Evaluating agricultural nonpoint-source pollution programs in two Lake Erie tributaries
During the past three decades, numerous government programs have encouraged Lake Erie basin farmers to adopt practices that reduce water pollution. The first section of this paper summarizes these state and federal government agricultural pollution abatement programs in watersheds of two prominent L...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2002-01, Vol.31 (1), p.24-31 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 31 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 24 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Forster, D.L Rausch, J.N |
| description | During the past three decades, numerous government programs have encouraged Lake Erie basin farmers to adopt practices that reduce water pollution. The first section of this paper summarizes these state and federal government agricultural pollution abatement programs in watersheds of two prominent Lake Erie tributaries, the Maumee River and Sandusky River. Expenditures are summarized for each program, total expenditures in each county are estimated, and cost effectiveness of program expenditures (i.e., cost per metric ton of soil saved) are analyzed. Farmers received nearly $143 million as incentive payments to implement agricultural nonpoint source pollution abatement programs in the Maumee and Sandusky River watersheds from 1987 to 1997. About 95% of these funds was from federal sources. On average, these payments totaled about $7000 per farm or about $30 per farm acre (annualized equivalent of $2 per acre) within the watersheds. Our analysis raises questions about how efficiently these incentive payments were allocated. The majority of Agricultural Conservation Program (ACP) funds appear to have been spent on less cost-effective practices. Also, geographic areas with relatively low (high) soil erosion rates received relatively large (small) funding. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2002.0024 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16150044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>105849431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-626dffce9ec522c7970712ee3ab3bd7c970ed6f6ab3bb2bdc404ac981522a3283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0clrGzEUB2ARWhon7S3nVgSSUyfVNiPPMQQnLRh6aEOPQqPRGLmy5GhpyX-fZzwQ6KUHLQ8-npYfQheU3DDKxZetfWKEsBsY4gQtaMtlw2B6gxaECNgL1p6is5y3hFBGZPcOnVK65FIwuUC_Vn-0r7q4sMF6k5ypvtSkPQ4x7KMLpcmxJmPxPnpfi4sB71PcJL3L2AVc_ka81r8tXiVncUluqEXDNr9Hbyfts_0wr-fo8X718-5rs_7-8O3udt0Y3vPSdKwbp8nY3pqWMSN7SSRl1nI98GGUBmo7dlN3KAc2jEYQoU2_pKA1Z0t-jq6PfeFWT9XmonYuG-u9DjbWrGhHW_gG8X8oOkLBArz8B27hBwI8QtFeCsK6ngP6fEQmxZyTndQ-uZ1Oz4oSdYhFzbGoQyzAP84967Cz4yuecwBwNQOdjfZT0sG4_Oq4ED0cC-7T0U06qkNeWT3-YIRyQsmypS3lLwy_nvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197402693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating agricultural nonpoint-source pollution programs in two Lake Erie tributaries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Forster, D.L ; Rausch, J.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Forster, D.L ; Rausch, J.N</creatorcontrib><description>During the past three decades, numerous government programs have encouraged Lake Erie basin farmers to adopt practices that reduce water pollution. The first section of this paper summarizes these state and federal government agricultural pollution abatement programs in watersheds of two prominent Lake Erie tributaries, the Maumee River and Sandusky River. Expenditures are summarized for each program, total expenditures in each county are estimated, and cost effectiveness of program expenditures (i.e., cost per metric ton of soil saved) are analyzed. Farmers received nearly $143 million as incentive payments to implement agricultural nonpoint source pollution abatement programs in the Maumee and Sandusky River watersheds from 1987 to 1997. About 95% of these funds was from federal sources. On average, these payments totaled about $7000 per farm or about $30 per farm acre (annualized equivalent of $2 per acre) within the watersheds. Our analysis raises questions about how efficiently these incentive payments were allocated. The majority of Agricultural Conservation Program (ACP) funds appear to have been spent on less cost-effective practices. Also, geographic areas with relatively low (high) soil erosion rates received relatively large (small) funding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2002.0024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11837427</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural conservation ; Agricultural pollution ; Agriculture - economics ; Agriculture - legislation & jurisprudence ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; basins ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation Reserve Program ; conservation tillage ; Continental surface waters ; corn ; cost effectiveness ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; duration ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environmental incentives ; Environmental Monitoring ; Erosion