A field test and comparison of acute and chronic sediment toxicity tests with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus in Chesapeake Bay, USA

A 28‐d partial life‐cycle test with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus was developed in response to the need for an assay to mimic chronic exposure to sediment‐associated contaminants. To ensure that toxicity tests have environmental relevance, it is essential to evaluate the relationshi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2004-07, Vol.23 (7), p.1751-1761
Hauptverfasser: McGee, Beth L., Fisher, Daniel J., Wright, David A., Yonkos, Lance T., Ziegler, Gregory P., Turley, Steven D., Farrar, J. Daniel, Moore, David W., Bridges, Todd S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1761
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1751
container_title Environmental toxicology and chemistry
container_volume 23
creator McGee, Beth L.
Fisher, Daniel J.
Wright, David A.
Yonkos, Lance T.
Ziegler, Gregory P.
Turley, Steven D.
Farrar, J. Daniel
Moore, David W.
Bridges, Todd S.
description A 28‐d partial life‐cycle test with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus was developed in response to the need for an assay to mimic chronic exposure to sediment‐associated contaminants. To ensure that toxicity tests have environmental relevance, it is essential to evaluate the relationship between laboratory responses and field measures of contamination. Consequently, one objective of the study was to compare the results of the chronic sediment toxicity test with L. plumulosus to gradients of sediment contamination and the in situ benthic community in its native Chesapeake Bay. Chronic tests were conducted by two laboratories, the Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station ([WES]; Vicksburg, MS, USA) and the University of Maryland ([UM] College Park, MD, USA) using different feeding regimes, providing the opportunity to evaluate the effect of this variable on response sensitivity. A second objective was to compare the relative sensitivity of acute and chronic tests with L. plumulosus with field‐collected sediments. Overall, there was good agreement between the toxicological response of acute and chronic tests with L. plumulosus and field measures of contamination. Survival in the acute test and chronic test conducted by WES was negatively correlated with concentrations of sediment‐associated contaminants. Survival in acute exposures was significantly reduced in sediments from 8 of 11 stations. Indigenous L. plumulosus were found only at two of the three stations that did not exhibit acute toxicity. An unexpected finding was the difference in responsiveness of the two chronic tests. Survival in tests conducted by UM and WES was significantly reduced in sediments from 4 and 6 of 11 stations, respectively. No additional sublethal toxicity was detected in the UM chronic test, but the WES test detected reproductive effects at two additional stations. We believe the observed differences were related to the test diet used. Partly as a result of our findings, the recommended diet for the L. plumulosus chronic test was changed in the final methods document.
doi_str_mv 10.1897/03-326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16174687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16174687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-314c6d28232f3e8de33cf311a32469e9edb3f7a14d322a9f912156106788caf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAURi0EoqXAIyBvYEXAP4ntLIeBTpFGgFSqWVquc62YJnGwHbXzHLwwhhlRNoiVr6_O-WzpQ-g5JW-oauVbwivOxAN0SpuGVUpQ9RCdEslJJZlQJ-hJSt8IoaJt28fohDaME87UKfqxws7D0OEMKWMzddiGcTbRpzDh4LCxS4bDvo9h8hYn6PwIU8Y53Hnr8_63mvCtzz3OPeByW0rAVLRx7v0cOryFOQfbg49LwvOwjMsQUhn9hNc9JDODuQH8zuxf46vL1VP0yJkhwbPjeYauzj98XV9U28-bj-vVtrJ1LWnFaW1FxxTjzHFQHXBuHafUcFaLFlrorrmThtYdZ8y0rqWMNoISIZWyxjF-hl4dcucYvi_l23r0ycIwmAnCkjQVVNZCyf-DtSRE1eQetDGkFMHpOfrRxL2mRP_qSROuS08FfHFMXK5H6O6xYzEFeHkETLJmcNFM1qe_OCVly5rC0QN36wfY_-M5XYhGMFKyJaPFqQ6OTxnu_jgm3mghuWz07tNGf7ncqc3u_L2-4D8BpDm4bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14700840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A field test and comparison of acute and chronic sediment toxicity tests with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus in Chesapeake Bay, USA</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>McGee, Beth L. ; Fisher, Daniel J. ; Wright, David A. ; Yonkos, Lance T. ; Ziegler, Gregory P. ; Turley, Steven D. ; Farrar, J. Daniel ; Moore, David W. ; Bridges, Todd S.</creator><creatorcontrib>McGee, Beth L. ; Fisher, Daniel J. ; Wright, David A. ; Yonkos, Lance T. ; Ziegler, Gregory P. ; Turley, Steven D. ; Farrar, J. Daniel ; Moore, David W. ; Bridges, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><description>A 28‐d partial life‐cycle test with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus was developed in response to the need for an assay to mimic chronic exposure to sediment‐associated contaminants. To ensure that toxicity tests have environmental relevance, it is essential to evaluate the relationship between laboratory responses and field measures of contamination. Consequently, one objective of the study was to compare the results of the chronic sediment toxicity test with L. plumulosus to gradients of sediment contamination and the in situ benthic community in its native Chesapeake Bay. Chronic tests were conducted by two laboratories, the Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station ([WES]; Vicksburg, MS, USA) and the University of Maryland ([UM] College Park, MD, USA) using different feeding regimes, providing the opportunity to evaluate the effect of this variable on response sensitivity. A second objective was to compare the relative sensitivity of acute and chronic tests with L. plumulosus with field‐collected sediments. Overall, there was good agreement between the toxicological response of acute and chronic tests with L. plumulosus and field measures of contamination. Survival