Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths
Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 1997-01, Vol.146 (1/3), p.37-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1/3 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Baier, Christine T. Purcell, Jennifer E. |
description | Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets towed for 2 min and preserved immediately (controls), or towed for 5 min and preserved after 0, 5, 15, or 35 min. The 333 μm mesh net undersampled small chaetognaths, resulting in different chaetognath species and length distributions and different prey compositions than those obtained from the 64 μm mesh net. Prey loss from gut contents was substantial, with as much as 50 % of prey lost in tows of greater than 2 min duration. Cod-end feeding, as indicated by prey in the foregut, undigested prey, and non-prey items, was much less than prey loss. Actual chaetognath predation effects may be more than double estimates made using net tow durations greater than 2 min. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3354/meps146037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16126636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24857437</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24857437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89f7f0fdaadc22e8778ceaaef8a2a1e3d59e4c3235d35ddf2a532a12b802777d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbuwJw_Car42yR6lVCsUvOh5mSaTdst-maRC_71bVhRemMM8DMxLyC2jj0IU8qnFITKpqNBnZMYUUzkryvKczCjTLDdK0EtyFeOeUqakVjOyWnqPNsWs91mEdmjqbptB57IhYMTwDanuu2wMDAME7FLmEd0JbY6Z3QGmfttB2sVrcuGhiXjzO-fk82X5sVjl6_fXt8XzOrfCyJSb0mtPvQNwlnM0WhuLAOgNcGAoXFGitIKLwo1xnkMhxgXfGMq11k7Myf10dwj91wFjqto6Wmwa6LA_xGp8misl1AgfJmhDH2NAXw2hbiEcK0arU1nVf1kjvpvwPqY-_EkuTaHluP8BmgJoGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16126636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths</title><source>Inter-Research</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baier, Christine T. ; Purcell, Jennifer E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baier, Christine T. ; Purcell, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><description>Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets towed for 2 min and preserved immediately (controls), or towed for 5 min and preserved after 0, 5, 15, or 35 min. The 333 μm mesh net undersampled small chaetognaths, resulting in different chaetognath species and length distributions and different prey compositions than those obtained from the 64 μm mesh net. Prey loss from gut contents was substantial, with as much as 50 % of prey lost in tows of greater than 2 min duration. Cod-end feeding, as indicated by prey in the foregut, undigested prey, and non-prey items, was much less than prey loss. Actual chaetognath predation effects may be more than double estimates made using net tow durations greater than 2 min.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps146037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Chaetognatha ; Fish larvae ; Foregut ; Grants ; Marine ; Marine ecology ; Marine fishes ; Plankton ; Predators ; Sagitta ; Sampling methods ; Specimens ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 1997-01, Vol.146 (1/3), p.37-42</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Inter-Research 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89f7f0fdaadc22e8778ceaaef8a2a1e3d59e4c3235d35ddf2a532a12b802777d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24857437$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24857437$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3759,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baier, Christine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purcell, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets towed for 2 min and preserved immediately (controls), or towed for 5 min and preserved after 0, 5, 15, or 35 min. The 333 μm mesh net undersampled small chaetognaths, resulting in different chaetognath species and length distributions and different prey compositions than those obtained from the 64 μm mesh net. Prey loss from gut contents was substantial, with as much as 50 % of prey lost in tows of greater than 2 min duration. Cod-end feeding, as indicated by prey in the foregut, undigested prey, and non-prey items, was much less than prey loss. Actual chaetognath predation effects may be more than double estimates made using net tow durations greater than 2 min.</description><subject>Chaetognatha</subject><subject>Fish larvae</subject><subject>Foregut</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Sagitta</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Specimens</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbuwJw_Car42yR6lVCsUvOh5mSaTdst-maRC_71bVhRemMM8DMxLyC2jj0IU8qnFITKpqNBnZMYUUzkryvKczCjTLDdK0EtyFeOeUqakVjOyWnqPNsWs91mEdmjqbptB57IhYMTwDanuu2wMDAME7FLmEd0JbY6Z3QGmfttB2sVrcuGhiXjzO-fk82X5sVjl6_fXt8XzOrfCyJSb0mtPvQNwlnM0WhuLAOgNcGAoXFGitIKLwo1xnkMhxgXfGMq11k7Myf10dwj91wFjqto6Wmwa6LA_xGp8misl1AgfJmhDH2NAXw2hbiEcK0arU1nVf1kjvpvwPqY-_EkuTaHluP8BmgJoGA</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Baier, Christine T.</creator><creator>Purcell, Jennifer E.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths</title><author>Baier, Christine T. ; Purcell, Jennifer E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89f7f0fdaadc22e8778ceaaef8a2a1e3d59e4c3235d35ddf2a532a12b802777d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Chaetognatha</topic><topic>Fish larvae</topic><topic>Foregut</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Sagitta</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Specimens</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baier, Christine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purcell, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baier, Christine T.</au><au>Purcell, Jennifer E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>1/3</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>37-42</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Chaetognaths are abundant predators of marine zooplankton. Their feeding typically has been quantified from gut contents of net-collected specimens. We evaluated the effects of mesh size and sampling duration on the gut contents of chaetognaths. Samples were compared from 333 μm and 64 μm mesh nets towed for 2 min and preserved immediately (controls), or towed for 5 min and preserved after 0, 5, 15, or 35 min. The 333 μm mesh net undersampled small chaetognaths, resulting in different chaetognath species and length distributions and different prey compositions than those obtained from the 64 μm mesh net. Prey loss from gut contents was substantial, with as much as 50 % of prey lost in tows of greater than 2 min duration. Cod-end feeding, as indicated by prey in the foregut, undigested prey, and non-prey items, was much less than prey loss. Actual chaetognath predation effects may be more than double estimates made using net tow durations greater than 2 min.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps146037</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-8630 |
ispartof | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 1997-01, Vol.146 (1/3), p.37-42 |
issn | 0171-8630 1616-1599 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16126636 |
source | Inter-Research; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Chaetognatha Fish larvae Foregut Grants Marine Marine ecology Marine fishes Plankton Predators Sagitta Sampling methods Specimens Zooplankton |
title | Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A53%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20sampling%20and%20preservation%20on%20apparent%20feeding%20by%20chaetognaths&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Baier,%20Christine%20T.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=1/3&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=37-42&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps146037&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24857437%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16126636&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24857437&rfr_iscdi=true |