Opening Out the Boundaries: Homage to the Journal of Chinese Philosophy
“Borders” are impermeable limits designed to stop the flow of human beings as well as ideas across them, whereas “boundaries” are permeable enclosure that permit and often encourage movement through limits. I develop the differences between these two forms of edge with a series of historical and geo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Chinese philosophy 2013-12, Vol.40 (S1), p.12-16 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 16 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S1 |
| container_start_page | 12 |
| container_title | Journal of Chinese philosophy |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Casey, Edward S. |
| description | “Borders” are impermeable limits designed to stop the flow of human beings as well as ideas across them, whereas “boundaries” are permeable enclosure that permit and often encourage movement through limits. I develop the differences between these two forms of edge with a series of historical and geographical examples. I conclude that the Journal of Chinese Philosophy is a sterling instance of a boundary whose entire being has consisted in facilitating the two‐way flow of concepts and traditions across formerly closed borders of communication and culture. I offer homage to this extraordinary accomplishment over the past forty years. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1540-6253.12061 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1613945804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3443429781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i2311-edec45b5ff8dc8a9b693fe225c7b196467009bda6406d94b1db468716efc941c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFPgzAUhxujiXN69trEixdmH7QFvOmizMWMLdF4bAqU0ckoUojuv5cNs4Pv8l7a7_eS9yF0DWQCfd0Bo8ThLvMm4BIOJ2h0fDlFI-IRcAJw4RxdWLshhDAfyAhFca0qXa1x3LW4LRR-NF2VyUYre49nZivXCrfm8DM3XVPJEpscTwtdKavwstClsaYudpfoLJelVVd_fYzen5_epjPnNY5epg-vjnY9AEdlKqUsYXkeZGkgw4SHXq5cl6V-AiGn3CckTDLJKeFZSBPIEsoDH7jK05BC6o3R7bC3bsxXp2wrttqmqixlpUxnBXDwQsoCQnv05h-6GS7oKcYZA-YHbk_xgfrWpdqJutFb2ewEELG3KvYOxd6hOFgV83i6PEx90BmC2rbq5xiUzafgvucz8bGIxCJarRaERoJ7v-NoeSM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1565515782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opening Out the Boundaries: Homage to the Journal of Chinese Philosophy</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Casey, Edward S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Casey, Edward S.</creatorcontrib><description>“Borders” are impermeable limits designed to stop the flow of human beings as well as ideas across them, whereas “boundaries” are permeable enclosure that permit and often encourage movement through limits. I develop the differences between these two forms of edge with a series of historical and geographical examples. I conclude that the Journal of Chinese Philosophy is a sterling instance of a boundary whose entire being has consisted in facilitating the two‐way flow of concepts and traditions across formerly closed borders of communication and culture. I offer homage to this extraordinary accomplishment over the past forty years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-8121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6253</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1540-6253.12061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Borders ; China ; Historical analysis ; Philosophy ; Tradition</subject><ispartof>Journal of Chinese philosophy, 2013-12, Vol.40 (S1), p.12-16</ispartof><rights>2014 Journal of Chinese Philosophy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1540-6253.12061$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1540-6253.12061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casey, Edward S.</creatorcontrib><title>Opening Out the Boundaries: Homage to the Journal of Chinese Philosophy</title><title>Journal of Chinese philosophy</title><addtitle>Journal of Chinese Philosophy</addtitle><description>“Borders” are impermeable limits designed to stop the flow of human beings as well as ideas across them, whereas “boundaries” are permeable enclosure that permit and often encourage movement through limits. I develop the differences between these two forms of edge with a series of historical and geographical examples. I conclude that the Journal of Chinese Philosophy is a sterling instance of a boundary whose entire being has consisted in facilitating the two‐way flow of concepts and traditions across formerly closed borders of communication and culture. I offer homage to this extraordinary accomplishment over the past forty years.</description><subject>Borders</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Tradition</subject><issn>0301-8121</issn><issn>1540-6253</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFPgzAUhxujiXN69trEixdmH7QFvOmizMWMLdF4bAqU0ckoUojuv5cNs4Pv8l7a7_eS9yF0DWQCfd0Bo8ThLvMm4BIOJ2h0fDlFI-IRcAJw4RxdWLshhDAfyAhFca0qXa1x3LW4LRR-NF2VyUYre49nZivXCrfm8DM3XVPJEpscTwtdKavwstClsaYudpfoLJelVVd_fYzen5_epjPnNY5epg-vjnY9AEdlKqUsYXkeZGkgw4SHXq5cl6V-AiGn3CckTDLJKeFZSBPIEsoDH7jK05BC6o3R7bC3bsxXp2wrttqmqixlpUxnBXDwQsoCQnv05h-6GS7oKcYZA-YHbk_xgfrWpdqJutFb2ewEELG3KvYOxd6hOFgV83i6PEx90BmC2rbq5xiUzafgvucz8bGIxCJarRaERoJ7v-NoeSM</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Casey, Edward S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Opening Out the Boundaries: Homage to the Journal of Chinese Philosophy</title><author>Casey, Edward S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2311-edec45b5ff8dc8a9b693fe225c7b196467009bda6406d94b1db468716efc941c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Borders</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Tradition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casey, Edward S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of Chinese philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casey, Edward S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opening Out the Boundaries: Homage to the Journal of Chinese Philosophy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Chinese philosophy</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Chinese Philosophy</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>12-16</pages><issn>0301-8121</issn><eissn>1540-6253</eissn><abstract>“Borders” are impermeable limits designed to stop the flow of human beings as well as ideas across them, whereas “boundaries” are permeable enclosure that permit and often encourage movement through limits. I develop the differences between these two forms of edge with a series of historical and geographical examples. I conclude that the Journal of Chinese Philosophy is a sterling instance of a boundary whose entire being has consisted in facilitating the two‐way flow of concepts and traditions across formerly closed borders of communication and culture. I offer homage to this extraordinary accomplishment over the past forty years.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1540-6253.12061</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-8121 |
| ispartof | Journal of Chinese philosophy, 2013-12, Vol.40 (S1), p.12-16 |
| issn | 0301-8121 1540-6253 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1613945804 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Borders China Historical analysis Philosophy Tradition |
| title | Opening Out the Boundaries: Homage to the Journal of Chinese Philosophy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A26%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opening%20Out%20the%20Boundaries:%20Homage%20to%20the%20Journal%20of%20Chinese%20Philosophy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chinese%20philosophy&rft.au=Casey,%20Edward%20S.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=12-16&rft.issn=0301-8121&rft.eissn=1540-6253&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1540-6253.12061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3443429781%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1565515782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |