Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant
A methodological approach for a comparative assessment of ionising radiation effects on man and non-human species, based on the use of Radiation Impact Factor (RIF) – ratios of actual exposure doses to biota species and man to critical dose is described. As such doses, radiation safety standards lim...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental radioactivity 2005, Vol.80 (1), p.1-25 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 25 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental radioactivity |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Fesenko, S.V. Alexakhin, R.M. Geras'kin, S.A. Sanzharova, N.I. Spirin, Ye.V. Spiridonov, S.I. Gontarenko, I.A. Strand, P. |
| description | A methodological approach for a comparative assessment of ionising radiation effects on man and non-human species, based on the use of
Radiation Impact Factor (RIF) – ratios of actual exposure doses to biota species and man to critical dose is described. As such doses, radiation safety standards limiting radiation exposure of man and doses at which radiobiological effects in non-human species were not observed after the Chernobyl accident, were employed. For the study area within the 30
km ChNPP zone dose burdens to 10 reference biota groups and the population (with and without evacuation) and the corresponding RIFs were calculated. It has been found that in 1986 (early period after the accident) the emergency radiation standards for man do not guarantee adequate protection of the environment, some species of which could be affected more than man. In 1991 RIFs for man were considerably (by factor of 20.0–1.1
×
10
5) higher compared with those for selected non-human species. Thus, for the long term after the accident radiation safety standards for man are shown to ensure radiation safety for biota as well. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.08.011 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16185220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0265931X04002620</els_id><sourcerecordid>16185220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-170d1099e45b3793e990ac38f9ecf7542786322935c203f2d38fa4042b4dc9583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2PFCEQhonRuOPqT9Bw0du0fHbDyZiJX8kmXjTxRmiozjLphhGY2cy_l3E62eNeoOrlqaLgRegtJR0ltP-47_YQT9n6jhEiOqI6QukztKFq0Fs6EPIcbQjr5VZz-ucGvSplT0jTFXuJbqjsJadKbNDDLi0Hm20NJ8CtW2hRijg00VXcojGkarGNHi-26RHXe8A2Q9OmCVwFj8fzVXQueIgV2_o_391Djmk8zzge3Qw240N6gLbONtbX6MVk5wJv1v0W_f765dfu-_bu57cfu893WycZrZeHeEq0BiFHPmgOWhPruJo0uGmQgg2q54xpLh0jfGK-HVlBBBuFd1oqfos-XPsecvp7hFLNEoqDuc0A6VgM7amSrNU-CYqBC8VZA-UVdDmVkmEyhxwWm8-GEnOxxuzNao25WGOIMs2aVvduveA4LuAfq1YvGvB-BWxxdp6yjS6UR66XvSKcN-7TlYP2b6cA2RQXIDrwITdDjE_hiVH-AeMTrtk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14734832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fesenko, S.V. ; Alexakhin, R.M. ; Geras'kin, S.A. ; Sanzharova, N.I. ; Spirin, Ye.V. ; Spiridonov, S.I. ; Gontarenko, I.A. ; Strand, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fesenko, S.V. ; Alexakhin, R.M. ; Geras'kin, S.A. ; Sanzharova, N.I. ; Spirin, Ye.V. ; Spiridonov, S.I. ; Gontarenko, I.A. ; Strand, P.</creatorcontrib><description>A methodological approach for a comparative assessment of ionising radiation effects on man and non-human species, based on the use of
Radiation Impact Factor (RIF) – ratios of actual exposure doses to biota species and man to critical dose is described. As such doses, radiation safety standards limiting radiation exposure of man and doses at which radiobiological effects in non-human species were not observed after the Chernobyl accident, were employed. For the study area within the 30
km ChNPP zone dose burdens to 10 reference biota groups and the population (with and without evacuation) and the corresponding RIFs were calculated. It has been found that in 1986 (early period after the accident) the emergency radiation standards for man do not guarantee adequate protection of the environment, some species of which could be affected more than man. In 1991 RIFs for man were considerably (by factor of 20.0–1.1
×
10
