Evaluation of a Biologically Active Cover for Mitigation of Landfill Gas Emissions

Landfills are the third largest source of anthropogenic CH4 in the United States, and there is potential for reduction in this source of greenhouse gases and other contaminants. The objective of this work was to contrast emissions of CH4 and non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs) from landfill cells...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2004-09, Vol.38 (18), p.4891-4899
Hauptverfasser: Barlaz, M. A, Green, R. B, Chanton, J. P, Goldsmith, C. D, Hater, G. R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4899
container_issue 18
container_start_page 4891
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 38
creator Barlaz, M. A
Green, R. B
Chanton, J. P
Goldsmith, C. D
Hater, G. R
description Landfills are the third largest source of anthropogenic CH4 in the United States, and there is potential for reduction in this source of greenhouse gases and other contaminants. The objective of this work was to contrast emissions of CH4 and non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs) from landfill cells covered with soil or a biologically active cover consisting of yard waste compost. On the basis of four field campaigns over 14 months, CH4 emissions from the biocover (BC) varied from −1.73 to 1.33 g m-2 d-1, with atmospheric uptake measured in 52% of tests. BC emissions did not increase when the gas collection system was turned off. Uptake of atmospheric CH4 was measured in 54% of tests on the soil cover (SC) when the gas collection was system active and 12% when the gas collection system was off. Many (26%) relatively high fluxes (>15 g m-2 d-1) were measured from the SC as were some dramatic effects due to deactivation of the gas collection system. In tests with positive emissions, stable isotope measurements showed that the BC and SC were responsible for oxidation of 55% and 21% of the CH4 reaching the bottom of the respective cover. Seven of the highest 10 NMOC emissions were measured in the SC, and 17 of 21 fluxes for speciated organic compounds were higher in the SC. The relationship between CH4, NMOC, and individual organic compound emissions suggested a correlation between CH4 and trace organic oxidation. BCs can reduce landfill gas emissions in the absence of a gas collection system and can serve as a polishing step in the presence of an active system.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es049605b
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16195665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16195665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a534t-8051032578e6b02c783736e95a03b3c2b435efd77347653c090427ab63f936e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1LHDEYB_AglbpqD_0CJRQqeBh9kkySmaNd1hdcsVSlpZeQyWYkNjvRZGbRb29kl12wh55yeH7587wg9JnAEQFKjm2CshbAmy00IpxCwStOPqARAGFFzcTvHbSb0gMAUAbVR7RDeFnJCsgI_ZwstB9070KHQ4s1_u6CD_fOaO9f8Inp3cLicVjYiNsQ8ZXr3f1aT3U3a533-EwnPJm7lHIh7aPtVvtkP63ePXR3OrkdnxfT67OL8cm00JyVfVEBJ8Aol5UVDVAjKyaZsDXXwBpmaFMybtuZlKyUgjMDNZRU6kawNo9kKdtDB8vcxxieBpt6lTsw1nvd2TAkRQSpuchf_wtLCZnVGX59Bx_CELs8hMqLI7QWXGZ0uEQmhpSibdVjdHMdXxQB9XYOtT5Htl9WgUMzt7ONXO0_g28roFNeeRt1Z1zaOJEDafU2a7F0LvX2eV3X8a8Skkmubn_cKHJzWV-O_0j1a5OrTdoM8W-Dr22Mqdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230129657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Biologically Active Cover for Mitigation of Landfill Gas Emissions</title><source>American Chemical Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Barlaz, M. A ; Green, R. B ; Chanton, J. P ; Goldsmith, C. D ; Hater, G. R</creator><creatorcontrib>Barlaz, M. A ; Green, R. B ; Chanton, J. P ; Goldsmith, C. D ; Hater, G. R</creatorcontrib><description>Landfills are the third largest source of anthropogenic CH4 in the United States, and there is potential for reduction in this source of greenhouse gases and other contaminants. The objective of this work was to contrast emissions of CH4 and non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs) from landfill cells covered with soil or a biologically active cover consisting of yard waste compost. On the basis of four field campaigns over 14 months, CH4 emissions from the biocover (BC) varied from −1.73 to 1.33 g m-2 d-1, with atmospheric uptake measured in 52% of tests. BC emissions did not increase when the gas collection system was turned off. Uptake of atmospheric CH4 was measured in 54% of tests on the soil cover (SC) when the gas collection was system active and 12% when the gas collection system was off. Many (26%) relatively high fluxes (&gt;15 g m-2 d-1) were measured from the SC as were some dramatic effects due to deactivation of the gas collection system. In tests with positive emissions, stable isotope measurements showed that the BC and SC were responsible for oxidation of 55% and 21% of the CH4 reaching the bottom of the respective cover. Seven of the highest 10 NMOC emissions were measured in the SC, and 17 