox0gyaCtbv-lLNMPsrO5dnHvq1kFolZI-JYRtZlD1GeGUzqAejRkNaJpcz6IeoYIHaZSwBbTo3AMhJE1JOI8WGCOUpTzuodtTa-5M7XBTYChBe9tU6q4GbzS-b0dgHdTOePNsfIt9gxPy-f4xfMNTqDBQ5m4Lb-ORbZ4brbxpauz8OG-X0VyhSgcrv3MJXe7tXuwMg6PT_YOd7aNAMxHSIE0gzIuYR0C1EFkWaZ4XrGBaRIniYSRUHkMYaU0V5zxLmdKxUDHVkc67tQiX0PrE233wNAbnZWWchrJUNTRjJ2nCukpRnIoO3Zig2jbOWSjkyJpK2VZSIr9byq6l_GnZsWu_2nFWQT4l_-J1wOYEeDEltP-b5GD3-E8ZTC6M8_A6vVD2USY85LG8OtmXNxfnYsDYoTwLvwBi0I8G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1620024589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Origins of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to 60 Hz magnetic fields: A provocation study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Kim, Deok Won ; Choi, Jae Lim ; Nam, Ki Chang ; Yang, Dong In ; Kwon, Min Kyung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Deok Won ; Choi, Jae Lim ; Nam, Ki Chang ; Yang, Dong In ; Kwon, Min Kyung</creatorcontrib><description>With increasing electrical device usage, social concerns about the possible effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic fields on human health have increased. The number of people with self‐attributed electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) who complain of various subjective symptoms such as headache and insomnia has also increased. However, it is unclear whether EHS results from physiological or other origins. In this double‐blinded study, we simultaneously investigated physiological changes (heart rate, respiration rate, and heart rate variability), subjective symptoms, and perception of the magnetic field to assess origins of the subjective symptoms. Two volunteer groups of 15 self‐reported EHS and 16 non‐EHS individuals were tested with exposure to sham and real (60 Hz, 12.5 µT) magnetic fields for 30 min. Magnetic field exposure did not have any effects on physiological parameters or eight subjective symptoms in either group. There was also no evidence that the EHS group perceived the magnetic field better than the non‐EHS group. In conclusion, the subjective symptoms did not result from the 60 Hz, 12.5 µT magnetic field exposures but from other non‐physiological factors. Bioelectromagnetics 33:326–333, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-8462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-186X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bem.20711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22012875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>60 Hz ; Adult ; Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects ; Female ; Heart Rate - radiation effects ; Humans ; hypersensitivity ; Male ; Perception ; physiological changes ; Respiration - radiation effects ; subjective symptoms</subject><ispartof>Bioelectromagnetics, 2012-05, Vol.33 (4), p.326-333</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-86e3df574e1c99bb4c7df2f2c946a7349ad5e34cc1a777b82ac59a51c4cdac5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-86e3df574e1c99bb4c7df2f2c946a7349ad5e34cc1a777b82ac59a51c4cdac5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbem.20711$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbem.20711$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22012875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Deok Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jae Lim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Ki Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dong In</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Min Kyung</creatorcontrib><title>Origins of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to 60 Hz magnetic fields: A provocation study</title><title>Bioelectromagnetics</title><addtitle>Bioelectromagnetics</addtitle><description>With increasing electrical device usage, social concerns about the possible effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic fields on human health have increased. The number of people with self‐attributed electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) who complain of various subjective symptoms such as headache and insomnia has also increased. However, it is unclear whether EHS results from physiological or other origins. In this double‐blinded study, we simultaneously investigated physiological changes (heart rate, respiration rate, and heart rate variability), subjective symptoms, and perception of the magnetic field to assess origins of the subjective symptoms. Two volunteer groups of 15 self‐reported EHS and 16 non‐EHS individuals were tested with exposure to sham and real (60 Hz, 12.5 µT) magnetic fields for 30 min. Magnetic field exposure did not have any effects on physiological parameters or eight subjective symptoms in either group. There was also no evidence that the EHS group perceived the magnetic field better than the non‐EHS group. In conclusion, the subjective symptoms did not result from the 60 Hz, 12.5 µT magnetic field exposures but from other non‐physiological factors. Bioelectromagnetics 33:326–333, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>60 