Direct and Derived Policies: Illicit Drug Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia
We distinguish two types of public policy issues: direct issues, in which concern comes bottom-up from the electorate at large; and derived issues, in which pressure for change comes top-down from expert opinion. We outline two continuing, contentious issues: policies towards illegal drug use and po...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of comparative policy analysis 2002-03, Vol.4 (1), p.51-74 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 74 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 51 |
| container_title | Journal of comparative policy analysis |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Marks, Robert E. |
| description | We distinguish two types of public policy issues: direct issues, in which concern comes bottom-up from the electorate at large; and derived issues, in which pressure for change comes top-down from expert opinion. We outline two continuing, contentious issues: policies towards illegal drug use and policies towards the prospect of global climate change. We argue that the media play a role in both policies' formulation: chaneling concern up in direct policy, and maintaining general interest and motivating the electorate to accept the pain of change in derived policy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13876980208412670 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16150159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39066678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2750-5a9759cc1ca63012d0104309fefb67c2850065e0118904ecc8046ca28917d3d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoso-PkDvAUP3qozafMlXsRdV0HQg-IxxDTVSLfRpPXj35t1PSnoaWbI8wxvmKLYRThAkHCIlRRcSaAga6RcwEqxgUzQktW1XM19fi8zINeLzZSeIIO0ho3ibuKjswMxfUMmLvpX15Dr0HnrXToiF92iG8gkjg_kNrkvbBad6x_DmMeZSWQ69yn50Cfie3IypiGazpvtYq01XXI733WruD2b3pyel5dXs4vTk8vSUsGgZEYJpqxFa3gFSBtAqCtQrWvvubBUMgDOHCBKBbWzVkLNraFSoWiqRlZbxf5y73MML6NLg85xrOs607scUVcKOOfifxA5MkCmMrj3A3wKY-zzJzQqQSWl1WIbLiEbQ0rRtfo5-rmJHxpBLw6ifx0kO8dLx_dtiHPzFmLX6MF8dCG20fTW57h_6eJf_Zelh_eh-gQCNqAX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197282238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct and Derived Policies: Illicit Drug Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Marks, Robert E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marks, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><description>We distinguish two types of public policy issues: direct issues, in which concern comes bottom-up from the electorate at large; and derived issues, in which pressure for change comes top-down from expert opinion. We outline two continuing, contentious issues: policies towards illegal drug use and policies towards the prospect of global climate change. We argue that the media play a role in both policies' formulation: chaneling concern up in direct policy, and maintaining general interest and motivating the electorate to accept the pain of change in derived policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-6988</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-5448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13876980208412670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Australia ; Climate change ; Comparative analysis ; Crime ; Design ; Drug use ; Drugs ; Emissions ; Engineers ; global warming ; Greenhouse effect ; greenhouse gas ; Greenhouse gases ; illicit drug use ; Jurisdiction ; media ; Narcotics ; Policy studies ; Property rights ; Public policy ; Social control ; Social policy ; Social problems ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative policy analysis, 2002-03, Vol.4 (1), p.51-74</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2750-5a9759cc1ca63012d0104309fefb67c2850065e0118904ecc8046ca28917d3d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marks, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct and Derived Policies: Illicit Drug Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia</title><title>Journal of comparative policy analysis</title><description>We distinguish two types of public policy issues: direct issues, in which concern comes bottom-up from the electorate at large; and derived issues, in which pressure for change comes top-down from expert opinion. We outline two continuing, contentious issues: policies towards illegal drug use and policies towards the prospect of global climate change. We argue that the media play a role in both policies' formulation: chaneling concern up in direct policy, and maintaining general interest and motivating the electorate to accept the pain of change in derived policy.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>greenhouse gas</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>illicit drug use</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>media</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Social control</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1387-6988</issn><issn>1572-5448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoso-PkDvAUP3qozafMlXsRdV0HQg-IxxDTVSLfRpPXj35t1PSnoaWbI8wxvmKLYRThAkHCIlRRcSaAga6RcwEqxgUzQktW1XM19fi8zINeLzZSeIIO0ho3ibuKjswMxfUMmLvpX15Dr0HnrXToiF92iG8gkjg_kNrkvbBad6x_DmMeZSWQ69yn50Cfie3IypiGazpvtYq01XXI733WruD2b3pyel5dXs4vTk8vSUsGgZEYJpqxFa3gFSBtAqCtQrWvvubBUMgDOHCBKBbWzVkLNraFSoWiqRlZbxf5y73MML6NLg85xrOs607scUVcKOOfifxA5MkCmMrj3A3wKY-zzJzQqQSWl1WIbLiEbQ0rRtfo5-rmJHxpBLw6ifx0kO8dLx_dtiHPzFmLX6MF8dCG20fTW57h_6eJf_Zelh_eh-gQCNqAX</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Marks, Robert E.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>Direct and Derived Policies: Illicit Drug Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia</title><author>Marks, Robert E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2750-5a9759cc1ca63012d0104309fefb67c2850065e0118904ecc8046ca28917d3d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>greenhouse gas</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>illicit drug use</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>media</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Social control</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marks, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative policy analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marks, Robert E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct and Derived Policies: Illicit Drug Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative policy analysis</jtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>51-74</pages><issn>1387-6988</issn><eissn>1572-5448</eissn><abstract>We distinguish two types of public policy issues: direct issues, in which concern comes bottom-up from the electorate at large; and derived issues, in which pressure for change comes top-down from expert opinion. We outline two continuing, contentious issues: policies towards illegal drug use and policies towards the prospect of global climate change. We argue that the media play a role in both policies' formulation: chaneling concern up in direct policy, and maintaining general interest and motivating the electorate to accept the pain of change in derived policy.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/13876980208412670</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1387-6988 |
| ispartof | Journal of comparative policy analysis, 2002-03, Vol.4 (1), p.51-74 |
| issn | 1387-6988 1572-5448 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16150159 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Australia Climate change Comparative analysis Crime Design Drug use Drugs Emissions Engineers global warming Greenhouse effect greenhouse gas Greenhouse gases illicit drug use Jurisdiction media Narcotics Policy studies Property rights Public policy Social control Social policy Social problems Studies |
| title | Direct and Derived Policies: Illicit Drug Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A27%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20and%20Derived%20Policies:%20Illicit%20Drug%20Use%20and%20Greenhouse%20Gas%20Emissions%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20policy%20analysis&rft.au=Marks,%20Robert%20E.&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=51-74&rft.issn=1387-6988&rft.eissn=1572-5448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13876980208412670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E39066678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197282238&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |