role of urban and agricultural areas during avian migration: an assessment of within‐year temporal turnover

AIM: Migration is often identified as the most vulnerable period in the annual cycle for birds, and land‐use change is likely to have altered how avian populations are regulated during migration events. However, the consequences of land‐use change for avian diversity are typically assessed based on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global ecology and biogeography 2014-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1225-1234
Hauptverfasser: La Sorte, Frank A, Tingley, Morgan W, Hurlbert, Allen H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1234
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1225
container_title Global ecology and biogeography
container_volume 23
creator La Sorte, Frank A
Tingley, Morgan W
Hurlbert, Allen H
description AIM: Migration is often identified as the most vulnerable period in the annual cycle for birds, and land‐use change is likely to have altered how avian populations are regulated during migration events. However, the consequences of land‐use change for avian diversity are typically assessed based on annual surveys of breeding communities with little consideration given to migration or other phases of the annual cycle. LOCATION: Forty‐four North American ecoregions. METHODS: We use eBird avian occurrence data to estimate, at a monthly temporal resolution for the combined period 2004 to 2013, how species richness and temporal turnover in species composition is structured within years across a land‐use gradient (intact vegetation, agricultural and urban). RESULTS: Species richness peaked on average during spring and autumn migrations. Intact vegetation had the highest and urban areas the lowest species richness on average. Despite differences in community size, the three land‐use categories had similar patterns of within‐year temporal turnover, suggesting analogous effects of geographic diffusion by migrating species. Agricultural and urban areas had comparatively dampened temporal turnover across the annual cycle, suggesting more homogeneous within‐year species compositions. Relative to eastern ecoregions, differences in species richness and temporal turnover among land‐use categories were substantially more pronounced in western ecoregions. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Agricultural and urban areas have lower species richness and reduced within‐year temporal turnover across the annual cycle relative to areas of intact vegetation, particularly in the west. Our findings suggest that avian diversity has been simplified across the annual cycle through the influence of human activities, with human‐transformed landscapes maintaining a degree of relevance for migratory birds, especially in the east.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/geb.12199
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1611615967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43871437</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43871437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5809-bcc2fc5bbb47cc7a411aa56d0c908321f7b751e5f2575da81cc89e2f33e5a78c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ktFqFDEUhgdRsFYvfAAxIIJeTJtkJpPEO7vUVagV1KJ34Uw2WbPOJGsy07p3fQSfsU9ixql7IRgCCZzv_znnT4riMcFHJK_jtWmPCCVS3ikOSN00paCVuLu_06_3iwcpbTDGrGbNQdHH0BkULBpjCx6BXyFYR6fHbhgjdAiigYRWY3R-jeDSZaZ36wiDC_4VmhQpmZR644fJ5coN35y_uf61MxDRYPptmFyylw-XJj4s7lnoknl0ex4WF29OPy_elmcflu8Wr89KzQSWZas1tZq1bVtzrTnUhACwZoW1xKKixPKWM2KYpYyzFQiitZCG2qoyDLjQ1WHxYvbdxvBjNGlQvUvadB14E8akSEPyZrLhGX32D7oJudvcXaawxBzTRmTq5UzpGFKKxqptdD3EnSJYTcGrHLz6E3xmn986QtLQ2Qheu7QXUCFJzp5m7njmrlxndv83VMvTk7_OT2bFJg0h7hV1JTipq2mWcq67NJif-zrE7ypPypn6cr5Ui5qeyI_4vTrP_NOZtxDU9OxJXXyimLD8PbgQhFa_AbhgtWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1609070268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>role of urban and agricultural areas during avian migration: an assessment of within‐year temporal turnover</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>La Sorte, Frank A ; Tingley, Morgan W ; Hurlbert, Allen H</creator><creatorcontrib>La Sorte, Frank A ; Tingley, Morgan W ; Hurlbert, Allen H</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: Migration is often identified as the most vulnerable period in the annual cycle for birds, and land‐use change is likely to have altered how avian populations are regulated during migration events. However, the consequences of land‐use change for avian diversity are typically assessed based on annual surveys of breeding communities with little consideration given to migration or other phases of the annual cycle. LOCATION: Forty‐four North American ecoregions. METHODS: We use eBird avian occurrence data to estimate, at a monthly temporal resolution for the combined period 2004 to 2013, how species richness and temporal turnover in species composition is structured within years across a land‐use gradient (intact vegetation, agricultural and urban). RESULTS: Species richness peaked on average during spring and autumn migrations. Intact vegetation had the highest and urban areas the lowest species richness on average. Despite differences in community size, the three land‐use categories had similar patterns of within‐year temporal turnover, suggesting analogous effects of geographic diffusion by migrating species. Agricultural and urban areas had comparatively dampened temporal turnover across the annual cycle, suggesting more homogeneous within‐year species compositions. Relative to eastern ecoregions, differences in species richness and temporal turnover among land‐use categories were substantially more pronounced in western ecoregions. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Agricultural and urban areas have lower species richness and reduced within‐year temporal turnover across the annual cycle relative to areas of intact vegetation, particularly in the west. Our findings suggest that avian diversity has been simplified across the annual cycle through the influence of human activities, with human‐transformed landscapes maintaining a degree of relevance for migratory birds, especially in the east.