Overview and comparison of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices and oysters (Crassostrea gigas) for assessing organic chemical exposure

We performed 20‐d, flow‐through exposures of lipid‐containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) to three concentrations (nominally 10, 100, and 250 ng/L) of a diverse mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Exposure water was seawater free of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2004-07, Vol.23 (7), p.1617-1628
Hauptverfasser: Huckins, James N., Prest, Harry F., Petty, Jimmie D., Lebo, Jon A., Hodgins, Maureen M., Clark, Randal C., Alvarez, David A., Gala, William R., Steen, Alexis, Gale, Robert, Ingersoll, Christopher G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1628
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1617
container_title Environmental toxicology and chemistry
container_volume 23
creator Huckins, James N.
Prest, Harry F.
Petty, Jimmie D.
Lebo, Jon A.
Hodgins, Maureen M.
Clark, Randal C.
Alvarez, David A.
Gala, William R.
Steen, Alexis
Gale, Robert
Ingersoll, Christopher G.
description We performed 20‐d, flow‐through exposures of lipid‐containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) to three concentrations (nominally 10, 100, and 250 ng/L) of a diverse mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Exposure water was seawater free of particulates larger than 0.1 μm. The results of these controlled laboratory studies demonstrated that SPMDs and oysters concentrate the same chemicals but that the relative amounts accumulated are different. For oysters, the 20‐d mean (across treatments) concentration factors (CFs) of test compounds with log Kow ≤ 4.8 were much lower (4.0‐ to 20‐fold lower) than those of the same compounds in SPMDs. In contrast, the 20‐d CFs of PAHs with log Kow ≥ 5.6 in oysters from the low‐level treatment were higher than the corresponding CFs for SPMDs. The CFs of these compounds in oysters from the low‐level treatment ranged from approximately 3.0‐ to 13‐fold higher than those in oysters from the high‐level treatment. This physiologically mediated difference in oyster CFs appears to be linked to active feeding in the low‐level treatment and to apparent toxicity‐induced cessation of feeding (i.e., valve closure) in the high‐level treatment. Because CFs for these compounds in oysters were not independent of exposure concentrations, it follows that tissue levels were not proportional to exposure concentration. However, both sampling approaches have advantages and disadvantages, and the appropriateness of their use depends on the goals of a given study.
doi_str_mv 10.1897/03-366
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16177463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14703838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4476-72f8825a19fdc3bd37df84e933966ea43ec534ccbc048253bc2b3a386970f6543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQhyMEokuBR0C-gOAQsDOO7RzRihZQ1Ur8EUfLcSaLIYmDZ3fbfQ2eGC-7KlwQ8mEk65tvNPMriseCvxSm0a84lKDUnWIh6roqjRLmbrHgGnipK2VOigdE3zgXqmma-8WJqCvgIGBR_LzaYtoGvGZu6piP4-xSoDix2LMhzKErfZzWLkxhWjHCMcyYRnTtgGzEsU1uQtbhNnik34a4ozUmYs-XyRFFWid0bBVWjl6wPiaWP5FoL4tp5abgmf-ard4NDG_mSJuED4t7vRsIHx3rafH57M2n5dvy4ur83fL1Reml1Crv1RtT1U40feeh7UB3vZHYADRKoZOAvgbpfeu5zBy0vmrBgVGN5r2qJZwWzw7eOcUfG6S1HQN5HIa8U9yQFUpoLRX8H5Sag8nvFvQpEiXs7ZzC6NLOCm73MVkONseUwSdH46YdsfuDHXPJwNMj4Cjfps939oH-4ozWjeCZEwfuOgy4-8c4m4laVTy7Nd8PLw89IUd1c9vj0nerNOjafrk8tx_eX8JHrs-shF-qy7lx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14703838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overview and comparison of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices and oysters (Crassostrea gigas) for assessing organic chemical exposure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Huckins, James N. ; Prest, Harry F. ; Petty, Jimmie D. ; Lebo, Jon A. ; Hodgins, Maureen M. ; Clark, Randal C. ; Alvarez, David A. ; Gala, William R. ; Steen, Alexis ; Gale, Robert ; Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huckins, James N. ; Prest, Harry F. ; Petty, Jimmie D. ; Lebo, Jon A. ; Hodgins, Maureen M. ; Clark, Randal C. ; Alvarez, David A. ; Gala, William R. ; Steen, Alexis ; Gale, Robert ; Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><description>We performed 20‐d, flow‐through exposures of lipid‐containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) to three concentrations (nominally 10, 100, and 250 ng/L) of a diverse mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Exposure water was seawater free of particulates larger than 0.1 μm. The results of these controlled laboratory studies demonstrated that SPMDs and oysters concentrate the same chemicals but that the relative amounts accumulated are different. For oysters, the 20‐d mean (across treatments) concentration factors (CFs) of test compounds with log Kow ≤ 4.8 were much lower (4.0‐ to 20‐fold lower) than those of the same compounds in SPMDs. In contrast, the 20‐d CFs of PAHs with log Kow ≥ 5.6 in oysters from the low‐level treatment were higher than the corresponding CFs for SPMDs. The CFs of these compounds in oysters from the low‐level treatment ranged from approximately 3.0‐ to 13‐fold higher than those in oysters from the high‐level treatment. This physiologically mediated difference in oyster CFs appears to be linked to active feeding in the low‐level treatment and to apparent toxicity‐induced cessation of feeding (i.e., valve closure) in the high‐level treatment. Because CFs for these compounds in oysters were not