5) higher compared with those for selected non-human species. Thus, for the long term after the accident radiation safety standards for man are shown to ensure radiation safety for biota as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-931X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.08.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15653184</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JERAEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biodiversity ; Cattle ; Chernobyl accident ; Chernobyl Nuclear Accident ; Edible Grain - radiation effects ; Humans ; Invertebrates - radiation effects ; Man ; Mice ; Non-human species ; Pinus - radiation effects ; Poaceae - radiation effects ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation impact ; Radiation Monitoring - standards ; Radiation protection ; Radiation Protection - standards ; Radioactive Hazard Release ; Risk Assessment ; Soil Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis ; Soil Pollutants, Radioactive - standards ; Species Specificity ; Ukraine ; Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Radioactive - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental radioactivity, 2005, Vol.80 (1), p.1-25</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-170d1099e45b3793e990ac38f9ecf7542786322935c203f2d38fa4042b4dc9583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-170d1099e45b3793e990ac38f9ecf7542786322935c203f2d38fa4042b4dc9583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.08.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,4010,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16568033$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15653184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fesenko, S.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexakhin, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geras'kin, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanzharova, N.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spirin, Ye.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiridonov, S.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gontarenko, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strand, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant</title><title>Journal of environmental radioactivity</title><addtitle>J Environ Radioact</addtitle><description>A methodological approach for a comparative assessment of ionising radiation effects on man and non-human species, based on the use of
Radiation Impact Factor (RIF) – ratios of actual exposure doses to biota species and man to critical dose is described. As such doses, radiation safety standards limiting radiation exposure of man and doses at which radiobiological effects in non-human species were not observed after the Chernobyl accident, were employed. For the study area within the 30
km ChNPP zone dose burdens to 10 reference biota groups and the population (with and without evacuation) and the corresponding RIFs were calculated. It has been found that in 1986 (early period after the accident) the emergency radiation standards for man do not guarantee adequate protection of the environment, some species of which could be affected more than man. In 1991 RIFs for man were considerably (by factor of 20.0–1.1
×
10
5) higher compared with those for selected non-human species. Thus, for the long term after the accident radiation safety standards for man are shown to ensure radiation safety for biota as well.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chernobyl accident</subject><subject>Chernobyl Nuclear Accident</subject><subject>Edible Grain - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Invertebrates - radiation effects</subject><subject>Man</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Non-human species</subject><subject>Pinus - radiation effects</subject><subject>Poaceae - radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation impact</subject><subject>Radiation Monitoring - standards</subject><subject>Radiation protection</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - standards</subject><subject>Radioactive Hazard Release</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants, Radioactive - standards</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Ukraine</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Radioactive - standards</subject><issn>0265-931X</issn><issn>1879-1700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2PFCEQhonRuOPqT9Bw0du0fHbDyZiJX8kmXjTxRmiozjLphhGY2cy_l3E62eNeoOrlqaLgRegtJR0ltP-47_YQT9n6jhEiOqI6QukztKFq0Fs6EPIcbQjr5VZz-ucGvSplT0jTFXuJbqjsJadKbNDDLi0Hm20NJ8CtW2hRijg00VXcojGkarGNHi-26RHXe8A2Q9OmCVwFj8fzVXQueIgV2_o_391Djmk8zzge3Qw240N6gLbONtbX6MVk5wJv1v0W_f765dfu-_bu57cfu893WycZrZeHeEq0BiFHPmgOWhPruJo0uGmQgg2q54xpLh0jfGK-HVlBBBuFd1oqfos-XPsecvp7hFLNEoqDuc0A6VgM7amSrNU-CYqBC8VZA-UVdDmVkmEyhxwWm8-GEnOxxuzNao25WGOIMs2aVvduveA4LuAfq1YvGvB-BWxxdp6yjS6UR66XvSKcN-7TlYP2b6cA2RQXIDrwITdDjE_hiVH-AeMTrtk</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Fesenko, S.V.</creator><creator>Alexakhin, R.M.</creator><creator>Geras'kin, S.A.</creator><creator>Sanzharova, N.I.</creator><creator>Spirin, Ye.V.</creator><creator>Spiridonov, S.I.</creator><creator>Gontarenko, I.A.