IMPLEMENTING STRONGER EUROPEAN AIR POLLUTION POLICIES: WILL HIGH HOPES IN BRUSSELS AND GENEVA BE DASHED IN LONDON?
The recently adopted National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive within the European Union and the 1999 Gothenburg Protocol within the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) require a substantial further reduction of emissions. What are the chances for implementation success an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Energy & environment (Essex, England) England), 2002, Vol.13 (3), p.383-399 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 399 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 383 |
| container_title | Energy & environment (Essex, England) |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Wettestad, Jørgen |
| description | The recently adopted National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive within the European Union and the 1999 Gothenburg Protocol within the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) require a substantial further reduction of emissions. What are the chances for implementation success and what are the determining factors? The earlier central air pollution 'laggard' the UK is singled out for specific scrutiny, along with Germany and France. With regard to the UK, it does not seem reasonable to assume that the 'high hopes' in Geneva/CLRTAP and Brussels will be dashed in London. Despite a recent worrying increase in the use of coal, the UK as ' the dirty man of Europe' seems to be history. The prospects for German implementation are more uncertain, but it seems reasonable to assume that the Germans will do quite well, but be less impressive than in the past. France is even more of an uncertain card here, and its unimpressive NOx and VOC performance so far does not bode well. As these countries are central in both the EU and CLRTAP contexts, the implementation prospects for the new EU and CLRTAP commitments are overall quite promising, even though there are huge uncertainties to be clarified further. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1260/095830502320268241 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16146474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43735422</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1260_095830502320268241</sage_id><sourcerecordid>43735422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-30079ecfd006c7c8c7b1ab3c88c0f13519fdbc213e266c292abc12ff1059995e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c2O0zAUBeAIgUQZeAEkJG9gV-b6NzEblGlNYsnjVEkL7CLX46BWnWYmbhe8PYk6ggUSrHwX3zm68k2Stxg-YiLgGiTPKHAglAARGWH4WTIjwLI5gxSeJ7MJzEfx_WXyKsY9AAGJ5SwZ9O3KqFtl19oWqFnXlS1UjdSmrlYqtyjXNVpVxmzWurLTpBdaNZ_QN20MKnVRonKEDdIW3dSbplGmQbldokJZ9TVHNwot86ZUywmYyi4r-_l18qJzhxjePL1XyeaLWi_KuakKvcjN3BPBT-OykMrguzsA4VOf-XSL3Zb6LPPQYcqx7O62nmAaiBCeSOK2HpOuw8CllDzQq-TDpfdh6B_PIZ7a-1304XBwx9CfY4sFZoKl7P-QCcozOUFygX7oYxxC1z4Mu3s3_GwxtNMd2r_vMIbeP7W76N2hG9zR7-KfJOM8ExxGd31x0f0I7b4_D8fxd_7d_O6S2MdTP_xuZDSlnBFCfwGDspPe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14635894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IMPLEMENTING STRONGER EUROPEAN AIR POLLUTION POLICIES: WILL HIGH HOPES IN BRUSSELS AND GENEVA BE DASHED IN LONDON?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Wettestad, Jørgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Wettestad, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><description>The recently adopted National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive within the European Union and the 1999 Gothenburg Protocol within the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) require a substantial further reduction of emissions. What are the chances for implementation success and what are the determining factors? The earlier central air pollution 'laggard' the UK is singled out for specific scrutiny, along with Germany and France. With regard to the UK, it does not seem reasonable to assume that the 'high hopes' in Geneva/CLRTAP and Brussels will be dashed in London. Despite a recent worrying increase in the use of coal, the UK as ' the dirty man of Europe' seems to be history. The prospects for German implementation are more uncertain, but it seems reasonable to assume that the Germans will do quite well, but be less impressive than in the past. France is even more of an uncertain card here, and its unimpressive NOx and VOC performance so far does not bode well. As these countries are central in both the EU and CLRTAP contexts, the implementation prospects for the new EU and CLRTAP commitments are overall quite promising, even though there are huge uncertainties to be clarified further.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-305X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2048-4070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1260/095830502320268241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Applied sciences ; Climate change policy ; Emissions policy ; Emissions reduction ; Energy ; Environmental policy ; European Union ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Global environmental pollution ; International environmental policy ; Legislation, regulations for energy use ; Pollutant emissions ; Pollution ; Renewable energy ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Energy & environment (Essex, England), 2002, Vol.13 (3), p.383-399</ispartof><rights>2002 MULTI-SCIENCE PUBLISHING CO. LTD.</rights><rights>2002 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-30079ecfd006c7c8c7b1ab3c88c0f13519fdbc213e266c292abc12ff1059995e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43735422$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43735422$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,21800,27902,27903,27904,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14558650$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wettestad, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><title>IMPLEMENTING STRONGER EUROPEAN AIR POLLUTION POLICIES: WILL HIGH HOPES IN BRUSSELS AND GENEVA BE DASHED IN LONDON?