Determination of the radiation dose due to radon ingestion and inhalation
The distribution of radon in ground and surface water samples in Sankey Tank and Mallathahalli Lake areas was determined using Durridge RAD-7 analyzer with RAD H2O accessory. The radiation dose received by an individual falling under different age groups (viz., 3 months; 1, 5, 10, 15 years and adult...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran) 2014-03, Vol.11 (2), p.493-508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The distribution of radon in ground and surface water samples in Sankey
Tank and Mallathahalli Lake areas was determined using Durridge RAD-7
analyzer with RAD H2O accessory. The radiation dose received by an
individual falling under different age groups (viz., 3 months; 1, 5,
10, 15 years and adult) depending upon their average annual water
consumption rate was attempted. The mean radon activity in surface
water of Sankey Tank and Mallathahalli Lake was 7.24 ± 1.48 and
11.43 ± 1.11 Bq/L, respectively. The average radon activities
ranged from 11.6 ± 1.7 to 381.2 ± 2.0 Bq/L and 1.50 ±
0.83 to 18.9 ± 1.59 Bq/L, respectively, in 12 groundwater samples
each around Sankey Tank and Mallathahalli Lake areas. Majority of the
measured groundwater samples (viz., 100 % in Sankey Tank area and 75 %
in Mallathahalli Lake area) showed mean radon values above the
EPA's maximum contaminant level of 11.1 Bq/L and only 66.67 % of
samples in Sankey Tank area showed radon above the WHO and EU's
reference level of 100 Bq/ L. The overall radiation dose due to radon
emanating from water in the study area was increasing with increase in
age and water consumption rates, but significantly lower than UNSCEAR
and WHO recommended limit of 1 mSv/year except for few groundwater
samples in Sankey Tank area (i.e., 0.92, 0.99 and 1.39 mSv/year). The
radiation dose rate received by bronchial epithelium via inhalation was
very high compared to that by stomach walls via ingestion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1735-1472 1735-2630 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13762-013-0252-x |