Instream community assessment of aquaculture effluents
The regionally concentrated commercial catfish industry has attracted attention to its possible contributions to basin contaminant loading. This study was included in a screening process to establish baseline bioassessment information for commercial aquaculture of the southeast United States. One va...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture 2004-03, Vol.231 (1), p.149-162 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 162 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 149 |
| container_title | Aquaculture |
| container_volume | 231 |
| creator | Stephens, William W. Farris, Jerry L. |
| description | The regionally concentrated commercial catfish industry has attracted attention to its possible contributions to basin contaminant loading. This study was included in a screening process to establish baseline bioassessment information for commercial aquaculture of the southeast United States. One valuable aspect of the typical drainage system in this industry's landscape is the assimilative capacity and transformation of contaminants associated with ditches. Two extensive commercial fish farm drainage systems in northeast Arkansas and affected receiving streams were examined for their response to potential nutrient related contamination. The research utilized modified Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBPs), as applied nationwide, in characterization and identification of potential water resource impairments. Additional biological impairment testing of related pond discharges and affected receiving streams was also conducted to further characterize potential effluent impacts. There was no observed significant toxicity (
P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.08.009 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16173694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004484860300557X</els_id><sourcerecordid>16173694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-1d39e56f461cdfd2dc276691650e6fd3107725fe49f6c86560884f45f25a07a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouH78hyrorXWSJpP2KItfsOBFzyGkE-jSjzXTCv57KysonjwNDM-8M_MIcSGhkCDxZlv4t9mHuZvmRIUCKAuoCoD6QKxkZcvcoFKHYgWgdV7pCo_FCfMWABCNXAl8GnhK5PssjH0_D-30kXlmYu5pmLIxZr_yM4qxm5c-n4mj6Dum8-96Kl7v717Wj_nm-eFpfbvJgwY75bIpazIYNcrQxEY1QVnEWqIBwtiUEqxVJpKuI4YKDUJV6ahNVMaD9bI8Fdf73F0a32biyfUtB-o6P9A4s5MobYm1XsDLP-B2nNOw3OYUaKytteUC1XsopJE5UXS71PY-fTgJ7kun27pf77ovnQ4qt-hcZq--F3gOvovJD6HlnwCjUcnaLtx6z9Gi5b2l5Di0NARq2kRhcs3Y_mPbJx-skMM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204697773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Instream community assessment of aquaculture effluents</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stephens, William W. ; Farris, Jerry L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stephens, William W. ; Farris, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><description>The regionally concentrated commercial catfish industry has attracted attention to its possible contributions to basin contaminant loading. This study was included in a screening process to establish baseline bioassessment information for commercial aquaculture of the southeast United States. One valuable aspect of the typical drainage system in this industry's landscape is the assimilative capacity and transformation of contaminants associated with ditches. Two extensive commercial fish farm drainage systems in northeast Arkansas and affected receiving streams were examined for their response to potential nutrient related contamination. The research utilized modified Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBPs), as applied nationwide, in characterization and identification of potential water resource impairments. Additional biological impairment testing of related pond discharges and affected receiving streams was also conducted to further characterize potential effluent impacts. There was no observed significant toxicity (
P<0.05) in
Pimephales promelas exposed for 48-h to pond discharges, while neonate production in
Ceriodaphnia dubia was significantly reduced. Upstream samples yielded significant (
P<0.05)
C. dubia toxicity and reproduction impairments, while downstream samples only yielded reproduction impairments. While physicochemical analyses indicated minor differences between fish pond effluents and receiving stream water, benthic community responses measured as taxa richness were not significantly different (
P=0.395) between receiving systems—upstream, facility effluent and downstream. Taxa richness of benthic macroinvertebrates was unaffected by pond discharge at all sites. Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies)—EPT taxa actually responded with increased abundance in receiving streams below the pond discharges. Taxa richness of fish was also unaffected in relation to upstream locations and downstream of the facility effluent release (
P=0.877) while fish abundance decreased. These findings suggest minimal detrimental instream effects result from the introduction of aquaculture effluents into receiving waters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-8486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5622</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.08.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AQCLAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Aquaculture ; Bioassessment ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ceriodaphnia dubia ; Effluents ; Ephemeroptera ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Pimephales promelas ; Plecoptera ; Receiving streams ; Trichoptera</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture, 2004-03, Vol.231 (1), p.149-162</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Mar 5, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-1d39e56f461cdfd2dc276691650e6fd3107725fe49f6c86560884f45f25a07a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-1d39e56f461cdfd2dc276691650e6fd3107725fe49f6c86560884f45f25a07a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004484860300557X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15462197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stephens, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><title>Instream community assessment of aquaculture effluents</title><title>Aquaculture</title><description>The regionally concentrated commercial catfish industry has attracted attention to its possible contributions to basin contaminant loading. This study was included in a screening process to establish baseline bioassessment information for commercial aquaculture of the southeast United States. One valuable aspect of the typical drainage system in this industry's landscape is the assimilative capacity and transformation of contaminants associated with ditches. Two extensive commercial fish farm drainage systems in northeast Arkansas and affected receiving streams were examined for their response to potential nutrient related contamination. The research utilized modified Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBPs), as applied nationwide, in characterization and identification of potential water resource impairments. Additional biological impairment testing of related pond discharges and affected receiving streams was also conducted to further characterize potential effluent impacts. There was no observed significant toxicity (