</creator><creator>Strand, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant</title><author>Fesenko, S.V. ; Alexakhin, R.M. ; Geras'kin, S.A. ; Sanzharova, N.I. ; Spirin, Ye.V. ; Spiridonov, S.I. ; Gontarenko, I.A. ; Strand, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-170d1099e45b3793e990ac38f9ecf7542786322935c203f2d38fa4042b4dc9583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chernobyl accident</topic><topic>Chernobyl Nuclear Accident</topic><topic>Edible Grain - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Invertebrates - radiation effects</topic><topic>Man</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Non-human species</topic><topic>Pinus - radiation effects</topic><topic>Poaceae - radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation impact</topic><topic>Radiation Monitoring - standards</topic><topic>Radiation protection</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - standards</topic><topic>Radioactive Hazard Release</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants, Radioactive - standards</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Ukraine</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Radioactive - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fesenko, S.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexakhin, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geras'kin, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanzharova, N.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spirin, Ye.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiridonov, S.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gontarenko, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strand, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental radioactivity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fesenko, S.V.</au><au>Alexakhin, R.M.</au><au>Geras'kin, S.A.</au><au>Sanzharova, N.I.</au><au>Spirin, Ye.V.</au><au>Spiridonov, S.I.</au><au>Gontarenko, I.A.</au><au>Strand, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental radioactivity</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Radioact</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>1-25</pages><issn>0265-931X</issn><eissn>1879-1700</eissn><coden>JERAEE</coden><abstract>A methodological approach for a comparative assessment of ionising radiation effects on man and non-human species, based on the use of
Radiation Impact Factor (RIF) – ratios of actual exposure doses to biota species and man to critical dose is described. As such doses, radiation safety standards limiting radiation exposure of man and doses at which radiobiological effects in non-human species were not observed after the Chernobyl accident, were employed. For the study area within the 30
km ChNPP zone dose burdens to 10 reference biota groups and the population (with and without evacuation) and the corresponding RIFs were calculated. It has been found that in 1986 (early period after the accident) the emergency radiation standards for man do not guarantee adequate protection of the environment, some species of which could be affected more than man. In 1991 RIFs for man were considerably (by factor of 20.0–1.1
×
10
5) higher compared with those for selected non-human species. Thus, for the long term after the accident radiation safety standards for man are shown to ensure radiation safety for biota as well.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15653184</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.08.011</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0265-931X |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental radioactivity, 2005, Vol.80 (1), p.1-25 |
| issn | 0265-931X 1879-1700 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16185220 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Animals Biodiversity Cattle Chernobyl accident Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Edible Grain - radiation effects Humans Invertebrates - radiation effects Man Mice Non-human species Pinus - radiation effects Poaceae - radiation effects Radiation Dosage Radiation impact Radiation Monitoring - standards Radiation protection Radiation Protection - standards Radioactive Hazard Release Risk Assessment Soil Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis Soil Pollutants, Radioactive - standards Species Specificity Ukraine Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis Water Pollutants, Radioactive - standards |
| title | Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T09%3A09%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20radiation%20impact%20on%20biota%20and%20man%20in%20the%20area%20affected%20by%20the%20accident%20at%20the%20Chernobyl%20nuclear%20power%20plant&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20radioactivity&rft.au=Fesenko,%20S.V.&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=1-25&rft.issn=0265-931X&rft.eissn=1879-1700&rft.coden=JERAEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.08.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16185220%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14734832&rft_id=info:pmid/15653184&rft_els_id=S0265931X04002620&rfr_iscdi=true |