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-8238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/geb.12199</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GEBIFS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal ecology ; Animal migration behavior ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; autumn ; Aves ; beta diversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; biotic homogenization ; Bird migration ; Birds ; breeding ; eBird ; Ecoregions ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; General aspects ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; humans ; interspecific variation ; land-use change ; landscapes ; Metropolitan areas ; migratory behavior ; North America ; seasonal avian migration ; Seasonal migration ; Species diversity ; species richness ; spring ; surveys ; Synecology ; temporal turnover ; Urban areas ; Urban ecology ; urbanization ; Vegetation ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Global ecology and biogeography, 2014-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1225-1234</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5809-bcc2fc5bbb47cc7a411aa56d0c908321f7b751e5f2575da81cc89e2f33e5a78c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5809-bcc2fc5bbb47cc7a411aa56d0c908321f7b751e5f2575da81cc89e2f33e5a78c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5678-9907</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43871437$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43871437$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27925,27926,45575,45576,58018,58251</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28915452$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>La Sorte, Frank A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tingley, Morgan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurlbert, Allen H</creatorcontrib><title>role of urban and agricultural areas during avian migration: an assessment of within‐year temporal turnover</title><title>Global ecology and biogeography</title><addtitle>Global Ecology and Biogeography</addtitle><description>AIM: Migration is often identified as the most vulnerable period in the annual cycle for birds, and land‐use change is likely to have altered how avian populations are regulated during migration events. However, the consequences of land‐use change for avian diversity are typically assessed based on annual surveys of breeding communities with little consideration given to migration or other phases of the annual cycle. LOCATION: Forty‐four North American ecoregions. METHODS: We use eBird avian occurrence data to estimate, at a monthly temporal resolution for the combined period 2004 to 2013, how species richness and temporal turnover in species composition is structured within years across a land‐use gradient (intact vegetation, agricultural and urban). RESULTS: Species richness peaked on average during spring and autumn migrations. Intact vegetation had the highest and urban areas the lowest species richness on average. Despite differences in community size, the three land‐use categories had similar patterns of within‐year temporal turnover, suggesting analogous effects of geographic diffusion by migrating species. Agricultural and urban areas had comparatively dampened temporal turnover across the annual cycle, suggesting more homogeneous within‐year species compositions. Relative to eastern ecoregions, differences in species richness and temporal turnover among land‐use categories were substantially more pronounced in western ecoregions. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Agricultural and urban areas have lower species richness and reduced within‐year temporal turnover across the annual cycle relative to areas of intact vegetation, particularly in the west. Our findings suggest that avian diversity has been simplified across the annual cycle through the influence of human activities, with human‐transformed landscapes maintaining a degree of relevance for migratory birds, especially in the east.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal migration behavior</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>autumn</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>beta diversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biotic homogenization</subject><subject>Bird migration</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>breeding</subject><subject>eBird</subject><subject>Ecoregions</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>interspecific variation</subject><subject>land-use change</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>migratory behavior</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>seasonal avian migration</subject><subject>Seasonal migration</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>species richness</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temporal turnover</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban ecology</subject><subject>urbanization</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>1466-822X</issn><issn>1466-8238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1ktFqFDEUhgdRsFYvfAAxIIJeTJtkJpPEO7vUVagV1KJ34Uw2WbPOJGsy07p3fQSfsU9ixql7IRgCCZzv_znnT4riMcFHJK_jtWmPCCVS3ikOSN00paCVuLu_06_3iwcpbTDGrGbNQdHH0BkULBpjCx6BXyFYR6fHbhgjdAiigYRWY3R-jeDSZaZ36wiDC_4VmhQpmZR644fJ5coN35y_uf61MxDRYPptmFyylw-XJj4s7lnoknl0ex4WF29OPy_elmcflu8Wr89KzQSWZas1tZq1bVtzrTnUhACwZoW1xKKixPKWM2KYpYyzFQiitZCG2qoyDLjQ1WHxYvbdxvBjNGlQvUvadB14E8akSEPyZrLhGX32D7oJudvcXaawxBzTRmTq5UzpGFKKxqptdD3EnSJYTcGrHLz6E3xmn986QtLQ2Qheu7QXUCFJzp5m7njmrlxndv83VMvTk7_OT2bFJg0h7hV1JTipq2mWcq67NJif-zrE7ypPypn6cr5Ui5qeyI_4vTrP_NOZtxDU9OxJXXyimLD8PbgQhFa_AbhgtWA</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>La Sorte, Frank A</creator><creator>Tingley, Morgan W</creator><creator>Hurlbert, Allen H</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5678-9907</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>role