Poor resource quality lowers transmission potential by changing foraging behaviour

Resource quality can have conflicting effects on the spread of disease. High‐quality resources could hinder disease spread by promoting host immune function. Alternatively, high‐quality food might enhance the spread of disease through other traits of hosts or parasites. Thus, to assess how resource...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2014-10, Vol.28 (5), p.1245-1255
Hauptverfasser: Penczykowski, Rachel M, Lemanski, Brian C. P, Sieg, R. Drew, Hall, Spencer R, Housley Ochs, Jessica, Kubanek, Julia, Duffy, Meghan A, Hõrak, Peeter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1255
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1245
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 28
creator Penczykowski, Rachel M
Lemanski, Brian C. P
Sieg, R. Drew
Hall, Spencer R
Housley Ochs, Jessica
Kubanek, Julia
Duffy, Meghan A
Hõrak, Peeter
description Resource quality can have conflicting effects on the spread of disease. High‐quality resources could hinder disease spread by promoting host immune function. Alternatively, high‐quality food might enhance the spread of disease through other traits of hosts or parasites. Thus, to assess how resource quality shapes epidemics, we need to delineate mechanisms by which food quality affects key epidemiological traits. Here, we disentangle effects of food quality on ‘transmission potential’ – a key component of parasite fitness that combines transmission rate and parasite production – using a zooplankton host and fungal parasite. We estimated the components of transmission potential (i.e. parasite encounter rate, susceptibility and yield of parasite propagules) for hosts fed a high‐quality green alga and a low‐quality cyanobacterium. A focal experiment was designed to disentangle food quality effects on various components of transmission potential. The low‐quality resource decreased transmission potential by stunting host growth and altering foraging behaviour. Hosts reared on low‐quality food were smaller and had lower size‐corrected feeding rates. Due to their slower grazing, they encountered fewer parasite spores in the water. Smaller hosts also had lower risk of an ingested spore causing infection (i.e. lower susceptibility) and yielded fewer parasite propagules. Hosts switched from high‐ to low‐quality food during spore exposure also had low transmission potential – despite their large size – because the poor quality resource strongly depressed foraging. A follow‐up experiment investigated traits of the low‐quality resource that might have driven those results. Cyanobacterial compounds that can inhibit digestive proteases of a related grazer likely did not cause the observed reductions in transmission potential. Our study highlights the value of using mechanistic models to pinpoint how resource quality can change transmission potential. Overall, our results show that low‐quality resources could inhibit the spread of disease through effects on multiple components of transmission potential. They also provide insight into how disease outbreaks in wildlife may respond to shifts in resource quality caused by eutrophication or climate change.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.12238
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1611635468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24034035</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24034035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4658-dc6876cae150501392da11c4cf4b2b8eda42febae259a7bbb9d0b862d15f6dbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlLxDAYxYMoOC5nT2JBBC91src9yuAGguJyDl_SdMxQmzHpKPPfm5m6gBdDICHfey-PH0IHBJ-RtMaESZFTzsQZoZSVG2j087KJRpjKKi-5ZNtoJ8YZxrgSlI7Qw733IQs2-kUwNntbQOv6Zdb6Dxti1gfo4quL0fkum_vedr2DNtPLzLxAN3XdNGt8gPVF2xd4dylmD2010Ea7_3XuoufLi6fJdX57d3UzOb_NDZeizGsjy0IasERggQmraA2EGG4arqkubQ2cNlaDpaKCQmtd1ViXktZENLLWmu2i0yF3HvzbwsZepabGti101i-iIpIQyQSXZZIe_5HOUtEutVNESCp5VVUyqcaDygQfY7CNmgf3CmGpCFYrxmpFVK2IqjXj5Dj5yoVooG0SLuPij42WRUGLgiedGHQfrrXL_2LV5cXkO_9w8M1i78NvLscsbZHmR8O8Aa9gGtLfz48UJ6IYS1Zwwj4BMSeejg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562649996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Poor resource quality lowers transmission potential by changing foraging behaviour</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Penczykowski, Rachel M ; Lemanski, Brian C. P ; Sieg, R. Drew ; Hall, Spencer R ; Housley Ochs, Jessica ; Kubanek, Julia ; Duffy, Meghan A ; Hõrak, Peeter</creator><contributor>Hõrak, Peeter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Penczykowski, Rachel M ; Lemanski, Brian C. P ; Sieg, R. Drew ; Hall, Spencer R ; Housley Ochs, Jessica ; Kubanek, Julia ; Duffy, Meghan A ; Hõrak, Peeter ; Hõrak, Peeter</creatorcontrib><description>Resource quality can have conflicting effects on the spread of disease. High‐quality resources could hinder disease spread by promoting host immune function. Alternatively, high‐quality food might enhance the spread of disease through other traits of hosts or parasites. Thus, to assess how resource quality shapes epidemics, we need to delineate mechanisms by which food quality affects key epidemiological traits. Here, we disentangle effects of food quality on ‘transmission potential’ – a key component of parasite fitness that combines transmission rate and parasite production – using a zooplankton host and fungal parasite. We estimated the components of transmission potential (i.e. parasite encounter rate, susceptibility and yield of parasite propagules) for hosts fed a high‐quality green alga and a low‐quality cyanobacterium. A focal experiment was designed to disentangle food quality effects on various components of transmission potential. The low‐quality resource decreased transmission potential by stunting host growth and altering foraging behaviour. Hosts reared on low‐quality food were smaller and had lower size‐corrected feeding rates. Due to their slower grazing, they encountered fewer parasite spores in the water. Smaller hosts also had lower risk of an ingested spore causing infection (i.e. lower susceptibility) and yielded fewer parasite propagules. Hosts switched from high‐ to low‐quality food during spore exposure also had low transmission potential – despite their large size – because the poor quality resource strongly depressed