Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise
Firearm is a common source of impulse noise that may potentially damage hearing organ. It has been suggested that otoacoustic emissions, particularly transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), might be more sensitive than pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the assessment of changes to cochlea caused...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health 2004, Vol.17 (2), p.285-294 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 294 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska, Małgorzata Dudarewicz, Adam Bak, Marek Fiszer, Marta Kotyło, Piotr Sliwińska-Kowalska, Mariola |
description | Firearm is a common source of impulse noise that may potentially damage hearing organ. It has been suggested that otoacoustic emissions, particularly transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), might be more sensitive than pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the assessment of changes to cochlea caused by noise. The aim of this study was to: (i) evaluate exposure to impulse noise from small-caliber weapons, (ii) compare the post-exposure changes in hearing measured by PTA and TEOAE and correlate them with noise parameters.
The study included 18 male hunters (group I) and 28 candidate policemen (group II) exposed to impulse noise from small firearms during target practices. Group I was unprotected during shooting, whereas group II used commonly available hearing protectors. PTA and TEOAE were performed before and 2-10 min after shooting. Exposure to impulse noise was evaluated by in situ measurements.
Groups I and II were exposed to 3-4 and 4-144 impulses of noise at mean C-weighted peak sound pressure levels of 154 dB and 156 dB, respectively. No post-exposure audiometric threshold shift was observed in group I. Significant reductions of TEOAE levels were found both for the whole response (-2.2 dB SPL) and for 1/2 -octave band responses in the frequency range of 1000-4000 Hz (from -1.6 to -3.0 dB SPL). These changes were not correlated with C-weighted peak sound pressure levels or equivalent-continuous A-weighted sound pressure level. Significant correlation was found for peak sound pressure and maximum sound pressure levels in 1/3-octave bands in the frequency range corresponding with the main part of the acoustic energy of impulses (correlation coefficients r from -0.58 to -0.77, p < 0.05). In group II neither PTA nor TEOAE showed significant hearing impairment after shooting.
The results show that even short-term exposure to impulse noise from small-calibre firearms might cause temporary hearing impairment measured by TEOAE. Therefore, the use of earmuffs is strongly recommended, because most of them seem to effectively attenuate impulse noise from small-calibre firearms. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16180652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16180652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p153t-b9fdf8d9515d12e38cccec1e845bd047c4ce0f6d9570a202fd04bee90b9757af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jz1rwzAYhDW0JGmav1A0dTPow7KkoUMJ_YJAl3Q2kvwqdrEtV5Kh_fd1aTId3D3ccVdoQxlnBSVKrtFNSp-EsFJrvkJrKriSRIkNejjCMIVo4g92rRlPkHA34hZM7MYTNj5DxPA9hTRHwDng1IaQ_6IxdAlu0bU3fYLdWbfo4_npuH8tDu8vb_vHQzEtS7mw2jdeNVpQ0VAGXDnnwFFQpbANKaUrHRBfLYAkhhHmF9MCaGK1FNJ4vkX3_71TDF8zpFwPXXLQ92aEMKeaVlSRSrAFvDuDsx2gqafYDcu3-nKY_wIpv1G5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16180652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska, Małgorzata ; Dudarewicz, Adam ; Bak, Marek ; Fiszer, Marta ; Kotyło, Piotr ; Sliwińska-Kowalska, Mariola</creator><creatorcontrib>Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska, Małgorzata ; Dudarewicz, Adam ; Bak, Marek ; Fiszer, Marta ; Kotyło, Piotr ; Sliwińska-Kowalska, Mariola</creatorcontrib><description>Firearm is a common source of impulse noise that may potentially damage hearing organ. It has been suggested that otoacoustic emissions, particularly transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), might be more sensitive than pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the assessment of changes to cochlea caused by noise. The aim of this study was to: (i) evaluate exposure to impulse noise from small-caliber weapons, (ii) compare the post-exposure changes in hearing measured by PTA and TEOAE and correlate them with noise parameters.
The study included 18 male hunters (group I) and 28 candidate policemen (group II) exposed to impulse noise from small firearms during target practices. Group I was unprotected during shooting, whereas group II used commonly available hearing protectors. PTA and TEOAE were performed before and 2-10 min after shooting. Exposure to impulse noise was evaluated by in situ measurements.
