Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study
It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model. The CircAdapt computa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Europace (London, England) England), 2014-11, Vol.16 Suppl 4 (suppl 4), p.iv62-iv68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | iv68 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl 4 |
container_start_page | iv62 |
container_title | Europace (London, England) |
container_volume | 16 Suppl 4 |
creator | Huntjens, Peter R Walmsley, John Ploux, Sylvain Bordachar, Pierre Prinzen, Frits W Delhaas, Tammo Lumens, Joost |
description | It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model.
The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work.
These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/europace/euu231 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1620024340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1620024340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8ba3b3834b7079c4d4f02069eb1932e47889577eb29721a0adc9b83b520fc4603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqUwsyGPLKHXjzzMhioelSqxwBw5zo0alMTBdiqVnf9N-mK6R-c79wyHkFsGDwyUmOPgbK8NjmLggp2RKYsFjzgofj5qUCqKGVcTcuX9FwCkXMWXZMJjkXCW8in5XXZVM2BnkNqKNlgFusEuuNoMjXajoUvaW1-H2nbUYaNDvUEaLPVmh63Re7KHvred38ORlbU2O2_bmbWzXf1zCIY1Ot1vH6mmrS2xoT4M5faaXFS68XhzvDPy-fL8sXiLVu-vy8XTKjISZIiyQotCZEIWKaTKyFJWwCFRWDAlOMo0y1ScplhwlXKmQZdGFZkoYg6VkQmIGbk_9PbOfg_oQ97W3mDT6A7t4HOWcAAuhdxF54eocdZ7h1Xeu7rVbpszyHfb56ft88P248fdsXwoWiz_86exxR8fq4VI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1620024340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Huntjens, Peter R ; Walmsley, John ; Ploux, Sylvain ; Bordachar, Pierre ; Prinzen, Frits W ; Delhaas, Tammo ; Lumens, Joost</creator><creatorcontrib>Huntjens, Peter R ; Walmsley, John ; Ploux, Sylvain ; Bordachar, Pierre ; Prinzen, Frits W ; Delhaas, Tammo ; Lumens, Joost</creatorcontrib><description>It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model.
The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work.
These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu231</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25362172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis ; Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology ; Bundle-Branch Block - therapy ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Cicatrix - physiopathology ; Computer Simulation ; Equipment Design ; Heart Failure - diagnosis ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Humans ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Myocardium - pathology ; Stroke Volume ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Ventricular Function, Right ; Ventricular Pressure</subject><ispartof>Europace (London, England), 2014-11, Vol.16 Suppl 4 (suppl 4), p.iv62-iv68</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8ba3b3834b7079c4d4f02069eb1932e47889577eb29721a0adc9b83b520fc4603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8ba3b3834b7079c4d4f02069eb1932e47889577eb29721a0adc9b83b520fc4603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25362172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huntjens, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmsley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploux, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordachar, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinzen, Frits W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delhaas, Tammo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumens, Joost</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study</title><title>Europace (London, England)</title><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><description>It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model.
The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work.
These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective.</description><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Cicatrix - physiopathology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Myocardium - pathology</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Right</subject><subject>Ventricular Pressure</subject><issn>1099-5129</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqUwsyGPLKHXjzzMhioelSqxwBw5zo0alMTBdiqVnf9N-mK6R-c79wyHkFsGDwyUmOPgbK8NjmLggp2RKYsFjzgofj5qUCqKGVcTcuX9FwCkXMWXZMJjkXCW8in5XXZVM2BnkNqKNlgFusEuuNoMjXajoUvaW1-H2nbUYaNDvUEaLPVmh63Re7KHvred38ORlbU2O2_bmbWzXf1zCIY1Ot1vH6mmrS2xoT4M5faaXFS68XhzvDPy-fL8sXiLVu-vy8XTKjISZIiyQotCZEIWKaTKyFJWwCFRWDAlOMo0y1ScplhwlXKmQZdGFZkoYg6VkQmIGbk_9PbOfg_oQ97W3mDT6A7t4HOWcAAuhdxF54eocdZ7h1Xeu7rVbpszyHfb56ft88P248fdsXwoWiz_86exxR8fq4VI</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Huntjens, Peter R</creator><creator>Walmsley, John</creator><creator>Ploux, Sylvain</creator><creator>Bordachar, Pierre</creator><creator>Prinzen, Frits W</creator><creator>Delhaas, Tammo</creator><creator>Lumens, Joost</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study</title><author>Huntjens, Peter R ; Walmsley, John ; Ploux, Sylvain ; Bordachar, Pierre ; Prinzen, Frits W ; Delhaas, Tammo ; Lumens, Joost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8ba3b3834b7079c4d4f02069eb1932e47889577eb29721a0adc9b83b520fc4603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Cicatrix - physiopathology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Myocardium - pathology</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Right</topic><topic>Ventricular Pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huntjens, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmsley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploux, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordachar, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinzen, Frits W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delhaas, Tammo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumens, Joost</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huntjens, Peter R</au><au>Walmsley, John</au><au>Ploux, Sylvain</au><au>Bordachar, Pierre</au><au>Prinzen, Frits W</au><au>Delhaas, Tammo</au><au>Lumens, Joost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study</atitle><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16 Suppl 4</volume><issue>suppl 4</issue><spage>iv62</spage><epage>iv68</epage><pages>iv62-iv68</pages><issn>1099-5129</issn><eissn>1532-2092</eissn><abstract>It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model.
The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work.
These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>25362172</pmid><doi>10.1093/europace/euu231</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1099-5129 |
ispartof | Europace (London, England), 2014-11, Vol.16 Suppl 4 (suppl 4), p.iv62-iv68 |
issn | 1099-5129 1532-2092 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1620024340 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology Bundle-Branch Block - therapy Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices Cicatrix - pathology Cicatrix - physiopathology Computer Simulation Equipment Design Heart Failure - diagnosis Heart Failure - physiopathology Heart Failure - therapy Humans Models, Cardiovascular Myocardium - pathology Stroke Volume Treatment Outcome Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy Ventricular Function, Left Ventricular Function, Right Ventricular Pressure |
title | Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A15%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20left%20ventricular%20lead%20position%20relative%20to%20scar%20location%20on%20response%20to%20cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy:%20a%20model%20study&rft.jtitle=Europace%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Huntjens,%20Peter%20R&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=16%20Suppl%204&rft.issue=suppl%204&rft.spage=iv62&rft.epage=iv68&rft.pages=iv62-iv68&rft.issn=1099-5129&rft.eissn=1532-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/europace/euu231&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1620024340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1620024340&rft_id=info:pmid/25362172&rfr_iscdi=true |