Evaluation of Drosophila for screening developmental toxicants: Test results with eighteen chemicals and presentation of a new Drosophila bioassay
The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive data set of chemically induced malformations in Drosophila using a detailed morphological examination of the entire fly (phase one). These data were analyzed, in blind, with the goal of developing a standardized set of criteria which could...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis, 1991, Vol.11 (3), p.147-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Lynch, Dennis W. Schuler, Ronald L. Hood, Ronald D. Davis, D. Gale |
description | The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive data set of chemically induced malformations in Drosophila using a detailed morphological examination of the entire fly (phase one). These data were analyzed, in blind, with the goal of developing a standardized set of criteria which could be used in a new, rapid, and economical Drosophila bioassay useful in the preliminary screening for potential developmental toxicants. After 32 chemicals were tested, formalized criteria were developed to form the basis of a new Drosophila bioassay. These criteria were then applied to the data from the same 32 chemicals (phase two). The data from only 18 of these chemicals met all requirements for evaluation, e.g., statistical significance, minimum fly numbers, sufficient challenge concentration administered, etc. In the new bioassay, rather than the detailed and time‐consuming examination of the entire fly for a multitude of morphological defects, only two specific anatomical sites are examined. These sites are the humeral bristle and the wing blade, with focus placed on two structural defects—a bent bristle and a notch in the wing. These defects were the only two external malformations among the multitude of defects observed in flies treated in the first phase with the 32 chemicals which demonstrated the following characteristics: 1) A consistent concentration‐response in flies treated with a variety of developmental toxicants; 2) a lack of response with most presumptive non‐developmental toxicants; and 3) consistently low‐background incidences in control flies. In both phases, developing Drosophila were exposed to the test agents from the egg through three larval stages by incorporating a range of concentrations of each chemical into the culture medium. Emerging adults were examined for an array of defects as part of a detailed morphological examination in the first phase, including bent bristles and wing notches. In the second phase, only bent bristle and wing notch data were evaluated. The incidences of bent humeral bristles and wing notches from flies exposed to each of the 18 chemicals were compared with those of concurrent controls. Of the 18 chemicals that could be evaluated using the new bioassay, 13 were known developmental toxicants while the remaining 5 were presumptive negative agents. Ten of the 13 mammalian developmental toxicants were correctly identified with this test (false negative rate of 23%). Four of five apparent non‐developmental toxica |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/tcm.1770110304 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16166941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16166941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-51f982c0325ea72f55b4e6c425e64533d70550377ad2ddecf925fb697bc43393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EKkvhyg3JB8Qtiz9ie8MNln6ASpHQShwtrzPpGpI4tZ1u92_0F9erLC2cOFnWPO-8M_Mi9JqSOSWEvU-2m1OlCKWEk_IJmlHBSCEXUj5FM8IUKTij9Dl6EeMvQmjm2BE6ohlYMDZDdyc3ph1Ncr7HvsGfg49-2LjW4MYHHG0A6F1_hWu4gdYPHfTJtDj5W2dNn-IHvIKYcIA4tinirUsbDO5qk7IM2w10GWsjNn2Nhwzt1X-sDO5h-7fh2nkTo9m9RM-aLIJXh_cYrU5PVsvz4uL72Zflx4vCcsHLQtCmWjBLOBNgFGuEWJcgbZm_shSc14oIQbhSpmZ1DbapmGjWslJrW3Je8WP0bmo7BH895i1056KFtjU9-DFqKqmUVUkzOJ9Am2eNARo9BNeZsNOU6H0GOmegHzPIgjeHzuO6g_oRn46e628PdRPzeZpgeuviAyYIk0LusWrCtq6F3X9M9Wr57Z8RiknrYoLbB60Jv7VUXAn98_JMX379cSo-CaHP-T3owrFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16166941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Drosophila for screening developmental toxicants: Test results with eighteen chemicals and presentation of a new Drosophila bioassay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lynch, Dennis W. ; Schuler, Ronald L. ; Hood, Ronald D. ; Davis, D. Gale</creator><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Dennis W. ; Schuler, Ronald L. ; Hood, Ronald D. ; Davis, D. Gale</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive data set of chemically induced malformations in Drosophila using a detailed morphological examination of the entire fly (phase one). These data were analyzed, in blind, with the goal of developing a standardized set of criteria which could be used in a new, rapid, and economical Drosophila bioassay useful in the preliminary screening for potential developmental toxicants. After 32 chemicals were tested, formalized criteria were developed to