rates ; Exact sciences and technology ; Farmers ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; funding ; Funds ; geography ; Glycine max ; Government programs ; governmental programs and projects ; Great Lakes Region ; Lake basins ; Lakes ; Natural water pollution ; no-tillage ; Nonpoint source pollution ; North America, Erie L ; Payments ; Pollution ; Pollution control ; Pollution, environment geology ; Public Policy ; Rivers ; Soil ; Soil and water pollution ; Soil erosion ; Soil science ; soybeans ; Tributaries ; USA, Maumee R ; USA, Ohio, Sandusky R ; Water pollution ; Water Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence ; Water Pollution - prevention & control ; water quality ; Water treatment and pollution ; Watersheds ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2002-01, Vol.31 (1), p.24-31</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-626dffce9ec522c7970712ee3ab3bd7c970ed6f6ab3bb2bdc404ac981522a3283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13449933$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11837427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forster, D.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rausch, J.N</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating agricultural nonpoint-source pollution programs in two Lake Erie tributaries</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>During the past three decades, numerous government programs have encouraged Lake Erie basin farmers to adopt practices that reduce water pollution. The first section of this paper summarizes these state and federal government agricultural pollution abatement programs in watersheds of two prominent Lake Erie tributaries, the Maumee River and Sandusky River. Expenditures are summarized for each program, total expenditures in each county are estimated, and cost effectiveness of program expenditures (i.e., cost per metric ton of soil saved) are analyzed. Farmers received nearly $143 million as incentive payments to implement agricultural nonpoint source pollution abatement programs in the Maumee and Sandusky River watersheds from 1987 to 1997. About 95% of these funds was from federal sources. On average, these payments totaled about $7000 per farm or about $30 per farm acre (annualized equivalent of $2 per acre) within the watersheds. Our analysis raises questions about how efficiently these incentive payments were allocated. The majority of Agricultural Conservation Program (ACP) funds appear to have been spent on less cost-effective practices. Also, geographic areas with relatively low (high) soil erosion rates received relatively large (small) funding.</description><subject>Agricultural conservation</subject><subject>Agricultural pollution</subject><subject>Agriculture - economics</subject><subject>Agriculture - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>basins</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation Reserve Program</subject><subject>conservation tillage</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>duration</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environmental incentives</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Erosion rates</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>funding</subject><subject>Funds</subject><subject>geography</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>governmental programs and projects</subject><subject>Great Lakes Region</subject><subject>Lake basins</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>Nonpoint source pollution</subject><subject>North America, Erie L</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil and water pollution</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>soybeans</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>USA, Maumee R</subject><subject>USA, Ohio, Sandusky R</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Water Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>water quality</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0clrGzEUB2ARWhon7S3nVgSSUyfVNiPPMQQnLRh6aEOPQqPRGLmy5GhpyX-fZzwQ6KUHLQ8-npYfQheU3DDKxZetfWKEsBsY4gQtaMtlw2B6gxaECNgL1p6is5y3hFBGZPcOnVK65FIwuUC_Vn-0r7q4sMF6k5ypvtSkPQ4x7KMLpcmxJmPxPnpfi4sB71PcJL3L2AVc_ka81r8tXiVncUluqEXDNr9Hbyfts_0wr-fo8X718-5rs_7-8O3udt0Y3vPSdKwbp8nY3pqWMSN7SSRl1nI98GGUBmo7dlN3KAc2jEYQoU2_pKA1Z0t-jq6PfeFWT9XmonYuG-u9DjbWrGhHW_gG8X8oOkLBArz8B27hBwI8QtFeCsK6ngP6fEQmxZyTndQ-uZ1Oz4oSdYhFzbGoQyzAP84967Cz4yuecwBwNQOdjfZT0sG4_Oq4ED0cC-7T0U06qkNeWT3-YIRyQsmypS3lLwy_nvA</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Forster, D.L</creator><creator>Rausch, J.N</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Evaluating agricultural nonpoint-source pollution programs in two Lake Erie tributaries</title><author>Forster, D.L ; Rausch, J.