Nutritional value of ensiled grocery food waste for cattle
Assessment of nutrient variability, feed value, ensiling capability, intake, and digestibility of grocery food waste recycled from large retail stores was conducted in 3 experiments. In Exp. 1, 115 proximate nutrient analyses of grocery byproduct feed (GBP) from stores in the southern United States...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2014-11, Vol.92 (11), p.5124-5133 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5133 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 5124 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Froetschel, M A Ross, C L Stewart, Jr, R L Azain, M J Michot, P Rekaya, R |
description | Assessment of nutrient variability, feed value, ensiling capability, intake, and digestibility of grocery food waste recycled from large retail stores was conducted in 3 experiments. In Exp. 1, 115 proximate nutrient analyses of grocery byproduct feed (GBP) from stores in the southern United States from April 8, 2011, to November 18, 2012, were evaluated for variation in nutrient concentration. Grocery byproduct feed was characterized as being a readily fermentable, high-moisture energy feed with an average DM content of 17.5 ± 3.7% and TDN of 89.8 ± 7.1%. In Exp. 2 and 3, grocery food waste consisting of fruit, vegetables, and bakery items from large retail stores in the Atlanta, GA, area was used for ensiling and feeding studies. The GBP material for Exp. 2 was processed on farm into homogenous slurry and treated to reduce its moisture content and preserved in experimental silos. Drying treatments included 3 levels of citrus pulp substitution (8, 16, and 24% as-fed basis), or passively removing liquid as seepage after stacking for 24 h, or oven drying (24 h at 80°C). All GBP mixtures effectively ensiled after 28 d, as determined by changes in pH, soluble carbohydrates, and fermentation acids. Ensiled GBP was moderately stable during 72-h aerobic exposure. In Exp. 3, a feeding/digestibility trial, 8 yearling Holstein steers were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin Square and fed 4 incremental levels of ensiled GBP in total mixed rations (TMR). Steers were fed 0, 18, 36, and 54% ensiled GBP as part of a TMR containing 68% wheat silage and 32% concentrate on a DM basis. The rations averaged 35.9, 30.7, 26.8, and 23.8% DM with incremental levels of GBP. Steers increased DM intake and digestibility when fed increasing GBP (P < 0.5). Digestible energy and TDN were linearly related to the level of GBP fed (P < 0.01). The TDN content of GBP was 82.7% (DM basis) and similar to predicted TDN values from commercial feed analyses of GBP. The feeding and nutritive value of ensiled GBP indicates it can be priced to be used effectively as an energy supplement in TMR for cattle. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2014-8126 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1618139654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3489989531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-97ae02112ad8c004b67cc185351c236529210ded22fe6963d71595e79ca20cc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsqJILCwpvnPtxGyo4kuqYIHZcp0LSpXWYCeg_nsctTAw3Un36NV7D2PnwKcosbhe2ThFDrO8BFQHbAwSZS5AiUM25hwhL9NhxE5iXHEOKLU8ZiOUYqaFVGN289x3oekav7Ft9mXbnjJfZ7SJTUtV9h68o7DNau-r7NvGjtIaMme7rqVTdlTbNtLZfk7Y2_3d6_wxX7w8PM1vF7kTGrpcF5ZSD0BblY7z2VIVzkEphQSHQknUCLyiCrEmpZWoCkglqdDOIneuFBN2tcv9CP6zp9iZdRMdta3dkO-jAQUlCK3kLKGX_9CV70N6baAQuSqhGALzHeWCjzFQbT5Cs7Zha4CbQapJUs0g1QxSE3-xT-2Xa6r-6F-L4ge8BHAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1622068178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutritional value of ensiled grocery food waste for cattle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Froetschel, M A ; Ross, C L ; Stewart, Jr, R L ; Azain, M J ; Michot, P ; Rekaya, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Froetschel, M A ; Ross, C L ; Stewart, Jr, R L ; Azain, M J ; Michot, P ; Rekaya, R</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment of nutrient variability, feed value, ensiling capability, intake, and digestibility of grocery food waste recycled from large retail stores was conducted in 3 experiments. In Exp. 1, 115 proximate nutrient analyses of grocery byproduct feed (GBP) from stores in the southern United States from April 8, 2011, to November 18, 2012, were evaluated for variation in nutrient concentration. Grocery byproduct feed was characterized as being a readily fermentable, high-moisture energy feed with an average DM content of 17.5 ± 3.7% and TDN of 89.8 ± 7.1%. In Exp. 2 and 3, grocery food waste consisting of fruit, vegetables, and bakery items from large retail stores in the Atlanta, GA, area was used for ensiling and feeding studies. The GBP material for Exp. 2 was processed on farm into homogenous slurry and treated to reduce its moisture content and preserved in experimental silos. Drying treatments included 3 levels of citrus pulp substitution (8, 16, and 24% as-fed basis), or passively removing liquid as seepage after stacking for 24 h, or oven drying (24 h at 80°C). All GBP mixtures effectively ensiled after 28 