Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study

It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model. The CircAdapt computa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Europace (London, England) England), 2014-11, Vol.16 Suppl 4 (suppl 4), p.iv62-iv68
Hauptverfasser: Huntjens, Peter R, Walmsley, John, Ploux, Sylvain, Bordachar, Pierre, Prinzen, Frits W, Delhaas, Tammo, Lumens, Joost
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page iv68
container_issue suppl 4
container_start_page iv62
container_title Europace (London, England)
container_volume 16 Suppl 4
creator Huntjens, Peter R
Walmsley, John
Ploux, Sylvain
Bordachar, Pierre
Prinzen, Frits W
Delhaas, Tammo
Lumens, Joost
description It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model. The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work. These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/europace/euu231
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1620024340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1620024340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8ba3b3834b7079c4d4f02069eb1932e47889577eb29721a0adc9b83b520fc4603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqUwsyGPLKHXjzzMhioelSqxwBw5zo0alMTBdiqVnf9N-mK6R-c79wyHkFsGDwyUmOPgbK8NjmLggp2RKYsFjzgofj5qUCqKGVcTcuX9FwCkXMWXZMJjkXCW8in5XXZVM2BnkNqKNlgFusEuuNoMjXajoUvaW1-H2nbUYaNDvUEaLPVmh63Re7KHvred38ORlbU2O2_bmbWzXf1zCIY1Ot1vH6mmrS2xoT4M5faaXFS68XhzvDPy-fL8sXiLVu-vy8XTKjISZIiyQotCZEIWKaTKyFJWwCFRWDAlOMo0y1ScplhwlXKmQZdGFZkoYg6VkQmIGbk_9PbOfg_oQ97W3mDT6A7t4HOWcAAuhdxF54eocdZ7h1Xeu7rVbpszyHfb56ft88P248fdsXwoWiz_86exxR8fq4VI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1620024340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Huntjens, Peter R ; Walmsley, John ; Ploux, Sylvain ; Bordachar, Pierre ; Prinzen, Frits W ; Delhaas, Tammo ; Lumens, Joost</creator><creatorcontrib>Huntjens, Peter R ; Walmsley, John ; Ploux, Sylvain ; Bordachar, Pierre ; Prinzen, Frits W ; Delhaas, Tammo ; Lumens, Joost</creatorcontrib><description>It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model. The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work. These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu231</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25362172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis ; Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology ; Bundle-Branch Block - therapy ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Cicatrix - physiopathology ; Computer Simulation ; Equipment Design ; Heart Failure - diagnosis ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Humans ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Myocardium - pathology ; Stroke Volume ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Ventricular Function, Right ; Ventricular Pressure</subject><ispartof>Europace (London, England), 2014-11, Vol.16 Suppl 4 (suppl 4), p.iv62-iv68</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8ba3b3834b7079c4d4f02069eb1932e47889577eb29721a0adc9b83b520fc4603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8ba3b3834b7079c4d4f02069eb1932e47889577eb29721a0adc9b83b520fc4603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25362172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huntjens, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmsley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploux, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordachar, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinzen, Frits W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delhaas, Tammo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumens, Joost</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study</title><title>Europace (London, England)</title><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><description>It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model. The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work. These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective.</description><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Cicatrix - physiopathology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Myocardium - pathology</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Right</subject><subject>Ventricular Pressure</subject><issn>1099-5129</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqUwsyGPLKHXjzzMhioelSqxwBw5zo0alMTBdiqVnf9N-mK6R-c79wyHkFsGDwyUmOPgbK8NjmLggp2RKYsFjzgofj5qUCqKGVcTcuX9FwCkXMWXZMJjkXCW8in5XXZVM2BnkNqKNlgFusEuuNoMjXajoUvaW1-H2nbUYaNDvUEaLPVmh63Re7KHvred38ORlbU2O2_bmbWzXf1zCIY1Ot1vH6mmrS2xoT4M5faaXFS68XhzvDPy-fL8sXiLVu-vy8XTKjISZIiyQotCZEIWKaTKyFJWwCFRWDAlOMo0y1ScplhwlXKmQZdGFZkoYg6VkQmIGbk_9PbOfg_oQ97W3mDT6A7t4HOWcAAuhdxF54eocdZ7h1Xeu7rVbpszyHfb56ft88P248fdsXwoWiz_86exxR8fq4VI</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Huntjens, Peter R</creator><creator>Walmsley, John</creator><creator>Ploux, Sylvain</creator><creator>Bordachar, Pierre</creator><creator>Prinzen, Frits W</creator><creator>Delhaas, Tammo</creator><creator>Lumens, Joost</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study</title><author>Huntjens, Peter R ; Walmsley, John ; Ploux, Sylvain ; Bordachar, Pierre ; Prinzen, Frits W ; Delhaas, Tammo ; Lumens, Joost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8ba3b3834b7079c4d4f02069eb1932e47889577eb29721a0adc9b83b520fc4603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Cicatrix - physiopathology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Myocardium - pathology</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Right</topic><topic>Ventricular Pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huntjens, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmsley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploux, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordachar, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinzen, Frits W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delhaas, Tammo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumens, Joost</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huntjens, Peter R</au><au>Walmsley, John</au><au>Ploux, Sylvain</au><au>Bordachar, Pierre</au><au>Prinzen, Frits W</au><au>Delhaas, Tammo</au><au>Lumens, Joost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study</atitle><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16 Suppl 4</volume><issue>suppl 4</issue><spage>iv62</spage><epage>iv68</epage><pages>iv62-iv68</pages><issn>1099-5129</issn><eissn>1532-2092</eissn><abstract>It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model. The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work. These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>25362172</pmid><doi>10.1093/europace/euu231</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-5129
ispartof Europace (London, England), 2014-11, Vol.16 Suppl 4 (suppl 4), p.iv62-iv68
issn 1099-5129
1532-2092
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1620024340
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis
Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology
Bundle-Branch Block - therapy
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
Cicatrix - pathology
Cicatrix - physiopathology
Computer Simulation
Equipment Design
Heart Failure - diagnosis
Heart Failure - physiopathology
Heart Failure - therapy
Humans
Models, Cardiovascular
Myocardium - pathology
Stroke Volume
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy
Ventricular Function, Left
Ventricular Function, Right
Ventricular Pressure
title Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A15%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20left%20ventricular%20lead%20position%20relative%20to%20scar%20location%20on%20response%20to%20cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy:%20a%20model%20study&rft.jtitle=Europace%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Huntjens,%20Peter%20R&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=16%20Suppl%204&rft.issue=suppl%204&rft.spage=iv62&rft.epage=iv68&rft.pages=iv62-iv68&rft.issn=1099-5129&rft.eissn=1532-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/europace/euu231&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1620024340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1620024340&rft_id=info:pmid/25362172&rfr_iscdi=true