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-626dffce9ec522c7970712ee3ab3bd7c970ed6f6ab3bb2bdc404ac981522a3283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agricultural conservation</topic><topic>Agricultural pollution</topic><topic>Agriculture - economics</topic><topic>Agriculture - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>basins</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation Reserve Program</topic><topic>conservation tillage</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>duration</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environmental incentives</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Erosion rates</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>funding</topic><topic>Funds</topic><topic>geography</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>governmental programs and projects</topic><topic>Great Lakes Region</topic><topic>Lake basins</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>Nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>North America, Erie L</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil and water pollution</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>soybeans</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>USA, Maumee R</topic><topic>USA, Ohio, Sandusky R</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Water Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>water quality</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forster, D.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rausch, J.N</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forster, D.L</au><au>Rausch, J.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating agricultural nonpoint-source pollution programs in two Lake Erie tributaries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>24-31</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>During the past three decades, numerous government programs have encouraged Lake Erie basin farmers to adopt practices that reduce water pollution. The first section of this paper summarizes these state and federal government agricultural pollution abatement programs in watersheds of two prominent Lake Erie tributaries, the Maumee River and Sandusky River. Expenditures are summarized for each program, total expenditures in each county are estimated, and cost effectiveness of program expenditures (i.e., cost per metric ton of soil saved) are analyzed. Farmers received nearly $143 million as incentive payments to implement agricultural nonpoint source pollution abatement programs in the Maumee and Sandusky River watersheds from 1987 to 1997. About 95% of these funds was from federal sources. On average, these payments totaled about $7000 per farm or about $30 per farm acre (annualized equivalent of $2 per acre) within the watersheds. Our analysis raises questions about how efficiently these incentive payments were allocated. The majority of Agricultural Conservation Program (ACP) funds appear to have been spent on less cost-effective practices. Also, geographic areas with relatively low (high) soil erosion rates received relatively large (small) funding.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><pmid>11837427</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2002.0024</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2002-01, Vol.31 (1), p.24-31 |
| issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 1537-2537 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16150044 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Agricultural conservation Agricultural pollution Agriculture - economics Agriculture - legislation & jurisprudence Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Applied sciences basins Biological and medical sciences Conservation of Natural Resources Conservation Reserve Program conservation tillage Continental surface waters corn cost effectiveness Cost-Benefit Analysis Costs and Cost Analysis duration Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Environmental incentives Environmental Monitoring Erosion rates Exact sciences and technology Farmers Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology funding Funds geography Glycine max Government programs governmental programs and projects Great Lakes Region Lake basins Lakes Natural water pollution no-tillage Nonpoint source pollution North America, Erie L Payments Pollution Pollution control Pollution, environment geology Public Policy Rivers Soil Soil and water pollution Soil erosion Soil science soybeans Tributaries USA, Maumee R USA, Ohio, Sandusky R Water pollution Water Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence Water Pollution - prevention & control water quality Water treatment and pollution Watersheds Zea mays |
| title | Evaluating agricultural nonpoint-source pollution programs in two Lake Erie tributaries |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A34%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20agricultural%20nonpoint-source%20pollution%20programs%20in%20two%20Lake%20Erie%20tributaries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Forster,%20D.L&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=24-31&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2002.0024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E105849431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197402693&rft_id=info:pmid/11837427&rfr_iscdi=true |