Evaluation of two-step haemoglobin screening with HemoCue for blood donor qualification in mobile collection sites

Background and Objectives Inaccuracy of fingerstick haemoglobin compromises donor's health and losses blood donations. We evaluated the benefit of double haemoglobin screening with HemoCue. Study Design and Methods Blood donors underwent fingerstick screening by HemoCue and were driven for dona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vox sanguinis 2014-11, Vol.107 (4), p.343-350
Hauptverfasser: Gómez-Simón, A., Plaza, E. M., Torregrosa, J. M., Ferrer-Marín, F., Sánchez-Guiu, I., Vicente, V., Lozano, M. L., Rivera, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objectives Inaccuracy of fingerstick haemoglobin compromises donor's health and losses blood donations. We evaluated the benefit of double haemoglobin screening with HemoCue. Study Design and Methods Blood donors underwent fingerstick screening by HemoCue and were driven for donation if capillary haemoglobin was within the regulatory range. Those failing were drawn venous blood and donated if their venous haemoglobin determined with HemoCue was acceptable. Results Of 276 605 donor clinic visits, 10 011 (3·6%) were assessed by two‐step haemoglobin screening using HemoCue, because of low (n = 9444) or high (n = 567) capillary haemoglobin. Among these, 2561 (25·6%) were deemed eligible [recovered donations]. The recovery rate was 23·8% and 55·0% among donors presenting with low and high capillary haemoglobin, respectively. In both categories of attempted donations, capillary and venous haemoglobin with HemoCue correlated significantly in recovered donors (R2 ≈ 0·5–0·7) but not in deferred visits (R2 
ISSN:0042-9007
1423-0410
DOI:10.1111/vox.12165