in the acute test and chronic test conducted by WES was negatively correlated with concentrations of sediment‐associated contaminants. Survival in acute exposures was significantly reduced in sediments from 8 of 11 stations. Indigenous L. plumulosus were found only at two of the three stations that did not exhibit acute toxicity. An unexpected finding was the difference in responsiveness of the two chronic tests. Survival in tests conducted by UM and WES was significantly reduced in sediments from 4 and 6 of 11 stations, respectively. No additional sublethal toxicity was detected in the UM chronic test, but the WES test detected reproductive effects at two additional stations. We believe the observed differences were related to the test diet used. Partly as a result of our findings, the recommended diet for the L. plumulosus chronic test was changed in the final methods document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1897/03-326</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15230328</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETOCDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Amphipod ; Amphipoda - drug effects ; Amphipoda - growth &amp; development ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Baltimore Harbor ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Chronic Disease ; Chronic sediment toxicity ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Environmental Monitoring ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Geologic Sediments - chemistry ; Leptocheirus plumulosus ; Maryland ; Principal Component Analysis ; Soil Pollutants - toxicity ; Toxicity Tests - methods ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2004-07, Vol.23 (7), p.1751-1761</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 SETAC</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-314c6d28232f3e8de33cf311a32469e9edb3f7a14d322a9f912156106788caf23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-314c6d28232f3e8de33cf311a32469e9edb3f7a14d322a9f912156106788caf23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1897%2F03-326$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1897%2F03-326$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15877925$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15230328$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGee, Beth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yonkos, Lance T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turley, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrar, J. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><title>A field test and comparison of acute and chronic sediment toxicity tests with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus in Chesapeake Bay, USA</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><description>A 28‐d partial life‐cycle test with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus was developed in response to the need for an assay to mimic chronic exposure to sediment‐associated contaminants. To ensure that toxicity tests have environmental relevance, it is essential to evaluate the relationship between laboratory responses and field measures of contamination. Consequently, one objective of the study was to compare the results of the chronic sediment toxicity test with L. plumulosus to gradients of sediment contamination and the in situ benthic community in its native Chesapeake Bay. Chronic tests were conducted by two laboratories, the Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station ([WES]; Vicksburg, MS, USA) and the University of Maryland ([UM] College Park, MD, USA) using different feeding regimes, providing the opportunity to evaluate the effect of this variable on response sensitivity. A second objective was to compare the relative sensitivity of acute and chronic tests with L. plumulosus with field‐collected sediments. Overall, there was good agreement between the toxicological response of acute and chronic tests with L. plumulosus and field measures of contamination. Survival in the acute test and chronic test conducted by WES was negatively correlated with concentrations of sediment‐associated contaminants. Survival in acute exposures was significantly reduced in sediments from 8 of 11 stations. Indigenous L. plumulosus were found only at two of the three stations that did not exhibit acute toxicity. An unexpected finding was the difference in responsiveness of the two chronic tests. Survival in tests conducted by UM and WES was significantly reduced in sediments from 4 and 6 of 11 stations, respectively. No additional sublethal toxicity was detected in the UM chronic test, but the WES test detected reproductive effects at two additional stations. We believe the observed differences were related to the test diet used. Partly as a result of our findings, the recommended diet for the L. plumulosus chronic test was changed in the final methods document.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Amphipod</subject><subject>Amphipoda - drug effects</subject><subject>Amphipoda - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Baltimore Harbor</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Chronic sediment toxicity</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</subject><subject>Leptocheirus plumulosus</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAURi0EoqXAIyBvYEXAP4ntLIeBTpFGgFSqWVquc62YJnGwHbXzHLwwhhlRNoiVr6_O-WzpQ-g5JW-oauVbwivOxAN0SpuGVUpQ9RCdEslJJZlQJ-hJSt8IoaJt28fohDaME87UKfqxws7D0OEMKWMzddiGcTbRpzDh4LCxS4bDvo9h8hYn6PwIU8Y53Hnr8_63mvCtzz3OPeByW0rAVLRx7v0cOryFOQfbg49LwvOwjMsQUhn9hNc9JDODuQH8zuxf46vL1VP0yJkhwbPjeYauzj98XV9U28-bj-vVtrJ1LWnFaW1FxxTjzHFQHXBuHafUcFaLFlrorrmThtYdZ8y0rqWMNoISIZWyxjF-hl4dcucYvi_l23r0ycIwmAnCkjQVVNZCyf-DtSRE1eQetDGkFMHpOfrRxL2mRP_qSROuS08FfHFMXK5H6O6xYzEFeHkETLJmcNFM1qe_OCVly5rC0QN36wfY_-M5XYhGMFKyJaPFqQ6OTxnu_jgm3mghuWz07tNGf7ncqc3u_L2-4D8BpDm4bQ</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>McGee, Beth L.