Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial

Summary Background Preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin might positively affect pregnancy outcomes, but this possibility has not been adequately assessed. Our aim was to investigate whether low-dose aspirin improved livebirth rates in women with one to two previous pregnancy losses. Methods In t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2014-07, Vol.384 (9937), p.29-36
Hauptverfasser: Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr, Silver, Robert M, Prof, Lesher, Laurie L, MBA, Faraggi, David, Prof, Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof, Townsend, Janet M, Prof, Lynch, Anne M, MD, Perkins, Neil J, PhD, Mumford, Sunni L, PhD, Galai, Noya, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 9937
container_start_page 29
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 384
creator Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr
Silver, Robert M, Prof
Lesher, Laurie L, MBA
Faraggi, David, Prof
Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof
Townsend, Janet M, Prof
Lynch, Anne M, MD
Perkins, Neil J, PhD
Mumford, Sunni L, PhD
Galai, Noya, PhD
description Summary Background Preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin might positively affect pregnancy outcomes, but this possibility has not been adequately assessed. Our aim was to investigate whether low-dose aspirin improved livebirth rates in women with one to two previous pregnancy losses. Methods In this multicentre, block-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, women aged 18–40 years who were attempting to become pregnant were recruited from four medical centres in the USA. Participants were stratified by eligibility criteria—the original stratum was restricted to women with one loss at less than 20 weeks' gestation during the previous year, whereas the expanded stratum included women with one to two previous losses, with no restrictions on gestational age or time of loss. Women were block-randomised by centre and eligibility stratum in a 1:1 ratio. Preconception-initiated daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg per day) plus folic acid was compared with placebo plus folic acid for up to six menstrual cycles; for women who conceived, study treatment continued until 36 weeks' gestation. Participants, trial staff, and investigators were masked to the assigned treatment. The primary outcome was livebirth rate, which was analysed by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00467363. Findings Overall, 1228 women were recruited and randomly assigned between June 15, 2007, and July 15, 2011, 1078 of whom completed the trial and were included in the analysis (535 in the low-dose aspirin group and 543 in the placebo group). 309 (58%) women in the low-dose aspirin group had livebirths, compared with 286 (53%) in the placebo group (p=0·0984; absolute difference in livebirth rate 5·09% [95% CI −0·84 to 11·02]). Pregnancy loss occurred in 68 (13%) women in the low-dose aspirin group, compared with 65 (12%) women in the placebo group (p=0·7812). In the original stratum, 151 (62%) of 242 women in the low-dose aspirin group had livebirths, compared with 133 (53%) of 250 in the placebo group (p=0·0446; absolute difference in livebirth rate 9·20% [0·51 to 17·89]). In the expanded stratum, 158 (54%) of 293 women in the low-dose aspirin group and 153 (52%) of 293 in the placebo group had livebirths (p=0·7406; absolute difference in livebirth rate 1·71% [−6·37 to 9·79]). Major adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Low-dose aspirin was associated with increased vaginal bleeding, but this adverse event was not associated wi
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60157-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609511984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673614601574</els_id><sourcerecordid>1609511984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c680t-90e63aa18a9b9a4abfd7d88d8a01ace84a9be2496025c74a2561fedb829882d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFTEQhoMo9lj9CUpAhHqxmmSTbOKFUkqtQkHxA7wy5CSzmrq7WZPdlvPvzZ5zbKE3ehUYnnkyMy9Cjyl5QQmVLz8Tykklm1oeUf5cEiqait9BK8obXgnefLuLVtfIAXqQ8wUhhEsi7qMDxhvCVC1W6PvHBC4ODsYpxAF38aryMQO2eQwpDNgOHo8Jfgx2cBsc58nFHvIrnCDP3ZRxm2KPp5-AT4_P4BNOhY99yODxlILtHqJ7re0yPNq_h-jr29MvJ--q8w9n70-OzysnFZkqTUDW1lJl9Vpbbtetb7xSXllCrQPFSx0Y15Iw4RpumZC0Bb9WTCvFPK8P0dHOO6b4e4Y8mTKEg66zA8Q5GyqJFpRq9R-o4LVslKKqoE9voRdxTkNZZKGYXu67CMWOcinmnKA1Ywq9TRtDiVmyMtuszBKEodxsszJL35O9fV734K-7_oZTgGd7wGZnu7Yc14V8wynRaE1Z4d7sOCgXvgyQTHYBSqY-lHAn42P45yivbxlcF4ZQPv0FG8g3W5vMDNlJFgflWwOv_wDJoMR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542901404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr ; Silver, Robert M, Prof ; Lesher, Laurie L, MBA ; Faraggi, David, Prof ; Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof ; Townsend, Janet M, Prof ; Lynch, Anne M, MD ; Perkins, Neil J, PhD ; Mumford, Sunni L, PhD ; Galai, Noya, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr ; Silver, Robert M, Prof ; Lesher, Laurie L, MBA ; Faraggi, David, Prof ; Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof ; Townsend, Janet M, Prof ; Lynch, Anne M, MD ; Perkins, Neil J, PhD ; Mumford, Sunni L, PhD ; Galai, Noya, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin might positively affect pregnancy outcomes, but this possibility has not been adequately assessed. Our aim was to investigate whether low-dose aspirin improved livebirth rates in women with one to two previous pregnancy losses. Methods In this multicentre, block-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, women aged 18–40 years who were attempting to become pregnant were recruited from four medical centres in the USA. Participants were stratified by eligibility criteria—the original stratum was restricted to women with one loss at less than 20 weeks' gestation during the previous year, whereas the expanded stratum included women with one to two previous losses, with no restrictions on gestational age or time of loss. Women were block-randomised by centre and eligibility stratum in a 1:1 ratio. Preconception-initiated daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg per day) plus folic acid was compared with placebo plus folic acid for up to six menstrual cycles; for women who conceived, study treatment continued until 36 weeks' gestation. Participants, trial staff, and investigators were masked to the assigned treatment. The primary outcome was livebirth rate, which was analysed by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00467363. Findings Overall, 1228 women were recruited and randomly assigned between June 15, 2007, and July 15, 2011, 1078 of whom completed the trial and were included in the analysis (535 in the low-dose aspirin group and 543 in the placebo group). 309 (58%) women in the low-dose aspirin group had livebirths, compared with 286 (53%) in the placebo group (p=0·0984; absolute difference in livebirth rate 5·09% [95% CI −0·84 to 11·02]). Pregnancy loss occurred in 68 (13%) women in the low-dose aspirin group, compared with 65 (12%) women in the placebo group (p=0·7812). In the original stratum, 151 (62%) of 242 women in the low-dose aspirin group had livebirths, compared with 133 (53%) of 250 in the placebo group (p=0·0446; absolute difference in livebirth rate 9·20% [0·51 to 17·89]). In the expanded stratum, 158 (54%) of 293 women in the low-dose aspirin group and 153 (52%) of 293 in the placebo group had livebirths (p=0·7406; absolute difference in livebirth rate 1·71% [−6·37 to 9·79]). Major adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Low-dose aspirin was associated with increased vaginal bleeding, but this adverse event was not associated with pregnancy loss. Interpretation Preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin was not significantly associated with livebirth or pregnancy loss in women with one to two previous losses. However, higher livebirth rates were seen in women with a single documented loss at less than 20 weeks' gestation during the previous year. Low-dose aspirin is not recommended for the prevention of pregnancy loss. Funding Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US National Institutes of Health).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60157-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24702835</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage ; Aspirin ; Aspirin - administration &amp; dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth Weight ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Folic acid ; Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; General aspects ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Infertility ; Internal Medicine ; Live Birth - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Miscarriage ; Preconception Care - methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; United States - epidemiology ; Women</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2014-07, Vol.384 (9937), p.29-36</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul 5, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c680t-90e63aa18a9b9a4abfd7d88d8a01ace84a9be2496025c74a2561fedb829882d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c680t-90e63aa18a9b9a4abfd7d88d8a01ace84a9be2496025c74a2561fedb829882d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673614601574$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28579912$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24702835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Robert M, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesher, Laurie L, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faraggi, David, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Janet M, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Anne M, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Neil J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Sunni L, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galai, Noya, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Summary Background Preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin might positively affect pregnancy outcomes, but this possibility has not been adequately assessed. Our aim was to investigate whether low-dose aspirin improved livebirth rates in women with one to two previous pregnancy losses. Methods In this