P<0.05) in
Pimephales promelas exposed for 48-h to pond discharges, while neonate production in
Ceriodaphnia dubia was significantly reduced. Upstream samples yielded significant (
P<0.05)
C. dubia toxicity and reproduction impairments, while downstream samples only yielded reproduction impairments. While physicochemical analyses indicated minor differences between fish pond effluents and receiving stream water, benthic community responses measured as taxa richness were not significantly different (
P=0.395) between receiving systems—upstream, facility effluent and downstream. Taxa richness of benthic macroinvertebrates was unaffected by pond discharge at all sites. Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies)—EPT taxa actually responded with increased abundance in receiving streams below the pond discharges. Taxa richness of fish was also unaffected in relation to upstream locations and downstream of the facility effluent release (
P=0.877) while fish abundance decreased. These findings suggest minimal detrimental instream effects result from the introduction of aquaculture effluents into receiving waters.</description><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Bioassessment</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ceriodaphnia dubia</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Ephemeroptera</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Pimephales promelas</subject><subject>Plecoptera</subject><subject>Receiving streams</subject><subject>Trichoptera</subject><issn>0044-8486</issn><issn>1873-5622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouH78hyrorXWSJpP2KItfsOBFzyGkE-jSjzXTCv57KysonjwNDM-8M_MIcSGhkCDxZlv4t9mHuZvmRIUCKAuoCoD6QKxkZcvcoFKHYgWgdV7pCo_FCfMWABCNXAl8GnhK5PssjH0_D-30kXlmYu5pmLIxZr_yM4qxm5c-n4mj6Dum8-96Kl7v717Wj_nm-eFpfbvJgwY75bIpazIYNcrQxEY1QVnEWqIBwtiUEqxVJpKuI4YKDUJV6ahNVMaD9bI8Fdf73F0a32biyfUtB-o6P9A4s5MobYm1XsDLP-B2nNOw3OYUaKytteUC1XsopJE5UXS71PY-fTgJ7kun27pf77ovnQ4qt-hcZq--F3gOvovJD6HlnwCjUcnaLtx6z9Gi5b2l5Di0NARq2kRhcs3Y_mPbJx-skMM</recordid><startdate>20040305</startdate><enddate>20040305</enddate><creator>Stephens, William W.</creator><creator>Farris, Jerry L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040305</creationdate><title>Instream community assessment of aquaculture effluents</title><author>Stephens, William W. ; Farris, Jerry L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-1d39e56f461cdfd2dc276691650e6fd3107725fe49f6c86560884f45f25a07a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Bioassessment</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ceriodaphnia dubia</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Ephemeroptera</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Pimephales promelas</topic><topic>Plecoptera</topic><topic>Receiving streams</topic><topic>Trichoptera</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stephens, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stephens, William W.</au><au>Farris, Jerry L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Instream community assessment of aquaculture effluents</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle><date>2004-03-05</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>231</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>149-162</pages><issn>0044-8486</issn><eissn>1873-5622</eissn><coden>AQCLAL</coden><abstract>The regionally concentrated commercial catfish industry has attracted attention to its possible contributions to basin contaminant loading. This study was included in a screening process to establish baseline bioassessment information for commercial aquaculture of the southeast United States. One valuable aspect of the typical drainage system in this industry's landscape is the assimilative capacity and transformation of contaminants associated with ditches. Two extensive commercial fish farm drainage systems in northeast Arkansas and affected receiving streams were examined for their response to potential nutrient related contamination. The research utilized modified Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBPs), as applied nationwide, in characterization and identification of potential water resource impairments. Additional biological impairment testing of related pond discharges and affected receiving streams was also conducted to further characterize potential effluent impacts. There was no observed significant toxicity (
P<0.05) in
Pimephales promelas exposed for 48-h to pond discharges, while neonate production in
Ceriodaphnia dubia was significantly reduced. Upstream samples yielded significant (
P<0.05)
C. dubia toxicity and reproduction impairments, while downstream samples only yielded reproduction impairments. While physicochemical analyses indicated minor differences between fish pond effluents and receiving stream water, benthic community responses measured as taxa richness were not significantly different (
P=0.395) between receiving systems—upstream, facility effluent and downstream. Taxa richness of benthic macroinvertebrates was unaffected by pond discharge at all sites. Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies)—EPT taxa actually responded with increased abundance in receiving streams below the pond discharges. Taxa richness of fish was also unaffected in relation to upstream locations and downstream of the facility effluent release (
P=0.877) while fish abundance decreased. These findings suggest minimal detrimental instream effects result from the introduction of aquaculture effluents into receiving waters.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.08.009</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0044-8486 |
| ispartof | Aquaculture, 2004-03, Vol.231 (1), p.149-162 |
| issn | 0044-8486 1873-5622 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16173694 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Animal aquaculture Animal productions Aquaculture Bioassessment Biological and medical sciences Ceriodaphnia dubia Effluents Ephemeroptera Fish Fisheries Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Pimephales promelas Plecoptera Receiving streams Trichoptera |
| title | Instream community assessment of aquaculture effluents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A55%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Instream%20community%20assessment%20of%20aquaculture%20effluents&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture&rft.au=Stephens,%20William%20W.&rft.date=2004-03-05&rft.volume=231&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=149-162&rft.issn=0044-8486&rft.eissn=1873-5622&rft.coden=AQCLAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.08.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16173694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204697773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S004484860300557X&rfr_iscdi=true |