The elusive rat model of conditioned placebo analgesia

Conditioned placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust. These experiments provide foundational information for the possible development of a successful model in the future. Recent research on human placebo analgesia has suggested the need for rodent models to further elucidate the neural s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain (Amsterdam) 2014-10, Vol.155 (10), p.2022-2032
Hauptverfasser: McNabb, Christopher T., White, Michelle M., Harris, Amber L., Fuchs, Perry N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2032
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2022
container_title Pain (Amsterdam)
container_volume 155
creator McNabb, Christopher T.
White, Michelle M.
Harris, Amber L.
Fuchs, Perry N.
description Conditioned placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust. These experiments provide foundational information for the possible development of a successful model in the future. Recent research on human placebo analgesia has suggested the need for rodent models to further elucidate the neural substrates of the placebo effect. This series of 3 experiments therefore was performed in an attempt to develop a model of placebo analgesia in rats. In each study, female Sprague-Dawley rats received an L5 spinal nerve ligation to induce a neuropathic pain condition. Each rat then underwent a 4-day conditioning procedure in which an active analgesic drug or its vehicle (unconditioned stimulus) was associated with the following cues (conditioned stimuli): novel testing room (environmental), vanilla scent cue (olfactory), dim incandescent lighting (visual), restraint procedure/injection (tactile), and time of day and injection-test latency (temporal). The analgesics for each experiment were as follows: Experiment 1 used 90mg/kg gabapentin, experiment 2 used 3mg/kg loperamide hydrochloride, and experiment 3 used 6mg/kg morphine sulfate. On the following test day, half of the animals received the opposite treatment, resulting in 4 conditioning manipulations: drug/drug, drug/vehicle, vehicle/drug, and vehicle/vehicle. Nociceptive thresholds were assessed with the mechanical paw withdrawal threshold test each day after the conditioning procedure. In all 3 experiments, no significant differences were detected on test day between control and placebo groups, indicating a lack of a conditioned placebo analgesic response. Our results contrast with prior research that implies the existence of a reliable and robust response to placebo treatment. We conclude that placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust and that it is difficult to achieve using conventional procedures and proper experimental design.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1611613205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304395914003200</els_id><sourcerecordid>1611613205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5019-651c055135368f11c2629667d8e7ff3e2a2b42c73be7e735388608c36c1c8e903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJabZJ_kAOxZdAL3ZmJFuWoZcQ-gWBXNKz0MrjrLZaayPZCf33ldlNcytICMHzzjs8jF0iVAgor7fV3rix4oB1BW0FUL9jK1QtL6Xk4oStQEBdiq7pTtnHlLYAwDnvPrBT3gCXHOsVkw8bKsjPyT1TEc1U7EJPvghDYcPYu8mFkfpi742ldSjMaPwjJWfO2fvB-EQXx_eM_fr29eH2R3l3__3n7c1daRvArpQNWmgaFI2QakC0ubWTsu0VtcMgiBu-rrltxZpaajOllARlhbRoFXUgztjnw9x9DE8zpUnvXLLkvRkpzEmjxHwEhyaj_IDaGFKKNOh9dDsT_2gEvfjSW7340osvDa3OvnLo03H-vN5R_y_yKigDV0fAJGv8EM1oXXrjlFJCKJm5-sC9BD9RTL_9_EJRb8j4aZOrAKToZLl04_Ir88Uux74cYpQlPrucSNbRaKl3keyk--D-t_5fr4-VnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1611613205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The elusive rat model of conditioned placebo analgesia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>McNabb, Christopher T. ; White, Michelle M. ; Harris, Amber L. ; Fuchs, Perry N.</creator><creatorcontrib>McNabb, Christopher T. ; White, Michelle M. ; Harris, Amber L. ; Fuchs, Perry N.</creatorcontrib><description>Conditioned placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust. These experiments provide foundational information for the possible development of a successful model in the future. Recent research on human placebo analgesia has suggested the need for rodent models to further elucidate the neural substrates of the placebo effect. This series of 3 experiments therefore was performed in an attempt to develop a model of placebo analgesia in rats. In each study, female Sprague-Dawley rats received an L5 spinal nerve ligation to induce a neuropathic pain condition. Each rat then underwent a 4-day conditioning procedure in which an active analgesic drug or its vehicle (unconditioned stimulus) was associated with the following cues (conditioned stimuli): novel testing room (environmental), vanilla scent cue (olfactory), dim incandescent lighting (visual), restraint procedure/injection (tactile), and time of day and injection-test latency (temporal). The analgesics for each experiment were as follows: Experiment 1 used 90mg/kg gabapentin, experiment 2 used 3mg/kg loperamide hydrochloride, and experiment 3 used 6mg/kg morphine sulfate. On the following test day, half of the animals received the