form the basis of a new Drosophila bioassay. These criteria were then applied to the data from the same 32 chemicals (phase two). The data from only 18 of these chemicals met all requirements for evaluation, e.g., statistical significance, minimum fly numbers, sufficient challenge concentration administered, etc. In the new bioassay, rather than the detailed and time‐consuming examination of the entire fly for a multitude of morphological defects, only two specific anatomical sites are examined. These sites are the humeral bristle and the wing blade, with focus placed on two structural defects—a bent bristle and a notch in the wing. These defects were the only two external malformations among the multitude of defects observed in flies treated in the first phase with the 32 chemicals which demonstrated the following characteristics: 1) A consistent concentration‐response in flies treated with a variety of developmental toxicants; 2) a lack of response with most presumptive non‐developmental toxicants; and 3) consistently low‐background incidences in control flies. In both phases, developing Drosophila were exposed to the test agents from the egg through three larval stages by incorporating a range of concentrations of each chemical into the culture medium. Emerging adults were examined for an array of defects as part of a detailed morphological examination in the first phase, including bent bristles and wing notches. In the second phase, only bent bristle and wing notch data were evaluated. The incidences of bent humeral bristles and wing notches from flies exposed to each of the 18 chemicals were compared with those of concurrent controls. Of the 18 chemicals that could be evaluated using the new bioassay, 13 were known developmental toxicants while the remaining 5 were presumptive negative agents. Ten of the 13 mammalian developmental toxicants were correctly identified with this test (false negative rate of 23%). Four of five apparent non‐developmental toxicants were correctly identified for a false positive rate of 20%. The sensitivity of the bioassay was 77% (10 of 13 known developmental toxicants accurately detected); the specificity was 80% (4 of 5 negative compounds accurately detected); and the overall accuracy was 78% (14 of 18 chemicals accurately detected). We believe ths formalized Drosophila bioassay is an improved version of previous screening tests using intact Drosophila, and that this bioassay shows promise for the screening of chemicals for their potential to induce developmental toxicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-3211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tcm.1770110304</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1686822</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TCMUD8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Abnormalities, Drug-Induced ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological Assay - methods ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drosophila melanogaster - drug effects ; Drosophila melanogaster - growth & development ; Embryology: invertebrates and vertebrates. Teratology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Teratology. Teratogens ; Toxicology - methods</subject><ispartof>Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis, 1991, Vol.11 (3), p.147-173</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1991 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-51f982c0325ea72f55b4e6c425e64533d70550377ad2ddecf925fb697bc43393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-51f982c0325ea72f55b4e6c425e64533d70550377ad2ddecf925fb697bc43393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftcm.1770110304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftcm.1770110304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,4022,27922,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5026562$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1686822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Dennis W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuler, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, D. Gale</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Drosophila for screening developmental toxicants: Test results with eighteen chemicals and presentation of a new Drosophila bioassay</title><title>Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis</title><addtitle>Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive data set of chemically induced malformations in Drosophila using a detailed morphological examination of the entire fly (phase one). These data were analyzed, in blind, with the goal of developing a standardized set of criteria which could be used in a new, rapid, and economical Drosophila bioassay useful in the preliminary screening for potential developmental toxicants. After 32 chemicals were tested, formalized criteria were developed to form the basis of a new Drosophila bioassay. These criteria were then applied to the data from the same 32 chemicals (phase two). The