The Neural Substrates of Drawing: A Voxel-based Morphometry Analysis of Constructional, Hierarchical, and Spatial Representation Deficits

Deficits in the ability to draw objects, despite apparently intact perception and motor abilities, are defined as constructional apraxia. Constructional deficits, often diagnosed based on performance on copying complex figures, have been reported in a range of pathologies, perhaps reflecting the con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cognitive neuroscience 2014-12, Vol.26 (12), p.2701-2715
Hauptverfasser: Chechlacz, Magdalena, Novick, Abigail, Rotshtein, Pia, Bickerton, Wai-Ling, Humphreys, Glyn W., Demeyere, Nele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2715
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2701
container_title Journal of cognitive neuroscience
container_volume 26
creator Chechlacz, Magdalena
Novick, Abigail
Rotshtein, Pia
Bickerton, Wai-Ling
Humphreys, Glyn W.
Demeyere, Nele
description Deficits in the ability to draw objects, despite apparently intact perception and motor abilities, are defined as constructional apraxia. Constructional deficits, often diagnosed based on performance on copying complex figures, have been reported in a range of pathologies, perhaps reflecting the contribution of several underlying factors to poor figure drawing. The current study provides a comprehensive analysis of brain–behavior relationships in drawing disorders based on data from a large cohort of subacute stroke patients ( = 358) using whole-brain voxel-wise statistical analyses linked to behavioral measures from a complex figure copy task. We found that (i) overall poor performance on figure copying was associated with subcortical lesions (BG and thalamus), (ii) lateralized deficits with respect to the midline of the viewer were associated with lesions within the posterior parietal lobule, and (iii) spatial positioning errors across the entire figure were associated with lesions within visual processing areas (lingual gyrus and calcarine) and the insula. Furthermore, deficits in reproducing global aspects of form were associated with damage to the right middle temporal gyrus, whereas deficits in representing local features were linked to the left hemisphere lesions within calcarine cortex (extending into the cuneus and precuneus), the insula, and the TPJ. The current study provides strong evidence that impairments in separate cognitive mechanisms (e.g., spatial coding, attention, motor execution, and planning) linked to different brain lesions contribute to poor performance on complex figure copying tasks. The data support the argument that drawing depends on several cognitive processes operating via discrete neuronal networks and that constructional problems as well as hierarchical and spatial representation deficits contribute to poor figure copying.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/jocn_a_00664
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_mit_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1619315684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3500306241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-3f6adf15b146ac41593867e4213ffc038faba38000d9e7c44c0d568ad4fb792d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokNhxxpZYtNFA_6LE7MbTYEiFZBoQewsx7lmPMrEwU5ohzfgrXGYgqqqC1ZXto7PZ_tD6CklLyiV7OUm2F4bTYiU4h5a0JKToq5VfR8tSB6FYurrAXqU0oYQwkopHqIDJmrFKyEW6NfFGvAHmKLp8PnUpDGaERIODp9Ec-n7b6_wEn8JV9AVjUnQ4vchDuuwhTHu8LI33S75P_gq9PnwZEcf8u4xPvUQTbRrb-eV6Vt8PpjR55hPMERI0I9mZvEJOG_9mB6jB850CZ5cz0P0-c3ri9Vpcfbx7bvV8qywJVFjwZ00raNlQ4U0VtBS8VpWIBjlzlnCa2caw-v81lZBZYWwpC1lbVrhmkqxlh-io713iOH7BGnUW58sdJ3pIUxJU8lLwjit-X-gVHGa7SKjz2-hmzDF_BMzxUpFJalUpo73lI0hpQhOD9FvTdxpSvTcpr7ZZsafXUunZgvtP_hvfRlY7oGtvxE4O34w6SnTnHAhlGaE0ezXROmffrgdcnSH4877_Aamcr7Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1625916079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Neural Substrates of Drawing: A Voxel-based Morphometry Analysis of Constructional, Hierarchical, and Spatial Representation Deficits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Chechlacz, Magdalena ; Novick, Abigail ; Rotshtein, Pia ; Bickerton, Wai-Ling ; Humphreys, Glyn W. ; Demeyere, Nele</creator><creatorcontrib>Chechlacz, Magdalena ; Novick, Abigail ; Rotshtein, Pia ; Bickerton, Wai-Ling ; Humphreys, Glyn W. ; Demeyere, Nele</creatorcontrib><description>Deficits in the ability to draw objects, despite apparently intact perception and motor abilities, are defined as constructional apraxia. Constructional deficits, often diagnosed based on performance on copying complex figures, have been reported in a range of pathologies, perhaps reflecting the contribution of several underlying factors to poor figure drawing. The current study provides a comprehensive analysis of brain–behavior relationships in drawing disorders based on data from a large cohort of subacute stroke patients ( = 358) using whole-brain voxel-wise statistical analyses linked to behavioral measures from a complex figure copy task. We found that (i) overall poor performance on figure copying was associated with subcortical lesions (BG and thalamus), (ii) lateralized deficits with respect to the midline of the viewer were associated with lesions within the posterior parietal lobule, and (iii) spatial positioning errors across the entire figure were associated with lesions within visual processing areas (lingual gyrus and calcarine) and the insula. Furthermore, deficits in reproducing global aspects of form were associated with damage to the right middle temporal gyrus, whereas deficits in representing local features were linked to the left hemisphere lesions within calcarine cortex (extending into the cuneus and precuneus), the insula, and the TPJ. The current study provides strong evidence that impairments in separate cognitive mechanisms (e.g., spatial coding, attention, motor execution, and planning) linked to different brain lesions contribute to poor performance on complex figure copying tasks. The data support the argument that drawing depends on several cognitive processes operating via discrete neuronal networks and that constructional problems as well as hierarchical and spatial representation deficits contribute to poor figure copying.