independent of exposure concentrations, it follows that tissue levels were not proportional to exposure concentration. However, both sampling approaches have advantages and disadvantages, and the appropriateness of their use depends on the goals of a given study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1897/03-366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15230313</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETOCDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Crassostrea gigas ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Environmental Exposure ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Equilibrium ; Feeding Behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Hydrophobic organic chemicals ; Kinetics ; Lipids - chemistry ; Membranes, Artificial ; Organic Chemicals - analysis ; Ostreidae - metabolism ; Oysters ; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - analysis ; Semipermeable membrane devices ; Specimen Handling ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2004-07, Vol.23 (7), p.1617-1628</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 SETAC</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4476-72f8825a19fdc3bd37df84e933966ea43ec534ccbc048253bc2b3a386970f6543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4476-72f8825a19fdc3bd37df84e933966ea43ec534ccbc048253bc2b3a386970f6543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1897%2F03-366$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1897%2F03-366$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15877910$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15230313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huckins, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prest, Harry F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petty, Jimmie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebo, Jon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, Maureen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Randal C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gala, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steen, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gale, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><title>Overview and comparison of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices and oysters (Crassostrea gigas) for assessing organic chemical exposure</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><description>We performed 20‐d, flow‐through exposures of lipid‐containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) to three concentrations (nominally 10, 100, and 250 ng/L) of a diverse mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Exposure water was seawater free of particulates larger than 0.1 μm. The results of these controlled laboratory studies demonstrated that SPMDs and oysters concentrate the same chemicals but that the relative amounts accumulated are different. For oysters, the 20‐d mean (across treatments) concentration factors (CFs) of test compounds with log Kow ≤ 4.8 were much lower (4.0‐ to 20‐fold lower) than those of the same compounds in SPMDs. In contrast, the 20‐d CFs of PAHs with log Kow ≥ 5.6 in oysters from the low‐level treatment were higher than the corresponding CFs for SPMDs. The CFs of these compounds in oysters from the low‐level treatment ranged from approximately 3.0‐ to 13‐fold higher than those in oysters from the high‐level treatment. This physiologically mediated difference in oyster CFs appears to be linked to active feeding in the low‐level treatment and to apparent toxicity‐induced cessation of feeding (i.e., valve closure) in the high‐level treatment. Because CFs for these compounds in oysters were not independent of exposure concentrations, it follows that tissue levels were not proportional to exposure concentration. However, both sampling approaches have advantages and disadvantages, and the appropriateness of their use depends on the goals of a given study.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Crassostrea gigas</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hydrophobic organic chemicals</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Lipids - chemistry</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - analysis</subject><subject>Ostreidae - metabolism</subject><subject>Oysters</subject><subject>Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - analysis</subject><subject>Semipermeable membrane devices</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQhyMEokuBR0C-gOAQsDOO7RzRihZQ1Ur8EUfLcSaLIYmDZ3fbfQ2eGC-7KlwQ8mEk65tvNPMriseCvxSm0a84lKDUnWIh6roqjRLmbrHgGnipK2VOigdE3zgXqmma-8WJqCvgIGBR_LzaYtoGvGZu6piP4-xSoDix2LMhzKErfZzWLkxhWjHCMcyYRnTtgGzEsU1uQtbhNnik34a4ozUmYs-XyRFFWid0bBVWjl6wPiaWP5FoL4tp5abgmf-ard4NDG_mSJuED4t7vRsIHx3rafH57M2n5dvy4ur83fL1Reml1Crv1RtT1U40feeh7UB3vZHYADRKoZOAvgbpfeu5zBy0vmrBgVGN5r2qJZwWzw7eOcUfG6S1HQN5HIa8U9yQFUpoLRX8H5Sag8nvFvQpEiXs7ZzC6NLOCm73MVkONseUwSdH46YdsfuDHXPJwNMj4Cjfps939oH-4ozWjeCZEwfuOgy4-8c4m4laVTy7Nd8PLw89IUd1c9vj0nerNOjafrk8tx_eX8JHrs-shF-qy7lx</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Huckins, James N.</creator><creator>Prest, Harry F.</creator><creator>Petty, Jimmie D.</creator><creator>Lebo, Jon A.</creator><creator>Hodgins, Maureen M.</creator><creator>Clark, Randal C.</creator><creator>Alvarez, David A.</creator><creator>Gala, William R.