Using Gradients in Tidal Restriction to Evaluate Nekton Community Responses to Salt Marsh Restoration

Few studies concerning tide-restricted and restoring salt marshes emphasize fishes and decapod crustaceans (nekton) despite their ecological significance. This study quantifies nekton utilization of three New England salt marshes under tide-restricted and restoring conditions (Hatches Harbor, Massac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Estuaries 2003-02, Vol.26 (1), p.98-105
Hauptverfasser: Raposa, Kenneth B., Roman, Charles T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue 1
container_start_page 98
container_title Estuaries
container_volume 26
creator Raposa, Kenneth B.
Roman, Charles T.
description Few studies concerning tide-restricted and restoring salt marshes emphasize fishes and decapod crustaceans (nekton) despite their ecological significance. This study quantifies nekton utilization of three New England salt marshes under tide-restricted and restoring conditions (Hatches Harbor, Massachusetts; Sachuest Point and Galilee, Rhode Island). The degree of tidal restriction differed among marshes allowing for an examination of nekton utilization patterns along a gradient of tidal restriction and subsequent restoration. Based on sampling in shallow subtidal creeks and pools, nekton density and richness were significantly lower in the restricted marsh compared to the unrestricted marsh only at the most tide-restricted site (Sachuest Point). The dissimilarity in community composition between the unrestricted and restricted marsh sites increased with more pronounced tidal restriction. The increase in nekton density resulting from tidal restoration was positively related to the increase in tidal range. Species richness only increased with restoration at the most tide-restricted site; no significant change was observed at the other two sites. These patterns suggest that only severe tidal restrictions significantly reduce the habitat value of New England salt marshes for shallow subtidal nekton. This study suggests that the greatest responses by nekton, and the most dramatic shift towards a more natural nekton assemblage, will occur with restoration of severely restricted salt marshes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02691697
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16147813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1353195</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1353195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-df9d8ac1c260e138e4e278bdea5df768cc18c0ed39f1c896704113bfc022f4743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouH5cPHsogh6EaqZJk_Soy64KfoDunktMU83aTdYkFfz3pq6w4Glg5plnhhehI8AXgDG_vJ7iglXAKr6FRlCWVV7wUmyjEQaGc0Eo30V7ISwwhoozPkJ6Hox9y268bIy2MWTGZjPTyC571iF6o6JxNosum3zJrpdRZ4_6I6bW2C2XvTXxewBXzgYdBuxFdjF7kD68_wqcl4PgAO20sgv68K_uo_l0Mhvf5vdPN3fjq_tcESJi3rRVI6QCVTCsgQhNdcHFa6Nl2bScCaVAKKwbUrWgRMU4pgDktVW4KFrKKdlHZ2vvyrvPPt2vlyYo3XXSateHGhhQLoAk8OQfuHC9t-m3OqVXUCg5TtD5GlLeheB1W6-8WUr_XQOuh7jrTdwJPv0zyqBk13pplQmbDcpYkcSJO15ziyGdzZyUBKqS_ACDuIii</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916241570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Gradients in Tidal Restriction to Evaluate Nekton Community Responses to Salt Marsh Restoration</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Raposa, Kenneth B. ; Roman, Charles T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raposa, Kenneth B. ; Roman, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies concerning tide-restricted and restoring salt marshes emphasize fishes and decapod crustaceans (nekton) despite their ecological significance. This study quantifies nekton utilization of three New England salt marshes under tide-restricted and restoring conditions (Hatches Harbor, Massachusetts; Sachuest Point and Galilee, Rhode Island). The degree of tidal restriction differed among marshes allowing for an examination of nekton utilization patterns along a gradient of tidal restriction and subsequent restoration. Based on sampling in shallow subtidal creeks and pools, nekton density and richness were significantly lower in the restricted marsh compared to the unrestricted marsh only at the most tide-restricted site (Sachuest Point). The dissimilarity in community composition between the unrestricted and restricted marsh sites increased with more pronounced tidal restriction. The increase in nekton density resulting from tidal restoration was positively related to the increase in tidal range. Species richness only increased with restoration at the most tide-restricted site; no significant change was observed at the other two sites. These patterns suggest that only severe tidal restrictions significantly