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-929X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00664</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24893744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brain ; Brain Mapping ; Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognition Disorders - etiology ; Female ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor ability ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Perceptual Disorders - complications ; Perceptual Disorders - pathology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Radiography ; Sensory perception ; Space Perception - physiology ; Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2014-12, Vol.26 (12), p.2701-2715</ispartof><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Dec 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-3f6adf15b146ac41593867e4213ffc038faba38000d9e7c44c0d568ad4fb792d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-3f6adf15b146ac41593867e4213ffc038faba38000d9e7c44c0d568ad4fb792d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://direct.mit.edu/jocn/article/doi/10.1162/jocn_a_00664$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,54008,54009</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24893744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chechlacz, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novick, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotshtein, Pia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickerton, Wai-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, Glyn W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demeyere, Nele</creatorcontrib><title>The Neural Substrates of Drawing: A Voxel-based Morphometry Analysis of Constructional, Hierarchical, and Spatial Representation Deficits</title><title>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><description>Deficits in the ability to draw objects, despite apparently intact perception and motor abilities, are defined as constructional apraxia. Constructional deficits, often diagnosed based on performance on copying complex figures, have been reported in a range of pathologies, perhaps reflecting the contribution of several underlying factors to poor figure drawing. The current study provides a comprehensive analysis of brain–behavior relationships in drawing disorders based on data from a large cohort of subacute stroke patients ( = 358) using whole-brain voxel-wise statistical analyses linked to behavioral measures from a complex figure copy task. We found that (i) overall poor performance on figure copying was associated with subcortical lesions (BG and thalamus), (ii) lateralized deficits with respect to the midline of the viewer were associated with lesions within the posterior parietal lobule, and (iii) spatial positioning errors across the entire figure were associated with lesions within visual processing areas (lingual gyrus and calcarine) and the insula. Furthermore, deficits in reproducing global aspects of form were associated with damage to the right middle temporal gyrus, whereas deficits in representing local features were linked to the left hemisphere lesions within calcarine cortex (extending into the cuneus and precuneus), the insula, and the TPJ. The current study provides strong evidence that impairments in separate cognitive mechanisms (e.g., spatial coding, attention, motor execution, and planning) linked to different brain lesions contribute to poor performance on complex figure copying tasks. The data support the argument that drawing depends on several cognitive processes operating via discrete neuronal networks and that constructional problems as well as hierarchical and spatial representation deficits contribute to poor figure copying.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor ability</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Perceptual Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Perceptual Disorders - pathology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0898-929X</issn><issn>1530-8898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokNhxxpZYtNFA_6LE7MbTYEiFZBoQewsx7lmPMrEwU5ohzfgrXGYgqqqC1ZXto7PZ_tD6CklLyiV7OUm2F4bTYiU4h5a0JKToq5VfR8tSB6FYurrAXqU0oYQwkopHqIDJmrFKyEW6NfFGvAHmKLp8PnUpDGaERIODp9Ec-n7b6_wEn8JV9AVjUnQ4vchDuuwhTHu8LI33S75P_gq9PnwZEcf8u4xPvUQTbRrb-eV6Vt8PpjR55hPMERI0I9mZvEJOG_9mB6jB850CZ5cz0P0-c3ri9Vpcfbx7bvV8qywJVFjwZ00raNlQ4U0VtBS8VpWIBjlzlnCa2caw-v81lZBZYWwpC1lbVrhmkqxlh-io713iOH7BGnUW58sdJ3pIUxJU8lLwjit-X-gVHGa7SKjz2-hmzDF_BMzxUpFJalUpo73lI0hpQhOD9FvTdxpSvTcpr7ZZsafXUunZgvtP_hvfRlY7oGtvxE4O34w6SnTnHAhlGaE0ezXROmffrgdcnSH4877_Aamcr7Z</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Chechlacz, Magdalena</creator><creator>Novick, Abigail</creator><creator>Rotshtein, Pia</creator><creator>Bickerton, Wai-Ling</creator><creator>Humphreys, Glyn W.