foraging. A follow‐up experiment investigated traits of the low‐quality resource that might have driven those results. Cyanobacterial compounds that can inhibit digestive proteases of a related grazer likely did not cause the observed reductions in transmission potential. Our study highlights the value of using mechanistic models to pinpoint how resource quality can change transmission potential. Overall, our results show that low‐quality resources could inhibit the spread of disease through effects on multiple components of transmission potential. They also provide insight into how disease outbreaks in wildlife may respond to shifts in resource quality caused by eutrophication or climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12238</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECOE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: British Ecological Society</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlorophycota ; climate change ; Community ecology ; Cyanobacterium ; Daphnia ; disease outbreaks ; Disease transmission ; Epidemiology ; eutrophication ; feeding rate ; Food ; Food quality ; Food security ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fungi ; General aspects ; grazing ; hosts ; Human ecology ; Infections ; mechanistic models ; Parasite hosts ; parasite production ; Parasites ; proteinases ; rearing ; risk ; Spores ; transmission rate ; wildlife ; zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2014-10, Vol.28 (5), p.1245-1255</ispartof><rights>2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4658-dc6876cae150501392da11c4cf4b2b8eda42febae259a7bbb9d0b862d15f6dbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4658-dc6876cae150501392da11c4cf4b2b8eda42febae259a7bbb9d0b862d15f6dbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24034035$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24034035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28772774$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hõrak, Peeter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Penczykowski, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemanski, Brian C. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieg, R. Drew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Spencer R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Housley Ochs, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubanek, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Meghan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hõrak, Peeter</creatorcontrib><title>Poor resource quality lowers transmission potential by changing foraging behaviour</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Resource quality can have conflicting effects on the spread of disease. High‐quality resources could hinder disease spread by promoting host immune function. Alternatively, high‐quality food might enhance the spread of disease through other traits of hosts or parasites. Thus, to assess how resource quality shapes epidemics, we need to delineate mechanisms by which food quality affects key epidemiological traits. Here, we disentangle effects of food quality on ‘transmission potential’ – a key component of parasite fitness that combines transmission rate and parasite production – using a zooplankton host and fungal parasite. We estimated the components of transmission potential (i.e. parasite encounter rate, susceptibility and yield of parasite propagules) for hosts fed a high‐quality green alga and a low‐quality cyanobacterium. A focal experiment was designed to disentangle food quality effects on various components of transmission potential. The low‐quality resource decreased transmission potential by stunting host growth and altering foraging behaviour. Hosts reared on low‐quality food were smaller and had lower size‐corrected feeding rates. Due to their slower grazing, they encountered fewer parasite spores in the water. Smaller hosts also had lower risk of an ingested spore causing infection (i.e. lower susceptibility) and yielded fewer parasite propagules. Hosts switched from high‐ to low‐quality food during spore exposure also had low transmission potential – despite their large size – because the poor quality resource strongly depressed foraging. A follow‐up experiment investigated traits of the low‐quality resource that might have driven those results. Cyanobacterial compounds that can inhibit digestive proteases of a related grazer likely did not cause the observed reductions in transmission potential. Our study highlights the value of using mechanistic models to pinpoint how resource quality can change transmission potential. Overall, our results show that low‐quality resources could inhibit the spread of disease through effects on multiple components of transmission potential. They also provide insight into how disease outbreaks in wildlife may respond to shifts in resource quality caused by eutrophication or climate change.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlorophycota</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Cyanobacterium</subject><subject>Daphnia</subject><subject>disease outbreaks</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>eutrophication</subject><subject>feeding rate</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>grazing</subject><subject>hosts</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>mechanistic models</subject><subject>Parasite hosts</subject><subject>parasite production</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>proteinases</subject><subject>rearing</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Spores</subject><subject>transmission rate</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><subject>zooplankton</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMlLxDAYxYMoOC5nT2JBBC91src9yuAGguJyDl_SdMxQmzHpKPPfm5m6gBdDICHfey-PH0IHBJ-RtMaESZFTzsQZoZSVG2j087KJRpjKKi-5ZNtoJ8YZxrgSlI7Qw733IQs2-kUwNntbQOv6Zdb6Dxti1gfo4quL0fkum_vedr2DNtPLzLxAN3XdNGt8gPVF2xd4dylmD2010Ea7_3XuoufLi6fJdX57d3UzOb_NDZeizGsjy0IasERggQmraA2EGG4arqkubQ2cNlaDpaKCQmtd1ViXktZENLLWmu2i0yF3HvzbwsZepabGti101i-iIpIQyQSXZZIe_5HOUtEutVNESCp5VVUyqcaDygQfY7CNmgf3CmGpCFYrxmpFVK2IqjXj5Dj5yoVooG0SLuPij42WRUGLgiedGHQfrrXL_2LV5cXkO_9w8M1i78NvLscsbZHmR8O8Aa9gGtLfz48UJ6IYS1Zwwj4BMSeejg</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Penczykowski, Rachel M</creator><creator>Lemanski, Brian