d, as determined by changes in pH, soluble carbohydrates, and fermentation acids. Ensiled GBP was moderately stable during 72-h aerobic exposure. In Exp. 3, a feeding/digestibility trial, 8 yearling Holstein steers were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin Square and fed 4 incremental levels of ensiled GBP in total mixed rations (TMR). Steers were fed 0, 18, 36, and 54% ensiled GBP as part of a TMR containing 68% wheat silage and 32% concentrate on a DM basis. The rations averaged 35.9, 30.7, 26.8, and 23.8% DM with incremental levels of GBP. Steers increased DM intake and digestibility when fed increasing GBP (P < 0.5). Digestible energy and TDN were linearly related to the level of GBP fed (P < 0.01). The TDN content of GBP was 82.7% (DM basis) and similar to predicted TDN values from commercial feed analyses of GBP. The feeding and nutritive value of ensiled GBP indicates it can be priced to be used effectively as an energy supplement in TMR for cattle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8126</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25349356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal Feed ; Animals ; By products ; Cattle ; Cattle - physiology ; Dietary Supplements ; Digestion - physiology ; Fermentation ; Food ; Fruit - metabolism ; Male ; Nutrients ; Nutritive Value - physiology ; Silage ; Triticum - metabolism ; Vegetables - metabolism ; Waste Products</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2014-11, Vol.92 (11), p.5124-5133</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Nov 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-97ae02112ad8c004b67cc185351c236529210ded22fe6963d71595e79ca20cc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-97ae02112ad8c004b67cc185351c236529210ded22fe6963d71595e79ca20cc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25349356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froetschel, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jr, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azain, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michot, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rekaya, R</creatorcontrib><title>Nutritional value of ensiled grocery food waste for cattle</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Assessment of nutrient variability, feed value, ensiling capability, intake, and digestibility of grocery food waste recycled from large retail stores was conducted in 3 experiments. In Exp. 1, 115 proximate nutrient analyses of grocery byproduct feed (GBP) from stores in the southern United States from April 8, 2011, to November 18, 2012, were evaluated for variation in nutrient concentration. Grocery byproduct feed was characterized as being a readily fermentable, high-moisture energy feed with an average DM content of 17.5 ± 3.7% and TDN of 89.8 ± 7.1%. In Exp. 2 and 3, grocery food waste consisting of fruit, vegetables, and bakery items from large retail stores in the Atlanta, GA, area was used for ensiling and feeding studies. The GBP material for Exp. 2 was processed on farm into homogenous slurry and treated to reduce its moisture content and preserved in experimental silos. Drying treatments included 3 levels of citrus pulp substitution (8, 16, and 24% as-fed basis), or passively removing liquid as seepage after stacking for 24 h, or oven drying (24 h at 80°C). All GBP mixtures effectively ensiled after 28 d, as determined by changes in pH, soluble carbohydrates, and fermentation acids. Ensiled GBP was moderately stable during 72-h aerobic exposure. In Exp. 3, a feeding/digestibility trial, 8 yearling Holstein steers were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin Square and fed 4 incremental levels of ensiled GBP in total mixed rations (TMR). Steers were fed 0, 18, 36, and 54% ensiled GBP as part of a TMR containing 68% wheat silage and 32% concentrate on a DM basis. The rations averaged 35.9, 30.7, 26.8, and 23.8% DM with incremental levels of GBP. Steers increased DM intake and digestibility when fed increasing GBP (P < 0.5). Digestible energy and TDN were linearly related to the level of GBP fed (P < 0.01). The TDN content of GBP was 82.7% (DM basis) and similar to predicted TDN values from commercial feed analyses of GBP. The feeding and nutritive value of ensiled GBP indicates it can be priced to be used effectively as an energy supplement in TMR for cattle.