</creator><creator>Demeyere, Nele</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>The Neural Substrates of Drawing: A Voxel-based Morphometry Analysis of Constructional, Hierarchical, and Spatial Representation Deficits</title><author>Chechlacz, Magdalena ; Novick, Abigail ; Rotshtein, Pia ; Bickerton, Wai-Ling ; Humphreys, Glyn W. ; Demeyere, Nele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-3f6adf15b146ac41593867e4213ffc038faba38000d9e7c44c0d568ad4fb792d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor ability</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Perceptual Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Perceptual Disorders - pathology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chechlacz, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novick, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotshtein, Pia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickerton, Wai-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, Glyn W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demeyere, Nele</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chechlacz, Magdalena</au><au>Novick, Abigail</au><au>Rotshtein, Pia</au><au>Bickerton, Wai-Ling</au><au>Humphreys, Glyn W.</au><au>Demeyere, Nele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Neural Substrates of Drawing: A Voxel-based Morphometry Analysis of Constructional, Hierarchical, and Spatial Representation Deficits</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2701</spage><epage>2715</epage><pages>2701-2715</pages><issn>0898-929X</issn><eissn>1530-8898</eissn><abstract>Deficits in the ability to draw objects, despite apparently intact perception and motor abilities, are defined as constructional apraxia. Constructional deficits, often diagnosed based on performance on copying complex figures, have been reported in a range of pathologies, perhaps reflecting the contribution of several underlying factors to poor figure drawing. The current study provides a comprehensive analysis of brain–behavior relationships in drawing disorders based on data from a large cohort of subacute stroke patients ( = 358) using whole-brain voxel-wise statistical analyses linked to behavioral measures from a complex figure copy task. We found that (i) overall poor performance on figure copying was associated with subcortical lesions (BG and thalamus), (ii) lateralized deficits with respect to the midline of the viewer were associated with lesions within the posterior parietal lobule, and (iii) spatial positioning errors across the entire figure were associated with lesions within visual processing areas (lingual gyrus and calcarine) and the insula. Furthermore, deficits in reproducing global aspects of form were associated with damage to the right middle temporal gyrus, whereas deficits in representing local features were linked to the left hemisphere lesions within calcarine cortex (extending into the cuneus and precuneus), the insula, and the TPJ. The current study provides strong evidence that impairments in separate cognitive mechanisms (e.g., spatial coding, attention, motor execution, and planning) linked to different brain lesions contribute to poor performance on complex figure copying tasks. The data support the argument that drawing depends on several cognitive processes operating via discrete neuronal networks and that constructional problems as well as hierarchical and spatial representation deficits contribute to poor figure copying.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><pmid>24893744</pmid><doi>10.1162/jocn_a_00664</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-929X
ispartof Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2014-12, Vol.26 (12), p.2701-2715
issn 0898-929X
1530-8898
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1619315684
source MEDLINE; MIT Press Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain
Brain Mapping
Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Cognition & reasoning
Cognition Disorders - etiology
Female
Functional Laterality - physiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motor ability
Neuropsychological Tests
Perceptual Disorders - complications
Perceptual Disorders - pathology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Radiography
Sensory perception
Space Perception - physiology
Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
title The Neural Substrates of Drawing: A Voxel-based Morphometry Analysis of Constructional, Hierarchical, and Spatial Representation Deficits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A17%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_mit_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Neural%20Substrates%20of%20Drawing:%20A%20Voxel-based%20Morphometry%20Analysis%20of%20Constructional,%20Hierarchical,%20and%20Spatial%20Representation%20Deficits&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cognitive%20neuroscience&rft.au=Chechlacz,%20Magdalena&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2701&rft.epage=2715&rft.pages=2701-2715&rft.issn=0898-929X&rft.eissn=1530-8898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/jocn_a_00664&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_mit_j%3E3500306241%3C/proquest_mit_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1625916079&rft_id=info:pmid/24893744&rfr_iscdi=true