Factors Affecting Gerbil Foraging Behavior and Rates of Owl Predation

We experimented on how illumination, habitat structure, and three different species of owls affected the foraging behavior of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum, two gerbil species that coexist on sand dune habitats in the Negev Desert, Israel. We also tested how illumination and habitat structure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 1991-12, Vol.72 (6), p.2249-2260
Hauptverfasser: Kotler, Burt P., Brown, Joel S., Hasson, Oren
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2260
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2249
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 72
creator Kotler, Burt P.
Brown, Joel S.
Hasson, Oren
description We experimented on how illumination, habitat structure, and three different species of owls affected the foraging behavior of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum, two gerbil species that coexist on sand dune habitats in the Negev Desert, Israel. We also tested how illumination and habitat structure affected rates of predation by owls on the two gerbil species. In a large aviary, we manipulated presence and absence of owls, owl species, presence and absence of illumination, and shrub cover. In response to the presence of owls or to increased illumination, gerbils foraged less, shifted foraging activity to the bush microhabitat, and quit patches at a higher giving—up density of resources. In accord with moonlight avoidance, both gerbil species suffered higher predation rates under illumination than in the absence of illumination. In addition, G. pyramidum distinguished among owl species, as indicated by changes in patch use and habitat selection. Habitat structure also affected foraging behavior and rates of predation. Gerbils foraged less in the open than in the bush microhabitat, foraged less when there was no cover present, and foraged less in the bush microhabitat when patches were encumbered by entangling branches. In accord with avoidance of open areas, both gerbil species suffered higher rates of predation when shrub cover was 0% than when shrub cover was 10%. With 0% cover, G. allenbyi suffered higher predation rates than G. pyramidum, but with 10% cover, rates of owl predation did not differ between gerbil species. Rates of owl predation on the two species corresponded to their natural patterns of macro— and microhabitat partitioning; relative to G. allenbyi, G. pyramidum predominates on open sand dunes and biases its behavior toward the open microhabitat. The results suggest that predation interacts with resource competition to determine the distribution and habitat separation of G. allenbyi and G. pyramidum.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1941575
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16096426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1941575</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1941575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5019-b917a3b0fc5e98f67a78ce8536cb3511ad42213c19da7796faa4ded076838b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoMouFbxJzho0aup5yQz-bisy24VChW1F16FM5lknWU6qclsS_-9KbsoCO25CQcenvPyhrHXCCdcgPqIpsFWtU_YAo0wtUEFT9kCAHltZKufsxc5b6EMNnrBVmtyc0y5Og3Bu3mYNtWZT90wVuuYaHO_f_K_6GaIqaKpr77R7HMVQ3VxO1Zfk-9pHuL0kj0LNGb_6vAescv16sfyc31-cfZleXpeuxbQ1F0JQ6KD4FpvdJCKlHZet0K6TrSI1Deco3BoelLKyEDU9L4HJbXQHW_EEXu_916n-Hvn82yvhuz8ONLk4y5blGBkw2UB3_4HbuMuTSWb5WgAFNe6QO8egpAXT4kkTKE-7CmXYs7JB3udhitKdxbB3jduD40X8vjgo-xoDIkmN-S_eFsON0oVTOyx22H0dw_Z7Gr5E00pjEvOG_NPvs3lvx7J8GaPBYqWNqncv_zOoRQDRaUBxB8l3p7y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219007288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Affecting Gerbil Foraging Behavior and Rates of Owl Predation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Kotler, Burt P. ; Brown, Joel S. ; Hasson, Oren</creator><creatorcontrib>Kotler, Burt P. ; Brown, Joel S. ; Hasson, Oren</creatorcontrib><description>We experimented on how illumination, habitat structure, and three different species of owls affected the foraging behavior of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum, two gerbil species that coexist on sand dune habitats in the Negev Desert, Israel. We also tested how illumination and habitat structure affected rates of predation by owls on the two gerbil species. In a large aviary, we manipulated presence and absence of owls, owl species, presence and absence of illumination, and shrub cover. In response to the presence of owls or to increased illumination, gerbils foraged less, shifted foraging activity to the bush microhabitat, and quit patches at a higher giving—up density of resources. In accord with moonlight avoidance, both gerbil species suffered higher