Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center
Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural fact...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2014-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1383-1390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1383 |
container_title | Infection control and hospital epidemiology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Talbot, Thomas R. Wang, Deede Swift, Melanie St. Jacques, Paul Johnson, Susan Brinsko, Vicki Thayer, Valerie Dail, Teresa Feistritzer, Nancye Polancich, Shea |
description | Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary.
Design. Before-after program analysis.
Setting. Large academic medical center.
Interventions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined.
Results. Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program.
Conclusions. An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/678417 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1615742282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/678417</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/678417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-28783882147062296fbaf91f9d4d31bb9faee9f0d1db5443d915b9dac719f5dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9LHDEQx4NU9LzaP6EECsWX1WSzP5JHez1b4UShLfi2zCaTvZXd5Exygv9H_2BXT33zaYbhMx-G-RLyhbNTzmR1VtWy4PUemfGyVFklRfGJzJhUKpO5uD0kRzHeMcZqpfgBOcxLIUQhxIz8vxw3A47oEqTeO-otBUeXbg1Oo6F_wGJ6zJau6x1ieJ6sIWzoT3zoNdLrBwyx79ZpWjL0x-C9aX1wSG8grX2Hjt4En1C_qKe2CzBSmGi6gtAhPddgcOw1vULTaxjoYjoEw2eyb2GIePxa5-TfxfLv4ne2uv51uThfZVqwOmW5rKWQMudFzao8V5VtwSpulSmM4G2rLCAqyww3bVkUwihetsqArrmypTFiTk523k3w91uMqRn7qHEYwKHfxoZXvKyLPJ9eOCffd6gOPsaAttmEfoTw2HDWPCfQ7BKYwK-vzm07onnH3l4-Ad92wF1MPnykeQLb94y_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615742282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Talbot, Thomas R. ; Wang, Deede ; Swift, Melanie ; St. Jacques, Paul ; Johnson, Susan ; Brinsko, Vicki ; Thayer, Valerie ; Dail, Teresa ; Feistritzer, Nancye ; Polancich, Shea</creator><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Thomas R. ; Wang, Deede ; Swift, Melanie ; St. Jacques, Paul ; Johnson, Susan ; Brinsko, Vicki ; Thayer, Valerie ; Dail, Teresa ; Feistritzer, Nancye ; Polancich, Shea</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary.
Design. Before-after program analysis.
Setting. Large academic medical center.
Interventions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined.
Results. Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program.
Conclusions. An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/678417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25333433</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration ; Blood-Borne Pathogens ; Equipment Design ; Gloves, Protective ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health care industry ; Humans ; Medical practice ; Needlestick injuries ; Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control ; Nursing ; Occupational Exposure - prevention & control ; Occupational Health - standards ; Occupational health and safety ; Occupational Injuries - prevention & control ; Organizational Policy ; Original Article ; Pathogens ; Physical trauma ; Program Development ; Review committees ; Safety devices ; Surgical procedures ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1383-1390</ispartof><rights>2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-28783882147062296fbaf91f9d4d31bb9faee9f0d1db5443d915b9dac719f5dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-28783882147062296fbaf91f9d4d31bb9faee9f0d1db5443d915b9dac719f5dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25333433$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Deede</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swift, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Jacques, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinsko, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dail, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feistritzer, Nancye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polancich, Shea</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary.
Design. Before-after program analysis.
Setting. Large academic medical center.
Interventions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined.
Results. Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program.