Hz</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hypersensitivity</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>physiological changes</subject><subject>Respiration - radiation effects</subject><subject>subjective symptoms</subject><issn>0197-8462</issn><issn>1521-186X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMsyBDEUQFOKYjwWfkBlyaJHkn6kY2cUhvKo8iiKRSqdvk3ox0gyaCtbv-lLNMPsrO5dnHvq1kFolZI-JYRtZlD1GeGUzqAejRkNaJpcz6IeoYIHaZSwBbTo3AMhJE1JOI8WGCOUpTzuodtTa-5M7XBTYChBe9tU6q4GbzS-b0dgHdTOePNsfIt9gxPy-f4xfMNTqDBQ5m4Lb-ORbZ4brbxpauz8OG-X0VyhSgcrv3MJXe7tXuwMg6PT_YOd7aNAMxHSIE0gzIuYR0C1EFkWaZ4XrGBaRIniYSRUHkMYaU0V5zxLmdKxUDHVkc67tQiX0PrE233wNAbnZWWchrJUNTRjJ2nCukpRnIoO3Zig2jbOWSjkyJpK2VZSIr9byq6l_GnZsWu_2nFWQT4l_-J1wOYEeDEltP-b5GD3-E8ZTC6M8_A6vVD2USY85LG8OtmXNxfnYsDYoTwLvwBi0I8G</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Kim, Deok Won</creator><creator>Choi, Jae Lim</creator><creator>Nam, Ki Chang</creator><creator>Yang, Dong In</creator><creator>Kwon, Min Kyung</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Origins of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to 60 Hz magnetic fields: A provocation study</title><author>Kim, Deok Won ; Choi, Jae Lim ; Nam, Ki Chang ; Yang, Dong In ; Kwon, Min Kyung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-86e3df574e1c99bb4c7df2f2c946a7349ad5e34cc1a777b82ac59a51c4cdac5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>60 Hz</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hypersensitivity</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>physiological changes</topic><topic>Respiration - radiation effects</topic><topic>subjective symptoms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Deok Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jae Lim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Ki Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dong In</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Min Kyung</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bioelectromagnetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Deok Won</au><au>Choi, Jae Lim</au><au>Nam, Ki Chang</au><au>Yang, Dong In</au><au>Kwon, Min Kyung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Origins of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to 60 Hz magnetic fields: A provocation study</atitle><jtitle>Bioelectromagnetics</jtitle><addtitle>Bioelectromagnetics</addtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>326-333</pages><issn>0197-8462</issn><eissn>1521-186X</eissn><abstract>With increasing electrical device usage, social concerns about the possible effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic fields on human health have increased. The number of people with self‐attributed electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) who complain of various subjective symptoms such as headache and insomnia has also increased. However, it is unclear whether EHS results from physiological or other origins. In this double‐blinded study, we simultaneously investigated physiological changes (heart rate, respiration rate, and heart rate variability), subjective symptoms, and perception of the magnetic field to assess origins of the subjective symptoms. Two volunteer groups of 15 self‐reported EHS and 16 non‐EHS individuals were tested with exposure to sham and real (60 Hz, 12.5 µT) magnetic fields for 30 min. Magnetic field exposure did not have any effects on physiological parameters or eight subjective symptoms in either group. There was also no evidence that the EHS group perceived the magnetic field better than the non‐EHS group. In conclusion, the subjective symptoms did not result from the 60 Hz, 12.5 µT magnetic field exposures but from other non‐physiological factors. Bioelectromagnetics 33:326–333, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22012875</pmid><doi>10.1002/bem.20711</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-8462
ispartof Bioelectromagnetics, 2012-05, Vol.33 (4), p.326-333
issn 0197-8462
1521-186X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1620024589
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects 60 Hz
Adult
Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects
Female
Heart Rate - radiation effects
Humans
hypersensitivity
Male
Perception
physiological changes
Respiration - radiation effects
subjective symptoms
title Origins of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to 60 Hz magnetic fields: A provocation study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T22%3A02%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Origins%20of%20electromagnetic%20hypersensitivity%20to%2060%E2%80%89Hz%20magnetic%20fields:%20A%20provocation%20study&rft.jtitle=Bioelectromagnetics&rft.au=Kim,%20Deok%20Won&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=326-333&rft.issn=0197-8462&rft.eissn=1521-186X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bem.20711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1620024589%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1620024589&rft_id=info:pmid/22012875&rfr_iscdi=true