predation rates under illumination than in the absence of illumination. In addition, G. pyramidum distinguished among owl species, as indicated by changes in patch use and habitat selection. Habitat structure also affected foraging behavior and rates of predation. Gerbils foraged less in the open than in the bush microhabitat, foraged less when there was no cover present, and foraged less in the bush microhabitat when patches were encumbered by entangling branches. In accord with avoidance of open areas, both gerbil species suffered higher rates of predation when shrub cover was 0% than when shrub cover was 10%. With 0% cover, G. allenbyi suffered higher predation rates than G. pyramidum, but with 10% cover, rates of owl predation did not differ between gerbil species. Rates of owl predation on the two species corresponded to their natural patterns of macro— and microhabitat partitioning; relative to G. allenbyi, G. pyramidum predominates on open sand dunes and biases its behavior toward the open microhabitat. The results suggest that predation interacts with resource competition to determine the distribution and habitat separation of G. allenbyi and G. pyramidum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1941575</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Deserts ; Ecology ; Foraging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gerbillus allenbyi ; Gerbillus pyramidum ; Gerbils ; Habitat selection ; Microhabitats ; Owls ; Predation ; Predators ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Rodents ; Shrubs</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1991-12, Vol.72 (6), p.2249-2260</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1991 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Dec 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5019-b917a3b0fc5e98f67a78ce8536cb3511ad42213c19da7796faa4ded076838b243</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1941575$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1941575$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5190477$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kotler, Burt P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Joel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasson, Oren</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Affecting Gerbil Foraging Behavior and Rates of Owl Predation</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>We experimented on how illumination, habitat structure, and three different species of owls affected the foraging behavior of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum, two gerbil species that coexist on sand dune habitats in the Negev Desert, Israel. We also tested how illumination and habitat structure affected rates of predation by owls on the two gerbil species. In a large aviary, we manipulated presence and absence of owls, owl species, presence and absence of illumination, and shrub cover. In response to the presence of owls or to increased illumination, gerbils foraged less, shifted foraging activity to the bush microhabitat, and quit patches at a higher giving—up density of resources. In accord with moonlight avoidance, both gerbil species suffered higher predation rates under illumination than in the absence of illumination. In addition, G. pyramidum distinguished among owl species, as indicated by changes in patch use and habitat selection. Habitat structure also affected foraging behavior and rates of predation. Gerbils foraged less in the open than in the bush microhabitat, foraged less when there was no cover present, and foraged less in the bush microhabitat when patches were encumbered by entangling branches. In accord with avoidance of open areas, both gerbil species suffered higher rates of predation when shrub cover was 0% than when shrub cover was 10%. With 0% cover, G. allenbyi suffered higher predation rates than G. pyramidum, but with 10% cover, rates of owl predation did not differ between gerbil species. Rates of owl predation on the two species corresponded to their natural patterns of macro— and microhabitat partitioning; relative to G. allenbyi, G. pyramidum predominates on open sand dunes and biases its behavior toward the open microhabitat. The results suggest that predation interacts with resource competition to determine the distribution and habitat separation of G. allenbyi and G. pyramidum.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gerbillus allenbyi</subject><subject>Gerbillus pyramidum</subject><subject>Gerbils</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoMouFbxJzho0aup5yQz-bisy24VChW1F16FM5lknWU6qclsS_-9KbsoCO25CQcenvPyhrHXCCdcgPqIpsFWtU_YAo0wtUEFT9kCAHltZKufsxc5b6EMNnrBVmtyc0y5Og3Bu3mYNtWZT90wVuuYaHO_f_K_6GaIqaKpr77R7HMVQ3VxO1Zfk-9pHuL0kj0LNGb_6vAescv16sfyc31-cfZleXpeuxbQ1F0JQ6KD4FpvdJCKlHZet0K6TrSI1Deco3BoelLKyEDU9L4HJbXQHW_EEXu_916n-Hvn82yvhuz8ONLk4y5blGBkw2UB3_4HbuMuTSWb5WgAFNe6QO8egpAXT4kkTKE-7CmXYs7JB3udhitKdxbB3jduD40X8vjgo-xoDIkmN-S_eFsON0oVTOyx22H0dw_Z7Gr5E00pjEvOG_NPvs3lvx7J8GaPBYqWNqncv_zOoRQDRaUBxB8l3p7y</recordid><startdate>199112</startdate><enddate>199112</enddate><creator>Kotler, Burt P.