Pseudarthrosis Failures of Anterior Subaxial Cervical Spine Fusion Using a Plate with a Single Screw Per Vertebral Body: A Case Series

Introduction The UNIPLATE was developed to improve operative times and limit dissection at the lateral margins of the vertebral bodies. The distinguishing character of this plate is its thin design, which requires only one screw per vertebral level (monovertebral screw plate). Most cervical spine pl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World neurosurgery 2014-07, Vol.82 (1), p.225-230
Hauptverfasser: Dumont, Travis M, Lin, Chih-Ta, Tranmer, Bruce I, Horgan, Michael A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 230
container_issue 1
container_start_page 225
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 82
creator Dumont, Travis M
Lin, Chih-Ta
Tranmer, Bruce I
Horgan, Michael A
description Introduction The UNIPLATE was developed to improve operative times and limit dissection at the lateral margins of the vertebral bodies. The distinguishing character of this plate is its thin design, which requires only one screw per vertebral level (monovertebral screw plate). Most cervical spine plates, in contrast, are designed for two screws per vertebral level (bivertebral screw plate). Limited reports of the biomechanical efficacy of the UNIPLATE are available, and to the authors' knowledge, this report represents the largest clinical study of its use. Methods This is a retrospective chart-review study of consecutively treated patients without previous cervical spine surgery undergoing anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion at one or two levels. The primary end point was symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery. Pseudarthrosis is defined as a failure of bony fusion on the operated level seen on thin-cut computed tomography scans performed on symptomatic patients. The rate of revision surgery caused by symptomatic pseudarthrosis was compared between patients undergoing one- and two-level fusion surgeries treated with UNIPLATE compared with other plates with two screws per vertebral level. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. Results A total of 162 patients were identified, including 125 patients with one-level fusion and 37 patients with two-level fusion surgery. The median follow-up period was 3.3 years. A significantly greater incidence (odds ratio 10.2, P  = 0.042) of reoperation for symptomatic pseudarthrosis was noted for patients treated with the UNIPLATE (4 of 13, 31%) compared with patients treated with bivertebral screw plates (1 of 24, 2.5%). No significant difference in reoperation attributable to symptomatic pseudarthrosis was noted for different plating systems for one-level fusion surgeries. Conclusions There is an increased rate of reoperation for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion surgery with the use of a monovertebral screw semiconstrained plate, particularly in two-level fusion surgeries. Use of the UNIPLATE system has since been abandoned at our institution in favor of bivertebral screw plating systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.03.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1615262101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1878875013004798</els_id><sourcerecordid>1615262101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ad57e7275c8872e6691ee61f08573c317000f020f11fb1e3c281cb86f6ea1cd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsFqGzEQXUpLE9L8QA9Fx17saCSvJJdScEydFgIxbNKr0GpnG7nrlSut4voH-t3R4jSHHiIGNBJv3jDvTVG8BzoFCuJiM933mKaMAp_SMdir4hSUVBMlxfz1c17Sk-I8xg3Nh8NMSf62OGG8ZDPK6Wnxdx0xNSYM98FHF8nKuC4FjMS3ZNEPGJwPpEq1-eNMR5YYHpzNSbVzPZJVis735C66_icxZN2ZAcneDff5UeW_DkllA-7JGgP5gWHAOuTiS98cPpEFWZqYAbkFxnfFm9Z0Ec-f7rPibvX1dvltcn1z9X25uJ7YGcAwMU0pUTJZWqUkQyHmgCigpaqU3HKQeciWMtoCtDUgt0yBrZVoBRqwDeNnxccj7y743wnjoLcuWuw606NPUYOAkgmWFc5QdoTarEwM2OpdcFsTDhqoHi3QGz1aoEcLNB1j5P_wxJ_qLTbPJf8Ez4DPRwDmKR8cBh2tw95i4wLaQTfevcz_5b9y27l-tOQXHjBufAp91k-DjkxTXY1LMO4AcEpncq74I5ZmrB4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615262101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pseudarthrosis Failures of Anterior Subaxial Cervical Spine Fusion Using a Plate with a Single Screw Per Vertebral Body: A Case Series</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dumont, Travis M ; Lin, Chih-Ta ; Tranmer, Bruce I ; Horgan, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Travis M ; Lin, Chih-Ta ; Tranmer, Bruce I ; Horgan, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The UNIPLATE was developed to improve operative times and limit dissection at the lateral margins of the vertebral bodies. The distinguishing character of this plate is its thin design, which requires only one screw per vertebral level (monovertebral screw plate). Most cervical spine plates, in contrast, are designed for two screws per vertebral level (bivertebral screw plate). Limited reports of the biomechanical efficacy of the UNIPLATE are available, and to the authors' knowledge, this report represents the largest clinical study of its use. Methods This is a retrospective chart-review study of consecutively treated patients without previous cervical spine surgery undergoing anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion at one or two levels. The primary end point was symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery. Pseudarthrosis is defined as a failure of bony fusion on the operated level seen on thin-cut computed tomography scans performed on symptomatic patients. The rate of revision surgery caused by symptomatic pseudarthrosis was compared between patients undergoing one- and two-level fusion surgeries treated with UNIPLATE compared with other plates with two screws per vertebral level. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. Results A total of 162 patients were identified, including 125 patients with one-level fusion and 37 patients with two-level fusion surgery. The median follow-up period was 3.3 years. A significantly greater incidence (odds ratio 10.2, P  = 0.042) of reoperation for symptomatic pseudarthrosis was noted for patients treated with the UNIPLATE (4 of 13, 31%) compared with patients treated with bivertebral screw plates (1 of 24, 2.5%). No significant difference in reoperation attributable to symptomatic pseudarthrosis was noted for different plating systems for one-level fusion surgeries. Conclusions There is an increased rate of reoperation for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion surgery with the use of a monovertebral screw semiconstrained plate, particularly in two-level fusion surgeries. Use of the UNIPLATE system has since been abandoned at our institution in favor of bivertebral screw plating systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.03.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23524030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ACDF ; Aged ; Anterior fixation ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Cervical ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Complication ; Diskectomy ; Endpoint Determination ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Instrumentation ; Internal Fixators ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurosurgery ; Odds Ratio ; Plating ; Pseudarthrosis ; Pseudarthrosis - surgery ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Smoking - adverse effects ; Smoking - epidemiology ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Spine ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2014-07, Vol.82 (1), p.225-230</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ad57e7275c8872e6691ee61f08573c317000f020f11fb1e3c281cb86f6ea1cd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ad57e7275c8872e6691ee61f08573c317000f020f11fb1e3c281cb86f6ea1cd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875013004798$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Travis M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chih-Ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranmer, Bruce I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horgan, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>Pseudarthrosis Failures of Anterior Subaxial Cervical Spine Fusion Using a Plate with a Single Screw Per Vertebral Body: A Case Series</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Introduction The UNIPLATE was developed to improve operative times and limit dissection at the lateral margins of the vertebral bodies. The distinguishing character of this plate is its thin design, which requires only one screw per vertebral level (monovertebral screw plate). Most cervical spine plates, in contrast, are designed for two screws per vertebral level (bivertebral screw plate). Limited reports of the biomechanical efficacy of the UNIPLATE are available, and to the authors' knowledge, this report represents the largest clinical study of its use. Methods This is a retrospective chart-review study of consecutively treated patients without previous cervical spine surgery undergoing anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion at one or two levels. The primary end point was symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery. Pseudarthrosis is defined as a failure of bony fusion on the operated level seen on thin-cut computed tomography scans performed on symptomatic patients. The rate of revision surgery caused by symptomatic pseudarthrosis was compared between patients undergoing one- and two-level fusion surgeries treated with UNIPLATE compared with other plates with two screws per vertebral level. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. Results A total of 162 patients were identified, including 125 patients with one-level fusion and 37 patients with two-level fusion surgery. The median follow-up period was 3.3 years. A significantly greater incidence (odds ratio 10.2, P  = 0.042) of reoperation for symptomatic pseudarthrosis was noted for patients treated with the UNIPLATE (4 of 13, 31%) compared with patients treated with bivertebral screw plates (1 of 24, 2.5%). No significant difference in reoperation attributable to symptomatic pseudarthrosis was noted for different plating systems for one-level fusion surgeries. Conclusions There is an increased rate of reoperation for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion surgery with the use of a monovertebral screw semiconstrained plate, particularly in two-level fusion surgeries. Use of the UNIPLATE system has since been abandoned at our institution in favor of bivertebral screw plating systems.</description><subject>ACDF</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anterior fixation</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cervical</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Complication</subject><subject>Diskectomy</subject><subject>Endpoint Determination</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Internal Fixators</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Plating</subject><subject>Pseudarthrosis</subject><subject>Pseudarthrosis - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Smoking - adverse effects</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsFqGzEQXUpLE9L8QA9Fx17saCSvJJdScEydFgIxbNKr0GpnG7nrlSut4voH-t3R4jSHHiIGNBJv3jDvTVG8BzoFCuJiM933mKaMAp_SMdir4hSUVBMlxfz1c17Sk-I8xg3Nh8NMSf62OGG8ZDPK6Wnxdx0xNSYM98FHF8nKuC4FjMS3ZNEPGJwPpEq1-eNMR5YYHpzNSbVzPZJVis735C66_icxZN2ZAcneDff5UeW_DkllA-7JGgP5gWHAOuTiS98cPpEFWZqYAbkFxnfFm9Z0Ec-f7rPibvX1dvltcn1z9X25uJ7YGcAwMU0pUTJZWqUkQyHmgCigpaqU3HKQeciWMtoCtDUgt0yBrZVoBRqwDeNnxccj7y743wnjoLcuWuw606NPUYOAkgmWFc5QdoTarEwM2OpdcFsTDhqoHi3QGz1aoEcLNB1j5P_wxJ_qLTbPJf8Ez4DPRwDmKR8cBh2tw95i4wLaQTfevcz_5b9y27l-tOQXHjBufAp91k-DjkxTXY1LMO4AcEpncq74I5ZmrB4</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Dumont, Travis