data from only 18 of these chemicals met all requirements for evaluation, e.g., statistical significance, minimum fly numbers, sufficient challenge concentration administered, etc. In the new bioassay, rather than the detailed and time‐consuming examination of the entire fly for a multitude of morphological defects, only two specific anatomical sites are examined. These sites are the humeral bristle and the wing blade, with focus placed on two structural defects—a bent bristle and a notch in the wing. These defects were the only two external malformations among the multitude of defects observed in flies treated in the first phase with the 32 chemicals which demonstrated the following characteristics: 1) A consistent concentration‐response in flies treated with a variety of developmental toxicants; 2) a lack of response with most presumptive non‐developmental toxicants; and 3) consistently low‐background incidences in control flies. In both phases, developing Drosophila were exposed to the test agents from the egg through three larval stages by incorporating a range of concentrations of each chemical into the culture medium. Emerging adults were examined for an array of defects as part of a detailed morphological examination in the first phase, including bent bristles and wing notches. In the second phase, only bent bristle and wing notch data were evaluated. The incidences of bent humeral bristles and wing notches from flies exposed to each of the 18 chemicals were compared with those of concurrent controls. Of the 18 chemicals that could be evaluated using the new bioassay, 13 were known developmental toxicants while the remaining 5 were presumptive negative agents. Ten of the 13 mammalian developmental toxicants were correctly identified with this test (false negative rate of 23%). Four of five apparent non‐developmental toxicants were correctly identified for a false positive rate of 20%. The sensitivity of the bioassay was 77% (10 of 13 known developmental toxicants accurately detected); the specificity was 80% (4 of 5 negative compounds accurately detected); and the overall accuracy was 78% (14 of 18 chemicals accurately detected). We believe ths formalized Drosophila bioassay is an improved version of previous screening tests using intact Drosophila, and that this bioassay shows promise for the screening of chemicals for their potential to induce developmental toxicity.</description><subject>Abnormalities, Drug-Induced</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological Assay - methods</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster - drug effects</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster - growth & development</subject><subject>Embryology: invertebrates and vertebrates. Teratology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Teratology. Teratogens</subject><subject>Toxicology - methods</subject><issn>0270-3211</issn><issn>1520-6866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EKkvhyg3JB8Qtiz9ie8MNln6ASpHQShwtrzPpGpI4tZ1u92_0F9erLC2cOFnWPO-8M_Mi9JqSOSWEvU-2m1OlCKWEk_IJmlHBSCEXUj5FM8IUKTij9Dl6EeMvQmjm2BE6ohlYMDZDdyc3ph1Ncr7HvsGfg49-2LjW4MYHHG0A6F1_hWu4gdYPHfTJtDj5W2dNn-IHvIKYcIA4tinirUsbDO5qk7IM2w10GWsjNn2Nhwzt1X-sDO5h-7fh2nkTo9m9RM-aLIJXh_cYrU5PVsvz4uL72Zflx4vCcsHLQtCmWjBLOBNgFGuEWJcgbZm_shSc14oIQbhSpmZ1DbapmGjWslJrW3Je8WP0bmo7BH895i1056KFtjU9-DFqKqmUVUkzOJ9Am2eNARo9BNeZsNOU6H0GOmegHzPIgjeHzuO6g_oRn46e628PdRPzeZpgeuviAyYIk0LusWrCtq6F3X9M9Wr57Z8RiknrYoLbB60Jv7VUXAn98_JMX379cSo-CaHP-T3owrFk</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Lynch, Dennis W.</creator><creator>Schuler, Ronald L.</creator><creator>Hood, Ronald D.</creator><creator>Davis, D. Gale</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Drosophila for screening developmental toxicants: Test results with eighteen chemicals and presentation of a new Drosophila bioassay</title><author>Lynch, Dennis W. ; Schuler, Ronald L. ; Hood, Ronald D. ; Davis, D. Gale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-51f982c0325ea72f55b4e6c425e64533d70550377ad2ddecf925fb697bc43393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities, Drug-Induced</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological Assay - methods</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster - drug effects</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster - growth & development</topic><topic>Embryology: invertebrates and vertebrates. Teratology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Teratology. Teratogens</topic><topic>Toxicology - methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Dennis W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuler, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, D. Gale</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lynch, Dennis W.</au><au>Schuler, Ronald L.</au><au>Hood, Ronald D.