Evaluation of two-step haemoglobin screening with HemoCue for blood donor qualification in mobile collection sites
Background and Objectives Inaccuracy of fingerstick haemoglobin compromises donor's health and losses blood donations. We evaluated the benefit of double haemoglobin screening with HemoCue. Study Design and Methods Blood donors underwent fingerstick screening by HemoCue and were driven for dona...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vox sanguinis 2014-11, Vol.107 (4), p.343-350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Objectives
Inaccuracy of fingerstick haemoglobin compromises donor's health and losses blood donations. We evaluated the benefit of double haemoglobin screening with HemoCue.
Study Design and Methods
Blood donors underwent fingerstick screening by HemoCue and were driven for donation if capillary haemoglobin was within the regulatory range. Those failing were drawn venous blood and donated if their venous haemoglobin determined with HemoCue was acceptable.
Results
Of 276 605 donor clinic visits, 10 011 (3·6%) were assessed by two‐step haemoglobin screening using HemoCue, because of low (n = 9444) or high (n = 567) capillary haemoglobin. Among these, 2561 (25·6%) were deemed eligible [recovered donations]. The recovery rate was 23·8% and 55·0% among donors presenting with low and high capillary haemoglobin, respectively. In both categories of attempted donations, capillary and venous haemoglobin with HemoCue correlated significantly in recovered donors (R2 ≈ 0·5–0·7) but not in deferred visits (R2 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-9007 1423-0410 |
DOI: | 10.1111/vox.12165 |