C. P</creator><creator>Sieg, R. Drew</creator><creator>Hall, Spencer R</creator><creator>Housley Ochs, Jessica</creator><creator>Kubanek, Julia</creator><creator>Duffy, Meghan A</creator><creator>Hõrak, Peeter</creator><general>British Ecological Society</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Poor resource quality lowers transmission potential by changing foraging behaviour</title><author>Penczykowski, Rachel M ; Lemanski, Brian C. P ; Sieg, R. Drew ; Hall, Spencer R ; Housley Ochs, Jessica ; Kubanek, Julia ; Duffy, Meghan A ; Hõrak, Peeter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4658-dc6876cae150501392da11c4cf4b2b8eda42febae259a7bbb9d0b862d15f6dbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlorophycota</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Cyanobacterium</topic><topic>Daphnia</topic><topic>disease outbreaks</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>eutrophication</topic><topic>feeding rate</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>grazing</topic><topic>hosts</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>mechanistic models</topic><topic>Parasite hosts</topic><topic>parasite production</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>proteinases</topic><topic>rearing</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Spores</topic><topic>transmission rate</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><topic>zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penczykowski, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemanski, Brian C. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieg, R. Drew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Spencer R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Housley Ochs, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubanek, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Meghan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hõrak, Peeter</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penczykowski, Rachel M</au><au>Lemanski, Brian C. P</au><au>Sieg, R. Drew</au><au>Hall, Spencer R</au><au>Housley Ochs, Jessica</au><au>Kubanek, Julia</au><au>Duffy, Meghan A</au><au>Hõrak, Peeter</au><au>Hõrak, Peeter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Poor resource quality lowers transmission potential by changing foraging behaviour</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1245</spage><epage>1255</epage><pages>1245-1255</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><coden>FECOE5</coden><abstract>Resource quality can have conflicting effects on the spread of disease. High‐quality resources could hinder disease spread by promoting host immune function. Alternatively, high‐quality food might enhance the spread of disease through other traits of hosts or parasites. Thus, to assess how resource quality shapes epidemics, we need to delineate mechanisms by which food quality affects key epidemiological traits. Here, we disentangle effects of food quality on ‘transmission potential’ – a key component of parasite fitness that combines transmission rate and parasite production – using a zooplankton host and fungal parasite. We estimated the components of transmission potential (i.e. parasite encounter rate, susceptibility and yield of parasite propagules) for hosts fed a high‐quality green alga and a low‐quality cyanobacterium. A focal experiment was designed to disentangle food quality effects on various components of transmission potential. The low‐quality resource decreased transmission potential by stunting host growth and altering foraging behaviour. Hosts reared on low‐quality food were smaller and had lower size‐corrected feeding rates. Due to their slower grazing, they encountered fewer parasite spores in the water. Smaller hosts also had lower risk of an ingested spore causing infection (i.e. lower susceptibility) and yielded fewer parasite propagules. Hosts switched from high‐ to low‐quality food during spore exposure also had low transmission potential – despite their large size – because the poor quality resource strongly depressed foraging. A follow‐up experiment investigated traits of the low‐quality resource that might have driven those results. Cyanobacterial compounds that can inhibit digestive proteases of a related grazer likely did not cause the observed reductions in transmission potential. Our study highlights the value of using mechanistic models to pinpoint how resource quality can change transmission potential. Overall, our results show that low‐quality resources could inhibit the spread of disease through effects on multiple components of transmission potential. They also provide insight into how disease outbreaks in wildlife may respond to shifts in resource quality caused by eutrophication or climate change.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>British Ecological Society</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.12238</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2014-10, Vol.28 (5), p.1245-1255
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1611635468
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
Chlorophycota
climate change
Community ecology
Cyanobacterium
Daphnia
disease outbreaks
Disease transmission
Epidemiology
eutrophication
feeding rate
Food
Food quality
Food security
Foraging
Foraging behavior
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
fungi
General aspects
grazing
hosts
Human ecology
Infections
mechanistic models
Parasite hosts
parasite production
Parasites
proteinases
rearing
risk
Spores
transmission rate
wildlife
zooplankton
title Poor resource quality lowers transmission potential by changing foraging behaviour
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A17%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Poor%20resource%20quality%20lowers%20transmission%20potential%20by%20changing%20foraging%20behaviour&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Penczykowski,%20Rachel%20M&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1245&rft.epage=1255&rft.pages=1245-1255&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft.coden=FECOE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12238&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24034035%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562649996&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24034035&rfr_iscdi=true