</au><au>Davis, D. Gale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Drosophila for screening developmental toxicants: Test results with eighteen chemicals and presentation of a new Drosophila bioassay</atitle><jtitle>Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis</jtitle><addtitle>Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen</addtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>147-173</pages><issn>0270-3211</issn><eissn>1520-6866</eissn><coden>TCMUD8</coden><abstract>The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive data set of chemically induced malformations in Drosophila using a detailed morphological examination of the entire fly (phase one). These data were analyzed, in blind, with the goal of developing a standardized set of criteria which could be used in a new, rapid, and economical Drosophila bioassay useful in the preliminary screening for potential developmental toxicants. After 32 chemicals were tested, formalized criteria were developed to form the basis of a new Drosophila bioassay. These criteria were then applied to the data from the same 32 chemicals (phase two). The data from only 18 of these chemicals met all requirements for evaluation, e.g., statistical significance, minimum fly numbers, sufficient challenge concentration administered, etc. In the new bioassay, rather than the detailed and time‐consuming examination of the entire fly for a multitude of morphological defects, only two specific anatomical sites are examined. These sites are the humeral bristle and the wing blade, with focus placed on two structural defects—a bent bristle and a notch in the wing. These defects were the only two external malformations among the multitude of defects observed in flies treated in the first phase with the 32 chemicals which demonstrated the following characteristics: 1) A consistent concentration‐response in flies treated with a variety of developmental toxicants; 2) a lack of response with most presumptive non‐developmental toxicants; and 3) consistently low‐background incidences in control flies. In both phases, developing Drosophila were exposed to the test agents from the egg through three larval stages by incorporating a range of concentrations of each chemical into the culture medium. Emerging adults were examined for an array of defects as part of a detailed morphological examination in the first phase, including bent bristles and wing notches. In the second phase, only bent bristle and wing notch data were evaluated. The incidences of bent humeral bristles and wing notches from flies exposed to each of the 18 chemicals were compared with those of concurrent controls. Of the 18 chemicals that could be evaluated using the new bioassay, 13 were known developmental toxicants while the remaining 5 were presumptive negative agents. Ten of the 13 mammalian developmental toxicants were correctly identified with this test (false negative rate of 23%). Four of five apparent non‐developmental toxicants were correctly identified for a false positive rate of 20%. The sensitivity of the bioassay was 77% (10 of 13 known developmental toxicants accurately detected); the specificity was 80% (4 of 5 negative compounds accurately detected); and the overall accuracy was 78% (14 of 18 chemicals accurately detected). We believe ths formalized Drosophila bioassay is an improved version of previous screening tests using intact Drosophila, and that this bioassay shows promise for the screening of chemicals for their potential to induce developmental toxicity.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>1686822</pmid><doi>10.1002/tcm.1770110304</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-3211 |
ispartof | Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis, 1991, Vol.11 (3), p.147-173 |
issn | 0270-3211 1520-6866 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16166941 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Abnormalities, Drug-Induced Animals Biological and medical sciences Biological Assay - methods Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drosophila melanogaster - drug effects Drosophila melanogaster - growth & development Embryology: invertebrates and vertebrates. Teratology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Sensitivity and Specificity Teratology. Teratogens Toxicology - methods |
title | Evaluation of Drosophila for screening developmental toxicants: Test results with eighteen chemicals and presentation of a new Drosophila bioassay |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A03%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Drosophila%20for%20screening%20developmental%20toxicants:%20Test%20results%20with%20eighteen%20chemicals%20and%20presentation%20of%20a%20new%20Drosophila%20bioassay&rft.jtitle=Teratogenesis,%20carcinogenesis,%20and%20mutagenesis&rft.au=Lynch,%20Dennis%20W.&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=147-173&rft.issn=0270-3211&rft.eissn=1520-6866&rft.coden=TCMUD8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tcm.1770110304&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16166941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16166941&rft_id=info:pmid/1686822&rfr_iscdi=true |