</creator><creator>Brown, Joel S.</creator><creator>Hasson, Oren</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199112</creationdate><title>Factors Affecting Gerbil Foraging Behavior and Rates of Owl Predation</title><author>Kotler, Burt P. ; Brown, Joel S. ; Hasson, Oren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5019-b917a3b0fc5e98f67a78ce8536cb3511ad42213c19da7796faa4ded076838b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gerbillus allenbyi</topic><topic>Gerbillus pyramidum</topic><topic>Gerbils</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kotler, Burt P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Joel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasson, Oren</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kotler, Burt P.</au><au>Brown, Joel S.</au><au>Hasson, Oren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Affecting Gerbil Foraging Behavior and Rates of Owl Predation</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1991-12</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2249</spage><epage>2260</epage><pages>2249-2260</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>We experimented on how illumination, habitat structure, and three different species of owls affected the foraging behavior of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum, two gerbil species that coexist on sand dune habitats in the Negev Desert, Israel. We also tested how illumination and habitat structure affected rates of predation by owls on the two gerbil species. In a large aviary, we manipulated presence and absence of owls, owl species, presence and absence of illumination, and shrub cover. In response to the presence of owls or to increased illumination, gerbils foraged less, shifted foraging activity to the bush microhabitat, and quit patches at a higher giving—up density of resources. In accord with moonlight avoidance, both gerbil species suffered higher predation rates under illumination than in the absence of illumination. In addition, G. pyramidum distinguished among owl species, as indicated by changes in patch use and habitat selection. Habitat structure also affected foraging behavior and rates of predation. Gerbils foraged less in the open than in the bush microhabitat, foraged less when there was no cover present, and foraged less in the bush microhabitat when patches were encumbered by entangling branches. In accord with avoidance of open areas, both gerbil species suffered higher rates of predation when shrub cover was 0% than when shrub cover was 10%. With 0% cover, G. allenbyi suffered higher predation rates than G. pyramidum, but with 10% cover, rates of owl predation did not differ between gerbil species. Rates of owl predation on the two species corresponded to their natural patterns of macro— and microhabitat partitioning; relative to G. allenbyi, G. pyramidum predominates on open sand dunes and biases its behavior toward the open microhabitat. The results suggest that predation interacts with resource competition to determine the distribution and habitat separation of G. allenbyi and G. pyramidum.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1941575</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1991-12, Vol.72 (6), p.2249-2260
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16096426
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Animal behavior
Animal ethology
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Deserts
Ecology
Foraging
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gerbillus allenbyi
Gerbillus pyramidum
Gerbils
Habitat selection
Microhabitats
Owls
Predation
Predators
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Rodents
Shrubs
title Factors Affecting Gerbil Foraging Behavior and Rates of Owl Predation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A12%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Affecting%20Gerbil%20Foraging%20Behavior%20and%20Rates%20of%20Owl%20Predation&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Kotler,%20Burt%20P.&rft.date=1991-12&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2249&rft.epage=2260&rft.pages=2249-2260&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1941575&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1941575%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219007288&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1941575&rfr_iscdi=true