</title><title>Energy & environment (Essex, England)</title><description>The recently adopted National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive within the European Union and the 1999 Gothenburg Protocol within the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) require a substantial further reduction of emissions. What are the chances for implementation success and what are the determining factors? The earlier central air pollution 'laggard' the UK is singled out for specific scrutiny, along with Germany and France. With regard to the UK, it does not seem reasonable to assume that the 'high hopes' in Geneva/CLRTAP and Brussels will be dashed in London. Despite a recent worrying increase in the use of coal, the UK as ' the dirty man of Europe' seems to be history. The prospects for German implementation are more uncertain, but it seems reasonable to assume that the Germans will do quite well, but be less impressive than in the past. France is even more of an uncertain card here, and its unimpressive NOx and VOC performance so far does not bode well. As these countries are central in both the EU and CLRTAP contexts, the implementation prospects for the new EU and CLRTAP commitments are overall quite promising, even though there are huge uncertainties to be clarified further.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Climate change policy</subject><subject>Emissions policy</subject><subject>Emissions reduction</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Global environmental pollution</subject><subject>International environmental policy</subject><subject>Legislation, regulations for energy use</subject><subject>Pollutant emissions</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>0958-305X</issn><issn>2048-4070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c2O0zAUBeAIgUQZeAEkJG9gV-b6NzEblGlNYsnjVEkL7CLX46BWnWYmbhe8PYk6ggUSrHwX3zm68k2Stxg-YiLgGiTPKHAglAARGWH4WTIjwLI5gxSeJ7MJzEfx_WXyKsY9AAGJ5SwZ9O3KqFtl19oWqFnXlS1UjdSmrlYqtyjXNVpVxmzWurLTpBdaNZ_QN20MKnVRonKEDdIW3dSbplGmQbldokJZ9TVHNwot86ZUywmYyi4r-_l18qJzhxjePL1XyeaLWi_KuakKvcjN3BPBT-OykMrguzsA4VOf-XSL3Zb6LPPQYcqx7O62nmAaiBCeSOK2HpOuw8CllDzQq-TDpfdh6B_PIZ7a-1304XBwx9CfY4sFZoKl7P-QCcozOUFygX7oYxxC1z4Mu3s3_GwxtNMd2r_vMIbeP7W76N2hG9zR7-KfJOM8ExxGd31x0f0I7b4_D8fxd_7d_O6S2MdTP_xuZDSlnBFCfwGDspPe</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Wettestad, Jørgen</creator><general>Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Multi-Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>IMPLEMENTING STRONGER EUROPEAN AIR POLLUTION POLICIES: WILL HIGH HOPES IN BRUSSELS AND GENEVA BE DASHED IN LONDON?</title><author>Wettestad, Jørgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-30079ecfd006c7c8c7b1ab3c88c0f13519fdbc213e266c292abc12ff1059995e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Climate change policy</topic><topic>Emissions policy</topic><topic>Emissions reduction</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Global environmental pollution</topic><topic>International environmental policy</topic><topic>Legislation, regulations for energy use</topic><topic>Pollutant emissions</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wettestad, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy & environment (Essex, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wettestad, Jørgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IMPLEMENTING STRONGER EUROPEAN AIR POLLUTION POLICIES: WILL HIGH HOPES IN BRUSSELS AND GENEVA BE DASHED IN LONDON?</atitle><jtitle>Energy & environment (Essex, England)</jtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>383-399</pages><issn>0958-305X</issn><eissn>2048-4070</eissn><abstract>The recently adopted National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive within the European Union and the 1999 Gothenburg Protocol within the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) require a substantial further reduction of emissions. What are the chances for implementation success and what are the determining factors? The earlier central air pollution 'laggard' the UK is singled out for specific scrutiny, along with Germany and France. With regard to the UK, it does not seem reasonable to assume that the 'high hopes' in Geneva/CLRTAP and Brussels will be dashed in London. Despite a recent worrying increase in the use of coal, the UK as ' the dirty man of Europe' seems to be history. The prospects for German implementation are more uncertain, but it seems reasonable to assume that the Germans will do quite well, but be less impressive than in the past. France is even more of an uncertain card here, and its unimpressive NOx and VOC performance so far does not bode well. As these countries are central in both the EU and CLRTAP contexts, the implementation prospects for the new EU and CLRTAP commitments are overall quite promising, even though there are huge uncertainties to be clarified further.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</pub><doi>10.1260/095830502320268241</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0958-305X |
| ispartof | Energy & environment (Essex, England), 2002, Vol.13 (3), p.383-399 |
| issn | 0958-305X 2048-4070 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16146474 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Journals |
| subjects | Air pollution Applied sciences Climate change policy Emissions policy Emissions reduction Energy Environmental policy European Union Exact sciences and technology General, economic and professional studies Global environmental pollution International environmental policy Legislation, regulations for energy use Pollutant emissions Pollution Renewable energy Volatile organic compounds |
| title | IMPLEMENTING STRONGER EUROPEAN AIR POLLUTION POLICIES: WILL HIGH HOPES IN BRUSSELS AND GENEVA BE DASHED IN LONDON? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A33%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IMPLEMENTING%20STRONGER%20EUROPEAN%20AIR%20POLLUTION%20POLICIES:%20WILL%20HIGH%20HOPES%20IN%20BRUSSELS%20AND%20GENEVA%20BE%20DASHED%20IN%20LONDON?&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20environment%20(Essex,%20England)&rft.au=Wettestad,%20J%C3%B8rgen&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=383-399&rft.issn=0958-305X&rft.eissn=2048-4070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1260/095830502320268241&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43735422%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14635894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43735422&rft_sage_id=10.1260_095830502320268241&rfr_iscdi=true |