</description><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>By products</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Digestion - physiology</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fruit - metabolism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutritive Value - physiology</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Triticum - metabolism</subject><subject>Vegetables - metabolism</subject><subject>Waste Products</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsqJILCwpvnPtxGyo4kuqYIHZcp0LSpXWYCeg_nsctTAw3Un36NV7D2PnwKcosbhe2ThFDrO8BFQHbAwSZS5AiUM25hwhL9NhxE5iXHEOKLU8ZiOUYqaFVGN289x3oekav7Ft9mXbnjJfZ7SJTUtV9h68o7DNau-r7NvGjtIaMme7rqVTdlTbNtLZfk7Y2_3d6_wxX7w8PM1vF7kTGrpcF5ZSD0BblY7z2VIVzkEphQSHQknUCLyiCrEmpZWoCkglqdDOIneuFBN2tcv9CP6zp9iZdRMdta3dkO-jAQUlCK3kLKGX_9CV70N6baAQuSqhGALzHeWCjzFQbT5Cs7Zha4CbQapJUs0g1QxSE3-xT-2Xa6r-6F-L4ge8BHAI</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Froetschel, M A</creator><creator>Ross, C L</creator><creator>Stewart, Jr, R L</creator><creator>Azain, M J</creator><creator>Michot, P</creator><creator>Rekaya, R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Nutritional value of ensiled grocery food waste for cattle</title><author>Froetschel, M A ; Ross, C L ; Stewart, Jr, R L ; Azain, M J ; Michot, P ; Rekaya, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-97ae02112ad8c004b67cc185351c236529210ded22fe6963d71595e79ca20cc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>By products</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Digestion - physiology</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fruit - metabolism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutritive Value - physiology</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Triticum - metabolism</topic><topic>Vegetables - metabolism</topic><topic>Waste Products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froetschel, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jr, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azain, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michot, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rekaya, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froetschel, M A</au><au>Ross, C L</au><au>Stewart, Jr, R L</au><au>Azain, M J</au><au>Michot, P</au><au>Rekaya, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutritional value of ensiled grocery food waste for cattle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5124</spage><epage>5133</epage><pages>5124-5133</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Assessment of nutrient variability, feed value, ensiling capability, intake, and digestibility of grocery food waste recycled from large retail stores was conducted in 3 experiments. In Exp. 1, 115 proximate nutrient analyses of grocery byproduct feed (GBP) from stores in the southern United States from April 8, 2011, to November 18, 2012, were evaluated for variation in nutrient concentration. Grocery byproduct feed was characterized as being a readily fermentable, high-moisture energy feed with an average DM content of 17.5 ± 3.7% and TDN of 89.8 ± 7.1%. In Exp. 2 and 3, grocery food waste consisting of fruit, vegetables, and bakery items from large retail stores in the Atlanta, GA, area was used for ensiling and feeding studies. The GBP material for Exp. 2 was processed on farm into homogenous slurry and treated to reduce its moisture content and preserved in experimental silos. Drying treatments included 3 levels of citrus pulp substitution (8, 16, and 24% as-fed basis), or passively removing liquid as seepage after stacking for 24 h, or oven drying (24 h at 80°C). All GBP mixtures effectively ensiled after 28 d, as determined by changes in pH, soluble carbohydrates, and fermentation acids. Ensiled GBP was moderately stable during 72-h aerobic exposure. In Exp. 3, a feeding/digestibility trial, 8 yearling Holstein steers were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin Square and fed 4 incremental levels of ensiled GBP in total mixed rations (TMR). Steers were fed 0, 18, 36, and 54% ensiled GBP as part of a TMR containing 68% wheat silage and 32% concentrate on a DM basis. The rations averaged 35.9, 30.7, 26.8, and 23.8% DM with incremental levels of GBP. Steers increased DM intake and digestibility when fed increasing GBP (P < 0.5). Digestible energy and TDN were linearly related to the level of GBP fed (P < 0.01). The TDN content of GBP was 82.7% (DM basis) and similar to predicted TDN values from commercial feed analyses of GBP. The feeding and nutritive value of ensiled GBP indicates it can be priced to be used effectively as an energy supplement in TMR for cattle.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>25349356</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2014-8126</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2014-11, Vol.92 (11), p.5124-5133 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1618139654 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Animal Feed Animals By products Cattle Cattle - physiology Dietary Supplements Digestion - physiology Fermentation Food Fruit - metabolism Male Nutrients Nutritive Value - physiology Silage Triticum - metabolism Vegetables - metabolism Waste Products |
title | Nutritional value of ensiled grocery food waste for cattle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A28%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutritional%20value%20of%20ensiled%20grocery%20food%20waste%20for%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Froetschel,%20M%20A&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5124&rft.epage=5133&rft.pages=5124-5133&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2014-8126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3489989531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1622068178&rft_id=info:pmid/25349356&rfr_iscdi=true |