</creator><creator>Steen, Alexis</creator><creator>Gale, Robert</creator><creator>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>SETAC</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>Overview and comparison of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices and oysters (Crassostrea gigas) for assessing organic chemical exposure</title><author>Huckins, James N. ; Prest, Harry F. ; Petty, Jimmie D. ; Lebo, Jon A. ; Hodgins, Maureen M. ; Clark, Randal C. ; Alvarez, David A. ; Gala, William R. ; Steen, Alexis ; Gale, Robert ; Ingersoll, Christopher G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4476-72f8825a19fdc3bd37df84e933966ea43ec534ccbc048253bc2b3a386970f6543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Crassostrea gigas</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hydrophobic organic chemicals</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Lipids - chemistry</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - analysis</topic><topic>Ostreidae - metabolism</topic><topic>Oysters</topic><topic>Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - analysis</topic><topic>Semipermeable membrane devices</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huckins, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prest, Harry F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petty, Jimmie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebo, Jon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, Maureen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Randal C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gala, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steen, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gale, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huckins, James N.</au><au>Prest, Harry F.</au><au>Petty, Jimmie D.</au><au>Lebo, Jon A.</au><au>Hodgins, Maureen M.</au><au>Clark, Randal C.</au><au>Alvarez, David A.</au><au>Gala, William R.</au><au>Steen, Alexis</au><au>Gale, Robert</au><au>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overview and comparison of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices and oysters (Crassostrea gigas) for assessing organic chemical exposure</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1617</spage><epage>1628</epage><pages>1617-1628</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><coden>ETOCDK</coden><abstract>We performed 20‐d, flow‐through exposures of lipid‐containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) to three concentrations (nominally 10, 100, and 250 ng/L) of a diverse mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Exposure water was seawater free of particulates larger than 0.1 μm. The results of these controlled laboratory studies demonstrated that SPMDs and oysters concentrate the same chemicals but that the relative amounts accumulated are different. For oysters, the 20‐d mean (across treatments) concentration factors (CFs) of test compounds with log Kow ≤ 4.8 were much lower (4.0‐ to 20‐fold lower) than those of the same compounds in SPMDs. In contrast, the 20‐d CFs of PAHs with log Kow ≥ 5.6 in oysters from the low‐level treatment were higher than the corresponding CFs for SPMDs. The CFs of these compounds in oysters from the low‐level treatment ranged from approximately 3.0‐ to 13‐fold higher than those in oysters from the high‐level treatment. This physiologically mediated difference in oyster CFs appears to be linked to active feeding in the low‐level treatment and to apparent toxicity‐induced cessation of feeding (i.e., valve closure) in the high‐level treatment. Because CFs for these compounds in oysters were not independent of exposure concentrations, it follows that tissue levels were not proportional to exposure concentration. However, both sampling approaches have advantages and disadvantages, and the appropriateness of their use depends on the goals of a given study.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>15230313</pmid><doi>10.1897/03-366</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7268
ispartof Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2004-07, Vol.23 (7), p.1617-1628
issn 0730-7268
1552-8618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16177463
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Crassostrea gigas
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Environmental Exposure
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Equilibrium
Feeding Behavior
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Hydrophobic organic chemicals
Kinetics
Lipids - chemistry
Membranes, Artificial
Organic Chemicals - analysis
Ostreidae - metabolism
Oysters
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - analysis
Semipermeable membrane devices
Specimen Handling
Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
title Overview and comparison of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices and oysters (Crassostrea gigas) for assessing organic chemical exposure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T17%3A24%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overview%20and%20comparison%20of%20lipid-containing%20semipermeable%20membrane%20devices%20and%20oysters%20(Crassostrea%20gigas)%20for%20assessing%20organic%20chemical%20exposure&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Huckins,%20James%20N.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1617&rft.epage=1628&rft.pages=1617-1628&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft.coden=ETOCDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1897/03-366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14703838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14703838&rft_id=info:pmid/15230313&rfr_iscdi=true