More about euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments
Male euglossine bees were captured monthly for one year in modified McPhail traps baited with cineole, methyl salicylate, and skatole. The traps were operated 90 km north of Manaus, Brazil in continuous terra firme forest and forest fragments of 1, 10, and 100 ha. Of the 16 species of euglossine bee...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biotropica 1991-12, Vol.23 (4), p.586-591 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 591 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 586 |
| container_title | Biotropica |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Becker, P. (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei) Moure, J.S Peralta, F.J.A |
| description | Male euglossine bees were captured monthly for one year in modified McPhail traps baited with cineole, methyl salicylate, and skatole. The traps were operated 90 km north of Manaus, Brazil in continuous terra firme forest and forest fragments of 1, 10, and 100 ha. Of the 16 species of euglossine bees captured, Euglossa chalybeata and Eg. stilbonota accounted for 85 percent. The traps had the advantage of operating unattended, but their capture efficiency was low Bee abundance and species richness were significantly correlated and peaked in the wet season when flowering also peaked. Contrary to a previous study in the same area, bee abundance was greater in 10- and 100-ha fragments than in continuous forest. Fragments of 1 ha had the smallest number of individuals and species. It appears that male euglossine abundance may vary considerably over short distances, making it difficult to characterize a forest by sampling a single site. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2388396 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16119611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2388396</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2388396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-afad85fc4c9f7f6d2ad36315c3b4d3593f8ffa9bab51638baec1e9d86e3030ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH7g3VMPoqdq0knS5LgsfsGKB91zmabJ0qVt1qQ96K83sot48jAMAw8P876EXDB6WwAt7wpQCrQ8IDNWcp6XvNCHZEYplTlIKo_JSYybdGpB-YyoFx9shrWfxsxO687H2A42q62NWTtk8x6__NDikLnExTFzAde9HcZ4Ro4cdtGe7_cpWT3cvy-e8uXr4_NivsxNIWHM0WGjhDPcaFc62RTYgAQmDNS8AaHBKedQ11gLJkHVaA2zulHSAgVqEU7J9c67Df5jSi9UfRuN7TocrJ9ixSRjOk0Cb3agCSlEsK7ahrbH8FkxWv00U-2bSeTVXonRYJciDaaNv7hgjFL2B9vE0Yd_bJc7zKGvcB2SafWmmRScK_gGgzZ1qQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16119611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>More about euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Becker, P. (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei) ; Moure, J.S ; Peralta, F.J.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, P. (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei) ; Moure, J.S ; Peralta, F.J.A</creatorcontrib><description>Male euglossine bees were captured monthly for one year in modified McPhail traps baited with cineole, methyl salicylate, and skatole. The traps were operated 90 km north of Manaus, Brazil in continuous terra firme forest and forest fragments of 1, 10, and 100 ha. Of the 16 species of euglossine bees captured, Euglossa chalybeata and Eg. stilbonota accounted for 85 percent. The traps had the advantage of operating unattended, but their capture efficiency was low Bee abundance and species richness were significantly correlated and peaked in the wet season when flowering also peaked. Contrary to a previous study in the same area, bee abundance was greater in 10- and 100-ha fragments than in continuous forest. Fragments of 1 ha had the smallest number of individuals and species. It appears that male euglossine abundance may vary considerably over short distances, making it difficult to characterize a forest by sampling a single site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2388396</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BTROAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, MA: Association for Tropical Biology</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; ANIMAL POPULATION ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; APIDAE ; Bees ; Biological and medical sciences ; BOSQUE TROPICAL ; BOSQUES ; BRASIL ; BRAZIL ; BRESIL ; CARACTERISTICAS DEL SITIO ; Deciduous forests ; Demecology ; ESTACIONES DEL ANO ; EUGLOSSA ; euglossa chalybeata ; euglossa stilbonata ; Euglossini ; EVOLUCION DE LA POBLACION ; EVOLUTION DE LA POPULATION ; FACTEUR LIE AU SITE ; FOREST INFLUENCES ; Forest insects ; Forest reserves ; FORESTS ; FORET ; FORET TROPICALE ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hymenoptera ; Insect biology ; Insect pollination ; INSECTA ; INSECTE NUISIBLE ; INSECTOS DANINOS ; Invertebrates ; Male animals ; mcphail traps ; PERIODICIDAD ; PERIODICITE ; PERIODICITY ; PEST INSECTS ; PIEGE ; Pipelines ; POBLACION ANIMAL ; POPULATION ANIMALE ; POPULATION CHANGE ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Rain ; SAISON ; SEASONALITY ; SEASONS ; SITE FACTORS ; TRAMPAS ; TRAPS ; TROPICAL FORESTS</subject><ispartof>Biotropica, 1991-12, Vol.23 (4), p.586-591</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-afad85fc4c9f7f6d2ad36315c3b4d3593f8ffa9bab51638baec1e9d86e3030ea3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2388396$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2388396$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5110016$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, P. (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moure, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta, F.J.A</creatorcontrib><title>More about euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments</title><title>Biotropica</title><description>Male euglossine bees were captured monthly for one year in modified McPhail traps baited with cineole, methyl salicylate, and skatole. The traps were operated 90 km north of Manaus, Brazil in continuous terra firme forest and forest fragments of 1, 10, and 100 ha. Of the 16 species of euglossine bees captured, Euglossa chalybeata and Eg. stilbonota accounted for 85 percent. The traps had the advantage of operating unattended, but their capture efficiency was low Bee abundance and species richness were significantly correlated and peaked in the wet season when flowering also peaked. Contrary to a previous study in the same area, bee abundance was greater in 10- and 100-ha fragments than in continuous forest. Fragments of 1 ha had the smallest number of individuals and species. It appears that male euglossine abundance may vary considerably over short distances, making it difficult to characterize a forest by sampling a single site.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>ANIMAL POPULATION</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>APIDAE</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BOSQUE TROPICAL</subject><subject>BOSQUES</subject><subject>BRASIL</subject><subject>BRAZIL</subject><subject>BRESIL</subject><subject>CARACTERISTICAS DEL SITIO</subject><subject>Deciduous forests</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>ESTACIONES DEL ANO</subject><subject>EUGLOSSA</subject><subject>euglossa chalybeata</subject><subject>euglossa stilbonata</subject><subject>Euglossini</subject><subject>EVOLUCION DE LA POBLACION</subject><subject>EVOLUTION DE LA POPULATION</subject><subject>FACTEUR LIE AU SITE</subject><subject>FOREST INFLUENCES</subject><subject>Forest insects</subject><subject>Forest reserves</subject><subject>FORESTS</subject><subject>FORET</subject><subject>FORET TROPICALE</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Insect biology</subject><subject>Insect pollination</subject><subject>INSECTA</subject><subject>INSECTE NUISIBLE</subject><subject>INSECTOS DANINOS</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>mcphail traps</subject><subject>PERIODICIDAD</subject><subject>PERIODICITE</subject><subject>PERIODICITY</subject><subject>PEST INSECTS</subject><subject>PIEGE</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>POBLACION ANIMAL</subject><subject>POPULATION ANIMALE</subject><subject>POPULATION CHANGE</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>SAISON</subject><subject>SEASONALITY</subject><subject>SEASONS</subject><subject>SITE FACTORS</subject><subject>TRAMPAS</subject><subject>TRAPS</subject><subject>TROPICAL FORESTS</subject><issn>0006-3606</issn><issn>1744-7429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH7g3VMPoqdq0knS5LgsfsGKB91zmabJ0qVt1qQ96K83sot48jAMAw8P876EXDB6WwAt7wpQCrQ8IDNWcp6XvNCHZEYplTlIKo_JSYybdGpB-YyoFx9shrWfxsxO687H2A42q62NWTtk8x6__NDikLnExTFzAde9HcZ4Ro4cdtGe7_cpWT3cvy-e8uXr4_NivsxNIWHM0WGjhDPcaFc62RTYgAQmDNS8AaHBKedQ11gLJkHVaA2zulHSAgVqEU7J9c67Df5jSi9UfRuN7TocrJ9ixSRjOk0Cb3agCSlEsK7ahrbH8FkxWv00U-2bSeTVXonRYJciDaaNv7hgjFL2B9vE0Yd_bJc7zKGvcB2SafWmmRScK_gGgzZ1qQ</recordid><startdate>19911201</startdate><enddate>19911201</enddate><creator>Becker, P. (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei)</creator><creator>Moure, J.S</creator><creator>Peralta, F.J.A</creator><general>Association for Tropical Biology</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911201</creationdate><title>More about euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments</title><author>Becker, P. (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei) ; Moure, J.S ; Peralta, F.J.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-afad85fc4c9f7f6d2ad36315c3b4d3593f8ffa9bab51638baec1e9d86e3030ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>ANIMAL POPULATION</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>APIDAE</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BOSQUE TROPICAL</topic><topic>BOSQUES</topic><topic>BRASIL</topic><topic>BRAZIL</topic><topic>BRESIL</topic><topic>CARACTERISTICAS DEL SITIO</topic><topic>Deciduous forests</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>ESTACIONES DEL ANO</topic><topic>EUGLOSSA</topic><topic>euglossa chalybeata</topic><topic>euglossa stilbonata</topic><topic>Euglossini</topic><topic>EVOLUCION DE LA POBLACION</topic><topic>EVOLUTION DE LA POPULATION</topic><topic>FACTEUR LIE AU SITE</topic><topic>FOREST INFLUENCES</topic><topic>Forest insects</topic><topic>Forest reserves</topic><topic>FORESTS</topic><topic>FORET</topic><topic>FORET TROPICALE</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Insect biology</topic><topic>Insect pollination</topic><topic>INSECTA</topic><topic>INSECTE NUISIBLE</topic><topic>INSECTOS DANINOS</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>mcphail traps</topic><topic>PERIODICIDAD</topic><topic>PERIODICITE</topic><topic>PERIODICITY</topic><topic>PEST INSECTS</topic><topic>PIEGE</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>POBLACION ANIMAL</topic><topic>POPULATION ANIMALE</topic><topic>POPULATION CHANGE</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>SAISON</topic><topic>SEASONALITY</topic><topic>SEASONS</topic><topic>SITE FACTORS</topic><topic>TRAMPAS</topic><topic>TRAPS</topic><topic>TROPICAL FORESTS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, P. (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moure, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta, F.J.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, P. (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei)</au><au>Moure, J.S</au><au>Peralta, F.J.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>More about euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments</atitle><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle><date>1991-12-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>586-591</pages><issn>0006-3606</issn><eissn>1744-7429</eissn><coden>BTROAZ</coden><abstract>Male euglossine bees were captured monthly for one year in modified McPhail traps baited with cineole, methyl salicylate, and skatole. The traps were operated 90 km north of Manaus, Brazil in continuous terra firme forest and forest fragments of 1, 10, and 100 ha. Of the 16 species of euglossine bees captured, Euglossa chalybeata and Eg. stilbonota accounted for 85 percent. The traps had the advantage of operating unattended, but their capture efficiency was low Bee abundance and species richness were significantly correlated and peaked in the wet season when flowering also peaked. Contrary to a previous study in the same area, bee abundance was greater in 10- and 100-ha fragments than in continuous forest. Fragments of 1 ha had the smallest number of individuals and species. It appears that male euglossine abundance may vary considerably over short distances, making it difficult to characterize a forest by sampling a single site.</abstract><cop>Malden, MA</cop><pub>Association for Tropical Biology</pub><doi>10.2307/2388396</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0006-3606 |
| ispartof | Biotropica, 1991-12, Vol.23 (4), p.586-591 |
| issn | 0006-3606 1744-7429 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16119611 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Animal and plant ecology ANIMAL POPULATION Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals APIDAE Bees Biological and medical sciences BOSQUE TROPICAL BOSQUES BRASIL BRAZIL BRESIL CARACTERISTICAS DEL SITIO Deciduous forests Demecology ESTACIONES DEL ANO EUGLOSSA euglossa chalybeata euglossa stilbonata Euglossini EVOLUCION DE LA POBLACION EVOLUTION DE LA POPULATION FACTEUR LIE AU SITE FOREST INFLUENCES Forest insects Forest reserves FORESTS FORET FORET TROPICALE Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hymenoptera Insect biology Insect pollination INSECTA INSECTE NUISIBLE INSECTOS DANINOS Invertebrates Male animals mcphail traps PERIODICIDAD PERIODICITE PERIODICITY PEST INSECTS PIEGE Pipelines POBLACION ANIMAL POPULATION ANIMALE POPULATION CHANGE Protozoa. Invertebrata Rain SAISON SEASONALITY SEASONS SITE FACTORS TRAMPAS TRAPS TROPICAL FORESTS |
| title | More about euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A46%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=More%20about%20euglossine%20bees%20in%20Amazonian%20forest%20fragments&rft.jtitle=Biotropica&rft.au=Becker,%20P.%20(Universiti%20Brunei%20Darussalam,%20Gadong,%20Brunei)&rft.date=1991-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=586-591&rft.issn=0006-3606&rft.eissn=1744-7429&rft.coden=BTROAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2388396&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2388396%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16119611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2388396&rfr_iscdi=true |