Pb mobility and extractant optimization for contaminated soils
Alternative technologies for the remediation for inorganic lead contaminated soils must be evaluated in addition to conventional standard technologies, such as stabilization, to help ensure the best technology was selected for implementation of the remediation solution. Innovative technologies such...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental Progress 1997-06, Vol.16 (2), p.88-92 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 88 |
container_title | Environmental Progress |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Legiec, I. A. |
description | Alternative technologies for the remediation for inorganic lead contaminated soils must be evaluated in addition to conventional standard technologies, such as stabilization, to help ensure the best technology was selected for implementation of the remediation solution. Innovative technologies such as extractive soil washing may provide an economical alternative to reaching remediation cleanup goals while, at the same time, protecting human health and the environment.
Extraction of inorganic Pb from contaminated soils has been previously demonstrated using strong acids or chelating reagents. For example, aqueous solutions of chelating agents such as citric acid, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DPTA), sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), sodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA) have been used to desorb metals from soils [1, 2]. Also investigated were strong acids, having concentrations up to 2 N, for extraction of metals from sandy soils [3]. Commercial pilot scale systems have been reported to utilize HCl at an extraction pH range of 1.8–2.2 to recover lead from contaminated soils [4]. Chloride complexation of lead can greatly enhance the solubility of lead in solution [5, 6]. Lead also will complex in solution with acetic or citric acid [7].
Incorporating acids or chelating agents with soil washing technologies may extract inorganic Pb species from contaminated soils. However, the feasibility of aqueous based extraction of organic lead species such as tetraethyl lead, and its related byproducts produced by weathering, was unknown. Weathered, contaminated soil core samples were obtained, composited and homogenized in 5 gallon HDPE buckets, and the homogenized sample was characterized. The soils were contaminated predominantly with inorganic Pb as well as trace quantities of organic Pb species. Therefore, a research program was carried out to investigate the feasibility of in‐situ or ex‐situ extractive soil washing to recover inorganic and organic lead contaminants from soil. Literature approaches utilizing acids, chelating agents, or combinations of these, were tested for extraction efficiency. Additional goals included optimizing lead extraction while minimizing extractant chemistry strength to ensure safety and to minimize cost. Both in‐situ and ex‐situ extraction techniques were simulated at bench scale, and the effects of these methodologies on organic lead species were also investigated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ep.3300160213 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16134676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16134676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3973-ca45018220c7f2bb416b29e75c37d5349c9e8d0ccfe12e89e2a251b75980f633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c9LHDEUB_BQKnSrHnsfS_E2mt-ZXApFrAriDxAXegmZ7BuMnUmmSZa6_vXOsoulPRRP7_J53_ceD6FPBB8RjOkxjEeMYUwkpoS9QzMiuKqFpuQ9mmGqmppzTT6gjzk_TkoQ1czQ15u2GmLre19WlQ2LCp5Ksq7YUKo4Fj_4Z1t8DFUXU-ViKHbwwRZYVDn6Pu-hnc72Gfa3dRfdfT-9OzmvL6_PLk6-XdaOacVqZ7nApKEUO9XRtuVEtlSDEo6phWBcOw3NAjvXAaHQaKCWCtIqoRvcScZ20cEmNubiTXa-gHuYtgngipHTIURN5nBjxhR_LSEXM_jsoO9tgLjMhkjCuFTyDRBzJeh66ud_4GNcpjDdaShmVGDNmwnVG-RSzDlBZ8bkB5tWhmCzfouB0fx5y-S_bENtdrbvkg3O59cmqrDkeM3Uhv32Paz-n2lOb_4asF3I5wJPr502_TRSMSXM_OrMiPMfc37fzM0tewG9cKmX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203250948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pb mobility and extractant optimization for contaminated soils</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Legiec, I. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Legiec, I. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Alternative technologies for the remediation for inorganic lead contaminated soils must be evaluated in addition to conventional standard technologies, such as stabilization, to help ensure the best technology was selected for implementation of the remediation solution. Innovative technologies such as extractive soil washing may provide an economical alternative to reaching remediation cleanup goals while, at the same time, protecting human health and the environment.
Extraction of inorganic Pb from contaminated soils has been previously demonstrated using strong acids or chelating reagents. For example, aqueous solutions of chelating agents such as citric acid, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DPTA), sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), sodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA) have been used to desorb metals from soils [1, 2]. Also investigated were strong acids, having concentrations up to 2 N, for extraction of metals from sandy soils [3]. Commercial pilot scale systems have been reported to utilize HCl at an extraction pH range of 1.8–2.2 to recover lead from contaminated soils [4]. Chloride complexation of lead can greatly enhance the solubility of lead in solution [5, 6]. Lead also will complex in solution with acetic or citric acid [7].
Incorporating acids or chelating agents with soil washing technologies may extract inorganic Pb species from contaminated soils. However, the feasibility of aqueous based extraction of organic lead species such as tetraethyl lead, and its related byproducts produced by weathering, was unknown. Weathered, contaminated soil core samples were obtained, composited and homogenized in 5 gallon HDPE buckets, and the homogenized sample was characterized. The soils were contaminated predominantly with inorganic Pb as well as trace quantities of organic Pb species. Therefore, a research program was carried out to investigate the feasibility of in‐situ or ex‐situ extractive soil washing to recover inorganic and organic lead contaminants from soil. Literature approaches utilizing acids, chelating agents, or combinations of these, were tested for extraction efficiency. Additional goals included optimizing lead extraction while minimizing extractant chemistry strength to ensure safety and to minimize cost. Both in‐situ and ex‐situ extraction techniques were simulated at bench scale, and the effects of these methodologies on organic lead species were also investigated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4491</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ep.3300160213</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; CONTAMINATION ; Decontamination. Miscellaneous ; ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION ; Environmental protection ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT ; Exact sciences and technology ; GEOSCIENCES ; Health care ; LEAD ; Pollution ; Q1 ; REMEDIAL ACTION ; Soil and sediments pollution ; SOILS ; Technology ; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Environmental Progress, 1997-06, Vol.16 (2), p.88-92</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Chemical Engineers Summer 1997</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3973-ca45018220c7f2bb416b29e75c37d5349c9e8d0ccfe12e89e2a251b75980f633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3973-ca45018220c7f2bb416b29e75c37d5349c9e8d0ccfe12e89e2a251b75980f633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fep.3300160213$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fep.3300160213$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2706403$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/617817$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Legiec, I. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Pb mobility and extractant optimization for contaminated soils</title><title>Environmental Progress</title><addtitle>Environ. Prog</addtitle><description>Alternative technologies for the remediation for inorganic lead contaminated soils must be evaluated in addition to conventional standard technologies, such as stabilization, to help ensure the best technology was selected for implementation of the remediation solution. Innovative technologies such as extractive soil washing may provide an economical alternative to reaching remediation cleanup goals while, at the same time, protecting human health and the environment.
Extraction of inorganic Pb from contaminated soils has been previously demonstrated using strong acids or chelating reagents. For example, aqueous solutions of chelating agents such as citric acid, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DPTA), sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), sodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA) have been used to desorb metals from soils [1, 2]. Also investigated were strong acids, having concentrations up to 2 N, for extraction of metals from sandy soils [3]. Commercial pilot scale systems have been reported to utilize HCl at an extraction pH range of 1.8–2.2 to recover lead from contaminated soils [4]. Chloride complexation of lead can greatly enhance the solubility of lead in solution [5, 6]. Lead also will complex in solution with acetic or citric acid [7].
Incorporating acids or chelating agents with soil washing technologies may extract inorganic Pb species from contaminated soils. However, the feasibility of aqueous based extraction of organic lead species such as tetraethyl lead, and its related byproducts produced by weathering, was unknown. Weathered, contaminated soil core samples were obtained, composited and homogenized in 5 gallon HDPE buckets, and the homogenized sample was characterized. The soils were contaminated predominantly with inorganic Pb as well as trace quantities of organic Pb species. Therefore, a research program was carried out to investigate the feasibility of in‐situ or ex‐situ extractive soil washing to recover inorganic and organic lead contaminants from soil. Literature approaches utilizing acids, chelating agents, or combinations of these, were tested for extraction efficiency. Additional goals included optimizing lead extraction while minimizing extractant chemistry strength to ensure safety and to minimize cost. Both in‐situ and ex‐situ extraction techniques were simulated at bench scale, and the effects of these methodologies on organic lead species were also investigated.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>CONTAMINATION</subject><subject>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>LEAD</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Q1</subject><subject>REMEDIAL ACTION</subject><subject>Soil and sediments pollution</subject><subject>SOILS</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>0278-4491</issn><issn>1944-7442</issn><issn>1547-5921</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c9LHDEUB_BQKnSrHnsfS_E2mt-ZXApFrAriDxAXegmZ7BuMnUmmSZa6_vXOsoulPRRP7_J53_ceD6FPBB8RjOkxjEeMYUwkpoS9QzMiuKqFpuQ9mmGqmppzTT6gjzk_TkoQ1czQ15u2GmLre19WlQ2LCp5Ksq7YUKo4Fj_4Z1t8DFUXU-ViKHbwwRZYVDn6Pu-hnc72Gfa3dRfdfT-9OzmvL6_PLk6-XdaOacVqZ7nApKEUO9XRtuVEtlSDEo6phWBcOw3NAjvXAaHQaKCWCtIqoRvcScZ20cEmNubiTXa-gHuYtgngipHTIURN5nBjxhR_LSEXM_jsoO9tgLjMhkjCuFTyDRBzJeh66ud_4GNcpjDdaShmVGDNmwnVG-RSzDlBZ8bkB5tWhmCzfouB0fx5y-S_bENtdrbvkg3O59cmqrDkeM3Uhv32Paz-n2lOb_4asF3I5wJPr502_TRSMSXM_OrMiPMfc37fzM0tewG9cKmX</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Legiec, I. A.