M</creator><creator>Lin, Chih-Ta</creator><creator>Tranmer, Bruce I</creator><creator>Horgan, Michael A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Pseudarthrosis Failures of Anterior Subaxial Cervical Spine Fusion Using a Plate with a Single Screw Per Vertebral Body: A Case Series</title><author>Dumont, Travis M ; Lin, Chih-Ta ; Tranmer, Bruce I ; Horgan, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ad57e7275c8872e6691ee61f08573c317000f020f11fb1e3c281cb86f6ea1cd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>ACDF</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anterior fixation</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cervical</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Complication</topic><topic>Diskectomy</topic><topic>Endpoint Determination</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Internal Fixators</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Plating</topic><topic>Pseudarthrosis</topic><topic>Pseudarthrosis - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Smoking - adverse effects</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Travis M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chih-Ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranmer, Bruce I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horgan, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dumont, Travis M</au><au>Lin, Chih-Ta</au><au>Tranmer, Bruce I</au><au>Horgan, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pseudarthrosis Failures of Anterior Subaxial Cervical Spine Fusion Using a Plate with a Single Screw Per Vertebral Body: A Case Series</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>225-230</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Introduction The UNIPLATE was developed to improve operative times and limit dissection at the lateral margins of the vertebral bodies. The distinguishing character of this plate is its thin design, which requires only one screw per vertebral level (monovertebral screw plate). Most cervical spine plates, in contrast, are designed for two screws per vertebral level (bivertebral screw plate). Limited reports of the biomechanical efficacy of the UNIPLATE are available, and to the authors' knowledge, this report represents the largest clinical study of its use. Methods This is a retrospective chart-review study of consecutively treated patients without previous cervical spine surgery undergoing anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion at one or two levels. The primary end point was symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery. Pseudarthrosis is defined as a failure of bony fusion on the operated level seen on thin-cut computed tomography scans performed on symptomatic patients. The rate of revision surgery caused by symptomatic pseudarthrosis was compared between patients undergoing one- and two-level fusion surgeries treated with UNIPLATE compared with other plates with two screws per vertebral level. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. Results A total of 162 patients were identified, including 125 patients with one-level fusion and 37 patients with two-level fusion surgery. The median follow-up period was 3.3 years. A significantly greater incidence (odds ratio 10.2, P  = 0.042) of reoperation for symptomatic pseudarthrosis was noted for patients treated with the UNIPLATE (4 of 13, 31%) compared with patients treated with bivertebral screw plates (1 of 24, 2.5%). No significant difference in reoperation attributable to symptomatic pseudarthrosis was noted for different plating systems for one-level fusion surgeries. Conclusions There is an increased rate of reoperation for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion surgery with the use of a monovertebral screw semiconstrained plate, particularly in two-level fusion surgeries. Use of the UNIPLATE system has since been abandoned at our institution in favor of bivertebral screw plating systems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23524030</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2013.03.032</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2014-07, Vol.82 (1), p.225-230
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1615262101
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ACDF
Aged
Anterior fixation
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Plates
Bone Screws
Cervical
Cervical Vertebrae - surgery
Complication
Diskectomy
Endpoint Determination
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Instrumentation
Internal Fixators
Male
Middle Aged
Neurosurgery
Odds Ratio
Plating
Pseudarthrosis
Pseudarthrosis - surgery
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Smoking - adverse effects
Smoking - epidemiology
Spinal Fusion - methods
Spine
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Failure
title Pseudarthrosis Failures of Anterior Subaxial Cervical Spine Fusion Using a Plate with a Single Screw Per Vertebral Body: A Case Series
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T13%3A12%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pseudarthrosis%20Failures%20of%20Anterior%20Subaxial%20Cervical%20Spine%20Fusion%20Using%20a%20Plate%20with%20a%20Single%20Screw%20Per%20Vertebral%20Body:%20A%20Case%20Series&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Dumont,%20Travis%20M&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=225-230&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.03.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1615262101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615262101&rft_id=info:pmid/23524030&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1878875013004798&rfr_iscdi=true