</creator><creator>Fisher, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Wright, David A.</creator><creator>Yonkos, Lance T.</creator><creator>Ziegler, Gregory P.</creator><creator>Turley, Steven D.</creator><creator>Farrar, J. Daniel</creator><creator>Moore, David W.</creator><creator>Bridges, Todd S.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>SETAC</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>A field test and comparison of acute and chronic sediment toxicity tests with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus in Chesapeake Bay, USA</title><author>McGee, Beth L. ; Fisher, Daniel J. ; Wright, David A. ; Yonkos, Lance T. ; Ziegler, Gregory P. ; Turley, Steven D. ; Farrar, J. Daniel ; Moore, David W. ; Bridges, Todd S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-314c6d28232f3e8de33cf311a32469e9edb3f7a14d322a9f912156106788caf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Amphipod</topic><topic>Amphipoda - drug effects</topic><topic>Amphipoda - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Baltimore Harbor</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Chronic sediment toxicity</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</topic><topic>Leptocheirus plumulosus</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGee, Beth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yonkos, Lance T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turley, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrar, J. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGee, Beth L.</au><au>Fisher, Daniel J.</au><au>Wright, David A.</au><au>Yonkos, Lance T.</au><au>Ziegler, Gregory P.</au><au>Turley, Steven D.</au><au>Farrar, J. Daniel</au><au>Moore, David W.</au><au>Bridges, Todd S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A field test and comparison of acute and chronic sediment toxicity tests with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus in Chesapeake Bay, USA</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1751</spage><epage>1761</epage><pages>1751-1761</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><coden>ETOCDK</coden><abstract>A 28‐d partial life‐cycle test with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus was developed in response to the need for an assay to mimic chronic exposure to sediment‐associated contaminants. To ensure that toxicity tests have environmental relevance, it is essential to evaluate the relationship between laboratory responses and field measures of contamination. Consequently, one objective of the study was to compare the results of the chronic sediment toxicity test with L. plumulosus to gradients of sediment contamination and the in situ benthic community in its native Chesapeake Bay. Chronic tests were conducted by two laboratories, the Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station ([WES]; Vicksburg, MS, USA) and the University of Maryland ([UM] College Park, MD, USA) using different feeding regimes, providing the opportunity to evaluate the effect of this variable on response sensitivity. A second objective was to compare the relative sensitivity of acute and chronic tests with L. plumulosus with field‐collected sediments. Overall, there was good agreement between the toxicological response of acute and chronic tests with L. plumulosus and field measures of contamination. Survival in the acute test and chronic test conducted by WES was negatively correlated with concentrations of sediment‐associated contaminants. Survival in acute exposures was significantly reduced in sediments from 8 of 11 stations. Indigenous L. plumulosus were found only at two of the three stations that did not exhibit acute toxicity. An unexpected finding was the difference in responsiveness of the two chronic tests. Survival in tests conducted by UM and WES was significantly reduced in sediments from 4 and 6 of 11 stations, respectively. No additional sublethal toxicity was detected in the UM chronic test, but the WES test detected reproductive effects at two additional stations. We believe the observed differences were related to the test diet used. Partly as a result of our findings, the recommended diet for the L. plumulosus chronic test was changed in the final methods document.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>15230328</pmid><doi>10.1897/03-326</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7268
ispartof Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2004-07, Vol.23 (7), p.1751-1761
issn 0730-7268
1552-8618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16174687
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Acute Disease
Amphipod
Amphipoda - drug effects
Amphipoda - growth & development
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Baltimore Harbor
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Chronic Disease
Chronic sediment toxicity
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Environmental Monitoring
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Geologic Sediments - chemistry
Leptocheirus plumulosus
Maryland
Principal Component Analysis
Soil Pollutants - toxicity
Toxicity Tests - methods
Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
title A field test and comparison of acute and chronic sediment toxicity tests with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus in Chesapeake Bay, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20field%20test%20and%20comparison%20of%20acute%20and%20chronic%20sediment%20toxicity%20tests%20with%20the%20estuarine%20amphipod%20Leptocheirus%20plumulosus%20in%20Chesapeake%20Bay,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=McGee,%20Beth%20L.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1751&rft.epage=1761&rft.pages=1751-1761&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft.coden=ETOCDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1897/03-326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16174687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14700840&rft_id=info:pmid/15230328&rfr_iscdi=true