opposite treatment, resulting in 4 conditioning manipulations: drug/drug, drug/vehicle, vehicle/drug, and vehicle/vehicle. Nociceptive thresholds were assessed with the mechanical paw withdrawal threshold test each day after the conditioning procedure. In all 3 experiments, no significant differences were detected on test day between control and placebo groups, indicating a lack of a conditioned placebo analgesic response. Our results contrast with prior research that implies the existence of a reliable and robust response to placebo treatment. We conclude that placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust and that it is difficult to achieve using conventional procedures and proper experimental design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25026214</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PAINDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Analgesia - methods ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive ; Conditioning ; Conditioning, Classical ; Cues ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Morphine - therapeutic use ; Neuralgia - drug therapy ; Neuralgia - etiology ; Pain ; Pain Measurement ; Peripheral Nerve Injuries - complications ; Placebo ; Placebo Effect ; Placebos ; Rat ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Pain (Amsterdam), 2014-10, Vol.155 (10), p.2022-2032</ispartof><rights>2014 International Association for the Study of Pain</rights><rights>International Association for the Study of Pain</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5019-651c055135368f11c2629667d8e7ff3e2a2b42c73be7e735388608c36c1c8e903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5019-651c055135368f11c2629667d8e7ff3e2a2b42c73be7e735388608c36c1c8e903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28883386$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25026214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNabb, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Amber L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Perry N.</creatorcontrib><title>The elusive rat model of conditioned placebo analgesia</title><title>Pain (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><description>Conditioned placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust. These experiments provide foundational information for the possible development of a successful model in the future. Recent research on human placebo analgesia has suggested the need for rodent models to further elucidate the neural substrates of the placebo effect. This series of 3 experiments therefore was performed in an attempt to develop a model of placebo analgesia in rats. In each study, female Sprague-Dawley rats received an L5 spinal nerve ligation to induce a neuropathic pain condition. Each rat then underwent a 4-day conditioning procedure in which an active analgesic drug or its vehicle (unconditioned stimulus) was associated with the following cues (conditioned stimuli): novel testing room (environmental), vanilla scent cue (olfactory), dim incandescent lighting (visual), restraint procedure/injection (tactile), and time of day and injection-test latency (temporal). The analgesics for each experiment were as follows: Experiment 1 used 90mg/kg gabapentin, experiment 2 used 3mg/kg loperamide hydrochloride, and experiment 3 used 6mg/kg morphine sulfate. On the following test day, half of the animals received the opposite treatment, resulting in 4 conditioning manipulations: drug/drug, drug/vehicle, vehicle/drug, and vehicle/vehicle. Nociceptive thresholds were assessed with the mechanical paw withdrawal threshold test each day after the conditioning procedure. In all 3 experiments, no significant differences were detected on test day between control and placebo groups, indicating a lack of a conditioned placebo analgesic response. Our results contrast with prior research that implies the existence of a reliable and robust response to placebo treatment. We conclude that placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust and that it is difficult to achieve using conventional procedures and proper experimental design.</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesia - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Morphine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Neuralgia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neuralgia - etiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerve Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Placebo</subject><subject>Placebo Effect</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Rat</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0304-3959</issn><issn>1872-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJabZJ_kAOxZdAL3ZmJFuWoZcQ-gWBXNKz0MrjrLZaayPZCf33ldlNcytICMHzzjs8jF0iVAgor7fV3rix4oB1BW0FUL9jK1QtL6Xk4oStQEBdiq7pTtnHlLYAwDnvPrBT3gCXHOsVkw8bKsjPyT1TEc1U7EJPvghDYcPYu8mFkfpi742ldSjMaPwjJWfO2fvB-EQXx_eM_fr29eH2R3l3__3n7c1daRvArpQNWmgaFI2QakC0ubWTsu0VtcMgiBu-rrltxZpaajOllARlhbRoFXUgztjnw9x9DE8zpUnvXLLkvRkpzEmjxHwEhyaj_IDaGFKKNOh9dDsT_2gEvfjSW7340osvDa3OvnLo03H-vN5R_y_yKigDV0fAJGv8EM1oXXrjlFJCKJm5-sC9BD9RTL_9_EJRb8j4aZOrAKToZLl04_Ir88Uux74cYpQlPrucSNbRaKl3keyk--D-t_5fr4-VnQ</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>McNabb, Christopher T.