Groups I and II were exposed to 3-4 and 4-144 impulses of noise at mean C-weighted peak sound pressure levels of 154 dB and 156 dB, respectively. No post-exposure audiometric threshold shift was observed in group I. Significant reductions of TEOAE levels were found both for the whole response (-2.2 dB SPL) and for 1/2 -octave band responses in the frequency range of 1000-4000 Hz (from -1.6 to -3.0 dB SPL). These changes were not correlated with C-weighted peak sound pressure levels or equivalent-continuous A-weighted sound pressure level. Significant correlation was found for peak sound pressure and maximum sound pressure levels in 1/3-octave bands in the frequency range corresponding with the main part of the acoustic energy of impulses (correlation coefficients r from -0.58 to -0.77, p < 0.05). In group II neither PTA nor TEOAE showed significant hearing impairment after shooting.
The results show that even short-term exposure to impulse noise from small-calibre firearms might cause temporary hearing impairment measured by TEOAE. Therefore, the use of earmuffs is strongly recommended, because most of them seem to effectively attenuate impulse noise from small-calibre firearms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1232-1087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15387085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland</publisher><subject>Adult ; Audiometry - methods ; Auditory Threshold ; Ear Protective Devices ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Firearms ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - epidemiology ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - etiology ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control ; Humans ; Leisure Activities ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Noise, Occupational ; Poland - epidemiology ; Police</subject><ispartof>International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 2004, Vol.17 (2), p.285-294</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,4012</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15387085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska, Małgorzata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudarewicz, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bak, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiszer, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotyło, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sliwińska-Kowalska, Mariola</creatorcontrib><title>Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise</title><title>International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health</title><addtitle>Int J Occup Med Environ Health</addtitle><description>Firearm is a common source of impulse noise that may potentially damage hearing organ. It has been suggested that otoacoustic emissions, particularly transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), might be more sensitive than pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the assessment of changes to cochlea caused by noise. The aim of this study was to: (i) evaluate exposure to impulse noise from small-caliber weapons, (ii) compare the post-exposure changes in hearing measured by PTA and TEOAE and correlate them with noise parameters.
The study included 18 male hunters (group I) and 28 candidate policemen (group II) exposed to impulse noise from small firearms during target practices. Group I was unprotected during shooting, whereas group II used commonly available hearing protectors. PTA and TEOAE were performed before and 2-10 min after shooting. Exposure to impulse noise was evaluated by in situ measurements.
Groups I and II were exposed to 3-4 and 4-144 impulses of noise at mean C-weighted peak sound pressure levels of 154 dB and 156 dB, respectively. No post-exposure audiometric threshold shift was observed in group I. Significant reductions of TEOAE levels were found both for the whole response (-2.2 dB SPL) and for 1/2 -octave band responses in the frequency range of 1000-4000 Hz (from -1.6 to -3.0 dB SPL). These changes were not correlated with C-weighted peak sound pressure levels or equivalent-continuous A-weighted sound pressure level. Significant correlation was found for peak sound pressure and maximum sound pressure levels in 1/3-octave bands in the frequency range corresponding with the main part of the acoustic energy of impulses (correlation coefficients r from -0.58 to -0.77, p < 0.05). In group II neither PTA nor TEOAE showed significant hearing impairment after shooting.