Conclusions. An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration</subject><subject>Blood-Borne Pathogens</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Gloves, Protective</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical practice</subject><subject>Needlestick injuries</subject><subject>Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</subject><subject>Occupational Health - standards</subject><subject>Occupational health and safety</subject><subject>Occupational Injuries - prevention & control</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Physical trauma</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Review committees</subject><subject>Safety devices</subject><subject>Surgical procedures</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9LHDEQx4NU9LzaP6EECsWX1WSzP5JHez1b4UShLfi2zCaTvZXd5Exygv9H_2BXT33zaYbhMx-G-RLyhbNTzmR1VtWy4PUemfGyVFklRfGJzJhUKpO5uD0kRzHeMcZqpfgBOcxLIUQhxIz8vxw3A47oEqTeO-otBUeXbg1Oo6F_wGJ6zJau6x1ieJ6sIWzoT3zoNdLrBwyx79ZpWjL0x-C9aX1wSG8grX2Hjt4En1C_qKe2CzBSmGi6gtAhPddgcOw1vULTaxjoYjoEw2eyb2GIePxa5-TfxfLv4ne2uv51uThfZVqwOmW5rKWQMudFzao8V5VtwSpulSmM4G2rLCAqyww3bVkUwihetsqArrmypTFiTk523k3w91uMqRn7qHEYwKHfxoZXvKyLPJ9eOCffd6gOPsaAttmEfoTw2HDWPCfQ7BKYwK-vzm07onnH3l4-Ad92wF1MPnykeQLb94y_</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Talbot, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Wang, Deede</creator><creator>Swift, Melanie</creator><creator>St. Jacques, Paul</creator><creator>Johnson, Susan</creator><creator>Brinsko, Vicki</creator><creator>Thayer, Valerie</creator><creator>Dail, Teresa</creator><creator>Feistritzer, Nancye</creator><creator>Polancich, Shea</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center</title><author>Talbot, Thomas R. ; Wang, Deede ; Swift, Melanie ; St. Jacques, Paul ; Johnson, Susan ; Brinsko, Vicki ; Thayer, Valerie ; Dail, Teresa ; Feistritzer, Nancye ; Polancich, Shea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-28783882147062296fbaf91f9d4d31bb9faee9f0d1db5443d915b9dac719f5dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration</topic><topic>Blood-Borne Pathogens</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Gloves, Protective</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical practice</topic><topic>Needlestick injuries</topic><topic>Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</topic><topic>Occupational Health - standards</topic><topic>Occupational health and safety</topic><topic>Occupational Injuries - prevention & control</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Physical trauma</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Review committees</topic><topic>Safety devices</topic><topic>Surgical procedures</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Deede</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swift, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Jacques, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinsko, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dail, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feistritzer, Nancye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polancich, Shea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Talbot, Thomas R.</au><au>Wang, Deede</au><au>Swift, Melanie</au><au>St. Jacques, Paul</au><au>Johnson, Susan</au><au>Brinsko, Vicki</au><au>Thayer, Valerie</au><au>Dail, Teresa</au><au>Feistritzer, Nancye</au><au>Polancich, Shea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1383</spage><epage>1390</epage><pages>1383-1390</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary.
Design. Before-after program analysis.
Setting. Large academic medical center.
Interventions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined.
Results. Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program.
Conclusions. An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>25333433</pmid><doi>10.1086/678417</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-823X |
ispartof | Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1383-1390 |
issn | 0899-823X 1559-6834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1615742282 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration Blood-Borne Pathogens Equipment Design Gloves, Protective Guidelines as Topic Health care industry Humans Medical practice Needlestick injuries Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control Nursing Occupational Exposure - prevention & control Occupational Health - standards Occupational health and safety Occupational Injuries - prevention & control Organizational Policy Original Article Pathogens Physical trauma Program Development Review committees Safety devices Surgical procedures Surgical Procedures, Operative Sutures |
title | Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20an%20Enhanced%20Safety-Engineered%20Sharp%20Device%20Oversight%20and%20Bloodborne%20Pathogen%20Protection%20Program%20at%20a%20Large%20Academic%20Medical%20Center&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Talbot,%20Thomas%20R.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1383&rft.epage=1390&rft.pages=1383-1390&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/678417&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/678417%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615742282&rft_id=info:pmid/25333433&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/678417&rfr_iscdi=true |