of urban and agricultural areas during avian migration: an assessment of within‐year temporal turnover</title><author>La Sorte, Frank A ; Tingley, Morgan W ; Hurlbert, Allen H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5809-bcc2fc5bbb47cc7a411aa56d0c908321f7b751e5f2575da81cc89e2f33e5a78c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal migration behavior</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>autumn</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>beta diversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biotic homogenization</topic><topic>Bird migration</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>breeding</topic><topic>eBird</topic><topic>Ecoregions</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>interspecific variation</topic><topic>land-use change</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>migratory behavior</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>seasonal avian migration</topic><topic>Seasonal migration</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>species richness</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temporal turnover</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban ecology</topic><topic>urbanization</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>La Sorte, Frank A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tingley, Morgan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurlbert, Allen H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>La Sorte, Frank A</au><au>Tingley, Morgan W</au><au>Hurlbert, Allen H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>role of urban and agricultural areas during avian migration: an assessment of within‐year temporal turnover</atitle><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle><addtitle>Global Ecology and Biogeography</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1225</spage><epage>1234</epage><pages>1225-1234</pages><issn>1466-822X</issn><eissn>1466-8238</eissn><coden>GEBIFS</coden><abstract>AIM: Migration is often identified as the most vulnerable period in the annual cycle for birds, and land‐use change is likely to have altered how avian populations are regulated during migration events. However, the consequences of land‐use change for avian diversity are typically assessed based on annual surveys of breeding communities with little consideration given to migration or other phases of the annual cycle. LOCATION: Forty‐four North American ecoregions. METHODS: We use eBird avian occurrence data to estimate, at a monthly temporal resolution for the combined period 2004 to 2013, how species richness and temporal turnover in species composition is structured within years across a land‐use gradient (intact vegetation, agricultural and urban). RESULTS: Species richness peaked on average during spring and autumn migrations. Intact vegetation had the highest and urban areas the lowest species richness on average. Despite differences in community size, the three land‐use categories had similar patterns of within‐year temporal turnover, suggesting analogous effects of geographic diffusion by migrating species. Agricultural and urban areas had comparatively dampened temporal turnover across the annual cycle, suggesting more homogeneous within‐year species compositions. Relative to eastern ecoregions, differences in species richness and temporal turnover among land‐use categories were substantially more pronounced in western ecoregions. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Agricultural and urban areas have lower species richness and reduced within‐year temporal turnover across the annual cycle relative to areas of intact vegetation, particularly in the west. Our findings suggest that avian diversity has been simplified across the annual cycle through the influence of human activities, with human‐transformed landscapes maintaining a degree of relevance for migratory birds, especially in the east.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><doi>10.1111/geb.12199</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5678-9907</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1466-822X
ispartof Global ecology and biogeography, 2014-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1225-1234
issn 1466-822X
1466-8238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1611615967
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Agriculture
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal and plant ecology
Animal ecology
Animal migration behavior
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
autumn
Aves
beta diversity
Biological and medical sciences
biotic homogenization
Bird migration
Birds
breeding
eBird
Ecoregions
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
General aspects
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
humans
interspecific variation
land-use change
landscapes
Metropolitan areas
migratory behavior
North America
seasonal avian migration
Seasonal migration
Species diversity
species richness
spring
surveys
Synecology
temporal turnover
Urban areas
Urban ecology
urbanization
Vegetation
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
title role of urban and agricultural areas during avian migration: an assessment of within‐year temporal turnover
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A04%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=role%20of%20urban%20and%20agricultural%20areas%20during%20avian%20migration:%20an%20assessment%20of%20within%E2%80%90year%20temporal%20turnover&rft.jtitle=Global%20ecology%20and%20biogeography&rft.au=La%20Sorte,%20Frank%20A&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1225&rft.epage=1234&rft.pages=1225-1234&rft.issn=1466-822X&rft.eissn=1466-8238&rft.coden=GEBIFS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/geb.12199&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43871437%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1609070268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43871437&rfr_iscdi=true