The results show that even short-term exposure to impulse noise from small-calibre firearms might cause temporary hearing impairment measured by TEOAE. Therefore, the use of earmuffs is strongly recommended, because most of them seem to effectively attenuate impulse noise from small-calibre firearms.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry - methods</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Ear Protective Devices</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</subject><subject>Firearms</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - etiology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leisure Activities</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise, Occupational</subject><subject>Poland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Police</subject><issn>1232-1087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jz1rwzAYhDW0JGmav1A0dTPow7KkoUMJ_YJAl3Q2kvwqdrEtV5Kh_fd1aTId3D3ccVdoQxlnBSVKrtFNSp-EsFJrvkJrKriSRIkNejjCMIVo4g92rRlPkHA34hZM7MYTNj5DxPA9hTRHwDng1IaQ_6IxdAlu0bU3fYLdWbfo4_npuH8tDu8vb_vHQzEtS7mw2jdeNVpQ0VAGXDnnwFFQpbANKaUrHRBfLYAkhhHmF9MCaGK1FNJ4vkX3_71TDF8zpFwPXXLQ92aEMKeaVlSRSrAFvDuDsx2gqafYDcu3-nKY_wIpv1G5</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska, Małgorzata</creator><creator>Dudarewicz, Adam</creator><creator>Bak, Marek</creator><creator>Fiszer, Marta</creator><creator>Kotyło, Piotr</creator><creator>Sliwińska-Kowalska, Mariola</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise</title><author>Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska, Małgorzata ; Dudarewicz, Adam ; Bak, Marek ; Fiszer, Marta ; Kotyło, Piotr ; Sliwińska-Kowalska, Mariola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p153t-b9fdf8d9515d12e38cccec1e845bd047c4ce0f6d9570a202fd04bee90b9757af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry - methods</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Ear Protective Devices</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</topic><topic>Firearms</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - etiology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leisure Activities</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise, Occupational</topic><topic>Poland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Police</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska, Małgorzata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudarewicz, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bak, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiszer, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotyło, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sliwińska-Kowalska, Mariola</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska, Małgorzata</au><au>Dudarewicz, Adam</au><au>Bak, Marek</au><au>Fiszer, Marta</au><au>Kotyło, Piotr</au><au>Sliwińska-Kowalska, Mariola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise</atitle><jtitle>International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Occup Med Environ Health</addtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>285-294</pages><issn>1232-1087</issn><abstract>Firearm is a common source of impulse noise that may potentially damage hearing organ. It has been suggested that otoacoustic emissions, particularly transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), might be more sensitive than pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the assessment of changes to cochlea caused by noise. The aim of this study was to: (i) evaluate exposure to impulse noise from small-caliber weapons, (ii) compare the post-exposure changes in hearing measured by PTA and TEOAE and correlate them with noise parameters.
The study included 18 male hunters (group I) and 28 candidate policemen (group II) exposed to impulse noise from small firearms during target practices. Group I was unprotected during shooting, whereas group II used commonly available hearing protectors. PTA and TEOAE were performed before and 2-10 min after shooting. Exposure to impulse noise was evaluated by in situ measurements.
Groups I and II were exposed to 3-4 and 4-144 impulses of noise at mean C-weighted peak sound pressure levels of 154 dB and 156 dB, respectively. No post-exposure audiometric threshold shift was observed in group I. Significant reductions of TEOAE levels were found both for the whole response (-2.2 dB SPL) and for 1/2 -octave band responses in the frequency range of 1000-4000 Hz (from -1.6 to -3.0 dB SPL). These changes were not correlated with C-weighted peak sound pressure levels or equivalent-continuous A-weighted sound pressure level. Significant correlation was found for peak sound pressure and maximum sound pressure levels in 1/3-octave bands in the frequency range corresponding with the main part of the acoustic energy of impulses (correlation coefficients r from -0.58 to -0.77, p < 0.05). In group II neither PTA nor TEOAE showed significant hearing impairment after shooting.
The results show that even short-term exposure to impulse noise from small-calibre firearms might cause temporary hearing impairment measured by TEOAE. Therefore, the use of earmuffs is strongly recommended, because most of them seem to effectively attenuate impulse noise from small-calibre firearms.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pmid>15387085</pmid><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1232-1087 |
ispartof | International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 2004, Vol.17 (2), p.285-294 |
issn | 1232-1087 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16180652 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Audiometry - methods Auditory Threshold Ear Protective Devices Evoked Potentials, Auditory Firearms Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - epidemiology Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - etiology Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - physiopathology Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control Humans Leisure Activities Male Middle Aged Noise, Occupational Poland - epidemiology Police |
title | Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A36%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporary%20changes%20in%20hearing%20after%20exposure%20to%20shooting%20noise&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20occupational%20medicine%20and%20environmental%20health&rft.au=Pawlaczyk-Luszczy%C5%84ska,%20Ma%C5%82gorzata&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=285-294&rft.issn=1232-1087&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E16180652%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16180652&rft_id=info:pmid/15387085&rfr_iscdi=true |