reduce the habitat value of New England salt marshes for shallow subtidal nekton. This study suggests that the greatest responses by nekton, and the most dramatic shift towards a more natural nekton assemblage, will occur with restoration of severely restricted salt marshes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-8347</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1559-2723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02691697</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTUDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Estuarine Research Federation</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic habitats ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Community composition ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Crustaceans ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Environmental restoration ; Estuaries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitats ; Marine ecology ; Marshes ; Nekton ; Restoration ecology ; Salt marshes ; Sample size ; Sea water ecosystems ; Species richness ; Synecology ; Tidal range ; Tides ; USA, Massachusetts, Hatches Harbor ; USA, Rhode Island, Galilee ; USA, Rhode Island, Sachuest Point ; Wetland ecology ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Estuaries, 2003-02, Vol.26 (1), p.98-105</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Estuarine Research Federation</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Estuarine Research Federation 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-df9d8ac1c260e138e4e278bdea5df768cc18c0ed39f1c896704113bfc022f4743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-df9d8ac1c260e138e4e278bdea5df768cc18c0ed39f1c896704113bfc022f4743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1353195$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1353195$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14662624$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raposa, Kenneth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Gradients in Tidal Restriction to Evaluate Nekton Community Responses to Salt Marsh Restoration</title><title>Estuaries</title><description>Few studies concerning tide-restricted and restoring salt marshes emphasize fishes and decapod crustaceans (nekton) despite their ecological significance. This study quantifies nekton utilization of three New England salt marshes under tide-restricted and restoring conditions (Hatches Harbor, Massachusetts; Sachuest Point and Galilee, Rhode Island). The degree of tidal restriction differed among marshes allowing for an examination of nekton utilization patterns along a gradient of tidal restriction and subsequent restoration. Based on sampling in shallow subtidal creeks and pools, nekton density and richness were significantly lower in the restricted marsh compared to the unrestricted marsh only at the most tide-restricted site (Sachuest Point). The dissimilarity in community composition between the unrestricted and restricted marsh sites increased with more pronounced tidal restriction. The increase in nekton density resulting from tidal restoration was positively related to the increase in tidal range. Species richness only increased with restoration at the most tide-restricted site; no significant change was observed at the other two sites. These patterns suggest that only severe tidal restrictions significantly reduce the habitat value of New England salt marshes for shallow subtidal nekton. This study suggests that the greatest responses by nekton, and the most dramatic shift towards a more natural nekton assemblage, will occur with restoration of severely restricted salt marshes.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Nekton</subject><subject>Restoration ecology</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Tidal range</subject><subject>Tides</subject><subject>USA, Massachusetts, Hatches Harbor</subject><subject>USA, Rhode Island, Galilee</subject><subject>USA, Rhode Island, Sachuest Point</subject><subject>Wetland ecology</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0160-8347</issn><issn>1559-2723</issn><issn>1559-2758</issn><issn>1559-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouH5cPHsogh6EaqZJk_Soy64KfoDunktMU83aTdYkFfz3pq6w4Glg5plnhhehI8AXgDG_vJ7iglXAKr6FRlCWVV7wUmyjEQaGc0Eo30V7ISwwhoozPkJ6Hox9y268bIy2MWTGZjPTyC571iF6o6JxNosum3zJrpdRZ4_6I6bW2C2XvTXxewBXzgYdBuxFdjF7kD68_wqcl4PgAO20sgv68K_uo_l0Mhvf5vdPN3fjq_tcESJi3rRVI6QCVTCsgQhNdcHFa6Nl2bScCaVAKKwbUrWgRMU4pgDktVW4KFrKKdlHZ2vvyrvPPt2vlyYo3XXSateHGhhQLoAk8OQfuHC9t-m3OqVXUCg5TtD5GlLeheB1W6-8WUr_XQOuh7jrTdwJPv0zyqBk13pplQmbDcpYkcSJO15ziyGdzZyUBKqS_ACDuIii</recordid><startdate>20030201</startdate><enddate>20030201</enddate><creator>Raposa, Kenneth B.