of 21 fluxes for speciated organic compounds were higher in the SC. The relationship between CH4, NMOC, and individual organic compound emissions suggested a correlation between CH4 and trace organic oxidation. BCs can reduce landfill gas emissions in the absence of a gas collection system and can serve as a polishing step in the presence of an active system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es049605b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15487801</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Carbon Isotopes - analysis ; Emissions ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gases ; Greenhouse gases ; Hydrocarbons, Acyclic - analysis ; Hydrocarbons, Cyclic - analysis ; Hydrocarbons, Halogenated - analysis ; Isotopes ; Kentucky ; Landfill ; Methane ; Methane - analysis ; Oxidation ; Pollution ; Prevention and purification methods ; Refuse Disposal - methods ; Soil - analysis ; Transports and other ; Volatilization ; Yard waste</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2004-09, Vol.38 (18), p.4891-4899</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Sep 15, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a534t-8051032578e6b02c783736e95a03b3c2b435efd77347653c090427ab63f936e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a534t-8051032578e6b02c783736e95a03b3c2b435efd77347653c090427ab63f936e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es049605b$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es049605b$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16102282$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15487801$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barlaz, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, R. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chanton, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, C. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hater, G. R</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Biologically Active Cover for Mitigation of Landfill Gas Emissions</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Landfills are the third largest source of anthropogenic CH4 in the United States, and there is potential for reduction in this source of greenhouse gases and other contaminants. The objective of this work was to contrast emissions of CH4 and non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs) from landfill cells covered with soil or a biologically active cover consisting of yard waste compost. On the basis of four field campaigns over 14 months, CH4 emissions from the biocover (BC) varied from −1.73 to 1.33 g m-2 d-1, with atmospheric uptake measured in 52% of tests. BC emissions did not increase when the gas collection system was turned off. Uptake of atmospheric CH4 was measured in 54% of tests on the soil cover (SC) when the gas collection was system active and 12% when the gas collection system was off. Many (26%) relatively high fluxes (&gt;15 g m-2 d-1) were measured from the SC as were some dramatic effects due to deactivation of the gas collection system. In tests with positive emissions, stable isotope measurements showed that the BC and SC were responsible for oxidation of 55% and 21% of the CH4 reaching the bottom of the respective cover. Seven of the highest 10 NMOC emissions were measured in the SC, and 17 of 21 fluxes for speciated organic compounds were higher in the SC. The relationship between CH4, NMOC, and individual organic compound emissions suggested a correlation between CH4 and trace organic oxidation. BCs can reduce landfill gas emissions in the absence of a gas collection system and can serve as a polishing step in the presence of an active system.</description><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Carbon Isotopes - analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons, Acyclic - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons, Cyclic - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons, Halogenated - analysis</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Kentucky</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Prevention and purification methods</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - methods</subject><subject>Soil - analysis</subject><subject>Transports and other</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><subject>Yard waste</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1LHDEYB_AglbpqD_0CJRQqeBh9kkySmaNd1hdcsVSlpZeQyWYkNjvRZGbRb29kl12wh55yeH7587wg9JnAEQFKjm2CshbAmy00IpxCwStOPqARAGFFzcTvHbSb0gMAUAbVR7RDeFnJCsgI_ZwstB9070KHQ4s1_u6CD_fOaO9f8Inp3cLicVjYiNsQ8ZXr3f1aT3U3a533-EwnPJm7lHIh7aPtVvtkP63ePXR3OrkdnxfT67OL8cm00JyVfVEBJ8Aol5UVDVAjKyaZsDXXwBpmaFMybtuZlKyUgjMDNZRU6kawNo9kKdtDB8vcxxieBpt6lTsw1nvd2TAkRQSpuchf_wtLCZnVGX59Bx_CELs8hMqLI7QWXGZ0uEQmhpSibdVjdHMdXxQB9XYOtT5Htl9WgUMzt7ONXO0_g28roFNeeRt1Z1zaOJEDafU2a7F0LvX2eV3X8a8Skkmubn_cKHJzWV-O_0j1a5OrTdoM8W-Dr22Mqdg</recordid><startdate>20040915</startdate><enddate>20040915</enddate><creator>Barlaz, M. A</creator><creator>Green, R. B</creator><creator>Chanton, J. P</creator><creator>Goldsmith, C. D</creator><creator>Hater, G. R</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040915</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Biologically Active Cover for Mitigation of Landfill Gas Emissions</title><author>Barlaz, M. A ; Green, R. B ; Chanton, J. P ; Goldsmith, C. D ; Hater, G. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a534t-8051032578e6b02c783736e95a03b3c2b435efd77347653c090427ab63f936e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Carbon Isotopes - analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons, Acyclic - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons, Cyclic - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons, Halogenated - analysis</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Kentucky</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Prevention and purification methods</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - methods</topic><topic>Soil - analysis</topic><topic>Transports and other</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><topic>Yard waste</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barlaz, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, R. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chanton, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, C. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hater, G. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barlaz, M. A</au><au>Green, R. B</au><au>Chanton, J. P</au><au>Goldsmith, C. D</au><au>Hater, G. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Biologically Active Cover for Mitigation of Landfill Gas Emissions</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2004-09-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>4891</spage><epage>4899</epage><pages>4891-4899</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Landfills are the third largest source of anthropogenic CH4 in the United States, and there is potential for reduction in this source of greenhouse gases and other contaminants. The objective of this work was to contrast emissions of CH4 and non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs) from landfill cells covered with soil or a biologically active cover consisting of yard waste compost. On the basis of four field campaigns over 14 months, CH4 emissions from the biocover (BC) varied from −1.73 to 1.33 g m-2 d-1, with atmospheric uptake measured in 52% of tests. BC emissions did not increase when the gas collection system was turned off. Uptake of atmospheric CH4 was measured in 54% of tests on the soil cover (SC) when the gas collection was system active and 12% when the gas collection system was off. Many (26%) relatively high fluxes (&gt;15 g m-2 d-1) were measured from the SC as were some dramatic effects due to deactivation of the gas collection system. In tests with positive emissions, stable isotope measurements showed that the BC and SC were responsible for oxidation of 55% and 21% of the CH4 reaching the bottom of the respective cover. Seven of the highest 10 NMOC emissions were measured in the SC, and 17 of 21 fluxes for speciated organic compounds were higher in the SC. The relationship between CH4, NMOC, and individual organic compound emissions suggested a correlation between CH4 and trace organic oxidation. BCs can reduce landfill gas emissions in the absence of a gas collection system and can serve as a polishing step in the presence of an active system.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>15487801</pmid><doi>10.1021/es049605b</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2004-09, Vol.38 (18), p.4891-4899
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16195665
source American Chemical Society; MEDLINE
subjects Air Pollutants - analysis
Applied sciences
Atmospheric pollution
Carbon Isotopes - analysis
Emissions
Exact sciences and technology
Gases
Greenhouse gases
Hydrocarbons, Acyclic - analysis
Hydrocarbons, Cyclic - analysis
Hydrocarbons, Halogenated - analysis
Isotopes
Kentucky
Landfill
Methane
Methane - analysis
Oxidation
Pollution
Prevention and purification methods
Refuse Disposal - methods
Soil - analysis
Transports and other
Volatilization
Yard waste
title Evaluation of a Biologically Active Cover for Mitigation of Landfill Gas Emissions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T00%3A57%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Biologically%20Active%20Cover%20for%20Mitigation%20of%20Landfill%20Gas%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Barlaz,%20M.%20A&rft.date=2004-09-15&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=4891&rft.epage=4899&rft.pages=4891-4899&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es049605b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16195665%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230129657&rft_id=info:pmid/15487801&rfr_iscdi=true