Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths

Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 1997-01, Vol.146 (1/3), p.37-42
Hauptverfasser: Baier, Christine T., Purcell, Jennifer E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1/3
container_start_page 37
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 146
creator Baier, Christine T.
Purcell, Jennifer E.
description Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets towed for 2 min and preserved immediately (controls), or towed for 5 min and preserved after 0, 5, 15, or 35 min. The 333 μm mesh net undersampled small chaetognaths, resulting in different chaetognath species and length distributions and different prey compositions than those obtained from the 64 μm mesh net. Prey loss from gut contents was substantial, with as much as 50 % of prey lost in tows of greater than 2 min duration. Cod-end feeding, as indicated by prey in the foregut, undigested prey, and non-prey items, was much less than prey loss. Actual chaetognath predation effects may be more than double estimates made using net tow durations greater than 2 min.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps146037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16126636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24857437</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24857437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89f7f0fdaadc22e8778ceaaef8a2a1e3d59e4c3235d35ddf2a532a12b802777d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbuwJw_Car42yR6lVCsUvOh5mSaTdst-maRC_71bVhRemMM8DMxLyC2jj0IU8qnFITKpqNBnZMYUUzkryvKczCjTLDdK0EtyFeOeUqakVjOyWnqPNsWs91mEdmjqbptB57IhYMTwDanuu2wMDAME7FLmEd0JbY6Z3QGmfttB2sVrcuGhiXjzO-fk82X5sVjl6_fXt8XzOrfCyJSb0mtPvQNwlnM0WhuLAOgNcGAoXFGitIKLwo1xnkMhxgXfGMq11k7Myf10dwj91wFjqto6Wmwa6LA_xGp8misl1AgfJmhDH2NAXw2hbiEcK0arU1nVf1kjvpvwPqY-_EkuTaHluP8BmgJoGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16126636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths</title><source>Inter-Research</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baier, Christine T. ; Purcell, Jennifer E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baier, Christine T. ; Purcell, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><description>Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets towed for 2 min and preserved immediately (controls), or towed for 5 min and preserved after 0, 5, 15, or 35 min. The 333 μm mesh net undersampled small chaetognaths, resulting in different chaetognath species and length distributions and different prey compositions than those obtained from the 64 μm mesh net. Prey loss from gut contents was substantial, with as much as 50 % of prey lost in tows of greater than 2 min duration. Cod-end feeding, as indicated by prey in the foregut, undigested prey, and non-prey items, was much less than prey loss. Actual chaetognath predation effects may be more than double estimates made using net tow durations greater than 2 min.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps146037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Chaetognatha ; Fish larvae ; Foregut ; Grants ; Marine ; Marine ecology ; Marine fishes ; Plankton ; Predators ; Sagitta ; Sampling methods ; Specimens ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 1997-01, Vol.146 (1/3), p.37-42</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Inter-Research 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89f7f0fdaadc22e8778ceaaef8a2a1e3d59e4c3235d35ddf2a532a12b802777d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24857437$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24857437$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3759,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baier, Christine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purcell, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets towed for 2 min and preserved immediately (controls), or towed for 5 min and preserved after 0, 5, 15, or 35 min. The 333 μm mesh net undersampled small chaetognaths, resulting in different chaetognath species and length distributions and different prey compositions than those obtained from the 64 μm mesh net. Prey loss from gut contents was substantial, with as much as 50 % of prey lost in tows of greater than 2 min duration. Cod-end feeding, as indicated by prey in the foregut, undigested prey, and non-prey items, was much less than prey loss. Actual chaetognath predation effects may be more than double estimates made using net tow durations greater than 2 min.</description><subject>Chaetognatha</subject><subject>Fish larvae</subject><subject>Foregut</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Sagitta</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Specimens</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbuwJw_Car42yR6lVCsUvOh5mSaTdst-maRC_71bVhRemMM8DMxLyC2jj0IU8qnFITKpqNBnZMYUUzkryvKczCjTLDdK0EtyFeOeUqakVjOyWnqPNsWs91mEdmjqbptB57IhYMTwDanuu2wMDAME7FLmEd0JbY6Z3QGmfttB2sVrcuGhiXjzO-fk82X5sVjl6_fXt8XzOrfCyJSb0mtPvQNwlnM0WhuLAOgNcGAoXFGitIKLwo1xnkMhxgXfGMq11k7Myf10dwj91wFjqto6Wmwa6LA_xGp8misl1AgfJmhDH2NAXw2hbiEcK0arU1nVf1kjvpvwPqY-_EkuTaHluP8BmgJoGA</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Baier, Christine T.</creator><creator>Purcell, Jennifer E.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths</title><author>Baier, Christine T. ; Purcell, Jennifer E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89f7f0fdaadc22e8778ceaaef8a2a1e3d59e4c3235d35ddf2a532a12b802777d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Chaetognatha</topic><topic>Fish larvae</topic><topic>Foregut</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Sagitta</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Specimens</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baier, Christine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purcell, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baier, Christine T.</au><au>Purcell, Jennifer E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>1/3</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>37-42</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets towed for 2 min and preserved immediately (controls), or towed for 5 min and preserved after 0, 5, 15, or 35 min. The 333 μm mesh net undersampled small chaetognaths, resulting in different chaetognath species and length distributions and different prey compositions than those obtained from the 64 μm mesh net. Prey loss from gut contents was substantial, with as much as 50 % of prey lost in tows of greater than 2 min duration. Cod-end feeding, as indicated by prey in the foregut, undigested prey, and non-prey items, was much less than prey loss. Actual chaetognath predation effects may be more than double estimates made using net tow durations greater than 2 min.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps146037</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 1997-01, Vol.146 (1/3), p.37-42
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16126636
source Inter-Research; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Chaetognatha
Fish larvae
Foregut
Grants
Marine
Marine ecology
Marine fishes
Plankton
Predators
Sagitta
Sampling methods
Specimens
Zooplankton
title Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A53%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20sampling%20and%20preservation%20on%20apparent%20feeding%20by%20chaetognaths&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Baier,%20Christine%20T.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=1/3&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=37-42&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps146037&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24857437%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16126636&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24857437&rfr_iscdi=true