</creator><creator>Roman, Charles T.</creator><general>Estuarine Research Federation</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030201</creationdate><title>Using Gradients in Tidal Restriction to Evaluate Nekton Community Responses to Salt Marsh Restoration</title><author>Raposa, Kenneth B. ; Roman, Charles T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-df9d8ac1c260e138e4e278bdea5df768cc18c0ed39f1c896704113bfc022f4743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Nekton</topic><topic>Restoration ecology</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Tidal range</topic><topic>Tides</topic><topic>USA, Massachusetts, Hatches Harbor</topic><topic>USA, Rhode Island, Galilee</topic><topic>USA, Rhode Island, Sachuest Point</topic><topic>Wetland ecology</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raposa, Kenneth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Estuaries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raposa, Kenneth B.</au><au>Roman, Charles T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Gradients in Tidal Restriction to Evaluate Nekton Community Responses to Salt Marsh Restoration</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries</jtitle><date>2003-02-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>98-105</pages><issn>0160-8347</issn><issn>1559-2723</issn><eissn>1559-2758</eissn><eissn>1559-2731</eissn><coden>ESTUDO</coden><abstract>Few studies concerning tide-restricted and restoring salt marshes emphasize fishes and decapod crustaceans (nekton) despite their ecological significance. This study quantifies nekton utilization of three New England salt marshes under tide-restricted and restoring conditions (Hatches Harbor, Massachusetts; Sachuest Point and Galilee, Rhode Island). The degree of tidal restriction differed among marshes allowing for an examination of nekton utilization patterns along a gradient of tidal restriction and subsequent restoration. Based on sampling in shallow subtidal creeks and pools, nekton density and richness were significantly lower in the restricted marsh compared to the unrestricted marsh only at the most tide-restricted site (Sachuest Point). The dissimilarity in community composition between the unrestricted and restricted marsh sites increased with more pronounced tidal restriction. The increase in nekton density resulting from tidal restoration was positively related to the increase in tidal range. Species richness only increased with restoration at the most tide-restricted site; no significant change was observed at the other two sites. These patterns suggest that only severe tidal restrictions significantly reduce the habitat value of New England salt marshes for shallow subtidal nekton. This study suggests that the greatest responses by nekton, and the most dramatic shift towards a more natural nekton assemblage, will occur with restoration of severely restricted salt marshes.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Estuarine Research Federation</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02691697</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-8347
ispartof Estuaries, 2003-02, Vol.26 (1), p.98-105
issn 0160-8347
1559-2723
1559-2758
1559-2731
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16147813
source SpringerLink Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic habitats
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Community composition
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Crustaceans
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Environmental restoration
Estuaries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitats
Marine ecology
Marshes
Nekton
Restoration ecology
Salt marshes
Sample size
Sea water ecosystems
Species richness
Synecology
Tidal range
Tides
USA, Massachusetts, Hatches Harbor
USA, Rhode Island, Galilee
USA, Rhode Island, Sachuest Point
Wetland ecology
Wetlands
title Using Gradients in Tidal Restriction to Evaluate Nekton Community Responses to Salt Marsh Restoration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A34%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Gradients%20in%20Tidal%20Restriction%20to%20Evaluate%20Nekton%20Community%20Responses%20to%20Salt%20Marsh%20Restoration&rft.jtitle=Estuaries&rft.au=Raposa,%20Kenneth%20B.&rft.date=2003-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=98-105&rft.issn=0160-8347&rft.eissn=1559-2758&rft.coden=ESTUDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02691697&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1353195%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916241570&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1353195&rfr_iscdi=true