Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center

Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural fact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2014-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1383-1390
Hauptverfasser: Talbot, Thomas R., Wang, Deede, Swift, Melanie, St. Jacques, Paul, Johnson, Susan, Brinsko, Vicki, Thayer, Valerie, Dail, Teresa, Feistritzer, Nancye, Polancich, Shea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1390
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1383
container_title Infection control and hospital epidemiology
container_volume 35
creator Talbot, Thomas R.
Wang, Deede
Swift, Melanie
St. Jacques, Paul
Johnson, Susan
Brinsko, Vicki
Thayer, Valerie
Dail, Teresa
Feistritzer, Nancye
Polancich, Shea
description Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary. Design. Before-after program analysis. Setting. Large academic medical center. Interventions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined. Results. Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program. Conclusions. An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/678417
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1615742282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/678417</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/678417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-28783882147062296fbaf91f9d4d31bb9faee9f0d1db5443d915b9dac719f5dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9LHDEQx4NU9LzaP6EECsWX1WSzP5JHez1b4UShLfi2zCaTvZXd5Exygv9H_2BXT33zaYbhMx-G-RLyhbNTzmR1VtWy4PUemfGyVFklRfGJzJhUKpO5uD0kRzHeMcZqpfgBOcxLIUQhxIz8vxw3A47oEqTeO-otBUeXbg1Oo6F_wGJ6zJau6x1ieJ6sIWzoT3zoNdLrBwyx79ZpWjL0x-C9aX1wSG8grX2Hjt4En1C_qKe2CzBSmGi6gtAhPddgcOw1vULTaxjoYjoEw2eyb2GIePxa5-TfxfLv4ne2uv51uThfZVqwOmW5rKWQMudFzao8V5VtwSpulSmM4G2rLCAqyww3bVkUwihetsqArrmypTFiTk523k3w91uMqRn7qHEYwKHfxoZXvKyLPJ9eOCffd6gOPsaAttmEfoTw2HDWPCfQ7BKYwK-vzm07onnH3l4-Ad92wF1MPnykeQLb94y_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615742282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Talbot, Thomas R. ; Wang, Deede ; Swift, Melanie ; St. Jacques, Paul ; Johnson, Susan ; Brinsko, Vicki ; Thayer, Valerie ; Dail, Teresa ; Feistritzer, Nancye ; Polancich, Shea</creator><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Thomas R. ; Wang, Deede ; Swift, Melanie ; St. Jacques, Paul ; Johnson, Susan ; Brinsko, Vicki ; Thayer, Valerie ; Dail, Teresa ; Feistritzer, Nancye ; Polancich, Shea</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary. Design. Before-after program analysis. Setting. Large academic medical center. Interventions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined. Results. Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program. Conclusions. An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/678417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25333433</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers - organization &amp; administration ; Blood-Borne Pathogens ; Equipment Design ; Gloves, Protective ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health care industry ; Humans ; Medical practice ; Needlestick injuries ; Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Nursing ; Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational Health - standards ; Occupational health and safety ; Occupational Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Organizational Policy ; Original Article ; Pathogens ; Physical trauma ; Program Development ; Review committees ; Safety devices ; Surgical procedures ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1383-1390</ispartof><rights>2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-28783882147062296fbaf91f9d4d31bb9faee9f0d1db5443d915b9dac719f5dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-28783882147062296fbaf91f9d4d31bb9faee9f0d1db5443d915b9dac719f5dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25333433$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Deede</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swift, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Jacques, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinsko, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dail, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feistritzer, Nancye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polancich, Shea</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary. Design. Before-after program analysis. Setting. Large academic medical center. Interventions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined. Results. Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program. Conclusions. An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Blood-Borne Pathogens</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Gloves, Protective</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical practice</subject><subject>Needlestick injuries</subject><subject>Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational Health - standards</subject><subject>Occupational health and safety</subject><subject>Occupational Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Physical trauma</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Review committees</subject><subject>Safety devices</subject><subject>Surgical procedures</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9LHDEQx4NU9LzaP6EECsWX1WSzP5JHez1b4UShLfi2zCaTvZXd5Exygv9H_2BXT33zaYbhMx-G-RLyhbNTzmR1VtWy4PUemfGyVFklRfGJzJhUKpO5uD0kRzHeMcZqpfgBOcxLIUQhxIz8vxw3A47oEqTeO-otBUeXbg1Oo6F_wGJ6zJau6x1ieJ6sIWzoT3zoNdLrBwyx79ZpWjL0x-C9aX1wSG8grX2Hjt4En1C_qKe2CzBSmGi6gtAhPddgcOw1vULTaxjoYjoEw2eyb2GIePxa5-TfxfLv4ne2uv51uThfZVqwOmW5rKWQMudFzao8V5VtwSpulSmM4G2rLCAqyww3bVkUwihetsqArrmypTFiTk523k3w91uMqRn7qHEYwKHfxoZXvKyLPJ9eOCffd6gOPsaAttmEfoTw2HDWPCfQ7BKYwK-vzm07onnH3l4-Ad92wF1MPnykeQLb94y_</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Talbot, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Wang, Deede</creator><creator>Swift, Melanie</creator><creator>St. Jacques, Paul</creator><creator>Johnson, Susan</creator><creator>Brinsko, Vicki</creator><creator>Thayer, Valerie</creator><creator>Dail, Teresa</creator><creator>Feistritzer, Nancye</creator><creator>Polancich, Shea</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center</title><author>Talbot, Thomas R. ; Wang, Deede ; Swift, Melanie ; St. Jacques, Paul ; Johnson, Susan ; Brinsko, Vicki ; Thayer, Valerie ; Dail, Teresa ; Feistritzer, Nancye ; Polancich, Shea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-28783882147062296fbaf91f9d4d31bb9faee9f0d1db5443d915b9dac719f5dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Blood-Borne Pathogens</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Gloves, Protective</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical practice</topic><topic>Needlestick injuries</topic><topic>Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational Health - standards</topic><topic>Occupational health and safety</topic><topic>Occupational Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Physical trauma</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Review committees</topic><topic>Safety devices</topic><topic>Surgical procedures</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Deede</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swift, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Jacques, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinsko, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dail, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feistritzer, Nancye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polancich, Shea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Talbot, Thomas R.</au><au>Wang, Deede</au><au>Swift, Melanie</au><au>St. Jacques, Paul</au><au>Johnson, Susan</au><au>Brinsko, Vicki</au><au>Thayer, Valerie</au><au>Dail, Teresa</au><au>Feistritzer, Nancye</au><au>Polancich, Shea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1383</spage><epage>1390</epage><pages>1383-1390</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Objective. Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary. Design. Before-after program analysis. Setting. Large academic medical center. Interventions. Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined. Results. Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program. Conclusions. An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>25333433</pmid><doi>10.1086/678417</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-823X
ispartof Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1383-1390
issn 0899-823X
1559-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1615742282
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration
Blood-Borne Pathogens
Equipment Design
Gloves, Protective
Guidelines as Topic
Health care industry
Humans
Medical practice
Needlestick injuries
Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control
Nursing
Occupational Exposure - prevention & control
Occupational Health - standards
Occupational health and safety
Occupational Injuries - prevention & control
Organizational Policy
Original Article
Pathogens
Physical trauma
Program Development
Review committees
Safety devices
Surgical procedures
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Sutures
title Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20an%20Enhanced%20Safety-Engineered%20Sharp%20Device%20Oversight%20and%20Bloodborne%20Pathogen%20Protection%20Program%20at%20a%20Large%20Academic%20Medical%20Center&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Talbot,%20Thomas%20R.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1383&rft.epage=1390&rft.pages=1383-1390&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/678417&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/678417%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615742282&rft_id=info:pmid/25333433&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/678417&rfr_iscdi=true