</creator><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><general>Willey</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Pb mobility and extractant optimization for contaminated soils</title><author>Legiec, I. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3973-ca45018220c7f2bb416b29e75c37d5349c9e8d0ccfe12e89e2a251b75980f633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>CONTAMINATION</topic><topic>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>LEAD</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Q1</topic><topic>REMEDIAL ACTION</topic><topic>Soil and sediments pollution</topic><topic>SOILS</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Legiec, I. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental Progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Legiec, I. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pb mobility and extractant optimization for contaminated soils</atitle><jtitle>Environmental Progress</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Prog</addtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>88-92</pages><issn>0278-4491</issn><issn>1944-7442</issn><eissn>1547-5921</eissn><eissn>1944-7450</eissn><coden>ENVPDI</coden><abstract>Alternative technologies for the remediation for inorganic lead contaminated soils must be evaluated in addition to conventional standard technologies, such as stabilization, to help ensure the best technology was selected for implementation of the remediation solution. Innovative technologies such as extractive soil washing may provide an economical alternative to reaching remediation cleanup goals while, at the same time, protecting human health and the environment.
Extraction of inorganic Pb from contaminated soils has been previously demonstrated using strong acids or chelating reagents. For example, aqueous solutions of chelating agents such as citric acid, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DPTA), sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), sodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA) have been used to desorb metals from soils [1, 2]. Also investigated were strong acids, having concentrations up to 2 N, for extraction of metals from sandy soils [3]. Commercial pilot scale systems have been reported to utilize HCl at an extraction pH range of 1.8–2.2 to recover lead from contaminated soils [4]. Chloride complexation of lead can greatly enhance the solubility of lead in solution [5, 6]. Lead also will complex in solution with acetic or citric acid [7].
Incorporating acids or chelating agents with soil washing technologies may extract inorganic Pb species from contaminated soils. However, the feasibility of aqueous based extraction of organic lead species such as tetraethyl lead, and its related byproducts produced by weathering, was unknown. Weathered, contaminated soil core samples were obtained, composited and homogenized in 5 gallon HDPE buckets, and the homogenized sample was characterized. The soils were contaminated predominantly with inorganic Pb as well as trace quantities of organic Pb species. Therefore, a research program was carried out to investigate the feasibility of in‐situ or ex‐situ extractive soil washing to recover inorganic and organic lead contaminants from soil. Literature approaches utilizing acids, chelating agents, or combinations of these, were tested for extraction efficiency. Additional goals included optimizing lead extraction while minimizing extractant chemistry strength to ensure safety and to minimize cost. Both in‐situ and ex‐situ extraction techniques were simulated at bench scale, and the effects of these methodologies on organic lead species were also investigated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</pub><doi>10.1002/ep.3300160213</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-4491 |
ispartof | Environmental Progress, 1997-06, Vol.16 (2), p.88-92 |
issn | 0278-4491 1944-7442 1547-5921 1944-7450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16134676 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences CONTAMINATION Decontamination. Miscellaneous ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION Environmental protection ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT Exact sciences and technology GEOSCIENCES Health care LEAD Pollution Q1 REMEDIAL ACTION Soil and sediments pollution SOILS Technology TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT Toxicity |
title | Pb mobility and extractant optimization for contaminated soils |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T19%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pb%20mobility%20and%20extractant%20optimization%20for%20contaminated%20soils&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20Progress&rft.au=Legiec,%20I.%20A.&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=88-92&rft.issn=0278-4491&rft.eissn=1547-5921&rft.coden=ENVPDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ep.3300160213&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E16134676%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203250948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |