Evolution of inspiratory diaphragm activity in children over the course of the PICU stay

Purpose Diaphragm function should be monitored in critically ill patients, as full ventilatory support rapidly induces diaphragm atrophy. Monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) may help assess the level of diaphragm activity, but such monitoring results are difficult to interpret...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intensive care medicine 2014-11, Vol.40 (11), p.1718-1726
Hauptverfasser: Emeriaud, Guillaume, Larouche, Alexandrine, Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence, Massicotte, Erika, Fléchelles, Olivier, Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann, Morneau, Sylvain, Beck, Jennifer, Jouvet, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1726
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1718
container_title Intensive care medicine
container_volume 40
creator Emeriaud, Guillaume
Larouche, Alexandrine
Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence
Massicotte, Erika
Fléchelles, Olivier
Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann
Morneau, Sylvain
Beck, Jennifer
Jouvet, Philippe
description Purpose Diaphragm function should be monitored in critically ill patients, as full ventilatory support rapidly induces diaphragm atrophy. Monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) may help assess the level of diaphragm activity, but such monitoring results are difficult to interpret because reference values are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe EAdi values in critically ill children during a stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), from the acute to recovery phases, and to assess the impact of ventilatory support on EAdi. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal observational study of children requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h. EAdi was recorded using a validated method in the acute phase, before extubation, after extubation, and before PICU discharge. Results Fifty-five critically ill children were enrolled in the study. Median maximum inspiratory EAdi (EAdi max ) during mechanical ventilation was 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.2–7.6] μV in the acute phase and 4.8 (IQR 2.0–10.7) μV in the pre-extubation phase. Periods of diaphragm inactivity (with no detectable inspiratory EAdi) were frequent during conventional ventilation, even with a low level of support. EAdi max in spontaneous ventilation was 15.4 (IQR 7.4–20.7) μV shortly after extubation and 12.6 (IQR 8.1–21.3) μV before PICU discharge. The difference in EAdi max between mechanical ventilation and post-extubation periods was significant ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00134-014-3431-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1612979112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724296189</galeid><sourcerecordid>A724296189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-2a858d35a37b115f4cdd6bc3f2b95523e5d5b12368b61bc32acd19df3c62461d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVJaTbbfoBeiiGXXpR69M_2MSxJEwi0hwZ6E7Ik7yrY1laSF_bbR2aTJilbdBCa-b3HjB5Cn6G8gLKsvsWyBMpwCQxTRgGzd2gBjBIMhNYnaFFSRjATjJyisxgfMl0JDh_QKeEAdS34Av2-2vl-Ss6Phe8KN8atCyr5sC-MU9tNUOuhUDq5nUv73C70xvUm2EzvbCjSxhbaTyHaWT2_ft6u7ouY1P4jet-pPtpPT_cS3V9f_Vrd4Lsf329Xl3dYCy4SJqrmtaFc0aoF4B3TxohW0460DeeEWm54m9cRdSsg14nSBhrTUS0IE2DoEn09-G6D_zPZmOTgorZ9r0brpyhBAGmqBrLHEp3_gz7k2cc83UwB44w18EKtVW-lGzufgtKzqbysCCONgLrJFD5Cre1og-r9aDuXy2_4iyN8PsYOTh8VwEGgg48x2E5ugxtU2Eso5Zy-PKQvc_pyTl-yrPnytODUDtb8VTzHnQFyAGJujWsbXv3Af10fAY_ttys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1611454491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of inspiratory diaphragm activity in children over the course of the PICU stay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Emeriaud, Guillaume ; Larouche, Alexandrine ; Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence ; Massicotte, Erika ; Fléchelles, Olivier ; Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann ; Morneau, Sylvain ; Beck, Jennifer ; Jouvet, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Emeriaud, Guillaume ; Larouche, Alexandrine ; Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence ; Massicotte, Erika ; Fléchelles, Olivier ; Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann ; Morneau, Sylvain ; Beck, Jennifer ; Jouvet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Diaphragm function should be monitored in critically ill patients, as full ventilatory support rapidly induces diaphragm atrophy. Monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) may help assess the level of diaphragm activity, but such monitoring results are difficult to interpret because reference values are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe EAdi values in critically ill children during a stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), from the acute to recovery phases, and to assess the impact of ventilatory support on EAdi. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal observational study of children requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h. EAdi was recorded using a validated method in the acute phase, before extubation, after extubation, and before PICU discharge. Results Fifty-five critically ill children were enrolled in the study. Median maximum inspiratory EAdi (EAdi max ) during mechanical ventilation was 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.2–7.6] μV in the acute phase and 4.8 (IQR 2.0–10.7) μV in the pre-extubation phase. Periods of diaphragm inactivity (with no detectable inspiratory EAdi) were frequent during conventional ventilation, even with a low level of support. EAdi max in spontaneous ventilation was 15.4 (IQR 7.4–20.7) μV shortly after extubation and 12.6 (IQR 8.1–21.3) μV before PICU discharge. The difference in EAdi max between mechanical ventilation and post-extubation periods was significant ( p  &lt; 0.001). Patients intubated mainly because of a lung pathology exhibited higher EAdi ( p  &lt; 0.01), with a similar temporal increase. Conclusions This is the first systematic description of EAdi evolution in children during their stay in the PICU. In our patient cohort, diaphragm activity was frequently low in conventional ventilation, suggesting that overassistance or oversedation is common in clinical practice. EAdi monitoring appears to be a helpful tool to detect such situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3431-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25118865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Airway Extubation ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesiology ; Catheters ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Clinical medicine ; Critical Care Medicine ; Critical Illness ; Diaphragm - physiopathology ; Emergency Medicine ; Extubation ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units, Pediatric ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Observational studies ; Pain Medicine ; Pediatric intensive care ; Pediatric Original ; Pediatrics ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Prospective Studies ; Respiration, Artificial ; Ventilators ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2014-11, Vol.40 (11), p.1718-1726</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-2a858d35a37b115f4cdd6bc3f2b95523e5d5b12368b61bc32acd19df3c62461d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-2a858d35a37b115f4cdd6bc3f2b95523e5d5b12368b61bc32acd19df3c62461d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00134-014-3431-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00134-014-3431-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25118865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emeriaud, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larouche, Alexandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massicotte, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fléchelles, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morneau, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouvet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of inspiratory diaphragm activity in children over the course of the PICU stay</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>Purpose Diaphragm function should be monitored in critically ill patients, as full ventilatory support rapidly induces diaphragm atrophy. Monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) may help assess the level of diaphragm activity, but such monitoring results are difficult to interpret because reference values are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe EAdi values in critically ill children during a stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), from the acute to recovery phases, and to assess the impact of ventilatory support on EAdi. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal observational study of children requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h. EAdi was recorded using a validated method in the acute phase, before extubation, after extubation, and before PICU discharge. Results Fifty-five critically ill children were enrolled in the study. Median maximum inspiratory EAdi (EAdi max ) during mechanical ventilation was 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.2–7.6] μV in the acute phase and 4.8 (IQR 2.0–10.7) μV in the pre-extubation phase. Periods of diaphragm inactivity (with no detectable inspiratory EAdi) were frequent during conventional ventilation, even with a low level of support. EAdi max in spontaneous ventilation was 15.4 (IQR 7.4–20.7) μV shortly after extubation and 12.6 (IQR 8.1–21.3) μV before PICU discharge. The difference in EAdi max between mechanical ventilation and post-extubation periods was significant ( p  &lt; 0.001). Patients intubated mainly because of a lung pathology exhibited higher EAdi ( p  &lt; 0.01), with a similar temporal increase. Conclusions This is the first systematic description of EAdi evolution in children during their stay in the PICU. In our patient cohort, diaphragm activity was frequently low in conventional ventilation, suggesting that overassistance or oversedation is common in clinical practice. EAdi monitoring appears to be a helpful tool to detect such situations.</description><subject>Airway Extubation</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Diaphragm - physiopathology</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Extubation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Pediatric</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pediatric intensive care</subject><subject>Pediatric Original</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVJaTbbfoBeiiGXXpR69M_2MSxJEwi0hwZ6E7Ik7yrY1laSF_bbR2aTJilbdBCa-b3HjB5Cn6G8gLKsvsWyBMpwCQxTRgGzd2gBjBIMhNYnaFFSRjATjJyisxgfMl0JDh_QKeEAdS34Av2-2vl-Ss6Phe8KN8atCyr5sC-MU9tNUOuhUDq5nUv73C70xvUm2EzvbCjSxhbaTyHaWT2_ft6u7ouY1P4jet-pPtpPT_cS3V9f_Vrd4Lsf329Xl3dYCy4SJqrmtaFc0aoF4B3TxohW0460DeeEWm54m9cRdSsg14nSBhrTUS0IE2DoEn09-G6D_zPZmOTgorZ9r0brpyhBAGmqBrLHEp3_gz7k2cc83UwB44w18EKtVW-lGzufgtKzqbysCCONgLrJFD5Cre1og-r9aDuXy2_4iyN8PsYOTh8VwEGgg48x2E5ugxtU2Eso5Zy-PKQvc_pyTl-yrPnytODUDtb8VTzHnQFyAGJujWsbXv3Af10fAY_ttys</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Emeriaud, Guillaume</creator><creator>Larouche, Alexandrine</creator><creator>Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence</creator><creator>Massicotte, Erika</creator><creator>Fléchelles, Olivier</creator><creator>Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann</creator><creator>Morneau, Sylvain</creator><creator>Beck, Jennifer</creator><creator>Jouvet, Philippe</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Evolution of inspiratory diaphragm activity in children over the course of the PICU stay</title><author>Emeriaud, Guillaume ; Larouche, Alexandrine ; Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence ; Massicotte, Erika ; Fléchelles, Olivier ; Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann ; Morneau, Sylvain ; Beck, Jennifer ; Jouvet, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-2a858d35a37b115f4cdd6bc3f2b95523e5d5b12368b61bc32acd19df3c62461d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Airway Extubation</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Diaphragm - physiopathology</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Extubation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Pediatric</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pediatric intensive care</topic><topic>Pediatric Original</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emeriaud, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larouche, Alexandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massicotte, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fléchelles, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morneau, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouvet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emeriaud, Guillaume</au><au>Larouche, Alexandrine</au><au>Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence</au><au>Massicotte, Erika</au><au>Fléchelles, Olivier</au><au>Pellerin-Leblanc, Amélie-Ann</au><au>Morneau, Sylvain</au><au>Beck, Jennifer</au><au>Jouvet, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of inspiratory diaphragm activity in children over the course of the PICU stay</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><stitle>Intensive Care Med</stitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1718</spage><epage>1726</epage><pages>1718-1726</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><abstract>Purpose Diaphragm function should be monitored in critically ill patients, as full ventilatory support rapidly induces diaphragm atrophy. Monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) may help assess the level of diaphragm activity, but such monitoring results are difficult to interpret because reference values are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe EAdi values in critically ill children during a stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), from the acute to recovery phases, and to assess the impact of ventilatory support on EAdi. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal observational study of children requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h. EAdi was recorded using a validated method in the acute phase, before extubation, after extubation, and before PICU discharge. Results Fifty-five critically ill children were enrolled in the study. Median maximum inspiratory EAdi (EAdi max ) during mechanical ventilation was 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.2–7.6] μV in the acute phase and 4.8 (IQR 2.0–10.7) μV in the pre-extubation phase. Periods of diaphragm inactivity (with no detectable inspiratory EAdi) were frequent during conventional ventilation, even with a low level of support. EAdi max in spontaneous ventilation was 15.4 (IQR 7.4–20.7) μV shortly after extubation and 12.6 (IQR 8.1–21.3) μV before PICU discharge. The difference in EAdi max between mechanical ventilation and post-extubation periods was significant ( p  &lt; 0.001). Patients intubated mainly because of a lung pathology exhibited higher EAdi ( p  &lt; 0.01), with a similar temporal increase. Conclusions This is the first systematic description of EAdi evolution in children during their stay in the PICU. In our patient cohort, diaphragm activity was frequently low in conventional ventilation, suggesting that overassistance or oversedation is common in clinical practice. EAdi monitoring appears to be a helpful tool to detect such situations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25118865</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00134-014-3431-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0342-4642
ispartof Intensive care medicine, 2014-11, Vol.40 (11), p.1718-1726
issn 0342-4642
1432-1238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1612979112
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Airway Extubation
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Catheters
Child, Preschool
Children
Clinical medicine
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Illness
Diaphragm - physiopathology
Emergency Medicine
Extubation
Female
Humans
Infant
Intensive
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Observational studies
Pain Medicine
Pediatric intensive care
Pediatric Original
Pediatrics
Pneumology/Respiratory System
Prospective Studies
Respiration, Artificial
Ventilators
Weaning
title Evolution of inspiratory diaphragm activity in children over the course of the PICU stay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T03%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20inspiratory%20diaphragm%20activity%20in%20children%20over%20the%20course%20of%20the%20PICU%20stay&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Emeriaud,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1718&rft.epage=1726&rft.pages=1718-1726&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00134-014-3431-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA724296189%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1611454491&rft_id=info:pmid/25118865&rft_galeid=A724296189&rfr_iscdi=true