</creator><creator>White, Michelle M.</creator><creator>Harris, Amber L.</creator><creator>Fuchs, Perry N.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>International Association for the Study of Pain</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>The elusive rat model of conditioned placebo analgesia</title><author>McNabb, Christopher T. ; White, Michelle M. ; Harris, Amber L. ; Fuchs, Perry N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5019-651c055135368f11c2629667d8e7ff3e2a2b42c73be7e735388608c36c1c8e903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesia - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Morphine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Neuralgia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neuralgia - etiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerve Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Placebo</topic><topic>Placebo Effect</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Rat</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNabb, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Amber L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Perry N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNabb, Christopher T.</au><au>White, Michelle M.</au><au>Harris, Amber L.</au><au>Fuchs, Perry N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The elusive rat model of conditioned placebo analgesia</atitle><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2022</spage><epage>2032</epage><pages>2022-2032</pages><issn>0304-3959</issn><eissn>1872-6623</eissn><coden>PAINDB</coden><abstract>Conditioned placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust. These experiments provide foundational information for the possible development of a successful model in the future. Recent research on human placebo analgesia has suggested the need for rodent models to further elucidate the neural substrates of the placebo effect. This series of 3 experiments therefore was performed in an attempt to develop a model of placebo analgesia in rats. In each study, female Sprague-Dawley rats received an L5 spinal nerve ligation to induce a neuropathic pain condition. Each rat then underwent a 4-day conditioning procedure in which an active analgesic drug or its vehicle (unconditioned stimulus) was associated with the following cues (conditioned stimuli): novel testing room (environmental), vanilla scent cue (olfactory), dim incandescent lighting (visual), restraint procedure/injection (tactile), and time of day and injection-test latency (temporal). The analgesics for each experiment were as follows: Experiment 1 used 90mg/kg gabapentin, experiment 2 used 3mg/kg loperamide hydrochloride, and experiment 3 used 6mg/kg morphine sulfate. On the following test day, half of the animals received the opposite treatment, resulting in 4 conditioning manipulations: drug/drug, drug/vehicle, vehicle/drug, and vehicle/vehicle. Nociceptive thresholds were assessed with the mechanical paw withdrawal threshold test each day after the conditioning procedure. In all 3 experiments, no significant differences were detected on test day between control and placebo groups, indicating a lack of a conditioned placebo analgesic response. Our results contrast with prior research that implies the existence of a reliable and robust response to placebo treatment. We conclude that placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust and that it is difficult to achieve using conventional procedures and proper experimental design.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25026214</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.004</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-3959
ispartof Pain (Amsterdam), 2014-10, Vol.155 (10), p.2022-2032
issn 0304-3959
1872-6623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1611613205
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Analgesia
Analgesia - methods
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive
Conditioning
Conditioning, Classical
Cues
Disease Models, Animal
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Morphine - therapeutic use
Neuralgia - drug therapy
Neuralgia - etiology
Pain
Pain Measurement
Peripheral Nerve Injuries - complications
Placebo
Placebo Effect
Placebos
Rat
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception)
interoception
electrolocation. Sensory receptors
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title The elusive rat model of conditioned placebo analgesia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A18%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20elusive%20rat%20model%20of%20conditioned%20placebo%20analgesia&rft.jtitle=Pain%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=McNabb,%20Christopher%20T.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2022&rft.epage=2032&rft.pages=2022-2032&rft.issn=0304-3959&rft.eissn=1872-6623&rft.coden=PAINDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1611613205%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1611613205&rft_id=info:pmid/25026214&rft_els_id=S0304395914003200&rfr_iscdi=true