multicentre, block-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, women aged 18–40 years who were attempting to become pregnant were recruited from four medical centres in the USA. Participants were stratified by eligibility criteria—the original stratum was restricted to women with one loss at less than 20 weeks' gestation during the previous year, whereas the expanded stratum included women with one to two previous losses, with no restrictions on gestational age or time of loss. Women were block-randomised by centre and eligibility stratum in a 1:1 ratio. Preconception-initiated daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg per day) plus folic acid was compared with placebo plus folic acid for up to six menstrual cycles; for women who conceived, study treatment continued until 36 weeks' gestation. Participants, trial staff, and investigators were masked to the assigned treatment. The primary outcome was livebirth rate, which was analysed by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00467363. Findings Overall, 1228 women were recruited and randomly assigned between June 15, 2007, and July 15, 2011, 1078 of whom completed the trial and were included in the analysis (535 in the low-dose aspirin group and 543 in the placebo group). 309 (58%) women in the low-dose aspirin group had livebirths, compared with 286 (53%) in the placebo group (p=0·0984; absolute difference in livebirth rate 5·09% [95% CI −0·84 to 11·02]). Pregnancy loss occurred in 68 (13%) women in the low-dose aspirin group, compared with 65 (12%) women in the placebo group (p=0·7812). In the original stratum, 151 (62%) of 242 women in the low-dose aspirin group had livebirths, compared with 133 (53%) of 250 in the placebo group (p=0·0446; absolute difference in livebirth rate 9·20% [0·51 to 17·89]). In the expanded stratum, 158 (54%) of 293 women in the low-dose aspirin group and 153 (52%) of 293 in the placebo group had livebirths (p=0·7406; absolute difference in livebirth rate 1·71% [−6·37 to 9·79]). Major adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Low-dose aspirin was associated with increased vaginal bleeding, but this adverse event was not associated with pregnancy loss. Interpretation Preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin was not significantly associated with livebirth or pregnancy loss in women with one to two previous losses. However, higher livebirth rates were seen in women with a single documented loss at less than 20 weeks' gestation during the previous year. Low-dose aspirin is not recommended for the prevention of pregnancy loss. Funding Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US National Institutes of Health).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Aspirin</subject><subject>Aspirin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Folic acid</subject><subject>Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Live Birth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Preconception Care - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFTEQhoMo9lj9CUpAhHqxmmSTbOKFUkqtQkHxA7wy5CSzmrq7WZPdlvPvzZ5zbKE3ehUYnnkyMy9Cjyl5QQmVLz8Tykklm1oeUf5cEiqait9BK8obXgnefLuLVtfIAXqQ8wUhhEsi7qMDxhvCVC1W6PvHBC4ODsYpxAF38aryMQO2eQwpDNgOHo8Jfgx2cBsc58nFHvIrnCDP3ZRxm2KPp5-AT4_P4BNOhY99yODxlILtHqJ7re0yPNq_h-jr29MvJ--q8w9n70-OzysnFZkqTUDW1lJl9Vpbbtetb7xSXllCrQPFSx0Y15Iw4RpumZC0Bb9WTCvFPK8P0dHOO6b4e4Y8mTKEg66zA8Q5GyqJFpRq9R-o4LVslKKqoE9voRdxTkNZZKGYXu67CMWOcinmnKA1Ywq9TRtDiVmyMtuszBKEodxsszJL35O9fV734K-7_oZTgGd7wGZnu7Yc14V8wynRaE1Z4d7sOCgXvgyQTHYBSqY-lHAn42P45yivbxlcF4ZQPv0FG8g3W5vMDNlJFgflWwOv_wDJoMR8</recordid><startdate>20140705</startdate><enddate>20140705</enddate><creator>Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr</creator><creator>Silver, Robert M, Prof</creator><creator>Lesher, Laurie L, MBA</creator><creator>Faraggi, David, Prof</creator><creator>Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof</creator><creator>Townsend, Janet M, Prof</creator><creator>Lynch, Anne M, MD</creator><creator>Perkins, Neil J, PhD</creator><creator>Mumford, Sunni L, PhD</creator><creator>Galai, Noya, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140705</creationdate><title>Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial</title><author>Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr ; Silver, Robert M, Prof ; Lesher, Laurie L, MBA ; Faraggi, David, Prof ; Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof ; Townsend, Janet M, Prof ; Lynch, Anne M, MD ; Perkins, Neil J, PhD ; Mumford, Sunni L, PhD ; Galai, Noya, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c680t-90e63aa18a9b9a4abfd7d88d8a01ace84a9be2496025c74a2561fedb829882d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Aspirin</topic><topic>Aspirin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Folic acid</topic><topic>Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Live Birth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Preconception Care - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Robert M, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesher, Laurie L, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faraggi, David, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Janet M, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Anne M, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Neil J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Sunni L, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galai, Noya, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schisterman, Enrique F, Dr</au><au>Silver, Robert M, Prof</au><au>Lesher, Laurie L, MBA</au><au>Faraggi, David, Prof</au><au>Wactawski-Wende, Jean, Prof</au><au>Townsend, Janet M, Prof</au><au>Lynch, Anne M, MD</au><au>Perkins, Neil J, PhD</au><au>Mumford, Sunni L, PhD</au><au>Galai, Noya, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2014-07-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>384</volume><issue>9937</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>29-36</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin might positively affect pregnancy outcomes, but this possibility has not been adequately assessed. Our aim was to investigate whether low-dose aspirin improved livebirth rates in women with one to two previous pregnancy losses. Methods In this multicentre, block-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, women aged 18–40 years who were attempting to become pregnant were recruited from four medical centres in the USA. Participants were stratified by eligibility criteria—the original stratum was restricted to women with one loss at less than 20 weeks' gestation during the previous year, whereas the expanded stratum included women with one to two previous losses, with no restrictions on gestational age or time of loss. Women were block-randomised by centre and eligibility stratum in a 1:1 ratio. Preconception-initiated daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg per day) plus folic acid was compared with placebo plus folic acid for up to six menstrual cycles; for women who conceived, study treatment continued until 36 weeks' gestation. Participants, trial staff, and investigators were masked to the assigned treatment. The primary outcome was livebirth rate, which was analysed by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00467363. Findings Overall, 1228 women were recruited and randomly assigned between June 15, 2007, and July 15, 2011, 1078 of whom completed the trial and were included in the analysis (535 in the low-dose aspirin group and 543 in the placebo group). 309 (58%) women in the low-dose aspirin group had livebirths, compared with 286 (53%) in the placebo group (p=0·0984; absolute difference in livebirth rate 5·09% [95% CI −0·84 to 11·02]). Pregnancy loss occurred in 68 (13%) women in the low-dose aspirin group, compared with 65 (12%) women in the placebo group (p=0·7812). In the original stratum, 151 (62%) of 242 women in the low-dose aspirin group had livebirths, compared with 133 (53%) of 250 in the placebo group (p=0·0446; absolute difference in livebirth rate 9·20% [0·51 to 17·89]). In the expanded stratum, 158 (54%) of 293 women in the low-dose aspirin group and 153 (52%) of 293 in the placebo group had livebirths (p=0·7406; absolute difference in livebirth rate 1·71% [−6·37 to 9·79]). Major adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Low-dose aspirin was associated with increased vaginal bleeding, but this adverse event was not associated with pregnancy loss. Interpretation Preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin was not significantly associated with livebirth or pregnancy loss in women with one to two previous losses. However, higher livebirth rates were seen in women with a single documented loss at less than 20 weeks' gestation during the previous year. Low-dose aspirin is not recommended for the prevention of pregnancy loss. Funding Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US National Institutes of Health).</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24702835</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60157-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 2014-07, Vol.384 (9937), p.29-36
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609511984
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage
Aspirin
Aspirin - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Birth Weight
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Folic acid
Folic Acid - administration & dosage
General aspects
Gestational Age
Humans
Infertility
Internal Medicine
Live Birth - epidemiology
Medical sciences
Miscarriage
Preconception Care - methods
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology
Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
United States - epidemiology
Women
title Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A15%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preconception%20low-dose%20aspirin%20and%20pregnancy%20outcomes:%20results%20from%20the%20EAGeR%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Schisterman,%20Enrique%20F,%20Dr&rft.date=2014-07-05&rft.volume=384&rft.issue=9937&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=29-36&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60157-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1609511984%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542901404&rft_id=info:pmid/24702835&rft_els_id=S0140673614601574&rfr_iscdi=true